Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Corticosteroides y agonistas beta2 de acción prolongada combinados en un solo inhalador versus placebo para la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica

Appendices

Appendix 1. Sources and search methods for the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (CAGR)

Electronic searches: core databases

Database

Frequency of search

CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library)

Monthly

MEDLINE (Ovid)

Weekly

EMBASE (Ovid)

Weekly

PsycINFO (Ovid)

Monthly

CINAHL (EBSCO)

Monthly

AMED (EBSCO)

Monthly

 

Handsearches: core respiratory conference abstracts

Conference

Years searched

American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI)

2001 onwards

American Thoracic Society (ATS)

2001 onwards

Asia Pacific Society of Respirology (APSR)

2004 onwards

British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting (BTS)

2000 onwards

Chest Meeting

2003 onwards

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

1992, 1994, 2000 onwards

International Primary Care Respiratory Group Congress (IPCRG)

2002 onwards

Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ)

1999 onwards

 

MEDLINE search strategy used to identify trials for the CAGR

COPD  search

1. Lung Diseases, Obstructive/

2. exp Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/

3. emphysema$.mp.

4. (chronic$ adj3 bronchiti$).mp.

5. (obstruct$ adj3 (pulmonary or lung$ or airway$ or airflow$ or bronch$ or respirat$)).mp.

6. COPD.mp.

7. COAD.mp.

8. COBD.mp.

9. AECB.mp.

10. or/1‐9

Filter to identify RCTs

1. exp "clinical trial (publication type)"/

2. (randomised or randomised).ab,ti.

3. placebo.ab,ti.

4. dt.fs.

5. randomly.ab,ti.

6. trial.ab,ti.

7. groups.ab,ti.

8. or/1‐7

9. Animals/

10. Humans/

11. 9 not (9 and 10)

12. 8 not 11

The MEDLINE strategy and the RCT filter are adapted to identify trials in other electronic databases.

Appendix 2. Definitions of exacerbations

Study ID

Definition of exacerbation

Barnes 2006

No definition found

Bourbeau 2007

No definition found

Calverley 2003

Mild exacerbations = number of days with intake of four or more puffs of rescue medication

Severe exacerbation = intake of a course of oral steroids and/or antibiotics and/or hospitalisation due to respiratory symptoms

Dal Negro 2003

Mild exacerbation = requiring increased use of salbutamol prn by > 2 occasions/24 hour period on two or more consecutive days compared with the baseline mean of last seven days of run‐in period

Moderate exacerbation = requiring treatment with antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids

Severe exacerbation = requiring emergency hospital treatment and/or hospitalisation

Doherty 2012

Mild exacerbation = clinically judged deterioration of COPD symptoms (managed with increased short‐acting bronchodilator use: ≥ 12 inhalations/d of SABA/short‐acting anticholinergic, or ≥ 2 nebulized treatments/d of 2.5 mg SABA/short‐acting anticholinergic) on any two consecutive days

Moderate exacerbation = clinically judged deterioration of COPD with an acute change in symptoms that required antibiotic and/or oral steroid treatment for lower airway disease

Severe exacerbation = deterioration of COPD that resulted in emergency treatment or hospitalisation due to COPD

Hanania 2003

Moderate exacerbation = requiring treatment with antibiotics and/or corticosteroids

Severe exacerbation = requiring hospitalisation

Lapperre 2009

No definition found

Mahler 2002

“exacerbations defined by treatment”—no further details

O'Donnell 2006

No definition found

Rennard 2009

“a course of oral steroids and/or hospitalisation due to a worsening of COPD”

SCO104925

No definition found

SFCT01

No definition found

Sin 2008

“Exacerbations were defined as worsening of COPD symptoms leading to hospitalisation, a visit to the emergency room, or use of an antimicrobial agent and/or systemic corticosteroids as an outpatient”

Szafranski 2003

Mild exacerbations = a day with ≥ 4 inhalations of reliever medication above the mean run‐in use

Severe exacerbation = use of oral steroids and/or antibiotics and/or hospitalisation due to respiratory symptoms

Tashkin 2008

“Worsening of COPD symptoms that required treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or hospitalisation”

Tashkin 2012

Mild exacerbation = clinically judged deterioration of COPD symptoms (managed with increased short‐acting bronchodilator use: ≥ 12 inhalations/d of SABA/short‐acting anticholinergic, or ≥ 2 nebulized treatments/d of 2.5 mg SABA/short‐acting anticholinergic) on any two consecutive days

Moderate exacerbation = clinically judged deterioration of COPD with an acute change in symptoms that required antibiotic and/or oral steroid treatment for lower airway disease

Severe exacerbation = deterioration of COPD that resulted in emergency treatment or hospitalisation due to COPD

TORCH

“A symptomatic deterioration requiring treatment with antibiotic agents, systemic corticosteroids, hospitalisation, or a combination of these”

TRISTAN

“Exacerbations were defined a priori as a worsening of COPD symptoms that required treatment with antibiotics, oral corticosteroids, or both. Episodes that required corticosteroid treatment or hospital admission were noted separately”

Zheng 2006

“A worsening of symptoms that required treatment with antibiotics or oral corticosteroids and/or hospitalisation” (analysed separately as those requiring antibiotics, those requiring corticosteroids, those requiring hospitalisation)

Appendix 3. Definitions of pneumonia

Study ID

Definition of pneumonia

Barnes 2006

No definition found

Bourbeau 2007

No definition found

Calverley 2003

No definition found

Dal Negro 2003

No definition found

Doherty 2012

“Including the AE terms of pneumonia, pneumonia viral, pneumonia aspiration, and lobar pneumonia”

Hanania 2003

No definition found

Lapperre 2009

No definition found

Mahler 2002

No definition found

O'Donnell 2006

No definition found

Rennard 2009

“Pneumonia events were reported by physicians based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (version 10.0) pneumonia‐related preferred

terms (pneumonia, bronchopneumonia, lobar pneumonia or pneumonia staphylococcal)”

SCO104925

No definition found

SFCT01

No definition found

Sin 2008

No definition found

Szafranski 2003

No definition found

Tashkin 2008

“Diagnosis of pneumonia was generally based on clinical judgment, without radiological confirmation in all cases”

Tashkin 2012

“Including the AE terms of pneumonia, pneumonia viral, pneumonia aspiration, and lobar pneumonia”

TORCH

“Since the finding was unexpected, there was no prospective definition of pneumonia in the study protocol (e.g. confirmation on chest radiography)”

TRISTAN

No definition found

Zheng 2006

No definition found

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.1 Exacerbation rates with combined inhalers versus placebo.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.1 Exacerbation rates with combined inhalers versus placebo.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.2 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.2 Mortality.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.3 Pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.3 Pneumonia.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.4 Hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.4 Hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.2 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), outcome: 1.2 Mortality.

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 1 Exacerbation rates with combined inhalers versus placebo.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 1 Exacerbation rates with combined inhalers versus placebo.

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 2 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 2 Mortality.

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 3 Pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 3 Pneumonia.

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 4 Hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 4 Hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations.

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 5 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes), Outcome 5 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 1 Exacerbations.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 1 Exacerbations.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 2 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 2 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 3 Participants with at least one exacerbation by type.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 3 Participants with at least one exacerbation by type.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 4 Exacerbations by type.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 4 Exacerbations by type.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 5 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 5 Mortality.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score).

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 7 Change from baseline in Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire scores.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 7 Change from baseline in Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire scores.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) scores.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) scores.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 9 Change from baseline in predose FEV1.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 9 Change from baseline in predose FEV1.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 10 Change from baseline in postdose FEV1.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 10 Change from baseline in postdose FEV1.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 11 Change from baseline in rescue medication usage (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 11 Change from baseline in rescue medication usage (puffs/d).

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 12 Withdrawals—total.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 12 Withdrawals—total.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 14 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 14 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 15 Adverse events—any.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.15

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 15 Adverse events—any.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 16 Adverse events—'serious'.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.16

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 16 Adverse events—'serious'.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 17 Adverse events—pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.17

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 17 Adverse events—pneumonia.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 18 Adverse events—candidiasis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.18

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 18 Adverse events—candidiasis.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 19 Adverse events—hoarseness.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.19

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 19 Adverse events—hoarseness.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 20 Adverse events—palpitations.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.20

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 20 Adverse events—palpitations.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 21 Adverse events—blood glucose increased.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.21

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 21 Adverse events—blood glucose increased.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 22 Adverse event—skin bruising.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.22

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 22 Adverse event—skin bruising.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 23 Adverse events—bronchitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.23

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 23 Adverse events—bronchitis.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 24 Adverse events—upper respiratory tract infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.24

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 24 Adverse events—upper respiratory tract infection.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 25 Adverse events—nasopharyngitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.25

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 25 Adverse events—nasopharyngitis.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 26 Adverse events—cough.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.26

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 26 Adverse events—cough.

