Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Ограниченное против неограниченного потребление воды для профилактики заболеваемости и смертности у недоношенных детей

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Bell 1980 {published data only}

Bell EF, Warburton D, Stonestreet BS, Oh W. Effect of fluid administration on the development of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus and congestive heart failure in premature infants. New England Journal of Medicine 1980;302:598‐604. [MEDLINE: 1980099478]
Bell EF, Warburton D, Stonestreet BS, Oh W. High‐volume fluid intake predisposes premature infants to necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet 1979;2:90. [MEDLINE: 1979198572]

Kavvadia 2000 {published data only}

Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitriou G, Forsling ML. Randomized trial of two levels of fluid input in the perinatal period ‐‐ effect on fluid balance, electrolyte and metabolic disturbances in ventilated VLBW infants. Acta Paediatrica 2000;89:237‐41. [MEDLINE: 20173131]
Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitriou G, Hooper R. Comparison of the effect of two fluid input regimens on perinatal lung function in ventilated very low birthweight infants. European Journal of Pediatrics 1999;158:917‐22. [MEDLINE: 20009459 20009459]
Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitriou G, Hooper R. Randomised trial of fluid restriction in ventilated very low birthweight infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2000;83:F91‐6. [MEDLINE: 20409236]

Lorenz 1982 {published data only}

Lorenz JM, Kleinman LI, Kotagal UR, Reller MD. Water balance in very low‐birth‐weight infants: relationship to water and sodium intake and effect on outcome. Journal of Pediatrics 1982;101:423‐32. [MEDLINE: 1982268391]
Reller MD, Lorenz JM, Kotagal UR, Meyer RA, Kaplan S. Hemodynamically significant PDA: an echocardiographic and clinical assessment of incidence, natural history, and outcome in very low birth weight infants maintained in negative fluid balance. Pediatric Cardiology 1985;6:17‐24. [MEDLINE: 1985242348]

Tammela 1992 {published data only}

Tammela OKT, Koivisto ME. Fluid restriction for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia? Reduced fluid intake during the first weeks of life improves the outcome of low‐birth‐weight infants. Acta Paediatrica 1992;81:207‐12. [MEDLINE: 1992379368]
Tammela OKT, Lanning FP, Koivisto ME. The relationship of fluid restriction during the 1st month of life to the occurrence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in low birth weight infants: a 1‐year radiological follow up. European Journal of Pediatrics 1992;151:295‐9. [MEDLINE: 1992362652]
Tammela OKT, Lanning FP, Koivisto ME. The relationship of fluid restriction during the 1st month of life to the occurrence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in low birth weight infants: a 1‐year radiological follow up. European Journal of Pediatrics 1992;151:367‐71. [MEDLINE: 1993011369]

von Stockhausen 1980 {published data only}

von Stockhausen HB, Struve M. Die Auswirkungen einer stark unterschiedlichen parenteralen Flussigkeitszufuhr bei Fruh‐ und Neugeborenen in den ersten drei Lebenstagen. Klinische Pädiatrie 1980;192:539‐46. [MEDLINE: 1981171265]

References to studies excluded from this review

Stroustrup 2012 {published data only}

Stroustrup A, Trasande L, Holzman IR. Randomized controlled trial of restrictive fluid management in transient tachypnea of the newborn. Journal of Pediatrics 2012;160(1):38‐43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.06.027; PUBMED: 21839467]

Bell 1978

Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L, Brotherton T. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Annals of Surgery 1978;187(1):1‐7.

Bell 1992

Bell EF. Fluid therapy. In: Sinclair JC, Bracken MB editor(s). Effective Care of the Newborn Infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:59‐72.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Papile 1978

Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. Journal of Pediatrics 1978;92(4):529‐34.

References to other published versions of this review

Bell 1998

Bell EF, Acarregui M. Restricted versus liberal water intake for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000503]

Bell 2001

Bell EF, Acarregui MJ. Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000503]

Bell 2008

Bell EF, Acarregui MJ. Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000503.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Bell 1980

Methods

Water intake was controlled by study protocol until one of six criteria was met: significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), dehydration, death, full enteral feedings, transfer to another hospital, or age 30 days. This was a randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Enrolled infants were divided into eight groups (prognostic stratification) according to three factors thought to influence the risk of PDA: birth weight below or above 1.25 kg, size for gestational age (AGA versus SGA), and respiratory status (presence or absence of significant RDS). Within each of the resulting eight groups, subjects were randomly assigned to either of two treatment groups ('low' and 'high' volume water intake) by opening the next opaque, sealed envelope from the pile for the corresponding prognostic group; the envelope contained the designation of 'low' or 'high' volume group as determined from a table of random numbers prior to enrollment of the first subject in the study. Within each of the eight prognostic groups, the randomization was balanced so that the number of low and high volume infants was equal after every second infant was enrolled into that group. Consecutively enrolled infants in each group were paired for analysis. A two‐sided sequential plan was used, and the outcomes for discordant pairs of infants were plotted on this plan. No confounding variables were identified. No infants were withdrawn from the study. Infants were cared for in unhumidified single‐walled incubators.

