Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 1 All ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 1 All ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 2 All ischemic stroke (fatal and non‐fatal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 2 All ischemic stroke (fatal and non‐fatal).

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 3 All disabling or fatal ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 3 All disabling or fatal ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 4 Myocardial infarction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 4 Myocardial infarction.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 5 All systemic emboli.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 5 All systemic emboli.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 6 All intracranial hemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 6 All intracranial hemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 7 All vascular death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 7 All vascular death.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 8 All major extracranial bleeds.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 8 All major extracranial bleeds.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 9 Composite: stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), myocardial infarction or vascular death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 9 Composite: stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), myocardial infarction or vascular death.

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 10 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Antiplatelet versus control, Outcome 10 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin), Outcome 1 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. All ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin), Outcome 1 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. All ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin), Outcome 2 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. Ischemic stroke (fatal and non‐fatal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin), Outcome 2 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. Ischemic stroke (fatal and non‐fatal).

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin), Outcome 3 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin), Outcome 3 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 3 Sensitivity analysis: non‐disabling stroke (all stroke minus disabling stroke), Outcome 1 All stroke minus disabling or fatal stroke (non‐disabling stroke).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Sensitivity analysis: non‐disabling stroke (all stroke minus disabling stroke), Outcome 1 All stroke minus disabling or fatal stroke (non‐disabling stroke).

Comparison 1. Antiplatelet versus control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.47, 1.07]

2 All ischemic stroke (fatal and non‐fatal) Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.46, 1.07]

3 All disabling or fatal ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.50, 1.49]

4 Myocardial infarction Show forest plot

2

1331

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.19, 1.14]

5 All systemic emboli Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.19, 2.33]

6 All intracranial hemorrhage Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.22, 7.80]

7 All vascular death Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.54, 1.25]

8 All major extracranial bleeds Show forest plot

2

1680

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.44, 2.98]

9 Composite: stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), myocardial infarction or vascular death Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.51, 0.97]

10 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

3

2077

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.54, 1.04]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Antiplatelet versus control
Comparison 2. Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. All ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage Show forest plot

4

2633

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.53, 1.00]

2 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. Ischemic stroke (fatal and non‐fatal) Show forest plot

4

2633

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.52, 0.99]

3 Three main aspirin trials plus SAFT. All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

4

2745

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.59, 1.02]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Sensitivity analyses: three main aspirin trials plus SAFT (ASA + ineffective dose warfarin)
Comparison 3. Sensitivity analysis: non‐disabling stroke (all stroke minus disabling stroke)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All stroke minus disabling or fatal stroke (non‐disabling stroke) Show forest plot

3

1965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.30, 1.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Sensitivity analysis: non‐disabling stroke (all stroke minus disabling stroke)