Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Antibiotika gegen akute Mittelohrentzündung bei Kindern

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Appelman 1991 {published data only}

Appelman CL, Claessen JQ, Touw Otten FW, Hordijk GJ, de Melker RA. Co‐amoxiclav in recurrent acute otitis media: placebo controlled study. BMJ 1991;303:1450‐2.
Appelman CL, Claessen JQ, Touw Otten FW, Hordijk GJ, de Melker RA. Severity of inflammation of tympanic membrane as predictor of clinical course of recurrent acute otitis media. BMJ 1993;306:895.
Claessen JQ, Appelman CL, Touw Otten FW, de Melker RA, Hordijk GJ. Persistence of middle ear dysfunction after recurrent acute otitis media. Clinical Otolaryngology 1994;19:35‐40.

Burke 1991 {published data only}

Burke P, Bain J, Robinson D, Dunleavey J. Acute red ear in children: controlled trial of non‐antibiotic treatment in general practice. BMJ 1991;303:558‐62.

Damoiseaux 2000 {published data only}

Bezáková N, Damoiseaux RA, Hoes AW, Schilder AG, Rovers MM. Recurrence up to 3.5 years after antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in very young Dutch children: survey of trial participants. BMJ 2009;338:b2525.
Damoiseaux RAMJ, van Balen FAM, Hoes AW, Verheij TJM, de Melker RA. Primary care based randomised, double blind trial of amoxicillin versus placebo for acute otitis media in children aged under 2 years. BMJ 2000;320:350‐4.

Halsted 1968 {published data only}

Halsted C, Lepow ML, Balassanian N, Emmerich J, Wolinsky E. Otitis media: clinical observation, microbiology and evaluation of therapy. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1968;115(5):542‐51.

Hoberman 2011 {published data only}

Hoberman A, Paradise JL, Rockette HE, Shaikh N, Wald ER, Kearney DH, et al. Treatment of acute otitis media in children under 2 years of age. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;364(2):105‐15.
Paradise JL, Hoberman A, Rockette HE, Shaikh N. Treating acute otitis media in young children: what constitutes success?. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2013;32(7):745‐7.

Howie 1972 {published data only}

Howie VM, Ploussard JH. Efficacy of fixed combination antibiotics versus separate components in otitis media: effectiveness of erythromycin estolate, triple sulfonamide, ampicillin, erythromycin estolate‐triple sulfonamide, and placebo in 280 patients with acute otitis media under two and one‐half years of age. Clinical Pediatrics 1972;11(4):205‐14.

Kaleida 1991 {published data only}

Kaleida PH, Casselhrant ML, Rockette HE, Paradise JL, Bluestone CD, Blatter MM, et al. Amoxicillin or myringotomy or both for acute otitis media: results of a randomized clinical trial. Paediatrics 1991;87(4):466‐74.

Laxdal 1970 {published data only}

Laxdal OE, Merida J, Jones RHT. Treatment of acute otitis media: a controlled study of 142 children. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1970;102(3):263‐8.

Le Saux 2005 {published data only}

Le Saux N, Gaboury I, Baird M, Klassen TP, MacCormick J, Blanchard C, et al. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled noninferiority trial of amoxicillin for clinically diagnosed acute otitis media in children 6 months to 5 years of age. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2005;172(3):335‐41.

Little 2001 {published data only}

Little P, Gould C, Williamson I, Moore M, Warner G, Dunleavey J. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of two prescribing strategies for childhood acute otitis media. BMJ 2001;322:336‐42.
Little P, Moore M, Warner G, Dunleavy J, Williamson I. Longer term outcomes from a randomised trial of prescribing strategies in otitis media. British Journal of General Practitioners 2006;56(524):176‐82.

McCormick 2005 {published data only}

McCormick DP, Chonmaitree T, Pittman C, Saeed K, Friedman NR, Uchida T, et al. Nonsevere acute otitis media: a clinical trial comparing outcomes of watchful waiting versus immediate antibiotic treatment. Pediatrics 2005;115(6):1455‐65.

Mygind 1981 {published data only}

Mygind N, Meistrup‐Larsen K‐I, Thomsen J, Thomsen VF, Josefsson K, Sorensen H. Penicillin in acute otitis media: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial. Clinical Otolaryngology 1981;6:5‐13.
Thomsen J, Meistrup‐Larsen KI, Sorensen H, Larsen PK, Mygind N. Penicillin and acute otitis: short and long term results. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Supplement 1980;89:271‐4.

Neumark 2007 {published data only}

Neumark T, Molstad S, Rosen C, Persson L, Torngren A, Brudin L, et al. Evaluation of phenoxymethylpenicillin treatment of acute otitis media in children aged 2‐16. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2007;25:166‐71.

Spiro 2006 {published data only}

Spiro DM, Tay K, Arnold DH, Dziura J, Baker M, Shapiro ED. Wait‐and‐see prescription for the treatment of acute otitis media. JAMA 2006;296(10):1235‐41.

Tähtinen 2011 {published data only}

Tähtinen PA, Laine MK, Huovinen P, Jalava J, Ruuskanen O, Ruohola A. A placebo‐controlled trial of antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;364(2):116‐26.

Tapiainen 2014 {published data only}

Tapiainen T, Kujala T, Renko M, Koivunen P, Kontiokari T, Kristo A, et al. Effect of antimicrobial treatment of acute otitis media on the daily disappearance of middle ear effusion: a placebo‐controlled trial. JAMA Pediatrics 2014;168(7):635‐41.

Thalin 1985 {published data only}

Thalin A, Densert O, Larsson A, Lyden E, Ripa T. Is penicillin necessary in the treatment of acute otitis media?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acute and Secretory Otitis Media 1985, Jerusalem. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications, 1985:441‐6.

van Buchem 1981a {published data only}

van Buchem FL, Dunk JHM, van't Hof MA. Therapy of acute otitis media: myringotomy, antibiotics or neither? A double‐blind study in children. Lancet 1981;2:883‐7.

van Buchem 1981b {published data only}

van Buchem FL, Dunk JHM, van't Hof MA. Therapy of acute otitis media: myringotomy, antibiotics or neither? A double‐blind study in children. Lancet 1981;2:883‐7.

References to studies excluded from this review

Arguedas 2011 {published data only}

Arguedas A, Soley C, Kamicker BJ, Jorgensen DM. Single‐dose extended‐release azithromycin versus a 10‐day regimen of amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of children with acute otitis media. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2011;15(4):e240‐8.

Casey 2012 {published data only}

Casey JR, Block SL, Hedrick J, Almudevar A, Pichichero ME. Comparison of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid high dose with cefdinir in the treatment of acute otitis media. Drugs 2012;72:1991‐7.

Chaput 1982 {published data only}

Chaput de Saintonge DM, Levine DF, Temple Savage IT, Burgess GW, Sharp J, Mayhew SR, et al. Trial of three‐day and ten‐day courses of amoxycillin in otitis media. British Medical Journal Clinical Research Edition 1982;284(6322):1078‐81.

Engelhard 1989 {published data only}

Engelhard D, Strauss N, Jorczak‐Sarni L, Cohen D, Sacjs TG, Shapiro M. Randomised study of myringotomy, amoxycillin/clavulanate, or both for acute otitis media in infants. Lancet 1989;2(8655):141‐3.

Liu 2011 {published data only}

Liu P, Fang AF, LaBadie RR, Crownover PH, Arguedas AG. Comparison of azithromycin pharmacokinetics following single oral doses of extended‐release and immediate‐release formulations in children with acute otitis media. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2011;55(11):5022‐6.

Ostfeld 1987 {published data only}

Ostfeld E, Segal J, Kaufstein M, Gelernter I. Management of acute otitis media without primary administration of systemic antimicrobial agents. Recent advances in otitis media. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium. Toronto: BC Decker, 1987:235‐9.

Rudberg 1954 {published data only}

Rudberg RD. Acute otitis media: comparative therapeutic results of sulphonamide and penicillin administered in various forms. Acta Oto‐Laryngologica 1954;113(Suppl):1‐79.

Ruohola 2003 {published data only}

Ruohola A, Heikkinen T, Meurman O, Puhakka T, Lindblad N, Ruuskanen O. Antibiotic treatment of acute otorrhea through tympanostomy tube: randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled study with daily follow‐up. Pediatrics 2003;111(5):1061‐7.

Sarrell 2003 {published data only}

Sarrell EM, Cohen HA, Kahan E. Naturopathic treatment for ear pain in children. Pediatrics 2003;111(5):574‐9.

Tähtinen 2012 {published data only}

Tähtinen PA, Laine MK, Ruuskanen O, Ruohola A. Delayed versus immediate antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2012;31(12):1227‐32.

van Buchem 1985 {published data only}

van Buchem F, Peeters M, Van' t Hof M. Acute otitis media: a new treatment strategy. BMJ 1985;290:1033‐7.

ACTRN12608000424303 {published data only}

ACTRN12608000424303. Antibiotics for asymptomatic acute otitis media. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12608000424303 (accessed 26 November 2014).

AAP 2013

American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians. Clinical practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics 2013;131(3):e964‐99.

Akkerman 2005

Akkerman AE, Kuyvenhoven MM, van der Wouden JC, Verhij TJM. Analysis of under‐and overprescribing of antibiotics in acute otitis media in general practice. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005;56:569‐74.

Arnold 2005

Arnold SR, Straus SE. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003539]

Arola 1990

Arola M, Ruuskanen O, Ziegler T, Mertsola J, Näntö‐Salonen K, Putto‐Laurila A, et al. Clinical role of respiratory virus infection in acute otitis media. Pediatrics 1990;86:848‐55.

Barkai 2009

Barkai G, Leibovitz E, Givon‐Lavi N, Dagan R. Potential contribution by nontypable Haemophilus influenzae in protracted and recurrent acute otitis media. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2009;28:466‐71.

Berman 1995

Berman S. Otitis media in developing countries. Pediatrics 1995;96:126‐31.

Casey 2013

Casey JR, Kaur R, Friedel VC, Pichichero ME. Acute otitis media otopathogens during 2008 to 2010 in Rochester, New York. Pediatic Infectious Disease Journal 2013;32(8):805‐9.

Cates 1999

Cates C. An evidence based approach to reducing antibiotic use in children with acute otitis media: controlled before and after the study. BMJ 1999;318:715‐6. [The handout is available at http://www.cates.cwc.net/]

Chao 2008

Chao JH, Kunkov S, Reyes LB, Lichten S, Crain EF. Comparison of two approaches to observation therapy for acute otitis media in the emergency department. Pediatrics 2008;121:31352‐e6.

Chonmaitree 1992

Chonmaitree T, Owen MJ, Patel JA, Hedgpeth D, Horlick D, Howie VM. Effect of viral respiratory tract infection on outcome of acute otitis media. Journal of Pediatrics 1992;120:856‐62.

Coker 2010

Coker TR, Chan LS, Newberry SJ, Limbos MA, Suttorp MJ, Shekelle PG, et al. Diagnosis, microbial epidemiology, and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in children: a systematic review. JAMA 2010;304(19):2161‐9.

Dickersin 1994

Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309(6964):1286‐91.

Froom 2001

Froom J, Culpepper L, Green LA, de Melker RA, Grob P, Heeren T, et al. A cross‐national study of acute otitis media: risk factors, severity, and treatment at initial visit. Report from the International Primary Care Network (IPCN) and the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN). Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2001;14:406‐17.

Gillies 2014

Gillies M, Ranakusuma A, Hoffmann T, Thorning S, McGuire T, Glasziou P, et al. Common harms from amoxicillin: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized placebo‐controlled trials for any indication. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2014 Nov 17 [Epub ahead of print]:.. [DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.140848]

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Klein 1989

Klein JO. Epidemiology of otitis media. Pediatic Infectious Disease Journal 1989;8(Suppl 1):89.

Koopman 2008

Koopman L, Hoes AW, Glasziou PP, Appelman CL, Burke P, McCormick DP, et al. Antibiotic therapy to prevent the development of asymptomatic middle ear effusion in children with acute otitis media. Archives of Otolaryngology ‐ Head and Neck Surgery 2008;134(2):128‐32.

