Métodos mecánicos para la inducción del trabajo de parto
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 14 marzo 2012see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
For this update M Jozwiak and M Boulvain performed data extraction. M Jozwiak entered the data and M Jozwiak and M Boulvain drafted the review. KWM Bloemenkamp, BW Mol, AJ Kelly and O Irion contributed to the final report of the review.
M Boulvain, C Lohse and O Irion wrote the protocol, did the search and extracted the data of the original review. During the process, a standard strategy to perform the reviews on methods for induction of labour was developed. A standard protocol was written, central search and extraction of data were performed, among others, by A Kelly. A Kelly, C Stan and M Boulvain entered the data. M Boulvain, C Stan and C Lohse wrote the draft review, with A Kelly and O Irion contributing to the final version.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
University of Geneva, Switzerland.
External sources
-
No sources of support supplied
Declarations of interest
Marta Jozwiak, Kitty Bloemenkamp and Ben Willem Mol are involved in an ongoing trial on induction of labour with a Foley catheter compared to induction with prostaglandins (Jozwiak 2009). In future updates Marta Jozwiak, Kitty Bloemenkamp and Ben Willem Mol will not be involved in assessing the Jozwiak 2009 trial for inclusion, assessing risk of bias, or extracting data. These tasks will be carried out by other members of the review team who are not directly involved in the trial.
Acknowledgements
This review was originally conducted by Prof MJNC Keirse. We would like to thank Cornelia Lohse and Catalin Stan for their work on the Boulvain 2001 version of this review; and Benjamin Lamy and Pernille Lau for the translation of articles.
As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by four peers (an editor and three referees who are external to the editorial team) and the Group's Statistical Adviser.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2023 Mar 30 | Mechanical methods for induction of labour | Review | Marieke DT Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol, Michel Boulvain | |
| 2019 Oct 18 | Mechanical methods for induction of labour | Review | Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies‐Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol, Michel Boulvain | |
| 2012 Mar 14 | Mechanical methods for induction of labour | Review | Marta Jozwiak, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Anthony J Kelly, Ben Willem J Mol, Olivier Irion, Michel Boulvain | |
| 2001 Oct 23 | Mechanical methods for induction of labour | Review | Michel Boulvain, Anthony J Kelly, Cornelia Lohse, Catalin M Stan, Olivier Irion | |
Differences between protocol and review
Comparisons of balloon catheter with concurrent oxytocin or prostaglandins versus prostaglandins were added, also comparisons of extra‐amniotic infusion with and without concurrent oxytocin versus prostaglandins were added. A number of not prespecified outcomes relevant to the comparisons made in this review were added (maternal fever, antibiotics during labour, endometritis, chorioamnionitis).
