Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Céphalosporines de troisième génération versus antibiotiques conventionnels pour le traitement de la méningite bactérienne aiguë

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001832.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 octubre 2007see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Kameshwar Prasad

    Correspondencia a: Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

    [email protected]

  • Amit Kumar

    Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • Tarun Singhal

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale‐New Haven Hospital, New Haven, USA

  • Praveen Kumar Gupta

    Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Salmaniya Medical Centre, Manama, Bahrain

Contributions of authors

Kameshwar Prasad (KP) conceptualised the review, developed and wrote the protocol, contributed to the selection of the studies, extraction of data, entry of data and wrote the final draft of the review. He also conducted the inter‐observer agreement analysis and wrote the update of this review.

Amit Kumar (AK) and Tarun Singhal (TS) contributed to the selection of studies, extraction of data, entry of data and review of the final draft. AK and TS entered the data for this update.
PK Gupta (PKG) contributed to entry of data, prepared tables for agreement analysis and provided valuable comments on the final draft of the review. He participated in the selection of new studies during the update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the infrastructure support provided by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; the College of Medicine & Medical Sciences; and The Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain. The review authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Mark Coulthard's contribution in developing the protocol and finding the studies; and Dr Nitin Jain for his contribution in the first publication of the review. Finally, we wish to thank the following people for commenting on the updated draft review: Liz Dooley, Sarah Thorning, Alison Thomas, Mette Nørgaard, Xavier Sáez‐Llorens, Terry Neeman and Diederik van de Beek.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2007 Oct 17

Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis

Review

Kameshwar Prasad, Amit Kumar, Tarun Singhal, Praveen Kumar Gupta

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001832.pub3

2004 Apr 19

Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis

Review

Kameshwar Prasad, Tarun Singhal, Nitin Jain, P K Gupta

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001832.pub2

1999 Jun 05

Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis

Protocol

Kameshwar Prasad, M Coulthard

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001832

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.