Kozyrskyj 2010

Kozyrskyj A, Klassen TP, Moffatt M, Harvey K. Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001095]

Lefebvre 2011

Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Little 2006

Little P, Moore M, Warner G, Dunleavy J, Williamson I. Longer term outcomes from a randomised trial of prescribing strategies in otitis media. British Journal of General Practice 2006;56:176‐82.

McCormick 2007

McCormick DP, Chandler SM, Chonmaitree T. Laterality of acute otitis media: different clinical and microbiologic characteristics. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2007;26:583‐8.

Rosenfeld 1994

Rosenfeld RM, Vertrees JE, Carr J, Cipolle RJ, Uden DL, Giebink GS, et al. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs for acute otitis media: meta‐analysis of 5400 children from thirty‐three randomized trials. Journal of Pediatrics 1994;124:355‐67.

Rothman 2003

Rothman R, Owens T, Simel D. Does this child have acute otitis media?. JAMA 2003;290(12):1633‐40.

Rovers 2006

Rovers MM, Glasziou P, Appelman CL, Burke P, McCormick DP, Damoiseaux RA, et al. Antibiotics for acute otitis media: a meta‐analysis with individual patient data. Lancet 2006;368:1429‐35.

Spurling 2013

Spurling GKP, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Foxlee R, Farley R. Delayed antibiotics for respiratory infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub4]

Stool 1989

Stool SE, Field MJ. The impact of otitis media. Pediatic Infectious Disease Journal 1989;8(Suppl 1):11‐4.

Teele 1989

Teele DW, Klein JO, Rosner B. Epidemiology of otitis media during first seven years of life in children in greater Boston: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1989;160:83‐94.

References to other published versions of this review

Glasziou 1995

Glasziou PP, Hayem M, Del Mar CB. A meta‐analysis of treatments for acute otitis media: antibiotic vs placebo, short vs long antibiotic course, and myringotomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1995, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000219]

Glasziou 1997

Glasziou PP, Hayem M, Del Mar CB. Treatments for acute otitis media in children: antibiotic versus placebo. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1997, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000219]

Glasziou 1999

Glasziou PP, Hayem M, Del Mar CB. Antibiotics versus placebo for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub2]

Glasziou 2005

Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB, Sanders SL, Hayem M. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub2]

Sanders 2009

Sanders SL, Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB, Rovers MM. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub2]

Venekamp 2013

Venekamp RP, Sanders S, Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB, Rovers MM. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub3]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Appelman 1991

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, computer‐generated random numbers

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes, blinding procedure not described

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 126 children (N = 121 children included in analysis)

Age ‐ between 6 months and 12 years
Setting ‐ general practice and secondary care in the Netherlands; confirmation of diagnosis and randomisation were done by otorhinolaryngologists

Inclusion criteria ‐ recurrence of acute otitis media (AOM) characterised by a (sub)acute onset, otalgia and otoscopic signs of middle‐ear infection within 4 weeks to 12 months of the previous attack

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 4 weeks prior to randomisation, previous participation in this study, contraindication for penicillin, serious concurrent disease that necessitated antibiotic treatment

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ amoxicillin/clavulanate (weight tailored dose) for 7 days; N = 70 (N = 67 included in analysis)
C ‐ matching placebo for 7 days; N = 56 (N = 54 included in analysis)
Use of additional medication ‐ each child was given analgesics (paracetamol) as long as earache was present and decongestive nose drops for 1 week

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ treatment failure (i.e. presence of otalgia or fever > 38 °C or both at 3 days)

Assessment by (blinded) general practitioner at 3 days on the presence or absence of fever (> 38 °C) and otalgia and 14 days on the presence or otorrhoea

Assessment by otorhinolaryngologist at 1 month of otoscopy, tympanometry and in children > 3 years of age an audiogram

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated random numbers

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Treatment allocated by otolaryngologist (independent to trial personnel); treatment code placed in sealed envelopes

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Identical taste and appearance to amoxicillin/clavulanate and placebo not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

Loss to follow‐up ‐ treatment: N = 3 (4%) and placebo: N = 2 (4%) due to loss of their registration forms

Burke 1991

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, computer‐generated random numbers

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ not described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 232 children

Age ‐ between 3 and 10 years
Setting ‐ general practice; 48 general practitioners in 17 general practices in Southampton, Bristol and Portsmouth (UK)

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute earache and at least 1 abnormal eardrum

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment or acute otitis media (AOM) < 2 weeks prior to randomisation, strong indication for antibiotic treatment according to general practitioner, contraindication for amoxicillin, serious chronic conditions

Baseline characteristics ‐ slight imbalance in gender (boys treated with antibiotics versus boys treated with placebo = 52% versus 42%) and figure 1 appears to demonstrate that fewer children were crying at baseline (0 hours) in the amoxicillin arm compared with the placebo arm, suggesting a failure of randomisation

Interventions

Tx ‐ amoxicillin 250 mg 3 times daily for 7 days; N = 114 (N = 114 included in analysis for short‐term outcome)
C ‐ matching placebo 3 times daily for 7 days; N = 118 (N = 118 included in analysis for short‐term outcome)
Use of additional medication ‐ analgesics (paracetamol 120 mg/5 mL) for pain as needed

Outcomes

Main outcomes were divided into short‐term, middle‐term and long‐term:

Short‐term ‐ (a) duration of symptoms; (b) use of analgesics (assessed by weighing bottles); (c) clinical signs at 1 week; (d) incidence of complications; (e) treatment failure (i.e. second‐line antibiotics were required)

Middle‐term ‐ (a) tympanometry findings at 1 and 3 months

Long‐term ‐ (b) number of AOM episodes in 12 months; (b) number of specialist referrals

Home visits by researcher at day 1, days 4 to 6 and general practitioner visit at day 7

Symptom diary kept by parents for 21 days

Notes

It is not clear whether the "discharging ears" in Table 1 should be included as perforations, we now included the number of perforations as summarised in Table 2 in our analysis