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 27 Adverse events—headache.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.27

Comparison 2 Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 27 Adverse events—headache.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 1 Severe exacerbations.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 1 Severe exacerbations.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 2 Mean severe exacerbation rates per participant per year.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 2 Mean severe exacerbation rates per participant per year.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 3 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 3 Mortality.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 4 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 4 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 5 Quality of life—change scores.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 5 Quality of life—change scores.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 6 Symptoms (change scores).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 6 Symptoms (change scores).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 7 Breathlessness, cough and sputum score (BCSS) change from baseline—average over treatment period.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 7 Breathlessness, cough and sputum score (BCSS) change from baseline—average over treatment period.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 8 Rescue medication usage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 8 Rescue medication usage.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 9 Mean FEV1 (% change from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 9 Mean FEV1 (% change from baseline).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 10 Average 12‐hour FEV1 change from baseline—end of treatment (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 10 Average 12‐hour FEV1 change from baseline—end of treatment (L).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 11 Predose FEV1 [L] change from baseline to the average over the randomised treatment period.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 11 Predose FEV1 [L] change from baseline to the average over the randomised treatment period.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 12 1 Hour postdose FEV1 [L] change from baseline to the average over the randomised treatment period.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 12 1 Hour postdose FEV1 [L] change from baseline to the average over the randomised treatment period.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 13 FEV1 at 12‐hour change from baseline—end of treatment (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 13 FEV1 at 12‐hour change from baseline—end of treatment (L).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 14 Morning PEFR change from baseline, average over treatment period (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 14 Morning PEFR change from baseline, average over treatment period (L/min).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 15 Evening PEFR mean change from baseline, average over treatment period (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 15 Evening PEFR mean change from baseline, average over treatment period (L/min).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 16 Withdrawals—total.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 16 Withdrawals—total.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 17 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 17 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 18 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 18 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 19 Adverse event—any.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.19

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 19 Adverse event—any.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 20 Adverse events—'serious'.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 20 Adverse events—'serious'.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 21 Adverse events—pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 21 Adverse events—pneumonia.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 22 Adverse events—candidiasis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.22

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 22 Adverse events—candidiasis.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 23 Adverse events—dysphonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.23

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 23 Adverse events—dysphonia.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 24 Adverse events—cataracts.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.24

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 24 Adverse events—cataracts.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 25 Adverse events—COPD.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.25

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 25 Adverse events—COPD.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 26 Adverse events—tremor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.26

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 26 Adverse events—tremor.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 27 Adverse events—palpitations.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.27

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 27 Adverse events—palpitations.

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 28 Adverse events—lumbar spine bone density change from baseline (g/cm2).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.28

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 28 Adverse events—lumbar spine bone density change from baseline (g/cm2).

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 29 Adverse events—hip bone density change from baseline (g/cm2).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.29

Comparison 3 Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA), Outcome 29 Adverse events—hip bone density change from baseline (g/cm2).

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of participants having at least one moderate or severe exacerbation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of participants having at least one moderate or severe exacerbation.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 3 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 3 Mortality.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 4 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 4 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score).

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 5 Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0–12 hours (mL)—week 13.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 5 Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0–12 hours (mL)—week 13.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 6 Mean change from baseline AM predose FEV1 at 13 weeks (mL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 6 Mean change from baseline AM predose FEV1 at 13 weeks (mL).

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 7 Withdrawals—total.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 7 Withdrawals—total.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 8 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 8 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 9 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 9 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse events—any.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse events—any.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 11 Adverse events—serious.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 11 Adverse events—serious.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 12 Adverse events—pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 12 Adverse events—pneumonia.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 13 Adverse events—candidiasis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 13 Adverse events—candidiasis.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 14 Adverse events—dysphonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.14

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 14 Adverse events—dysphonia.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 15 Adverse events—cataract.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.15

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 15 Adverse events—cataract.

