Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Apport d'eau restrictif versus libéral pour prévenir la morbidité et la mortalité chez les nouveau‐nés prématurés

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000503.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 04 diciembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neonatología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Edward F Bell

    Correspondencia a: Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA

    [email protected]

  • Michael J Acarregui

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA

Contributions of authors

The contact review author (EFB) corresponded with the editors, compiled the studies to be considered for inclusion in the review, identified studies meeting the search criteria, assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, and composed the text of the review.

The co‐review author (MJA) identified studies meeting the search criteria, assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, and reviewed the text.

The 2010 review and the 2014 update were conducted centrally by the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group staff (Yolanda Montagne, Diane Haughton, Colleen Ovelman and Roger Soll). This update was reviewed and approved by EFB.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.

    Editorial support of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN275201100016C

Declarations of interest

None

Acknowledgements

The Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded in part with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN267200603418C. 

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Dec 04

Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

Review

Edward F Bell, Michael J Acarregui

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000503.pub3

2008 Jan 23

Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

Review

Edward F Bell, Michael J Acarregui

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000503.pub2

2001 Jul 23

Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

Review

Edward F Bell, M J Acarregui

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000503

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 1 Weight loss (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 1 Weight loss (%).

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 2 Dehydration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 2 Dehydration.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 3 Patent ductus arteriosus.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 3 Patent ductus arteriosus.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 4 Necrotizing enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 4 Necrotizing enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades).

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 7 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Restricted versus liberal water intake, Outcome 7 Death.

Comparison 1. Restricted versus liberal water intake

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Weight loss (%) Show forest plot

3

326

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.82, 3.07]

2 Dehydration Show forest plot

2

258

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.43 [0.71, 8.28]

3 Patent ductus arteriosus Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.37, 0.73]

4 Necrotizing enterocolitis Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.21, 0.87]

5 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia Show forest plot

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.63, 1.14]

6 Intraventricular hemorrhage (all grades) Show forest plot

3

356

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.48, 1.14]

7 Death Show forest plot

5

582

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.54, 1.23]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Restricted versus liberal water intake