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated random numbers

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation was carried out independently of the investigators; randomisation code was kept sealed and was unknown to any of the participants in the study

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes; baseline characteristics ‐ imbalance for gender and crying

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Each bottle was identified only by number

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Loss to follow‐up ‐ not described; all randomised patients included in short‐outcome analysis

Damoiseaux 2000

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, computerised 2 block randomisation

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 240 children (N = 212 children included in analysis)

Age ‐ between 6 months and 2 years
Setting ‐ general practice; 53 general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute otitis media (AOM) defined as infection of the middle ear of acute onset and a characteristic eardrum picture (injection along the handle of the malleus and the annulus of the tympanic membrane or a diffusely red or bulging eardrum) or acute otorrhoea. In addition 1 or more symptoms of acute infection (fever, recent earache, general malaise, recent irritability)

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 4 weeks prior to randomisation, contraindication for amoxicillin, comprised immunity, craniofacial abnormalities, Down's syndrome or being entered in this study before

Baseline characteristics ‐ slight imbalance in the prevalence of recurrent AOM, regular attendance at a daycare centre and parental smoking; logistic regression was used to adjust for these imbalances

Interventions

Tx ‐ amoxicillin suspension 40 mg/kg/day 3 times daily for 10 days; N = 117 (N = 107 included in analysis for short‐term outcome)
C ‐ matching placebo suspension for 10 days; N = 123 (N = 105 included in analysis for short‐term outcome)
Use of additional medication ‐ all children received decongestive nose drops for 7 days; analgesics (paracetamol, children < 1 year: 120 mg suppository, > 1 year: 240 mg suppository) was allowed

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ persistent symptoms at day 4: assessed by the doctor and defined as persistent earache, fever > 38 °C, crying or being irritable. Additionally, prescription of another antibiotic because of clinical deterioration before the first follow‐up visit was to be considered a persistent symptom

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) clinical treatment failure at day 11 (i.e. persistent fever, earache, crying, being irritable or no improvement of tympanic membrane (including perforation); (b) duration of fever, pain or crying; (c) mean number of doses analgesics given; (d) adverse effects mentioned in diaries; (e) percentage of children with middle‐ear effusion at 6 weeks (i.e. combined otoscopy and tympanometry)

Follow‐up visits at the GP's clinic were scheduled at day 4 and 11; home visit at 6 weeks by the researcher collecting data of symptoms, referrals and both otoscopy and tympanometry was performed

Parents were instructed to keep a symptom diary for 10 days

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computerised 2 block randomisation

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation was carried out independently of the investigators; randomisation code was kept in pharmacy of the University Medical Centre Utrecht

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ slight imbalance, logistic regression was used to adjust for imbalances in prognostic factors

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Placebo suspension with same taste and appearance as amoxicillin

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Loss to follow‐up/exclusion from analysis (received other antibiotics or had grommets inserted) ‐ treatment: N = 10 (9%) and placebo: N = 18 (15%). However, for primary analysis of symptoms at day 4 all randomised patients were included

Halsted 1968

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, pre‐determined code, which was unknown to physician; method of random sequence generation unclear

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 106 children (N = 89 children included in analysis; N = 12 children were excluded because they did not adhere to the double‐blind protocol; N = 5 children lost to follow‐up or excluded because of persistent fever, development of complication requiring antibiotic treatment or if group A streptococci was cultured from the middle ear)

Age ‐ between 2 months and 5.5 years
Setting ‐ secondary care: paediatric department of Cleveland (USA)

Inclusion criteria ‐ AOM based on otoscopic findings; most of the cases had bulging membrane with loss of normal light reflex and landmarks, in a few the eardrum was only diffusely red

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 10 days prior to randomisation, associated bacterial infection requiring antibiotic treatment, rupture of tympanic membrane, contraindication for study drugs

Baseline characteristics ‐ not described

Interventions

Tx 1 ‐ ampicillin 100 mg/kg/day 4 daily for 10 days; N = ? (N = 30 included in analysis)

Tx 2 ‐ pheneticillin 30 mg/kg/day 4 daily and sulfisoxazole 150 mg/kg/day 4 daily for 10 days; N = ? (N = 32 included in analysis)
C ‐ placebo for 10 days; N = ? (N = 27 included in analysis)
Use of additional medication ‐ phenylephrine nose drops and aspirin for children over 6 months was prescribed as necessary; no other medications were employed

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ early improvement defined as defervescence and decrease of symptoms at 24 to 72 hours

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) late improvement defined as resolution of symptoms and normal tympanic membrane at 14 to 18 days, (b) bacteriological cultures

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Pre‐determined code, which was unknown to physician; method of random sequence generation unclear

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Identical taste and appearance to antibiotics and placebo not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Reasons described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Hoberman 2011

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, stratified block randomisation with computer‐generated randomisation lists

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 291 (N = 291 included in analysis)

Age ‐ between 6 months and 2 years
Setting ‐ secondary care; children's hospital of Pittsburgh and a private paediatric clinic in Kittanning (USA)

Inclusion criteria ‐ children needed to have received at least 2 doses of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and to have acute otitis media (AOM) as defined on the basis of 3 criteria: (a) the onset (i.e. within the preceding 48 hours) of symptoms that parents rated with a score of at least 3 on the acute otitis media ‐ severity of symptoms (AOM‐SOS) scale (on which scores range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms), (b) the presence of middle‐ear effusion and (c) moderate or marked bulging of the tympanic membrane or slight bulging accompanied by either otalgia or marked erythema of the membrane

All the study clinicians were otoscopists who had successfully completed an otoscopic validation programme

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 96 hours prior to randomisation, concomitant acute illness (e.g. pneumonia) or a chronic illness (e.g. cystic fibrosis), contraindication to amoxicillin, presence of otalgia for more than 48 hours, perforation of the tympanic membrane

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ amoxicillin‐clavulanate 90‐6.4 mg/kg daily in 2 doses for 10 days; N = 144 (N = 139 were assessed at day 4 to 5)
C ‐ matching placebo in 2 doses for 10 days; N = 147 (N = 142 were assessed at day 4 to 5)
Use of additional medication ‐ acetaminophen (paracetamol) as needed for symptom relief

