Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Radioterapia versus cirugía abierta versus cirugía endolaríngea (con o sin láser) para el cáncer escamocelular laríngeo inicial

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002027.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Enfermedades de oído, nariz y garganta

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Laura Warner

    Correspondencia a: Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, North Manchester General Hospital, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK

    [email protected]

  • Jessal Chudasama

    Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK

  • Charles G Kelly

    Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

  • Sean Loughran

    Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

  • Kenneth McKenzie

    Department of ENT Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

  • Richard Wight

    Department of ENT Surgery, North Riding Infirmary, Middlesborough, UK

  • Paola Dey

    School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

Contributions of authors

Janet Wilson (previous author), RW and KMacK were responsible for the conception of the review. PD and DA planned the first electronic search and screened the abstracts. PD, supported by Gemma Sandberg from the Cochrane ENT Group, planned the second electronic search and PD and KMacK screened the trials. The third and fourth electronic searches were conducted by Carolyn Doree from the Cochrane ENT group and PD assessed the abstracts. RW and KMacK assessed the trials. All authors discussed the review. PD extracted data. The first draft of the manuscript was completed by PD. All authors commented on the manuscript and agreed the final draft. PD updated the review. In 2014 an update was undertaken with searches performed by Gemma Sandberg and Samantha Faulkner. Laura Warner and Jessal Chudasama screened the results in conjunction with Paola Dey. Laura Warner, Paola Dey and Sean Loughran updated the text of the review. DA has retired.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Freeman Hospital Trustees, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

KMacK and RW are members of the UK feasibility study comparing the effectiveness of radiotherapy and endoscopic excision (with or without laser) (EaStER). Laura Warner, Paola Dey, Sean Loughran, Jessal Chudasama and Charles Kelly do not have any known conflicts of interest,

Acknowledgements

Janet Wilson, Professor of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, who helped to initiate the study and applied for funding and was previously a co‐author. Derrick Arnold, former data manager for the centre of cancer epidemiology, Christie Hospital NHS trust, who was involved in the original search. Melanie Hinde, formerly Medical Librarian, Christie Hospital NHS Trust Medical Library, for her invaluable help and advice on search strategies and for conducting additional searches.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Dec 12

Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer

Review

Laura Warner, Jessal Chudasama, Charles G Kelly, Sean Loughran, Kenneth McKenzie, Richard Wight, Paola Dey

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002027.pub2

2002 Apr 22

Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer

Review

Paola Dey, Derrick Arnold, Richard Wight, Charles G Kelly, Kenneth McKenzie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002027

Differences between protocol and review

We updated the assessment of risk of bias in the included studies in 2014 to the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' method. We separated outcomes into 'primary' and 'secondary' and added information regarding potential future data synthesis.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva