Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barreras subjetivas para evitar la deambulación de las personas con deterioro cognitivo

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001932Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 22 enero 2001see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Demencia y trastornos cognitivos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • James D Price

    Correspondencia a: Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK

    [email protected]

  • Dymphna Hermans

    Clinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • John Grimley Evans

    Division of Clinical Geratology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Contributions of authors

‐James Price:
Reading all abstracts; application of inclusion/exclusion criteria to articles obtained; data extraction; data synthesis; data analysis; writing of review
‐Dymphna Hermans:
Search strategy; obtaining of hard copy; reading all abstracts; application of inclusion/exclusion criteria to articles obtained; data extraction; data synthesis; data analysis; writing of review; organising and coordinating consumer input; updating
‐John Grimley Evans:
Assistance with data synthesis, analysis and writing of review; checking the update of 2009.

DH did the update search in 2005 and 2007 and updated the review accordingly. Vittoria Lutje conducted the update search in 2009

Consumer editors: U Hla Htay, Joyce McFarlane, Christine Derrick and Margaret Clarke.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Division of Clinical Geratology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.

External sources

  • NHS R&D Executive, UK.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

Four consumers have put considerable effort into shaping this review. Their vigour, experience and dedication have benefited both the review and the reviewers. We would like to thank Margaret Clarke, Christine Derrick, U Hla Htay and Joyce MacFarlen and hope their involvement with the Group will continue. We also acknowledge the help of Julia Cream from the Alzheimer's Society who initiated consumer involvement, organised meetings and helped where necessary.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2001 Jan 22

Subjective barriers to prevent wandering of cognitively impaired people

Review

James D Price, Dymphna Hermans, John Grimley Evans

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001932

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.