Participants

The participants were 170 infants with birth weight ranging from 751 to 2000 g. They were enrolled within the first three days of life. Complete accounting is given for infants in this weight range who contemporaneously were not enrolled in the study. Infants were excluded who by the third day of life had died, were receiving more than half of their water intake enterally, had evidence of PDA or other congenital heart defect, were suspected of having renal anomaly or injury or elevated intracranial pressure, or were clinically dehydrated. Of the 384 consecutive infants admitted with birth weight between 751 and 2000 g, 123 were excluded according to one or more of the aforementioned criteria. Of the remaining 261 eligible infants, consent was not sought in 39 cases and was denied in 52 cases. The remaining 170 infants were enrolled in the study. The mean birth weight was 1.4 kg in both groups, and the mean gestational age was 31 weeks.

Interventions

The subjects' total water intake (enteral plus parenteral) was determined by study protocol. An upper limit was set for the 'low' volume group, and a lower limit was set for the 'high' volume group. These limits depended on birth weight and varied with postnatal age and were raised by 10 ml/kg/d during phototherapy. The mean daily water intake for all subjects throughout the study was 122 ml/kg/d for the low volume group and 169 ml/kg/d for the high volume group.

Outcomes

The outcomes compared between the treatment groups included maximum weight loss, PDA, PDA with signs of congestive heart failure, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and death

Notes

The results of this study were reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (1980; 302:598‐604) except for the detailed limits for water intake in all subgroups, which were published only in a letter in the Lancet (1979; 2:90)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomized, unblinded clinical trial

Enrolled infants were divided into eight groups (prognostic stratification) according to three factors thought to influence the risk of PDA: birth weight below or above 1.25 kg, size for gestational age (AGA versus SGA), and respiratory status (presence or absence of significant RDS)

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Within each of the resulting eight groups, subjects were randomly assigned to either of two treatment groups ('low' and 'high' volume water intake) by opening the next opaque, sealed envelope from the pile for the corresponding prognostic group; the envelope contained the designation of 'low' or 'high' volume group as determined from a table of random numbers prior to enrollment of the first subject in the study. Within each of the eight prognostic groups, the randomization was balanced so that the number of low and high volume infants was equal after every second infant was enrolled into that group. Consecutively enrolled infants in each group were paired for analysis. A two‐sided sequential plan was used, and the outcomes for discordant pairs of infants were plotted on this plan.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No infants were withdrawn from the study

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

Kavvadia 2000

Methods

Water intake was determined by study protocol for first seven days. This was a randomized, unblinded clinical trial

Participants

The participants were 168 infants with birth weight 1500 g or less with required assisted ventilation within 6 hours of birth

Interventions

Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one of two fluid regimens. The water intake prescribed for the infants in the restricted intake group was lower than the liberal group by 20 to 40 ml/kg/d. The water intake could be adjusted according to specific guidelines if an infant in either group developed renal failure, hypotension, or hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy. Overall, the infants in the restricted intake group received 11% less water than the infants in the liberal group.

Outcomes

The outcomes compared between groups were death or survival, duration of assisted ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygen, oxygen dependence at 28 d, oxygen dependence at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, intracranial hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, renal failure, and treatment with pancuronium, inhaled nitric oxide, high‐frequency ventilation, diuretic drugs, and corticosteroids.

Notes

The results of this study were reported in three papers: European Journal of Pediatrics (1999; 158:917‐22), Acta Paediatrica (2000; 89:237‐41), and Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition (2000; 83:F91‐6)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

This was a randomized, unblinded clinical trial

The methods of allocation and randomization were unclear

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Unclear

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Lorenz 1982

Methods

The duration of the study (control of water intake according to study criteria) was for five days after birth. This was a randomized, unblinded clinical trial. The details of randomization are not given, but the subjects were first stratified according to birthweight group (750 to 999 g, 1000 to 1249 g, and 1250 to 1500 g), 5‐minute Apgar score (6 or less versus more than 6), presence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and hospital of birth (inborn versus outborn). No confounding variables were identified in a comparison of demographic features in the two groups. Deviations from the protocol were allowed for infants with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), but the number for whom this occurred is not stated. Seven of 108 infants were withdrawn from the study. Two infants in the liberal water intake group were subsequently found to have non‐PDA congenital heart defects; two in the restricted water intake group were withdrawn because of intestinal obstruction or perforation requiring surgery; and three infants in the restricted water intake group died within 24 hours of enrollment. In addition, 13 infants were excluded from analysis because they had no matching infant (according to the above stratification criteria) who received the other treatment. Infants were cared for in maximally humidified, single‐walled incubators.