At each visit children were categorised as having met the criteria for either clinical success or clinical failure

Children who met the criteria for clinical failure were treated with a standardised 10‐day regimen of orally administered amoxicillin (90 mg/kg daily) and cefixime (8 mg/kg daily)

Outcomes

Primary outcomes ‐ (a) time to resolution of symptoms (i.e. time to the first recording of an AOM‐SOS score of 0 or 1 and the time to the second of 2 successive recordings of that score; (b) symptom burden over time (i.e. mean AOM‐SOS score over time each day for the first 7 days of follow‐up and groups' weighted mean scores for that period)

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) clinical failure at day 4 to 5; (b) clinical failure at day 10 to 12; (c) use of acetaminophen (paracetamol); (d) occurrence of adverse events; (e) nasopharyngeal colonisation rates; (f) use of healthcare resources; (g) relapses

Clinical failure was defined at or before the day 4 to 5 visit as either a lack of substantial improvement in symptoms, a worsening of signs on otoscopic examination, or both and at the day 10 to 12 visit as the failure to achieve complete or nearly complete resolutions of symptoms and otoscopic signs, without regard to the persistence of resolution of middle‐ear effusion. Once a child had met the criteria for clinical failure, he or she remained in that category for the analysis

Daily symptoms were assessed with the use of a structured interview of 1 of the child's parents until the first follow‐up visit; visits were scheduled at day 4 or 5, day 10 to 12 (end of treatment) and at day 21 to 25

Patients were asked to complete a diary twice a day for 3 days and once a day thereafter

Notes

This study did not report pain data that could be used for the review comparing antibiotics with placebo

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Stratified block randomisation with computer‐generated randomisation lists

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A pharmacist (independent of the trial team) provided masked study medication bottles with amoxicillin/clavulanate or placebo

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Placebo with same taste and appearance as amoxicillin‐clavulanate

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

Children not assessed at day 4 to 5 ‐ treatment: N = 5 (3%) and placebo: N = 5 (3%). All randomised patients included in analysis

Howie 1972

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, method of randomisation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ not described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 280 children

Age ‐ 2.5 years or younger
Setting ‐ secondary care: general paediatric practice in Huntsville (USA)

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute otitis media (AOM) as clinically diagnosed by the participating paediatricians

Exclusion criteria ‐ if researchers felt that parents would not accept diagnostic aspiration, when condition of the patient required immediate antibiotic treatment

Baseline characteristics ‐ not described

Interventions

Tx 1 ‐ erythromycin estolate 125 mg/5 mL ‐ triple sulphonamide suspension 0.5 g/5 mL; N = 80

Tx 2 ‐ ampicillin 250 mg/5 mL; N = 36

Tx 3 ‐ triple sulphonamide suspension 0.5 g/5 mL; N = 23

Tx 4 ‐ erythromycin estolate 125 mg/5 mL; N = 25
C 1 ‐ placebo ‐ equal parts acetaminophen (paracetamol) and chlorpheniramine maleate syrup; N = 33

C 2 ‐ placebo ‐ 4 parts Kaopectate and 1 part acetaminophen (paracetamol, Tylenol) plus food colouring; N = 83
Use of additional medication ‐ all children received decongestive nose drops for 7 days; analgesics (paracetamol, children < 1 year: 120 mg suppository, > 1 year: 240 mg suppository) was allowed

Outcomes

Primary outcomes ‐ (a) presence or absence of exudate while on medication; (b) bacteriological findings of the exudate when present; no patient‐relevant outcomes were described

At baseline and before treatment was started, the middle‐ear exudate was aspirated. The decision whether to collect exudate on the first repeat visit was made with no knowledge of the drug regimen to which the patient had been assigned

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation was performed by a collaborating pharmacist

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Identical taste and appearance to amoxicillin/clavulanate and placebo not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Loss to follow‐up ‐ not described

Kaleida 1991

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, stratified randomisation, method of randomisation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ unclear, method not described
Double‐blind ‐ yes, blinding procedure not described

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ not described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 536 children (representing 1049 non‐severe acute otitis media (AOM) episodes; 980 non‐severe AOM episodes included for primary analysis)
Age ‐ between 7 months and 12 years

Setting ‐ secondary care: children's hospital and a private paediatric practice in Pittsburgh (USA)

Inclusion criteria ‐ AOM based on presence of middle‐ear effusion, as determined otoscopically, in association with specified symptoms of acute middle‐ear infection (fever, otalgia or irritability), or signs of acute infection (erythema or white opacification, or both, accompanied by fullness or bulging and impaired mobility), or both

Exclusion criteria ‐ children who recently received antibiotics, who had potential complicating or confounding conditions (e.g. eardrum perforation, asthma or chronic sinusitis)

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Children were enrolled for a 1‐year period. At entry each child was assigned randomly to a treatment regimen that specified consistent treatments for episodes of non‐severe and severe AOM based on severity of otalgia and the presence of fever (> 39 °C orally or > 39.5 °C rectally within the 24‐hour period before presentation)

Non‐severe AOM episodes were treated with:

Tx ‐ amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day 3 times daily for 14 days; N = 522 (N = 488 included in primary analysis)

C ‐ placebo for 14 days; N = 527 (N = 492 included in primary analysis)

Severe AOM episodes in children aged < 2 years were treated with:

Tx 1 ‐ amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day 3 times daily for 14 days

Tx 2 ‐ amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day 3 times daily for 14 days and myringotomy

Severe AOM episodes in children aged ≥ 2 years were treated with:
Tx 1 ‐ amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day 3 times daily for 14 days

Tx 2 ‐ amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day 3 times daily for 14 days and myringotomy

Tx 3 ‐ placebo and myringotomy

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ initial treatment failure: in non‐severe episodes this was the case when either otalgia, fever or both was present more than 24 hours after treatment was initiated and when 48 hours or more after initial treatment was initiated the child's temperature reached 38 °C orally or 38.5 °C rectally or an otalgia score of ≥ 6 was present

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) recurrent AOM defined as the development of AOM 15 days or more after the initiation of treatment for a preceding episode, (b) new episodes of otitis media with effusion defined by otoscopy and tympanometry findings

After initial visits, children were followed up by telephone to identify those with persistent symptoms and children younger than 2 years of age were re‐examined within 48 to 72 hours

Follow‐up visits were scheduled routinely after 2 and 6 weeks after initial treatment and monthly thereafter

Notes

We included only the non‐severe AOM episodes in this review (N = 1049 of which 980 were included for primary analysis); children experiencing non‐severe AOM episodes were randomly allocated to either antibiotics or placebo

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Identical taste and appearance to amoxicillin and placebo not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Follow‐up/exclusion of non‐severe episodes for short‐term outcome ‐ treatment: N = 34 (7%) and placebo: N = 35 (7%). Reasons not described

Laxdal 1970

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, method of randomisation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ unclear; method not described
Double‐blind ‐ no; open‐label study, investigators not blinded

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ not described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 142 children

Age ‐ between 0 to 15 years
Setting ‐ secondary care (private paediatric clinic) in Saskatoon (Canada)

Inclusion criteria ‐ at least 1 eardrum had to show redness and loss of landmarks

Exclusion criteria ‐ predominant respiratory symptoms, if allergy appeared to be a significant factor or if rupture of the eardrum had occurred

Baseline characteristics ‐ not described

Interventions

Tx 1 ‐ penicillin G 250 mg/m2/day 4 times daily (approximately 33 mg/kg/day) for at least 7 days; N = 45

Tx 2 ‐ ampicillin 250 mg/m2/day 4 times daily (approximately 33 mg/kg/day) for at least 7 days; N = 49
C ‐ symptomatic therapy (Auralgan ear drops, acetylsalicylic acid, decongestive nose drops); N = 48
Use of additional medication ‐ children in treatment groups also received symptomatic therapy as required

Outcomes

Primary outcomes ‐ (a) treatment failure (i.e. either deterioration or no improvement observed at day 7) (b) relapses

Results were evaluated at 7 days, except in cases where the ear inflammation was severe and the child appeared sufficiently ill (toxic) to warrant further examination 24 to 48 hours after treatment initiation

Children in the control group were subjected to very close scrutiny, especially during the first 48 hours and particularly when severe involvement was evident (high risk of detection bias)

Notes

Open‐label trial comparing immediate antibiotics (penicillin G and ampicillin) versus expectant observation

It was unclear whether otalgia played an important role in the definition of treatment failure

Data on relapses: N = 126 included in analysis, no crude numbers for separate treatment groups provided

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Other bias

High risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ not described, high risk of detection bias due to different follow‐up strategies between treatment groups

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Open‐label trial, outcome assessment not blinded

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Loss to follow‐up ‐ not described for short‐term outcome. Loss to follow‐up for long‐term outcome (acute otitis media (AOM) relapses) ‐ N = 16 (11%), no crude numbers of separate treatment groups provided

Le Saux 2005

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 531 children (N = 512 children included in analysis; N = 19 were excluded post hoc due to inappropriate randomisation (N = 4) or alternative clinical diagnosis (N = 15))

Age ‐ between 6 months and 5 years
Setting ‐ secondary care: emergency department in Ottawa (Canada)

Inclusion criteria ‐ new onset (< 4 days) of symptoms referable to the upper respiratory tract and either ear pain or fever (> 38 °C). In addition, all patients had to have evidence of middle‐ear effusion, defined by ≥ 2 of the following signs: opacity, impaired mobility on the basis of pneumatic otoscopy and redness or bulging (or both) of the tympanic membrane

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 2 weeks prior to randomisation, contraindication to amoxicillin or penicillin or sensitivity to ibuprofen or aspirin, presence of otorrhoea, co‐morbid disease such as sinusitis or pneumonia, prior middle‐ear surgery, placement of a ventilation tube, history of recurrent acute otitis media (more than 4 episodes in 12 months), compromised immunity, craniofacial abnormalities, or any chronic or genetic disorder

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ amoxicillin suspension (60 mg/kg) 3 times daily for 10 days; N = 258 (N = 253 included in analysis for day 3)
C ‐ matching placebo for 10 days; N = 254 (N = 246 included in analysis for day 3)
Use of additional medication ‐ parents were given a 5‐day supply of antipyretic and analgesic medication in the form of ibuprofen suspension as required for pain or fever and a 48‐hour supply of codeine elixir to be given as required for pain and fever

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ clinical resolution of symptoms, defined as absence of receipt of an antimicrobial (other than amoxicillin in the treatment group) at any time during the 14‐day period. The initiation of antimicrobial therapy was based on persistence or worsening of symptoms, fever or irritability associated with otoscopic signs of unresolving AOM, or development of symptoms indicative for mastoiditis or invasive disease

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) presence of symptoms (i.e. fever, pain, irritability, vomiting, activity level) on days 1, 2 and 3; (b) number of analgesic doses, codeine doses on days 1, 2 and 3; (c) occurrence of any rash or diarrhoea in the 14 days after randomisation; (d) presence of middle‐ear effusion assessed by tympanometry at 1 and 3 months after diagnosis

The parents were contacted on days 1, 2 and 3 after randomisation and once between day 10 and day 14 for administration of a standard questionnaire. If the parents or research assistant felt that the symptoms were not improving or were worsening, a medical reassessment was advised and the child was seen by a physician in the emergency department or clinic or by the paediatrician

The child was clinically assessed at 1 month and 3 months after randomisation to determine the number of subsequent episodes of acute otitis media (AOM) and to undergo tympanometry

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence stratified by study centre and age using random‐permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation sequence was kept under secure conditions and was accessible only by the trial pharmacist

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Placebo was similar to amoxicillin with regard to appearance and taste and was dispensed in identical opaque bottles, which were numbered sequentially

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

Loss to follow‐up at day 3 ‐ treatment: N = 5 (2%) and placebo: N = 8 (3%)

Little 2001

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, method of randomisation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ no; open‐label study, investigators not blinded

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 315 children (N = 285 children included in analysis)

Age ‐ between 6 months and 10 years

Setting ‐ general practice; 42 general practitioners in 3 health authorities in south‐west England

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute otalgia and otoscopic evidence of acute inflammation of the eardrum (dullness or cloudiness with erythema, bulging or perforation). When children were too young for otalgia to be specifically documented from their history (under 3 years old) then otoscopic evidence alone was a sufficient entry criterion

Exclusion criteria ‐ otoscopic appearances consistent with crying or a fever alone (pink drum alone), appearances and history more suggestive of otitis media with effusion and chronic suppurative otitis media, serious chronic disease (such as cystic fibrosis, valvular heart disease), use of antibiotics < 2 weeks prior to randomisation, previous complications (septic complications, hearing impairment) and if the child was unwell to be left to wait and see (e.g. high fever, floppy, drowsy, not responding to antipyretics)

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ immediate treatment with antibiotics: amoxicillin syrup 125 mg/5 mL 3 times daily for 7 days (children who were allergic to amoxicillin received erythromycin 125 mg/5 mL 4 times daily; N = 151 (N = 135 included in analysis)
C ‐ similar antibiotics were prescribed but parents were asked to wait for 72 hours before considering using the prescription. Parents were instructed that if their child still had substantial otalgia or fever after 72 hours, had discharge for > 10 days or was not starting to get better then they should collect the antibiotic prescription that was left at the practice; N = 164 (N = 150 included in analysis)
Use of additional medication ‐ for both groups doctors emphasised the importance of paracetamol in full doses for relief of pain and fever

Outcomes

Primary outcomes ‐ (a) duration of symptoms (i.e. earache, ear discharge, night disturbance, crying); (b) daily pain score; (c) episodes of distress; (d) spoons of paracetamol used; (e) use of antibiotics

Doctors were asked to provide information on days of illness, physical signs and antibiotic prescribing; parents were asked to complete a daily symptom diary

Notes

Open‐label trial comparing immediate versus delayed antibiotic prescription (prescription provided but advised to fill only if symptoms did not improve or worsened)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed, numbered, opaque envelopes

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Open‐label trial, outcome assessment not blinded

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

Loss to follow‐up/exclusion from analysis (intervention ineffective, did not use antibiotics or did not delay) ‐ treatment: N = 16 (12%) and placebo: N = 14 (9%); comparison of the baseline information for the 3 types of responders (those who provided diaries, those who gave information by telephone and those from whom no diary information could be collected) revealed no evidence of significant bias between treatment groups or between patients by age or severity of symptoms

McCormick 2005

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Concealment of allocation ‐ unclear; method not described
Double‐blind ‐ no, open‐label trial, investigators blinded, parents not blinded

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 223 children (N = 218 children included in analysis at day 12)

Age ‐ between 6 months and 12 years

Setting ‐ secondary care: paediatric clinic of University of Texas Medical Branch (USA)

Inclusion criteria ‐ children were required to have (a) symptoms of ear infection; (b) otoscopic evidence of acute otitis media (AOM), including middle‐ear effusion; (c) non‐severe AOM

Exclusion criteria ‐ co‐morbidity requiring antibiotic treatment, anatomic defect of ear or nasopharynx, allergy to study medication, immunologic deficiency, major medical condition and/or indwelling ventilation tube or draining otitis in the affected ear(s)

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ immediate treatment with antibiotics: oral amoxicillin 90 mg/kg/day twice daily for 10 days; N = 112 (N = 110 included in analysis at day 12)
C ‐ expectant observation: no immediate antibiotics; N = 111 (N = 108 included in analysis at day 12)

Children in the control group with AOM failure or recurrence received oral amoxicillin 90 mg/kg/day; children in Tx group with AOM failure or recurrence received amoxicillin‐clavulanate (90 mg/kg/day of amoxicillin component)
Use of additional medication ‐ all parents received saline nose drops and/or cerumen‐removal drops (if needed), ibuprofen and over‐the‐counter decongestant/antihistamine to be given as needed

Outcomes

Primary outcomes ‐ (a) parent satisfaction with AOM care; (b) resolution of AOM symptoms after treatment, including number of doses of symptom medication given; (c) AOM failure (days 0 to 12) or recurrence (days 13 to 30) defined as attending to the paediatrician clinic with acute ear symptoms, an abnormal tympanic membrane, or an AOM severity score higher than that at enrolment; (d) nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to antibiotics

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) minor adverse events caused by medication (e.g. allergy, diarrhoea and candidal infection); (b) serious AOM‐related adverse events (e.g. invasive pneumococcal disease, mastoiditis, bacteraemia, meningitis, perforation of the tympanic membrane, hospitalisation and emergency ear surgery; (c) parent‐child quality of life measures related to AOM

Parents were instructed to complete a symptom diary from day 1 to 10 and a satisfaction questionnaire on day 12 and day 30; routine follow‐up appointments for data collection were scheduled for day 12 and day 30. Patient‐initiated visits were scheduled on request by the parents for children who seemed to not be responding to treatment

Notes

Investigator‐blinded trial comparing immediate antibiotic prescribing versus expectant observation (no prescription provided)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Investigator‐blinded study, parents not blinded

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

Loss to follow‐up at day 12 ‐ treatment: N = 2 (2%) and expectant observation: N = 3 (3%)

Mygind 1981

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, method of randomisation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ reasons described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 158 children (N = 149 included in analysis)

Age ‐ between 1 and 10 years
Setting ‐ general practice and secondary care: confirmation of diagnosis and trial recruitment were done by otorhinolaryngologists in Copenhagen (Denmark)

Inclusion criteria ‐ earache for 1 to 24 hours. The diagnosis was made if the child cried because of pain and if the tympanic membrane appeared to be red and inflamed

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 4 weeks prior to randomisation, other treatment apart from acetylsalicylic acid already commenced, secretion in the external ear, suspected chronic otitis media, treatment for secretory otitis media within last 12 months, concurrent disease (e.g. pneumonia or severe tonsillitis), suspected penicillin allergy

