Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interne Fixierung verglichen mit Hüftgelenkersatz bei Oberschenkelhalsbrüchen bei Erwachsenen

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001708.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 octubre 2006see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Lesiones óseas, articulares y musculares

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Martyn J Parker

    Correspondencia a: Department of Orthopaedics, Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, UK

    [email protected]

  • Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

    Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Martyn Parker initiated and designed the review, read all the studies, extracted data and checked all text and results. For this and first update of the review, Kurinchiselvum Gurusamy read all the new studies, extracted data and checked the data. Kurinchiselvum Gurusamy also checked the text and presentation of the results. Martyn Parker is the guarantor of this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Martyn Parker has received and may continue to receive financial payment from manufacturing companies of orthopaedic implants for attending meeting organised by these companies and for advising on the design and use of hip fracture implants. Kurinchi Gurusamy has no connection with any manufacturing company. Martyn Parker was the lead investigator in one of the included trials, assessment of eligibility of this trial and the subsequent quality assessment was done independently by the other review author.

Acknowledgements

We thank Joanne Elliott for updating the search strategy and searches, and Lindsey Elstub, Helen Handoll and Rajan Madhok for their help with various aspects of this update. For acknowledgements for former versions, see Appendix 3.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2006 Oct 18

Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults

Review

Martyn J Parker, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001708.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults

Review

Moyra Anne Masson, Martyn J Parker, Stephanie Schoelzel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001708

Differences between protocol and review

Risk of bias assessment was carried out on three items: sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding.

Notes

In Issue 2, 2001 the lead reviewer on the protocol of this review changed to Ms Moyra Masson. The previous lead reviewer, Dr Martyn Parker, remained a co‐reviewer. Some of the outcomes sought were further defined, the proposed statistical analysis changed from Peto odds ratios to relative risks and the methodological quality assessment tool was modified (Item 9).