Participants

The participants included in the analysis were 88 AGA infants with birth weight between 750 and 1500 g. The 'exclusion' criteria given in the report were actually withdrawal criteria: non‐PDA congenital heart disease, conditions requiring surgery, and death within 24 hours after entry into the study. The mean birth weight in both groups was 1.2 kg, and the mean gestational age was 29 weeks. Thirty‐four infants had 5‐minute Apgar scores of 6 or less; 64 had RDS; and 30 infants were inborn. The gender distribution is not given.

Interventions

The water intake of infants in the restricted water intake group was managed to allow a 3% to 5% loss of weight per day to a maximum of 15%. Their water intake began at 65 to 70 ml/kg/d and increased to 80 ml/kg/d by day 5. In the liberal water intake group, the water intake was managed to allow a 1% to 2% loss of weight per day to a maximum loss of 10%. The water intake in the liberal intake group began at 80 ml./kg on the first day and increased gradually to 140 ml/kg/d by day 5. The actual mean weight losses were 12.9% and 8.8% in the restricted and liberal groups, respectively.

Outcomes

The outcomes examined were maximum weight loss as a percentage of birth weight, water intake and urine output, sodium intake, serum sodium concentration, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, hyponatremia, hypernatremia, significant PDA, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intracranial hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, dehydration, acute renal failure, and death.

Notes

The results of this study were published in two papers: Journal of Pediatrics (1982; 101:423‐32) and Pediatric Cardiology (1985; 6:17‐24)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Randomized, unblinded clinical trial. The details of randomization are not given, but the subjects were first stratified according to birthweight group (750 to 999 g, 1000 to 1249 g, and 1250 to 1500 g), 5‐minute Apgar score (6 or less versus more than 6), presence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and hospital of birth (inborn versus outborn)

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Unclear

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Seven of 108 infants were withdrawn from the study. Two infants in the liberal water intake group were subsequently found to have non‐PDA congenital heart defects; two in the restricted water intake group were withdrawn because of intestinal obstruction or perforation requiring surgery; and three infants in the restricted water intake group died within 24 hours of enrollment. In addition, 13 infants were excluded from analysis because they had no matching infant (according to the above stratification criteria) who received the other treatment.

Tammela 1992

Methods

The duration of the study, that is determination of water intake according to study protocol, was for 28 days beginning on the day of birth. This was a randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was by ordered opening of sealed envelopes containing the assignment to 'dry' or 'control' group as determined from a table of random numbers. There was no prognostic stratification. No confounding variables were identified in a comparison of demographic features in the two groups. No information was given about dropouts or deviations from study protocol except to say that water intake was increased by 10 ml/kg/d for infants in either group who lost more than 5% of their body weight in a day or more than 15% in total since birth. All infants were initially cared for in incubators with 50% relative humidity.

Participants

The participants were 100 infants with birth weight below 1751 g who were admitted to the NICU during the first 24 h of life. During a two‐year period, 100 of 103 consecutive eligible infants were enrolled. Two were excluded because of extreme prematurity (gestational age < 24 weeks), and one was excluded because of failure to obtain parental consent. The mean birthweight in both groups was 1.3 kg, and the mean gestational age was 31 weeks. Thirty‐four infants (34%) were SGA, 31% were delivered by cesarean section, 49% were males, and 91% had endotracheal tubes placed for respiratory assistance.

Interventions

The subjects' total water intake (enteral plus parenteral except replacement of phlebotomy losses with transfused erythrocytes) was determined by the study protocol. The 'dry' group was targeted to receive 50 ml/kg on day 1, 60 ml/kg on day 2, 70 ml/kg on day 3, 80 ml/kg on day 4, 90 ml/kg on day 5, 100 ml/kg on day 6, 120 ml/kg on day 7, and 150 ml/kg thereafter. The 'control' group was targeted to receive 80 ml/kg on day 1, 100 ml/kg on day 2, 120 ml/kg on day 3, 150 ml/kg on days 4 through 7, and 200 ml/kg thereafter. The volumes actually delivered varied slightly from these targets but differed highly significantly between the groups, as planned.

Outcomes

The outcomes compared between the treatment groups included maximum weight loss, age to recovery of birth weight, weight at 28 days (as % of birth weight), hypotension, volume of erythrocytes transfused, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, need for phototherapy, patent ductus arteriosus requiring treatment, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, duration of assisted ventilation, duration of intubation, need for high ventilator pressures, pulmonary air leak, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and death.

Notes

The results of this study were reported in three published papers: Acta Paediatrica (1992; 81:207‐12) and two identical papers in the European Journal of Pediatrics (1992; 151:295‐99 and 1992; 151:367‐71)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Randomization was by ordered opening of sealed envelopes containing the assignment to 'dry' or 'control' group as determined from a table of random numbers. There was no prognostic stratification

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Adequate

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information was given about dropouts or deviations from the study protocol except to say that water intake was increased by 10 ml/kg/d for infants in either group who lost more than 5% of their body weight in a day or more than 15% in total since birth

von Stockhausen 1980

Methods

The duration of the study, that is determination of water intake according to study protocol, was the first three days of life. This was a randomized, unblinded clinical trial. The subjects were randomly assigned to 'low' or 'high' volume of water intake for the first three days of life. The details of randomization are not given, and there was no prognostic stratification. Males outnumbered females in both groups, but the preponderance of males was greater in the low volume group (23/28 versus 17/28). The low group also had slightly higher mean birth weight (2.0 versus 1.9 kg) and gestational age (34.6 versus 34.2 weeks). No information was given about dropouts or deviations from the study protocol. All infants were cared for in incubators with maximal humidity.

Participants

The participants were 56 newborn infants, most of whom were premature, all enrolled on the first day of life. Five of these infants required intermittent positive‐pressure ventilation, and six others required continuous positive airway pressure. No information is given on exclusion criteria.

Interventions

The subjects' total intake was determined by study protocol for the first three days of life. The 'low' volume group was given 60 ml/kg/d, and the 'high' volume group was given 150 ml/kg/d.

Outcomes

The outcomes reported include death, maximum weight loss, urine volume, osmolal clearance, creatinine clearance, free water clearance, net acid excretion, sodium clearance, chloride clearance, and a number of laboratory values, including urinary osmolality, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphate, creatinine, urea, and uric acid. Also reported were hematocrit, blood osmolality, and serum concentrations of sodium, chloride, calcium, phosphate, creatinine, urea, and bilirubin.

Notes

No information is given on the incidence of PDA, NEC, or BPD

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Randomized, unblinded clinical trial. The subjects were randomly assigned to 'low' or 'high' volume of water intake for the first three days of life. The details of randomization are not given, and there was no prognostic stratification

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Unclear

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded clinical trial

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information was given about dropouts or deviations from study protocol

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Stroustrup 2012

Prospective randomized controlled trial of 64 late preterm and term neonates diagnosed with TTN at a single tertiary care hospital in the United States. Infants were randomized to receive standard fluid management or mild fluid restriction

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Restricted versus liberal water intake

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Weight loss (%) Show forest plot

3

326

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.82, 3.07]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 1 Weight loss (%).

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 1 Weight loss (%).

2 Dehydration Show forest plot

2

258

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.43 [0.71, 8.28]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 2 Dehydration.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 2 Dehydration.

3 Patent ductus arteriosus Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.37, 0.73]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 3 Patent ductus arteriosus.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 3 Patent ductus arteriosus.

4 Necrotizing enterocolitis Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.21, 0.87]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 4 Necrotizing enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 4 Necrotizing enterocolitis.

5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.63, 1.14]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades) Show forest plot

3

356

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.48, 1.14]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades).

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades).

7 Death Show forest plot

5

582

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.54, 1.23]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 7 Death.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 7 Death.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 1 Weight loss (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 1 Weight loss (%).

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 2 Dehydration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 2 Dehydration.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 3 Patent ductus arteriosus.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 3 Patent ductus arteriosus.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 4 Necrotizing enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 4 Necrotizing enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades).

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 7 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 7 Death.

Comparison 1. Restricted versus liberal water intake

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Weight loss (%) Show forest plot

3

326

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.82, 3.07]

2 Dehydration Show forest plot

2

258

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.43 [0.71, 8.28]

3 Patent ductus arteriosus Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.37, 0.73]

4 Necrotizing enterocolitis Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.21, 0.87]

5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.63, 1.14]

6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades) Show forest plot

3

356

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.48, 1.14]

7 Death Show forest plot

5

582

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.54, 1.23]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Restricted versus liberal water intake