Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Anticuerpo inhibidor del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa para la inducción de la remisión en la enfermedad de Crohn

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Referencias de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión

Sandborn 2001a {published data only}

Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, Present DH, Sutherland LR, Kamm M, et al. An engineered human antibody to TNF (CDP571) for active Crohn's disease: A randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1330‐8.

Sandborn 2001b {published data only}

Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB, Katz S, Safdi M, Wolf DG, Baerg RD, et al. Etanercept for active Crohn's disease: A randomized double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2001;121:1088‐94.

Stack 1997 {published data only}

Stack WA, Mann SD, Roy AJ, Heath P, Sopwith M, Freeman J, et al. Randomised controlled trial of CDP571 antibody to tumour necrosis factor‐alpha in Crohn's disease. Lancet 1997;349:521‐4.

Targan 1997 {published data only}

Targan SR, Hanauer SB, van Deventer SJH, Mayer L, Present DH, Braakman T, et al. A short term study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor alpha for Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1029‐35.

Referencias de los estudios excluidos de esta revisión

Baldassano 2003 {published data only}

Baldassano R, Braegger CP, Escher JC, DeWoody K, Hendricks DF, Keenan G, et al. Infliximab (REMICADE) therapy in the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:833‐8.

D'Haens 1999 {published data only}

D'Haens G, van Deventer S, van Hogezand R, Chalmers D, Kothe C, Baert F, et al. Endoscopic and histologic healing with infliximab anti‐tumor Necrosis factor antibodies in Crohn's Disease: a European multicentre trial. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1029‐34.

Hanauer 2002 {published data only}

Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, Mayer LF, Schreiber S, Colombel JF, et al. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:1541‐9.

Present 1999 {published data only}

Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, Hanauer SB, Mayer L, van Hogezand RA, et al. Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1398‐405.

Rutgeerts 1999 {published data only}

Rutgeerts P, D'Haens G, Targan S, Vasiliauskas E, Hanauer SB, Present DH, et al. Efficacy and safety of retreatment with anti‐tumor necrosis factor antibody (infliximab) to maintain remission in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1999;117:761‐9.

Rutgeerts 2003 {published data only}

Rutgeerts P, Lemmens L, Van Assche G, Noman M, Borghini‐Fuhrer I, Goedkoop R. Treatment of active Crohn's disease with onercept (recombinant human soluble p55 tumour necrosis factor receptor): results of a randomized, open label study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:185‐92.

Referencias adicionales

Baert 1999

Baert FJ, D'Haens GR, Peeters M, Hiele MI, Schaible TF, Shealy D, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody (infliximab) therapy profoundly down‐regulates the inflammation in Crohn's ileocolitis. Gastroenterology 1999;116:22‐8.

Bauditz 1997

Bauditz J, Haemling J, Ortner M, Lochs H, Raedler A, Schreiber S. Treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor oxpentifylline does not improve corticosteroid dependent chronic active Crohn's disease. Gut 1997;40:470‐4.

Bell 2000

Bell SJ, Kamm MA. Review article: the clinical role of anti‐TNF alpha antibody treatment in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000;14:501‐14.

Breese 1994

Breese EJ, Michie CA, Nicholls SW, Murch SH, Williams CB, Domizio P, et al. Tumor necrosis factor ‐alpha producing cells in the intestinal musosa of children with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1994;106:1455‐66.

Brown 2002

Brown SL, Greene MH, Gershon SK, Edwards ET, Braun MM. Tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy and lymphoma development: twenty‐six cases reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:3151‐8.

Clarke 2001

Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.1.4 [updated October 2001]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001. Oxford : Update software. Updated quarterly.

Jadad 1996

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1‐12.

Keane 2001

Keane J, Gershon S, Wise RP, Mirabile‐Levens E, Kasznica J, Schwieterman WD, et al. Tuberculosis associated with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor alpha‐neutralizing agent. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1098‐104.

MacDonald 1990

MacDonald TT, Hutchings P, Choy MY, Murch S, Cooke A. Tumour necrosis factor‐alpha and interferon gamma production measured at the single cell level in normal and inflamed human intestine. Clin Exp Immunol 1990;81:301‐5.

