Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for women to prevent neonatal tetanus

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 06 julio 2015

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002959.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Vittorio Demicheli

    Correspondencia a: Servizio Regionale di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia, SSEpi‐SeREMI ‐ Cochrane Vaccines Field, Azienda Sanitaria Locale ASL AL, Alessandria, Italy

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Antonella Barale

    Struttura di Epidemiologia, ASL VC, Vercelli, Italy

  • Alessandro Rivetti

    Servizio Regionale di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia, SSEpi‐SeREMI ‐ Cochrane Vaccines Field, Azienda Sanitaria Locale ASL AL, Alessandria, Italy

Contributions of authors

Vittorio Demicheli produced the first draft and the final version of the protocol. Antonella Barale wrote the background section and commented on the draft protocol.

Vittorio Demicheli applied the inclusion criteria, checked the data extraction, structured the comparison and outcome tables, entered data into Review Manager, and drafted the report. Antonella Barale applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and commented on the report. Alessandro Rivetti applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and commented on the report.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • ASL 20 Alessandria, Italy.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

disponible en

None known.

Acknowledgements

disponible en

We would like to thank the many people that contributed to this review. Lynn Hampson revised our search strategies and Gabriella Morandi ran some of the searches and helped us retrieve the papers. Carlo Di Pietrantonj assisted us in evaluating and interpreting the statistical content of the papers. Rebecca Smyth and Jim Neilson revised the review and provided us with lots of useful comments and suggestions that led to a substantial update of the review.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by three peers (an editor and two referees who are external to the editorial team), one or more members of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Jul 06

Vaccines for women for preventing neonatal tetanus

Review

Vittorio Demicheli, Antonella Barale, Alessandro Rivetti

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002959.pub4

2013 May 31

Vaccines for women to prevent neonatal tetanus

Review

Vittorio Demicheli, Antonella Barale, Alessandro Rivetti

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002959.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Vaccines for women to prevent neonatal tetanus

Review

Vittorio Demicheli, Antonella Barale, Alessandro Rivetti

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002959.pub2

2001 Jan 22

Vaccines for preventing neonatal tetanus

Protocol

Vittorio Demicheli, Antonella Barale

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002959

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.