Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Dolor y cuidados paliativos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Christopher Eccleston

    Correspondencia a: Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Tonya M Palermo

    Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

  • Amanda C de C Williams

    Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK

  • Amy Lewandowski

    Child Health, Behaviour & Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, USA

  • Stephen Morley

    Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

  • Emma Fisher

    Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK

  • Emily Law

    Child Health, Behaviour & Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, USA

Contributions of authors

Christopher Eccleston oversaw the project and contributed to the design, analysis and authoring of the text and is responsible for any future update of this review.

Amy Lewandowski, Emma Fisher, Emily Law, Stephen Morley, Tonya Palermo, and Amanda Williams, all contributed to the design, analysis and authoring of the text.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • New Source of support, Not specified.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kiki Mastroyannopoulou and Louise Yorke for their contributions to the original version of this review. Thank you also to Hannah Somhegyi for help with coding and data management and to Jane Hayes for running the updated search. Finally, thanks also go to the PaPaS review group team and to the peer referees for their helpful comments.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Oct 01

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Review

Emma Fisher, Emily Law, Joanne Dudeney, Tonya M Palermo, Gavin Stewart, Christopher Eccleston

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub5

2014 May 05

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Review

Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo, Amanda C de C Williams, Amy Lewandowski Holley, Stephen Morley, Emma Fisher, Emily Law

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub4

2012 Dec 12

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Review

Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo, Amanda C de C Williams, Amy Lewandowski, Stephen Morley, Emma Fisher, Emily Law

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub3

2009 Apr 15

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Review

Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo, Amanda C de C Williams, Amy Lewandowski, Stephen Morley

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub2

2003 Jan 20

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Review

Christopher Eccleston, Louise Yorke, Stephen Morley, Amanda C de C Williams, Kiki Mastroyannopoulou

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003968

Differences between protocol and review

  1. In Eccleston 2009 CENTRAL database was searched to recruit studies. In this review we judged this to have a low yield and any potential studies could be identified through PsychINFO, EMBASE, and MEDLINE.

  2. In this update of the review, there is more clarity around how treatment and control groups were combined.

  3. In Eccleston 2009 Odds Ratios and Risk Ratios were reported for dichotomous outcomes. In this review we only report Risk Ratios.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.