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 16 Adverse events—COPD requiring hospitalisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo, Outcome 16 Adverse events—COPD requiring hospitalisation.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Patient or population: patients with COPD
Settings: community
Intervention: combined inhalers

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes)

Annual exacerbation rates

1.35

0.99

(0.93 to 1.05)

Rate ratio 0.73

(0.69 to 0.78)

7473

(seven studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1, 2

Participants with at least one exacerbation

Duration of six months3

301 per 1000

251 per 1000

(221 to 286)

OR 0.78
(0.66 to 0.93)

3141

(eight studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

Mortality

Duration of 18 months3

60 per 1000

50 per 1000
(41 to 59)

OR 0.82
(0.68 to 0.99)

10129
(16 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2, 4

Pneumonia

Duration of 18 months3

55 per 1000

85 per 1000
(73 to 101)

OR 1.62
(1.36 to 1.94)

9620
(14 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1, 2

Hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations

Duration of 18 months3

115 per 1000

108 per 1000
(95 to 121)

OR 0.93
(0.81 to 1.06)

9492
(12 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3, 5

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Downgraded because of risk of attrition bias.

2Concerns have been raised about the analysis of the largest study, TORCH. We note that the protocol was published after the trial had recruited (See Feedback 1, Feedback 2). No downgrade.

3Weighted mean duration.

4Downgraded because of imprecision.

5Downgraded because of risk of attrition bias and imprecision.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Summary of findings 2. Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo for COPD

Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo for COPD

Patient or population: patients with COPD
Settings: community
Intervention: fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS)

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA)

Adverse eventsany

Duration of two years1

780 per 1000

794 per 1000
(771 to 816)

OR 1.09
(0.95 to 1.25)

5574
(nine studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2, 3

Adverse events'serious'

Duration of two years1

271 per 1000

287 per 1000
(261 to 314)

OR 1.08
(0.95 to 1.23)

5531
(nine studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2, 3

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Weighted mean duration.

2Downgraded because of risk of attrition bias and imprecision.

3Concerns have been raised about the analysis of the largest study, TORCH. We note that the protocol was published after the trial had recruited (See Feedback 1, Feedback 2).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo for COPD
Summary of findings 3. Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo for COPD

Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo for COPD

Patient or population: patients with COPD
Settings: community
Intervention: budesonide/formoterol (BDF)

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo

Adverse eventany320/94

Duration of nine months 3

538 per 1000

623 per 1000
(574 to 669)

OR 1.42
(1.16 to 1.74)

1552
(two studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

Adverse eventany160/94

Duration of nine months 3

538 per 1000

606 per 1000
(557 to 652)

OR 1.32
(1.08 to 1.61)

1556
(two studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

Adverse events'serious'320/94

Duration of 10 months3

162 per 1000

184 per 1000
(155 to 219)

OR 1.17
(0.95 to 1.45)

2476
(four studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

Adverse events'serious'160/94

Duration of nine months 3

113 per 1000

132 per 1000
(102 to 171)

OR 1.2
(0.89 to 1.63)

1556
(two studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Downgraded because of risk of attrition bias and imprecision and heterogeneity.
2Downgraded because of risk of attrition bias and imprecision.

3Weighted mean duration.

4Delivered dose.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo for COPD
Summary of findings 4. Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo for COPD

Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo for COPD

Patient or population: patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Settings: community
Intervention: mometasone/formoterol (MF/F)

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo

Adverse eventany400/103

Duration of six months

362 per 1000

357 per 1000
(298 to 424)

OR 0.98
(0.75 to 1.3)

890
(two studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

Adverse eventany200/103

Duration of six months

362 per 1000

317 per 1000
(260 to 382)

OR 0.82
(0.62 to 1.09)

894
(two studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

Adverse eventsserious400/103

Duration of six months

74 per 1000

80 per 1000
(50 to 125)

OR 1.09
(0.66 to 1.79)

890
(two studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

Adverse eventsserious200/103

Duration of six months

74 per 1000

53 per 1000
(32 to 89)

OR 0.71
(0.41 to 1.23)

894
(two studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Downgraded because of risk of attrition bias, imprecision and heterogeneity.
2Downgraded because of risk of attrition bias and imprecision.

