Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

兒童肥胖症預防之介入法

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 diciembre 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud pública

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Elizabeth Waters

    Correspondencia a: Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, The McCaughey Centre, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Andrea de Silva‐Sanigorski

    Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, The McCaughey Centre, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

  • Belinda J Burford

    The Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, The McCaughey Centre, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

  • Tamara Brown

    Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Division of Clinical Effectiveness, School of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

  • Karen J Campbell

    Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

  • Yang Gao

    School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

  • Rebecca Armstrong

    Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, The McCaughey Centre, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

  • Lauren Prosser

    Dental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, Australia

  • Carolyn D Summerbell

    School of Medicine and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Queen's Campus, Durham University, Stockton‐on‐Tees, UK

Contributions of authors

Elizabeth Waters lead the review process, provided the overall structure and process, provided advice with data extraction, meta‐analysis and data synthesis decisions, helped to write the review text and contributed to previous versions of this review.
Andrea de Silva‐Sanigorski lead the review process, extracted data, performed the meta‐analysis, performed data synthesis, and wrote the review text.
Belinda Hall extracted data, helped with the meta‐analysis, performed data synthesis and wrote the review text.
Tamara Brown helped with data extraction, commented on the final review and contributed to previous versions of this review.
Karen Campbell helped with data extraction, commented on the final review and contributed to previous versions of this review.
Gemma Gao helped with data extraction and commented on the final review.
Rebecca Armstrong worked on the amended protocol, provided searching advice, helped to develop the extraction template and commented on the final review.
Lauren Prosser helped with searching, data extraction and commented on the final review.
Carolyn Summerbell commented on the final review and contributed to previous versions of this review

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, UK.

  • School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.

  • Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Australia.

  • Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, Australia.

External sources

  • Department of Health, UK.

  • World Health Organisation, Switzerland.

  • Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), Victoria, Australia.

  • Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Australia.

  • National Health and Medical Research Council Capacity Building Grant, Australia.

  • The Jack Brockhoff Foundation, Australia.

  • Karen Campbell is supported by a VicHealth Fellowship, Australia.

  • Andrea de Silva Sanigorski is funded by an NHMRC Capacity Building Program for Child and Adolescent Obesity Prevention, Australia.

Declarations of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Review Advisory Group: Liz Bickerdike (Cochrane Heart Group, Bristol, UK), Margaret Burke (Cochrane Heart Group, Bristol, UK), Tim Lobstein (International Obesity Taskforce, UK), Kellie‐Ann Jolley (Director of Active Communities and Healthy Eating Unit, VicHealth), The Parent's Jury, Melbourne, Australia. The authors would particularly like to thank Tahna Pettman, Rachel Clark, Shayne Zang, Priscilla Lai Han Lunn, Jodie Doyle, Rebecca Conning and Alana Pirrone for their contributions and assistance with searching, data extraction and knowledge translation recommendations. The authors would also like to thank Nicole Martin (Cochrane Heart Review Group Trials Search Coordinator), Fleur van de Wetering (Dutch Cochrane Centre) and Rob Scholten (Dutch Cochrane Centre) for their help with translation of papers in German and Dutch for inclusion in this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Jul 23

Interventions for preventing obesity in children

Review

Tamara Brown, Theresa HM Moore, Lee Hooper, Yang Gao, Amir Zayegh, Sharea Ijaz, Martha Elwenspoek, Sophie C Foxen, Lucia Magee, Claire O'Malley, Elizabeth Waters, Carolyn D Summerbell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub4

2011 Dec 07

Interventions for preventing obesity in children

Review

Elizabeth Waters, Andrea de Silva‐Sanigorski, Belinda J Burford, Tamara Brown, Karen J Campbell, Yang Gao, Rebecca Armstrong, Lauren Prosser, Carolyn D Summerbell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub3

2005 Jul 20

Interventions for preventing obesity in children

Review

Carolyn D Summerbell, Elizabeth Waters, Laurel Edmunds, Sarah AM Kelly, Tamara Brown, Karen J Campbell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub2

2002 Apr 22

Interventions for preventing obesity in children

Review

Karen J Campbell, Elizabeth Waters, Susan O'Meara, Sarah Kelly, Carolyn D Summerbell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001871

Differences between protocol and review

Previous versions of this review recorded the following differences between the protocol and the review : Duration referred to the intervention itself or to a combination of the intervention with a follow‐up phase. However, in light of the very small numbers of studies (n = 3) that met this criterion for the first version of this review (published in 2001) we changed the criteria to include shorter term studies with minimum duration three months. We reviewed our protocol in light of the Cochrane Guidelines for Health Promotion and Public Health Reviews (Armstrong 2007) and changed the inclusion criteria of this study to exclude studies published before 1990.

For this update, the minimum duration of 12 weeks was maintained. In previous versions of the review the 12‐week duration referred to the length of the intervention itself or to a combination of the intervention with a follow‐up phase. For this review update, studies were required to have minimum intervention duration of 12 weeks, meaning that one study that had been included in previous versions of this review was excluded. The reviewers are aware of susceptibility of post hoc questions to bias (Alderson 2005).

In the previous version of this review, and as specified in the protocol, studies were categorised into long‐term (at least one year) and short‐term (at least 12 weeks), referring to the length of the intervention itself or to a combination of the intervention with a follow‐up phase. For this review update, studies were categorised based on target age group (0‐5 years, 6‐12 years, and 13‐18 years) rather than study duration, to enhance utility of this review for decision makers.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.