Intervenciones psicológicas y educativas para la prevención de la depresión en niños y adolescentes
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub3Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 07 diciembre 2011see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos mentales comunes
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
Sally Merry, Heather McDowell, Julliet Bir, Sarah Hetrick devised the protocol.
Sally Merry co‐ordinated the review, extracted and entered data, ran analysis, and took a lead role in writing the review.
Sarah Hetrick ran searches, screened trials for inclusion, extracted data and assisted with the write‐up on the review.
Georgina Cox ran searches, screened trials for inclusion, extracted and entered data and checked drafts of the review.
Tessa Brudevold‐Iversen ran searches, screened trials for inclusion, extracted and entered data and checked drafts of the review.
Julliet Bir screened trials for inclusion, extracted and entered data and checked drafts of the review.
Heather McDowell screened trials for inclusion, extracted and entered data and checked drafts of the review.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
University of Auckland, New Zealand.
External sources
-
Health Research Council, New Zealand.
Declarations of interest
Drs Merry and McDowell and Ms J Bir have been involved in a study of a depression prevention programme. The results of this have been included in this update.
Acknowledgements
The advice of Prof P Hazell is gratefully acknowledged. The 2002 Review Completion Workshop run at the Cochrane Centre in Melbourne was extremely helpful and we would like to thank Dr Sally Green and centre staff for organising this. We would like to thank Jane Dennis, who advised us on many aspects of the review and also assisted with second reviewing of the tables of bias, as well as Vanessa Jordan for the advice she provided. We would like to thank Sarah Dawson (the trials search co‐ordinator) for updating and running the search, as well as helping with screening. We would like to thank Matt Gillard for assistance with data extraction and entry. We would like to thank Magenta Simmons for assisting with screening retrieved articles from the most recent search update and Nellie Muller who contributed to the drafting of the original published protocol but who is no longer available to assist with writing the review. We would also like to thank Gemma Colhoun who contributed to data extraction.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2016 Aug 09 | Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), third‐wave CBT and interpersonal therapy (IPT) based interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents | Review | Sarah E Hetrick, Georgina R Cox, Katrina G Witt, Julliet J Bir, Sally N Merry | |
| 2011 Dec 07 | Psychological and educational interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents | Review | Sally N Merry, Sarah E Hetrick, Georgina R Cox, Tessa Brudevold‐Iversen, Julliet J Bir, Heather McDowell | |
| 2004 Apr 19 | Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents | Review | Sally N Merry, Heather H McDowell, Sarah E Hetrick, Julliet J Bir, N Muller | |
| 2001 Feb 08 | Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents | Review | Sally N Merry, Heather H McDowell, Sarah E Hetrick, Julliet J Bir, N Muller | |
Differences between protocol and review
In the first version of the review, the protocol indicated that uncontrolled and controlled clinical trials, open trials, case‐controlled trials, and cohort studies (e.g. Altman 1991; Myles 2000; SIGN 2000) would be included if there were no, very few, or only poor quality RCTs. However, given the large number of RCTs retrieved both for the first version and for this updated version of the review, only RCTs have been included.
In the updated version of the review, fewer outcomes have been included given the paucity of data available in the first version of the review for these additional outcomes, and because of the large number of studies included in this update.
Assessment of the risk of bias has been used in this version of the review, updating the previous quality assessment methods used.
Notes
During the course of this review update the authors have recognised that the review topic might now be better addressed in a series of separate intervention specific reviews and this work is likely to be undertaken during the next year.