3Delivered dose.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo for COPD
Table 1. Search history

Version

Detail

First published version—Issue 4, 2003 (all years to April 2002)

References identified: 34
References retrieved: seven
Studies excluded: three (Cazzola 2000; Chapman 2002; Soriano 2002)
Studies identified from supplementary searching: four (Dal Negro 2003; Hanania 2003—both included; Cazzola 2002a; Cazzola 2004—both excluded).
Studies included: four

Second published version—Issue 3, 2004 (April 2003 to April 2004)

References identified: 12
References retrieved: three (two papers full publications of previously included or cited studies (Dal Negro 2003; Hanania 2003). Handsearching identified two further references to the COSMIC 2003 study
Studies identified from supplementary searching: one (TRISTAN 2003)
New studies included: two
Total studies included: six

Third published version—Issue 3, 2005 (April 2004 to April 2005)

References identified: 52
References retrieved: 46 (references to studies already included/excluded/ongoing: 24)
New unique studies identified: 10 (ongoing studies: two)
New studies included: zero
Total studies included: six

Fourth published version (April 2005 to April 2007)

References identified: 66
References retrieved: 27 (references to studies already included/excluded/ongoing)
New unique studies identified: five (ongoing studies: zero)
New studies included: five
Total studies included: 11

Fifth published version (April 2007 to June 2013)

References identified: 129

New unique studies identified: eight (ongoing studies: zero)

New studies included: eight

Total studies included: 19

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Search history
Table 2. Rates and NNTB of mortality and NNTH of pneumonia

Study ID

Study duration

Placebo rate (%)

mortality

NNTB for mortality

Placebo rate (%)

pneumonia

NNTH for pneumonia

TORCH

156 weeks

15.2

42 (24 to 775)

12.3

17 (27 to 12)

TRISTAN

52 weeks

1.94

292 (164 to 5256)

0.83

197 (339 to 131)

Calverley 2003

52 weeks

1.95

249 (149 to 1307)

3.6

48 (82 to 32)

Szafranski 2003

52 weeks

4.5

110 (66 to 581)

0

N/A

Rennard 2009

52 weeks

0.83

674 (379 to 12,149)

4.78

37 (63 to 25)

Tashkin 2008

26 weeks

0.33

1689 (950 to 30,403)

1

164 (282 to 109)

Doherty 2012

26 weeks

0.85

659 (370 to 11,865)

0.85

193 (331 to 128)

Tashkin 2012

26 weeks

0.47

1187 (668 to 21,377)

0.47

346 (595 to 229)

Mahler 2002

24 weeks

1.66

340 (191 to 6125)

0

N/A

O'Donnell 2006

8 weeks

0

N/A

1.56

107 (182 to 71)

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Rates and NNTB of mortality and NNTH of pneumonia
Comparison 1. Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Exacerbation rates with combined inhalers versus placebo Show forest plot

7

Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.69, 0.78]

1.1 Fluticasone/salmeterol

3

Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.69, 0.80]

1.2 Budesonide/formoterol

4

Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.62, 0.81]

2 Mortality Show forest plot

16

10129

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.68, 0.99]

2.1 Fluticasone/salmeterol

10

5543

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.65, 0.97]

2.2 Budesonide/formoterol

4

3250

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.57, 1.93]

2.3 Mometasone/formoterol

2

1336

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.36, 5.13]

3 Pneumonia Show forest plot

14

9620

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.62 [1.36, 1.94]

3.1 Fluticasone/salmeterol

9

5447

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.76 [1.46, 2.14]

3.2 Budesonide/formoterol

3

2837

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.57, 1.47]

3.3 Mometasone/formoterol

2

1336

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.39 [0.68, 8.36]

4 Hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations Show forest plot

12

9492

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.80, 1.06]

4.1 Fluticasone/salmeterol

7

5309

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.75, 1.04]

4.2 Budesonide/formoterol

3

2847

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.87, 1.58]

4.3 Mometasone/formoterol

2

1336

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.31, 1.07]

5 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation Show forest plot

9

3141

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.66, 0.93]

5.1 Fluticasone/salmeterol

7

1817

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.64, 1.07]

5.2 Mometasone/formoterol

2

1324

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.58, 0.94]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Combined inhalers versus placebo (primary outcomes)
Comparison 2. Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Exacerbations Show forest plot

3

3777

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.69, 0.80]

1.1 Poorly reversible population

3

3777

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.69, 0.80]

