Intervenciones profesionales, estructurales y organizacionales en la atención primaria para la reducción de errores de medicación
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 04 octubre 2017see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
Anthony Avery, Hanan Khalil and Aziz Sheikh were involved in the conception of this review, the drafting of the initial protocol and providing critical feedback on drafts of the review.
Helen Chambers retrieved the studies and provided support with the searching.
Hanan Khalil, Helen Chambers and Brian Bell selected the studies for inclusion/exclusion and critically appraised the included studies.
Hanan Khalil undertook the analysis described in the review and wrote the review. Brian Bell helped with editing the review.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Rural Health, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
External sources
-
No sources of support supplied
Declarations of interest
Hanan Khalil has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Brian Bell has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Helen Chambers has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Aziz Sheikh received a WHO grant addressing patient safety in primary care.
Tony Avery received BUPA Foundation funding in 2001 to 2002 on a much earlier version of this review (Smeaton 2002).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Brian Serumaga for his work on earlier versions of the review. In addition, the authors would like to thank Paul Miller (EPOC Information Specialist) for support with the search strategies, Emma Tavender and Clare Dooley (EPOC Managing Editors) for their support with the review, Ignacio Ricci Cabello for his translation of the Spanish article (Alvarez 2001), Eric Harvey (Peer Reviewer), Luke Vale (EPOC Economics Editor), Burnard Bernard (EPOC Editor), Christiana Kartsonaki (EPOC Statistician), Pierre Durieux (EPOC Contact Editor), and Denise Mitchell (Copy‐editor).
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service (NHS) or the Department of Health.
The Australasian Satellite of Cochrane EPOC is funded by the Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC); it is a partnership between Cochrane EPOC and Monash University.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2017 Oct 04 | Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors | Review | Hanan Khalil, Brian Bell, Helen Chambers, Aziz Sheikh, Anthony J Avery | |
| 2013 Nov 11 | Interventions in primary care for reducing preventable medication errors that lead to hospital admissions, mortality and emergency department visits | Protocol | Hanan Khalil, Anthony J Avery, Helen Chambers, Brian Bell, Brian Serumaga, Aziz Sheikh | |
| 2002 Oct 21 | Interventions in primary care for reducing preventable medication errors that lead to hospital admissions, mortality and emergency department visits | Protocol | Hanan Khalil, Anthony J Avery, Helen Chambers, Brian Bell, Brian Serumaga, Aziz Sheikh | |
Differences between protocol and review
For the primary outcome, we included all the studies that reported on the number of hospital admissions and the number of participants admitted to hospitals. The two outcomes are different since some people can have more than one hospital admission.
We also included all the trials in the final meta‐analysis, irrespective of their qualities. Removing them from the analysis would give rise to selective reporting.
