Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 19 mayo 2022

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Debbie A Blake

    Correspondencia a: Biotechnology Research Institute, Auckland University of Techology, Auckland, New Zealand

    [email protected]

  • Michelle Proctor

    Psychological Service, Department of Corrections, North Harbour, New Zealand

  • Neil Johnson

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

  • David Olive

    San Francisco, USA

  • Cindy M Farquhar

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Quirine Lamberts

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Contributions of authors

Debbie Blake: took the lead in writing the protocol and review, performed initial searches of databases for trials, involved in selecting trials for inclusion, performed independent data extraction and quality assessment of the included trials, was responsible for statistical analysis and interpretation of the data.
Michelle Proctor: involved in selecting trials for inclusion, performed independent data extraction and quality assessment of the included trials, contributed to discussion and interpretation of results.
Neil Johnson: made significant contribution to the interpretation of results.
David Olive: commented on drafts of the protocol and review.
Cindy Farquhar: For the 2005 update, added in the new studies, redesigned the table of comparisons and rewrote the results section as well as edited the review.
Quirine Lamberts: For the 2005 update, checked the data and study information extracted
.

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of those who refereed previous versions of this review, in particular Mr Andy Vail and Dr Gayle Jones. Thanks to Dr Plachot, Dr Huisman, Dr Utsunomiya, Dr Hreinsson, Dr Rienzi, Dr Levron, Dr Levitas, Dr Bungum, Dr Karaki and Dr Frattarelli for supplying additional information. Finally, special thanks to the highly supportive team at the Cochrane office in Auckland: Review Group Coordinator Sarah Hetrick, Trials Search Coordinator Sue Furness and Lisa McComb‐Williams.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 May 19

Cleavage‐stage versus blastocyst‐stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology

Review

Demián Glujovsky, Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar, Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo, Agustín Ciapponi, Simone Cornelisse, Deborah Blake

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6

2016 Jun 30

Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology

Review

Demián Glujovsky, Cindy Farquhar, Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar, Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo, Deborah Blake

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5

2012 Jul 11

Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology

Review

Demián Glujovsky, Debbie Blake, Ariel Bardach, Cindy Farquhar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4

2007 Oct 17

Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology

Review

Debbie Blake, Cindy Farquhar, Neil Johnson, Michelle Proctor

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception

Review

Debbie A Blake, Michelle Proctor, Neil Johnson, David Olive, Cindy M Farquhar, Quirine Lamberts

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub2

2002 Apr 22

Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception

Review

Debbie DA Blake, Michelle Proctor, Neil Johnson, David Olive

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.