Murch 1991

Murch SH, Lamkin VA, Savage MO, Walker Smith JA, MacDonald TT. Serum concentrations of tumour necrosis factor‐alpha in childhood chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 1991;32:913‐7.

Papadikas 2000

Papadikas KA, Targan SR. Tumor necrosis factor: Biology and therapeutic inhibitors. Gastroenterolgy 2000;119:1148‐57.

Pitkin 1999

Pitkin RM, Branagan MA, Burmeister LF. Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. JAMA 1999;281:1110‐1.

Rampton 1999

Rampton DS. Management of Crohn's disease. BMJ 1999;319:1480‐5.

Reimund 1996

Reimund JM, Wittersheim C, Dumont S, Muller CD, Kenney JS, Baumann R, et al. Increased production of tumour necrosis factor‐a, interleukin 1b, and interleukin‐6 by morphologically normal intestinal biopsies from patients with Crohn's disease. Gut 1996;39:684‐9.

Scallon 1995

Scallon BJ, Moore MA, Trinh H, Knight DM, Ghrayeb J. Chimeric anti TNF‐ alpha monoclonal antibody Ca2 binds recombinant trasmembrane TNF‐ alpha and activates immune effector functions. Cytokine 1995;7:251‐9.

Shanahan 2001

Shanahan F. Inflammatory bowel disease: immunodiagnostics, immunotherapeutics and ecotherapeutics. Gastroenterology 2001;120:622‐35.

Siegel 1995

Siegel SA, Shealy DJ, Nakada MT, Le J, Woulfe DS, Probert L, et al. The mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 neutralizes in vitro and protects transgenic mice from cachexia and TNF‐ lethality in vivo. Cytokine 1995;7:15‐25.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Sandborn 2001a

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind placebo controlled study.
Primary outcome measurement: Clinical response at 2 weeks

Participants

169 adults; 86 males, 83 females

Interventions

111 received CDP571 and 58 received placebo

Outcomes

Clinical response defined as a decrease in CDAI of 70 or more at 2 weeks.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Sandborn 2001b

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial.
Outcome measures: Clinical response and clinical remission

Participants

43 adults; 26 males and 17 females

Interventions

23 received etanercept and 20 received placebo

Outcomes

Clinical response defined as a decrease in CDAI of at least 70. Remission defined as CDAI <150.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Stack 1997

Methods

Randomized, placebo‐controlled trial.
Primary outcome assessment: Remission at 2 weeks.

Participants

31 adults; 14 males and 16 females

Interventions

21 patients received CDP571 and 10 received placebo

Outcomes

Remission defined as CDAI<150 after 2 weeks.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Targan 1997

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, placebo controlled study.
Outcome assessments: Clinical response and remission at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Participants

108 adults; 55 males, 53 females

Interventions

83 received infliximab and 25 received placebo

Outcomes

Clinical response defined as a decrease in CDAI of 70 or more. Remission defined as CDAI <150.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Baldassano 2003

Did not compare TNF‐a blocking agents with either placebo or another treatment but rather only compared different doses of infliximab.

D'Haens 1999

A subgroup analysis from the Targan 1997 study.

Hanauer 2002

Described the use of TNF‐a agents for maintenance of remission rather than induction of remission.

Present 1999

Only described the use of infliximab for treatment of fistulas.

Rutgeerts 1999

Described the use of TNF‐a agents for maintenance of remission rather than induction of remission.

Rutgeerts 2003

Compared different doses of recombinant human soluble p55 TNF receptor (onercept) rather than comparing a TNF‐a blocking agent with either placebo or another treatment.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Infliximab versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission rate Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

2 Clinical Response Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. CDP571 versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission rate Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

2 Clinical Response Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Etanercept versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission rate Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

2 Clinical response Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical response.

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical response.

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Infliximab versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 CDP571 versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical Response.

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission rate.

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical response.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Etanercept versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical response.

Comparison 1. Infliximab versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission rate Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Clinical Response Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Infliximab versus placebo
Comparison 2. CDP571 versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission rate Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Clinical Response Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. CDP571 versus placebo
Comparison 3. Etanercept versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission rate Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Clinical response Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Etanercept versus placebo