Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Клюква для профилактики инфекций мочевыводящих путей

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Background

Cranberries have been used widely for several decades for the prevention and treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). This is the third update of our review first published in 1998 and updated in 2004 and 2008.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of cranberry products in preventing UTIs in susceptible populations.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (4 June 2013) through contact with the Trials' Search Co‐ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.We contacted companies involved with the promotion and distribution of cranberry preparations and checked reference lists of review articles and relevant studies.

Date of search: July 2012

Selection criteria

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi‐RCTs of cranberry products for the prevention of UTIs.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently assessed and extracted data. Information was collected on methods, participants, interventions and outcomes (incidence of symptomatic UTIs, positive culture results, side effects, adherence to therapy). Risk ratios (RR) were calculated where appropriate, otherwise a narrative synthesis was undertaken. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.

Main results

This updated review includes a total of 24 studies (six cross‐over studies, 11 parallel group studies with two arms; five with three arms, and two studies with a factorial design) with a total of 4473 participants. Ten studies were included in the 2008 update, and 14 studies have been added to this update. Thirteen studies (2380 participants) evaluated cranberry juice/concentrate; nine studies (1032 participants) evaluated cranberry tablets or capsules; one study compared cranberry juice and tablets; and one study compared cranberry capsules and tablets. The comparison/control arms were placebo, no treatment, water, methenamine hippurate, antibiotics, or lactobacillus. Eleven studies were not included in the meta‐analyses because either the design was a cross‐over study and data were not reported separately for the first phase, or there was a lack of relevant data. Data included in the meta‐analyses showed that, compared with placebo, water or not treatment, cranberry products did not significantly reduce the occurrence of symptomatic UTI overall (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.04) or for any the subgroups: women with recurrent UTIs (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.31); older people (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.44); pregnant women (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.17); children with recurrent UTI (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.22); cancer patients (RR 1.15 95% CI 0.75 to 1.77); or people with neuropathic bladder or spinal injury (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.20). Overall heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 55%). The effectiveness of cranberry was not significantly different to antibiotics for women (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.85, 2.02) and children (RR 0.69 95% CI 0.32 to 1.51). There was no significant difference between gastrointestinal adverse effects from cranberry product compared to those of placebo/no treatment (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.27). Many studies reported low compliance and high withdrawal/dropout problems which they attributed to palatability/acceptability of the products, primarily the cranberry juice. Most studies of other cranberry products (tablets and capsules) did not report how much of the 'active' ingredient the product contained, and therefore the products may not have had enough potency to be effective.

Authors' conclusions

Prior to the current update it appeared there was some evidence that cranberry juice may decrease the number of symptomatic UTIs over a 12 month period, particularly for women with recurrent UTIs. The addition of 14 further studies suggests that cranberry juice is less effective than previously indicated. Although some of small studies demonstrated a small benefit for women with recurrent UTIs, there were no statistically significant differences when the results of a much larger study were included. Cranberry products were not significantly different to antibiotics for preventing UTIs in three small studies. Given the large number of dropouts/withdrawals from studies (mainly attributed to the acceptability of consuming cranberry products particularly juice, over long periods), and the evidence that the benefit for preventing UTI is small, cranberry juice cannot currently be recommended for the prevention of UTIs. Other preparations (such as powders) need to be quantified using standardised methods to ensure the potency, and contain enough of the 'active' ingredient, before being evaluated in clinical studies or recommended for use.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Клюква для профилактики инфекций мочевыводящих путей

Клюква (обычно в виде клюквенного сока) используется для профилактики инфекций мочевыводящих путей (ИМП). Клюква содержит вещество, которое может препятствовать прилипанию бактерий к стенкам мочевого пузыря. Это может помочь предотвратить инфекции мочевого пузыря и мочевыводящих путей. Обзор идентифицировал 24 исследования (с 4473 участниками), в которых сравнивались продукты клюквы с контролем или альтернативными методами лечения. Была [выявлена] небольшая тенденция к уменьшению ИМП у людей, принимающих продукты клюквы по сравнению с плацебо или отсутствием лечения, но это не было статистически значимо. Многие участники исследования прекратили пить клюквенный сок, предполагая, что он не может быть приемлемым вмешательством. Клюквенный сок, как оказывается, не обладает значительным преимуществом в профилактике ИМП и не приемлем для длительного применения. Продукты клюквы (такие, как таблетки или капсулы) также были не эффективны (хотя имели такую же результативность, как и при приеме антибиотиков), возможно, из‐за отсутствия полезного действия «активного ингредиента».