Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intervencije koje potiču žene da počnu dojiti

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 20 abril 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Lisa Dyson

    Correspondencia a: Mother and Infant Research Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

    [email protected]

  • Felicia M McCormick

    Mother and Infant Research Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

  • Mary J Renfrew

    Mother and Infant Research Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

Contributions of authors

L Dyson: primary review author for independent prescreening, data extraction, quality appraisal, analysis and synthesis of findings.

F McCormick: second author for final review preparation, third author for data extraction. Administrative support for retrieval and translation of papers.

Professor MJ Renfrew: second author for independent trawling of titles and abstracts and checking of prescreening, data extraction, quality appraisal, analysis and synthesis of findings.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Mother and Infant Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK.

External sources

  • Canadian Cochrane Child Health Field Bursary Award, Canada.

  • York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, UK.

Declarations of interest

disponible en

None known.

Acknowledgements

disponible en

Developmental work for this review (development of the conceptual framework for identification and classification of health promotion interventions and the search strategy) was conducted for the purposes of 'A systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to promote the initiation of breastfeeding', funded by and produced for the NHS Research and Development Health Technology Assessment Programme, UK (Fairbank 2000). Co‐authors of this review, not involved in the adaptation and update of this review for the Cochrane Collaboration, were: S O'Meara, Dr AJ Sowden, D Lister‐Sharp (NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK) and Dr M Woolridge (Mother and Infant Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK). An international Advisory Panel of breastfeeding and health promotion experts also provided guidance on the classification of studies and interpretation of findings for the HTA 2000 review. Members of the Advisory Panel were: Rosamund Bryar, Petra Clarke, Leslie Davidson, Elisabeth Helsing, Stuart Logan, Miranda Mugford, Patricia Muirhead, Felicity Savage, Jim Sikorski and Mary Smale.

Searches for studies relevant to this substantive update of this Cochrane review were conducted by Lynn Hampson (Trials Search Co‐ordinator, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Liverpool Women's Hospital Foundation Trust). Professor Martin Bland, University of York, provided statistical advice for this update.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Nov 09

Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding

Review

Olukunmi O Balogun, Elizabeth J O'Sullivan, Alison McFadden, Erika Ota, Anna Gavine, Christine D Garner, Mary J Renfrew, Stephen MacGillivray

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3

2005 Apr 20

Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding

Review

Lisa Dyson, Felicia M McCormick, Mary J Renfrew

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub2

1999 Jul 26

Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding

Protocol

L Fairbank, D Lister‐Sharpe, Mary J Renfrew, Mike Woolridge, Amanda JS Sowden, Susan O'Meara, Lisa Dyson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001688

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.