Administración sistémica de agentes anestésicos locales para aliviar el dolor neuropático
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003345.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 19 octubre 2005see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Dolor y cuidados paliativos
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
Ivo W. Tremont‐Lukats proposed this systematic review at a training workshop in systematic reviews hosted by the PaPaS Cochrane Review Group in Boston, Massachusetts, in June 2000. The protocol and search strategy were done later.
Vidya Challapalli and Ivo Tremont ran an updated search, screened studies, extracted, tabulated, and analyzed the data. Data extraction and analysis were discussed and overseen weekly, and serial drafts of the review were edited by Daniel Carr. Joseph Lau reviewed and edited all statistical analyses.
Ewan McNicol performed a significant portion of the editing and final rewriting, contributed to the data extraction, and coordinated the assembly of various portions of text and data into the appropriate format. All reviewers contributed to the drafts, edition, and final published version.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
Financial Support: The Richard Saltonsall Charitable Foundation and the Evenor Armington Fund, USA
External sources
-
No sources of support supplied
Declarations of interest
None known
Acknowledgements
We thank Mrs Frances Fairman of the Cochrane Collaborative Review Group on Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pain Research Unit (University of Oxford, England) for conducting a literature search in EMBASE.
Miroslav‐Misha Backonja M.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA provided individual patient data for the study cited as Backonja 2000. This trial will be fully published in the Clinical Journal of Pain in 2005 or early 2006.
Andrew Baranowski, M.D., London, UK provided means and standard errors of the means of VAS pain scores for the study cited as Baranowski 1999.
Faye Chiou, M.D., Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA reviewed and verified the absence of side effects from mexiletine in the study cited as Chiou‐Tan 1996.
Mark Wallace, M.D., University of California, San Diego, California, USA provided complete information on means, standard deviations of pain scores and adverse effects in the study cited as Wallace 2000b.
Per‐Eric Lins, M.D., and Per Oskarsson M.D., Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden supplied mean pain scores and standard errors for daytime and nocturnal pain for the study cited as Oskarsson 1997.
Prabhav Tella, M.B.B.S., M.S., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA provided means and standard deviations of pretreatment and posttreatment pain scores for lidocaine,
placebo, and morphine for the study cited as Wu 2002.
Trolsen Nielsen, M.D., Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark tried to assist in contacting the principal investigator for additional information regarding study cited as Ellemann 1989.
Didier Boussahira, M.D., PhD (Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, Paris, France) gave us additional response rates from study cited as Attal 2004.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2005 Oct 19 | Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain | Review | Vidya Challapalli, Ivo W Tremont-Lukats, Ewan D McNicol, Joseph Lau, Daniel B Carr | |
| 2001 Oct 23 | Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain | Protocol | Ivo W. Tremont‐Lukats, G M Teixeira, Misha‐Miroslav Backonja, Gilda Teixeira da Silva | |
Notes
2017
A restricted search in June 2017 did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. If appropriate, we will update the review if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitate major revisions.
2019
We performed another restricted search in September 2019 but did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors, and we will reassess the review for updating in 2020. If appropriate, we will update the review sooner if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitate major revisions.
2020
We performed another restricted search in September 2020 but again did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. This area of research is not active and therefore this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors; we will reassess the review for updating in 2025. If appropriate, we will update the review sooner if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitate major revisions.