2 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation Show forest plot

7

1817

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.64, 1.07]

2.1 Reversible population

1

126

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.06, 1.66]

2.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

713

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.69, 1.44]

2.3 Poorly reversible population

3

841

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.54, 1.15]

2.4 Unclear reversibility

1

137

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.09, 1.05]

3 Participants with at least one exacerbation by type Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Requirement for oral steroids

2

417

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.61, 1.68]

3.2 Requirement for antibiotic treatment

1

140

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.26, 2.44]

3.3 Requirement for oral steroid or antibiotic treatment

1

140

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.32 [0.13, 82.80]

3.4 Hospitalisation

1

140

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.32 [0.13, 82.80]

4 Exacerbations by type Show forest plot

3

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Requirement for oral steroids

3

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.52, 0.63]

4.2 Requirement for antibiotic treatment

1

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.41, 0.88]

4.3 Hospitalisation

2

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.70, 0.97]

5 Mortality Show forest plot

10

5543

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.65, 0.97]

5.1 Mortality: three‐year data

1

3057

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.66, 0.99]

5.2 Mortality: one‐year data

3

987

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.13, 1.65]

5.3 Mortality: six‐month data

3

1154

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.11, 2.75]

5.4 Mortality: three‐month data

3

345

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.90 [‐3.61, ‐2.18]

6.1 Poorly reversible population

4

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.90 [‐3.61, ‐2.18]

7 Change from baseline in Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire scores Show forest plot

2

712

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.0 [2.48, 7.52]

7.1 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

712

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.0 [2.48, 7.52]

8 Change from baseline in Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) scores Show forest plot

2

707

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.56, 1.53]

8.1 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

707

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.56, 1.53]

9 Change from baseline in predose FEV1 Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.14, 0.19]

9.1 Reversible population

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.15, 0.24]

9.2 Poorly reversible population

4

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.11, 0.18]

10 Change from baseline in postdose FEV1 Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.07, 0.11]

10.1 Poorly reversible population

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.07, 0.11]

11 Change from baseline in rescue medication usage (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

703

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.19 [‐1.83, ‐0.55]

11.1 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

703

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.19 [‐1.83, ‐0.55]

12 Withdrawals—total Show forest plot

13

5769

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.62, 0.78]

12.1 Reversible population

1

121

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.95 [0.30, 29.18]

12.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

709

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.60, 1.13]

12.3 Poorly reversible population

6

4632

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.60, 0.76]

12.4 Unclear reversibility

4

307

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.25, 1.17]

13 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

11

5491

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.64, 0.86]

13.1 Reversible population

1

123

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.01, 8.90]

13.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

1

354

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.31, 1.51]

13.3 Poorly reversible population

6

4630

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.65, 0.89]

13.4 Unclear reversibility

4

384

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.11, 0.93]

14 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

8

5115

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.22, 0.41]

14.1 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

1

346

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.08, 1.04]

14.2 Poorly reversible population

6

4632

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.21, 0.42]

14.3 Unclear reversibility

1

137

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.08, 1.11]

15 Adverse events—any Show forest plot

9

5574

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.95, 1.25]

15.1 Reversible population

1

126

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.59, 2.46]

15.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

717

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.42 [1.03, 1.96]

15.3 Poorly reversible population

5

4650

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.88, 1.21]

15.4 Unclear reversibility

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.19, 1.79]

16 Adverse events—'serious' Show forest plot

9

5531

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.95, 1.23]

16.1 Reversible population

1

123

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.05, 6.05]

16.2 Partially reversible population

2

709

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.38, 1.35]

16.3 Poorly reversible population

6

4699

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.97, 1.26]

17 Adverse events—pneumonia Show forest plot

9

5447

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.80 [1.49, 2.18]

17.1 Reversible population

1

126

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.01, 8.47]

17.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

709

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.55 [0.26, 116.46]

17.3 Poorly reversible population

4

4394

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.80 [1.48, 2.18]

17.4 Unclear reversibility

2

218

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.31 [0.13, 83.73]

18 Adverse events—candidiasis Show forest plot

7

2039

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.73 [3.07, 10.67]

18.1 Reversible population

1

126

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.06, 16.88]

18.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

717

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.13 [3.36, 36.90]

18.3 Poorly reversible population

3

1115

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.40 [2.01, 9.62]

18.4 Unclear reversibility

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Adverse events—hoarseness Show forest plot

2

585

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.61 [0.61, 4.26]

19.1 Poorly reversible population

2

585

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.61 [0.61, 4.26]

20 Adverse events—palpitations Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 Poorly reversible population

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Adverse events—blood glucose increased Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21.1 Poorly reversible population

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Adverse event—skin bruising Show forest plot

1

445

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.1 Poorly reversible population

1

445

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Adverse events—bronchitis Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 Poorly reversible population

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Adverse events—upper respiratory tract infection Show forest plot

5

4963

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [1.04, 1.47]

24.1 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

709

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.81, 1.92]

24.2 Poorly reversible population

3

4254

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [1.02, 1.48]

25 Adverse events—nasopharyngitis Show forest plot

2

3535

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.05, 1.56]

25.1 Poorly reversible population

2

3535

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.05, 1.56]

26 Adverse events—cough Show forest plot

3

612

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.23, 1.27]

26.1 Reversible population

1

126

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.13, 78.72]

26.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

1

346

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.18, 1.31]

26.3 Poorly reversible population

1

140

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.04, 3.48]

27 Adverse events—headache Show forest plot

4

3922

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.84, 1.31]

27.1 Reversible population

1

123

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.02, 2.01]

27.2 Partially reversible population (mixed population)

2

709

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.91, 2.10]

27.3 Poorly reversible population

1

3090

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.73, 1.26]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Fluticasone/salmeterol (FPS) versus placebo (PLA)
Comparison 3. Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Severe exacerbations Show forest plot

2

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.62, 0.88]

1.1 Poorly reversible

2

Rate ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.62, 0.88]

2 Mean severe exacerbation rates per participant per year Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Poorly reversible population

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Mortality Show forest plot

4

3250

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.57, 1.93]

4 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 320/9 mcg

4

2350

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.73 [‐4.83, ‐2.63]

4.2 160/9 mcg

2

1442

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.39 [‐4.70, ‐2.07]

5 Quality of life—change scores Show forest plot

2

SGRQ (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.06 [‐7.90, ‐4.22]

5.1 Poorly reversible

2

SGRQ (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.06 [‐7.90, ‐4.22]

6 Symptoms (change scores) Show forest plot

2

Symptom scale (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.63 [‐0.90, ‐0.37]

6.1 Poorly reversible

2

Symptom scale (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.63 [‐0.90, ‐0.37]

7 Breathlessness, cough and sputum score (BCSS) change from baseline—average over treatment period Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 320/9 mcg

2

1533

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.59, ‐0.26]

7.2 160/9 mcg

2

1536

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.60, ‐0.28]

8 Rescue medication usage Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 320/9 mcg

4

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.98 [‐1.18, ‐0.79]

8.2 160/9 mcg

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.28 [‐1.55, ‐1.00]

9 Mean FEV1 (% change from baseline) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

14.40 [11.91, 16.90]

9.1 Poorly reversible

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

14.40 [11.91, 16.90]

10 Average 12‐hour FEV1 change from baseline—end of treatment (L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 320/9 mcg

1

246

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.12, 0.26]

10.2 160/9 mcg

1

245

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.10, 0.22]

11 Predose FEV1 [L] change from baseline to the average over the randomised treatment period Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 320/9 mcg

1

577

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.04, 0.12]

11.2 160/9 mcg

1

581

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [0.03, 0.09]

12 1 Hour postdose FEV1 [L] change from baseline to the average over the randomised treatment period Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 320/9 mcg

1

577

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.14, 0.20]

12.2 160/9 mcg

1

581

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.13, 0.19]

13 FEV1 at 12‐hour change from baseline—end of treatment (L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 320/9 mcg

1

246

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.1 [0.03, 0.17]

13.2 160/9 mcg

1

245

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [0.00, 0.14]

14 Morning PEFR change from baseline, average over treatment period (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14.1 320/9 mcg

2

1530

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

19.12 [15.69, 22.55]

14.2 160/9 mcg

2

1535

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

14.63 [11.47, 17.80]

15 Evening PEFR mean change from baseline, average over treatment period (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 320/9 mcg

2

1529

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

16.09 [12.61, 19.57]

15.2 160/9 mcg

2

1531

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

12.74 [9.56, 15.91]

