Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 2 Leaving the study early ‐ medium term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 2 Leaving the study early ‐ medium term.

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 3 Leaving the study early ‐ long term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 3 Leaving the study early ‐ long term.

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, SANS, high = poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, SANS, high = poor).

Study

Intervention

Mean

SD

N

Notes

BPRS

Richardson 2002

Art therapy

13.5

6.5

35

Richardson 2002

Standard care

16.5

8.6

38

BSI

Richardson 2002

Art therapy

0.80

0.50

35

This seems to be a very small score for this rating scale and the change between this and the baseline data is only ‐0.1 for standard care and ‐0.2 for art therapy.

Richardson 2002

Standard care

0.90

0.80

36

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint skewed data, various scales, high = poor).

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 6 Social functioning: 1a. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, SFS, high = poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 6 Social functioning: 1a. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, SFS, high = poor).

Study

Intervention

Mean

SD

N

Notes

Richardson 2002

Art therapy

0.90

0.60

35

Richardson 2002

Standard care

1.00

0.70

37

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 7 Social functioning: 1b. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint skewed data, IIP, high = good).

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 8 Quality of life: Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, PercQoL, high = good).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE, Outcome 8 Quality of life: Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, PercQoL, high = good).

Comparison 1. ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

90

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.41, 2.29]

1.1 before the end of therapy

1

90

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.41, 2.29]

2 Leaving the study early ‐ medium term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 before the end of therapy

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.15, 0.80]

2.2 before 6 month follow up

1

90

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.76, 1.58]

3 Leaving the study early ‐ long term Show forest plot

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.57, 1.60]

3.1 before 9 month follow up

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.57, 1.60]

4 Mental state: 1a. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, SANS, high = poor) Show forest plot

1

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.30 [‐4.10, ‐0.50]

4.1 at the end of therapy

1

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.30 [‐4.10, ‐0.50]

5 Mental state: 1b. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint skewed data, various scales, high = poor) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

5.1 BPRS

Other data

No numeric data

5.2 BSI

Other data

No numeric data

6 Social functioning: 1a. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, SFS, high = poor) Show forest plot

1

70

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.20 [‐2.53, 16.93]

6.1 at end of therapy

1

70

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.20 [‐2.53, 16.93]

7 Social functioning: 1b. Average score ‐ short term (endpoint skewed data, IIP, high = good) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

8 Quality of life: Average score ‐ short term (endpoint data, PercQoL, high = good) Show forest plot

1

74

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.27, 0.47]

8.1 at end of therapy

1

74

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.27, 0.47]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. ART THERAPY + STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE