Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tratamiento corticosteroide para el síndrome nefrótico en niños

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001533.pub6Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 31 agosto 2020see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Riñón y trasplante

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Deirdre Hahn

    Department of Nephrology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia

  • Susan M Samuel

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

  • Narelle S Willis

    Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia

  • Jonathan C Craig

    Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia

    College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

  • Elisabeth M Hodson

    Correspondencia a: Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    [email protected]

    Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia

Contributions of authors

  • Deirdre Hahn: Study selection, quality appraisal, data extraction, data analysis, writing review, updating review.

  • Susan Samuel: Study selection, data extraction, updating review

  • Narelle Willis: Literature search, obtaining articles, organising translation, data extraction, data analysis, data display, updating review.

  • Jonathan Craig: Data analysis, writing review, updating review.

  • Elisabeth Hodson: Study selection, quality appraisal, data extraction, data analysis, writing review, updating review.

Declarations of interest

  • Deirdre Hahn: none known

  • Susan Samuel: none known

  • Narelle Willis: none known

  • Jonathan Craig: none known

  • Elisabeth Hodson: none known

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr John F Knight who contributed to the design, quality assessment, data collection, entry, analysis and interpretation, and writing of early versions of this review (Hodson 2000; Hodson 2005).

The authors would like to thank Professor A Bagga, Professor A Abeyagunawardena, Professor PF Hoyer, Professor UK Jayantha, Dr C Kleinknecht, Professor M Liern, Professor TE Mattoo, Professor O Mishra, Professor RK Sharma, Professor Nicholas Webb and Professor N Yoshikawa for the information that they provided about their studies. The authors wish to thank Professors Barratt, Brodehl, Broyer and Ponticelli for responding to our requests for information about unpublished studies.

The authors are grateful to the following peer reviewers for their time and comments for this review update: William Wong (Director of Paediatric Nephrology, Clinical Director, Paediatric Medical Specialties, Starship Children's Hospital, New Zealand); Damien Noone (Division of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Aug 31

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Review

Deirdre Hahn, Susan M Samuel, Narelle S Willis, Jonathan C Craig, Elisabeth M Hodson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001533.pub6

2015 Mar 18

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Review

Deirdre Hahn, Elisabeth M Hodson, Narelle S Willis, Jonathan C Craig

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001533.pub5

2007 Oct 17

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Review

Elisabeth M Hodson, Narelle S Willis, Jonathan C Craig

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001533.pub4

2005 Jan 24

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Review

Elisabeth M Hodson, John F Knight, Narelle S Willis, Jonathan C Craig

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001533.pub3

2003 Apr 22

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Review

Elisabeth M Hodson, John JF Knight, Narelle S Willis, Jonathan J C Craig

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001533.pub2

2002 Sep 23

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Review

Elisabeth Hodson, John JF Knight, Narelle S Willis, Jonathan C Craig

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001533

Differences between protocol and review

Risk of bias assessment tool has replaced the Quality assessment checklist list used in the previous versions of this review.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, outcome: 1.3 Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of bias for selection bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, outcome: 1.3 Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of bias for selection bias.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, outcome: 2.3 Number with frequent relapses stratified by risk of selection bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, outcome: 2.3 Number with frequent relapses stratified by risk of selection bias.

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 1: Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 1: Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 2: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 2: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 3: Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of bias for selection bias

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 3: Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of bias for selection bias

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 4: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 4: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 5: Adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 5: Adverse events

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 1: Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 1: Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 2: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 2: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 3: Number with frequent relapses stratified by risk of selection bias

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 3: Number with frequent relapses stratified by risk of selection bias

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 4: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 4: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 5: Adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2: Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months, Outcome 5: Adverse events

Comparison 3: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 1: Number of children relapsing by 6 to 12 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 1: Number of children relapsing by 6 to 12 months

Comparison 3: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 2: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 2: Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

Comparison 3: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 3: Number with frequent relapses

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy, Outcome 3: Number with frequent relapses

Comparison 4: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 12 months versus 5 months therapy, Outcome 1: Number with relapse

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Steroid therapy in the first episode: 12 months versus 5 months therapy, Outcome 1: Number with relapse

Comparison 5: Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration, Outcome 1: Relapse at 12 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5: Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration, Outcome 1: Relapse at 12 months

Comparison 5: Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration, Outcome 2: Number with FRNS

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5: Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration, Outcome 2: Number with FRNS

Comparison 5: Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration, Outcome 3: Adverse effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5: Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration, Outcome 3: Adverse effects

Comparison 6: Methylprednisolone in steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: methylprednisone versus prednisolone, Outcome 1: Time to remission

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6: Methylprednisolone in steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: methylprednisone versus prednisolone, Outcome 1: Time to remission

Comparison 6: Methylprednisolone in steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: methylprednisone versus prednisolone, Outcome 2: Number with relapse

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6: Methylprednisolone in steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: methylprednisone versus prednisolone, Outcome 2: Number with relapse

Comparison 7: Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections, Outcome 1: Number with relapse with infection

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7: Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections, Outcome 1: Number with relapse with infection

Comparison 7: Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections, Outcome 2: Number of relapses/patient

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7: Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections, Outcome 2: Number of relapses/patient

Comparison 7: Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections, Outcome 3: Number of relapses/patient at 2 years

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7: Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections, Outcome 3: Number of relapses/patient at 2 years

Comparison 8: Deflazacort versus prednisolone, Outcome 1: Number with remission

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8: Deflazacort versus prednisolone, Outcome 1: Number with remission

Comparison 8: Deflazacort versus prednisolone, Outcome 2: Number of children with relapse by 9 to 12 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8: Deflazacort versus prednisolone, Outcome 2: Number of children with relapse by 9 to 12 months

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 1: Number of children relapsing during therapy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 1: Number of children relapsing during therapy

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 2: Number of children with relapses by 9 to 12 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 2: Number of children with relapses by 9 to 12 months

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 3: Mean time to relapse

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 3: Mean time to relapse

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 4: Mean relapse rate/patient/year

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 4: Mean relapse rate/patient/year

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 5: Cumulative steroid dose

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 5: Cumulative steroid dose

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 6: Mean time to remission

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 6: Mean time to remission

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 7: Serious adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.7

Comparison 9: Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 7: Serious adverse events

Comparison 10: Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses, Outcome 1: Time to remission with different prednisone doses

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10: Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses, Outcome 1: Time to remission with different prednisone doses

Comparison 10: Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses, Outcome 2: Cumulative prednisone dose to achieve remission

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10: Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses, Outcome 2: Cumulative prednisone dose to achieve remission

Comparison 10: Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses, Outcome 3: Number with relapse

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10: Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses, Outcome 3: Number with relapse

Comparison 11: Daily versus alternate‐day prednisone for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 1: Number of relapses in 12 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11: Daily versus alternate‐day prednisone for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 1: Number of relapses in 12 months

Comparison 11: Daily versus alternate‐day prednisone for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 2: Adverse effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11: Daily versus alternate‐day prednisone for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 2: Adverse effects

Comparison 12: Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone, Outcome 1: Relapse at 6 months

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12: Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone, Outcome 1: Relapse at 6 months

Comparison 12: Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone, Outcome 2: Adverse effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12: Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone, Outcome 2: Adverse effects

Comparison 12: Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone, Outcome 3: Prednisone dose

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12: Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone, Outcome 3: Prednisone dose

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 1: Number with relapses

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 1: Number with relapses

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 2: Relapse rate/patient/year

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.2

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 2: Relapse rate/patient/year

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 3: Number with FRNS or SDNS

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.3

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 3: Number with FRNS or SDNS

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 4: Cumulative steroid dose

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.4

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 4: Cumulative steroid dose

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 5: Adverse effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.5

Comparison 13: Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome, Outcome 5: Adverse effects

Summary of findings 1. Steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: 3 months or more versus 2 months of therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: 3 months or more versus 2 months of therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

Patient or population: children with nephrotic syndrome
Setting: paediatric or paediatric nephrology services
Intervention: steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: 3 months or more
Comparison: 2 months of therapy

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Risk with 2 months of therapy

Risk with 3 months or more of therapy

Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months

450 per 1,000

387 per 1,000
(319 to 477)

RR 0.86
(0.71 to 1.06)

976 (8)

⊕⊕⊕⊝1
MODERATE

Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

646 per 1,000

497 per 1,000
(407 to 614)

RR 0.77
(0.63 to 0.95)

1309 (12)

⊕⊕⊝⊝1,2
LOW

Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias: Low risk of selection bias

413 per 1,000

409 per 1,000
(339 to 491)

RR 0.99
(0.82 to 1.19)

585 (4)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias: Unclear or high risk of bias for allocation bias

357 per 1,000

161 per 1,000
(93 to 275)

RR 0.45
(0.26 to 0.77)

220 (3)

⊕⊕⊝⊝ 1,2
LOW

Adverse events: psychological disorders

470 per 1,000

470 per 1,000
(249 to 894)

RR 1.00
(0.53 to 1.90)

456 (4)

⊕⊕⊝⊝2,3
LOW

Adverse events: hypertension

50 per 1,000

89 per 1,000
(28 to 287)

RR 1.78
(0.55 to 5.73)

548 (7)

⊕⊕⊕⊝ 1
MODERATE

Adverse events: Cushing's syndrome

402 per 1,000

450 per 1,000
(305 to 663)

RR 1.12
(0.76 to 1.65)

547 (5)

⊕⊕⊕⊝1
MODERATE

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Significant heterogeneity between studies

2 Some studies at high or unclear risk of bias

3 Few studies included in analyses

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: 3 months or more versus 2 months of therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children
Summary of findings 2. Steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: five to seven months versus three months for nephrotic syndrome in children

Steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months for nephrotic syndrome in children

Patient or population: children with nephrotic syndrome
Settings: paediatric or paediatric nephrology services
Intervention: steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Risk with 3 months of therapy

Risk with 5 to 7 months of therapy

Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months

387 per 1000

282 per 1000
(190 to 422)

RR 0.73
(0.49 to 1.09)

706 (6)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months

696 per 1000

432 per 1000
(313 to 592)

RR 0.62
(0.45 to 0.85)

762 (7)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

Subgroup analysis by risk of bias for number with frequent relapses: low risk of selection bias

440 per 1000

436 per 1000
(326 to 585)

RR 0.99
(0.74 to 1.33)

376 (3)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

Subgroup analysis by risk of bias for number with frequent relapses: Unclear or high risk of selection bias

327 per 1000

157 per 1000
(105 to 236)

RR 0.48
(0.32 to 0.72)

330 (3)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Adverse events: hypertension

126 per 1000

140 per 1000
(90 to 220)

RR 1.11
(0.71 to 1.74)

752 (6)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Adverse events: eye complications

36 per 1000

17 per 1000
(6 to 42)

RR 0.46
(0.18 to 1.17)

614
(5)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Adverse events: Cushingoid appearance

375 per 1000

323 per 1000
(225 to 461)

RR 0.86
(0.61 to 1.23)

762 (6)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Adverse events: psychological disorders

53 per 1000

16 per 1000
(3 to 96)

RR 0.30
(0.05 to 1.83)

505 (4)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Significant heterogeneity between studies

2 Some studies at high or unclear risk of bias

3 Few studies included in analyses

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: five to seven months versus three months for nephrotic syndrome in children
Comparison 1. Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months Show forest plot

8

976

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.71, 1.06]

1.2 Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months Show forest plot

12

1309

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.63, 0.95]

1.3 Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of bias for selection bias Show forest plot

7

805

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.59, 1.06]

1.3.1 Low risk of selection bias

4

585

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.82, 1.19]

1.3.2 Unclear or high risk of selection bias

3

220

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.26, 0.77]

1.4 Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias Show forest plot

11

1108

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.65, 0.95]

1.4.1 Low risk of selection bias

5

637

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.78, 1.06]

1.4.2 Unclear or high risk of selection bias

6

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.49, 0.98]

1.5 Adverse events Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.5.1 Psychological disorders

4

456

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.53, 1.90]

1.5.2 Hypertension

7

548

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.55, 5.73]

1.5.3 Cataracts/eye disorders

6

623

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.11, 1.52]

1.5.4 Retarded growth

4

354

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.25, 1.18]

1.5.5 Cushingoid facies

5

547

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.76, 1.65]

1.5.6 Infections

2

172

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.53, 1.17]

1.5.7 Osteoporosis

3

233

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.06, 3.38]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Steroid therapy in first episode: ≥ 3 months versus 2 months therapy
Comparison 2. Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 Number with frequent relapses by 12 to 24 months Show forest plot

6

706

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.49, 1.09]

2.2 Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months Show forest plot

7

762

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.45, 0.85]

2.3 Number with frequent relapses stratified by risk of selection bias Show forest plot

6

706

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.49, 1.09]

2.3.1 Studies at low risk of selection bias

3

376

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.74, 1.33]

2.3.2 Studies at high or unclear risk of selection bias

3

330

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.32, 0.72]

2.4 Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months stratified by risk of selection bias Show forest plot

7

762

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.45, 0.85]

2.4.1 Studies at low risk of selection bias

3

376

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.69, 1.11]

2.4.2 Studies at high or unclear risk of selection bias

4

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.34, 0.67]

2.5 Adverse events Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.5.1 Hypertension

6

752

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.71, 1.74]

2.5.2 Eye complications

5

614

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.18, 1.17]

2.5.3 Infections

5

702

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.65, 1.46]

2.5.4 Cushingoid appearance

6

762

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.60, 1.23]

2.5.5 Gastrointestinal bleeding

1

140

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.50 [0.26, 8.70]

2.5.6 Addisonian crisis

1

140

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.05, 5.39]

2.5.7 Psychological disorders

4

505

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.05, 1.83]

2.5.8 Growth

3

436

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.36, 1.48]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Steroid therapy in first episode: 5 to 7 months versus 3 months
Comparison 3. Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Number of children relapsing by 6 to 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.2 Number of children relapsing by 12 to 24 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.3 Number with frequent relapses Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Steroid therapy in the first episode: 1 month versus 2 months therapy
Comparison 4. Steroid therapy in the first episode: 12 months versus 5 months therapy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Number with relapse Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Steroid therapy in the first episode: 12 months versus 5 months therapy
Comparison 5. Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

5.1 Relapse at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.2 Number with FRNS Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.3 Adverse effects Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.3.1 Hypertension

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.3.2 Psychological disorders

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.3.3 Cushing's Syndrome

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Steroid therapy in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome: different total doses given over the same duration
Comparison 6. Methylprednisolone in steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: methylprednisone versus prednisolone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

6.1 Time to remission Show forest plot

2

38

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.54 [‐8.46, ‐2.61]

6.2 Number with relapse Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Methylprednisolone in steroid therapy in first episode of nephrotic syndrome: methylprednisone versus prednisolone
Comparison 7. Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

7.1 Number with relapse with infection Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.2 Number of relapses/patient Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.2.1 Number of infection‐related relapses/patient/year

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.2.2 Total relapses (episodes/patient/1 year)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.3 Number of relapses/patient at 2 years Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Daily prednisolone treatment during viral infections
Comparison 8. Deflazacort versus prednisolone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

8.1 Number with remission Show forest plot

2

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.94, 1.24]

8.2 Number of children with relapse by 9 to 12 months Show forest plot

2

63

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.27, 0.78]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Deflazacort versus prednisolone
Comparison 9. Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

9.1 Number of children relapsing during therapy Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1.1 Intermittent dose versus alternate‐day therapy (6 months therapy)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1.2 Daily versus intermittent therapy (2 months therapy)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.2 Number of children with relapses by 9 to 12 months Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.2.1 Intermittent dose versus alternate‐day therapy (6 months therapy)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.2.2 Single versus divided dose therapy (2 months therapy)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.2.3 Intravenous versus oral therapy (6 months therapy)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.2.4 Prolonged oral versus intermittent therapy (2 months therapy)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.3 Mean time to relapse Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.3.1 Single versus divided dose therapy (2 months therapy)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.3.2 Daily versus intermittent therapy (2 months therapy)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.4 Mean relapse rate/patient/year Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.4.1 Single versus divided dose therapy (2 months therapy)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.4.2 Daily versus intermittent therapy (2 months therapy)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.5 Cumulative steroid dose Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.6 Mean time to remission Show forest plot

2

138

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.98, 1.06]

9.7 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

2

138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.18, 0.91]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. Treatment therapy (various) versus standard therapy in relapsing nephrotic syndrome
Comparison 10. Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

10.1 Time to remission with different prednisone doses Show forest plot

2

79

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [‐0.43, 1.86]

10.2 Cumulative prednisone dose to achieve remission Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.3 Number with relapse Show forest plot

2

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.16, 2.68]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. Steroid therapy for relapse: different prednisone doses
Comparison 11. Daily versus alternate‐day prednisone for relapsing nephrotic syndrome

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

11.1 Number of relapses in 12 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.2 Adverse effects Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.2.1 Cushingoid facies

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.2.2 Cataracts

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. Daily versus alternate‐day prednisone for relapsing nephrotic syndrome
Comparison 12. Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

12.1 Relapse at 6 months Show forest plot

2

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.71, 1.49]

12.2 Adverse effects Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.2.1 Cushingoid features

2

144

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.58, 2.32]

12.2.2 Serious infections

2

144

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.20, 1.66]

12.2.3 Eye changes

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.05, 5.57]

12.2.4 Hypertension

2

144

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.05, 1.73]

12.3 Prednisone dose Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.3.1 Induction dose

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.3.2 Cumulative dose over 6 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 12. Weight‐based versus body surface area (BSA)‐based dosing of prednisolone
Comparison 13. Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

13.1 Number with relapses Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1.1 Relapse by 6 months

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1.2 Relapse by 12 months

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1.3 Relapse by 2 years

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1.4 Relapse by 3 years

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.2 Relapse rate/patient/year Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.2.1 Relapse rate at 1 year

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.2.2 Relapse rate at 2 years

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.2.3 Relapse rate at 3 years

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.3 Number with FRNS or SDNS Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.4 Cumulative steroid dose Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.4.1 After 1 year

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.4.2 After 2 years

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.4.3 After 3 years

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.5 Adverse effects Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.5.1 Number with hypertension

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.5.2 Number with growth failure

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 13. Prolonged steroid therapy (7 months) for relapsing nephrotic syndrome