16 Withdrawals—total Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 320/9 mcg

4

2475

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.48, 0.68]

16.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.50, 0.78]

17 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

17.1 320/9 mcg

4

2475

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.61, 1.01]

17.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.70, 1.30]

18 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18.1 320/9 mcg

3

1898

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.34, 0.63]

18.2 160/9 mcg

1

975

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.60, 1.71]

19 Adverse event—any Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

19.1 320/9 mcg

2

1552

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.42 [1.16, 1.74]

19.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [1.08, 1.61]

20 Adverse events—'serious' Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

20.1 320/9 mcg

4

2476

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.95, 1.45]

20.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.89, 1.63]

21 Adverse events—pneumonia Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

21.1 320/9 mcg

3

2062

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.52, 1.52]

21.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.45, 1.42]

22 Adverse events—candidiasis Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

22.1 320/9 mcg

2

1552

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.45 [1.88, 6.34]

22.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.05 [1.07, 3.92]

23 Adverse events—dysphonia Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

23.1 320/9 mcg

2

1552

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.07 [1.52, 10.90]

23.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.37, 3.67]

24 Adverse events—cataracts Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

24.1 320/9 mcg

1

975

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 7.97]

24.2 160/9 mcg

1

975

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.95 [0.18, 21.59]

25 Adverse events—COPD Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

25.1 320/9 mcg

2

1552

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.69, 1.22]

25.2 160/9 mcg

2

1556

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.88, 1.53]

26 Adverse events—tremor Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

26.1 320/9 mcg

1

577

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26.2 160/9 mcg

1

581

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.55 [0.39, 146.88]

27 Adverse events—palpitations Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

27.1 320/9 mcg

1

577

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.26 [0.13, 80.37]

27.2 160/9 mcg

1

581

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28 Adverse events—lumbar spine bone density change from baseline (g/cm2) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

28.1 320/9 mcg

1

149

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.03, ‐0.01]

28.2 160/9 mcg

1

149

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.01, 0.01]

29 Adverse events—hip bone density change from baseline (g/cm2) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

29.1 320/9 mcg

1

149

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.01, 0.01]

29.2 160/9 mcg

1

147

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [0.00, 0.02]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus placebo (PLA)
Comparison 4. Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of participants with at least one exacerbation Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 400/10 mcg

2

882

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.54, 0.95]

1.2 200/10 mcg

2

886

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.58, 1.01]

2 Number of participants having at least one moderate or severe exacerbation Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 400/10 mcg

2

882

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.38, 0.86]

2.2 200/10 mcg

2

886

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.42, 0.92]

3 Mortality Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.72 [0.41, 7.25]

3.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.20, 4.98]

4 Change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (total score) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 400/10 mcg

2

866

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.80 [‐5.75, ‐1.86]

4.2 200/10 mcg

2

869

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.91 [‐6.01, ‐1.81]

5 Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0–12 hours (mL)—week 13 Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 400/10 mcg

2

862

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

162.04 [126.54, 197.53]

5.2 200/10 mcg

2

869

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

122.01 [86.64, 157.39]

6 Mean change from baseline AM predose FEV1 at 13 weeks (mL) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 400/10 mcg

2

856

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

114.64 [77.79, 151.50]

6.2 200/10 mcg

2

859

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

70.43 [33.63, 107.23]

7 Withdrawals—total Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.40, 0.77]

7.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.40, 0.76]

8 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.08, 0.74]

8.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.11, 0.84]

9 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.58, 1.98]

9.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.16, 0.84]

10 Adverse events—any Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.75, 1.30]

10.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.62, 1.09]

11 Adverse events—serious Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.66, 1.79]

11.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.41, 1.23]

12 Adverse events—pneumonia Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.14 [0.84, 11.65]

12.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.40, 7.04]

13 Adverse events—candidiasis Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.22 [0.50, 9.91]

13.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.17, 5.87]

14 Adverse events—dysphonia Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14.1 400/10 mcg

1

461

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.11 [0.19, 23.41]

14.2 200/10 mcg

1

475

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.18, 22.02]

15 Adverse events—cataract Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 400/10 mcg

1

429

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.06, 15.72]

15.2 200/10 mcg

1

419

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.06, 16.48]

16 Adverse events—COPD requiring hospitalisation Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 400/10 mcg

2

890

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.40, 1.60]

16.2 200/10 mcg

2

894

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.15, 0.86]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus placebo