Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, outcome: 1.1 Peak withdrawal severity.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, outcome: 1.1 Peak withdrawal severity.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, outcome: 1.2 Overall withdrawal severity.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, outcome: 1.2 Overall withdrawal severity.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, outcome: 1.3 Completion rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, outcome: 1.3 Completion rate.

Comparison 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, Outcome 1 Peak withdrawal severity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, Outcome 1 Peak withdrawal severity.

Comparison 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, Outcome 2 Overall withdrawal severity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, Outcome 2 Overall withdrawal severity.

Comparison 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, Outcome 3 Completion rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist, Outcome 3 Completion rate.

Comparison 1. Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Peak withdrawal severity Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Naltrexone

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Naloxone

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Overall withdrawal severity Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Naltrexone

3

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Naloxone

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Completion rate Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Naltrexone

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Naloxone

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Antagonist‐adrenergic combination versus adrenergic agonist