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ penicillin 50 mg/mL 4 times daily; children aged 1 to 2 years: 10 mL daily, children between 3 and 5 years: 20 mL daily, children between 6 and 10 years: 30 mL daily for 7 days; N = ? (N = 72 included in analysis)
C ‐ placebo for 7 days; N = ? (N = 77 included in analysis)
Use of additional medication ‐ acetylsalicylic acid tablets (maximum of 50 mg/kg/day for 3 days) were supplied as the only supplementary treatment permitted

Outcomes

Main outcomes: (a) mean symptoms (i.e. pain, fever) scores; (b) number of analgesic tables used; (c) contralateral otitis; (d) spontaneous perforation of tympanic membrane; (e) mean number of days of otorrhoea; (f) tympanometry results at 1 week, 4 weeks and 3 months

Initial visits were performed at home: otoscopy and bacterial culture from nasopharynx were performed

Score cards were given to parents

Follow‐up visits at hospital at day 2 to 3, day 7, week 4 and week 12. If supplementary treatment was required at day 2 to 3, then myringotomy was performed. If supplementary treatment was required at day 7, then amoxicillin was given

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation performed by pharmaceutical company. Penicillin and placebo were supplied in coded bottles to study personnel

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Identical taste and appearance to amoxicillin and placebo not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Patients not included in analysis ‐ N = 9 (6%). Reasons described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Neumark 2007

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, Internet‐based random number generator

Concealment of allocation ‐ unclear; method not described
Double‐blind ‐ no, open‐label trial

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ reasons described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 186 children (N = 179 patients were included in analysis; 7 patients were excluded due to non‐compliance with protocol)

Age ‐ between 2 and 16 years

Setting ‐ general practice: 32 healthcare centres and 72 general practitioners in Sweden

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute otitis media (AOM) was based on direct inspection of the eardrum by pneumatic otoscope or preferably an aural microscope. Findings had to include a bulging, red eardrum displaying reduced mobility

Exclusion criteria ‐ perforation of the eardrum, chronic ear conditions or impaired hearing, previous adverse reactions to penicillin, concurrent disease that should be treated with antibiotics, recurrent AOM (3 or more AOM episodes during the past 6 months), children with immunosuppressive conditions, genetic disorders and mental disease or retardation

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ immediate treatment with antibiotics: phenoxymethylpenicillin 25 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days; N = 92
C ‐ expectant observation: no immediate antibiotics; N = 87

The guardians received written information about how to act if the condition did not improve or got worse within 3 days after randomisation
Use of additional medication ‐ symptomatic treatment with paracetamol or non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), drugs reducing the swelling of the nasal mucosa (e.g. decongestive nose drops) and nasal steroids were allowed

Outcomes

Primary outcomes ‐ (a) pain at day 0, 1, 2 and 3 to 7; (b) use of analgesics at day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 to 7; (c) fever > 38 °C at day 0, 1, 2 and 3 to 7; (d) subjective recovery at day 14 and 3 months; (e) perforations at 3 months; (f) serous otitis media at 3 months

All participants were asked to complete a symptom diary for 7 days; a nurse telephoned all participants after approximately 14 days to supplement the information in the diary and to register all acute contacts that had occurred during the first week of treatment; the final follow‐up was performed after 3 months to register perforations and serous otitis media

Notes

Open‐label trial comparing immediate antibiotic prescribing versus expectant observation (no prescription provided but advice on what to do if symptoms did not improve or worsened)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Internet‐based random number generator

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Open‐label trial, outcome assessment not blinded

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Patients not included in analysis ‐ N = 7 (4%). Reasons described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Spiro 2006

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, computer‐assisted randomisation

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ no, open‐label study, investigators blinded

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 283 children (N = 265 children included in analysis at days 4 to 6)

Age ‐ between 6 months and 12 years

Setting ‐ secondary care: paediatric emergency department of Yale‐New Haven Hospital in New Haven (USA)

Inclusion criteria ‐ the diagnosis of acute otitis media (AOM) was made at the discretion of the clinician according to the diagnostic criteria in the evidence‐based guideline published in Pediatrics 2004

Exclusion criteria ‐ presence of additional intercurrent bacterial infection such as pneumonia, if the patient appeared to be "toxic" as determined by the clinician, hospitalisation, immunocompromised children, antibiotic treatment < 1 week prior to randomisation, children who had either myringotomy or a perforated tympanic membrane, uncertain access to medical care (e.g. no telephone access), primary language of parents was neither English nor Spanish, previous enrolment in the study

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ immediate treatment with antibiotics; N = 145 (N = 133 included in analysis at days 4 to 6)
C ‐ participants randomised to delayed prescription were given written and verbal instructions "not to fill the antibiotic prescription unless your child either is not better or is worse 48 hours (2 days) after today's visit"; N = 138 (N = 132 included in analysis at days 4 to 6)
Use of additional medication ‐ all participants received complimentary bottles of ibuprofen suspension (100 mg/5 mL) and analgesic ear drops

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ proportion of each group that filled the prescription for an antibiotic. This was defined by whether the parent filled the prescription within 3 days of enrolment and was determined by the response to this question at the interview at day 4 to 6

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) clinical course of the illness; (b) adverse effects of medications; (c) days of school or work missed; (d) unscheduled medical visits; (e) comfort of parents with management of AOM without antibiotics for future episodes

2 trained research assistants blinded to group assignment conducted standardised, structured telephone interviews with the parents at day 4 to 6, day 11 to 14, day 30 and day 40 after enrolment

Notes

Investigator‐blinded study comparing immediate versus delayed antibiotic prescribing (prescription provided and advised to fill only if symptoms worsen or do not improve)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐assisted randomisation

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed, opaque envelopes

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Unclear risk

Investigator‐blinded study, parents not blinded

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Loss to follow‐up at day 4 to 6 treatment: N = 12 (8%) and expectant observation: N = 6 (4%)

Tapiainen 2014

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, block randomisation, computerised randomisation list

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 84 children (N = 84 children included in analysis at 8 weeks)

Age ‐ between 6 months and 15 years

Setting ‐ primary and secondary care: children in day care centres attending an AOM prevention trial at the Department of Pediatrics, Oulu University Hospital and children visiting the City of Oulu Health Care Center and Mehiläinen Pediatric Private Practice, Oulu (Finland)

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute symptoms of respiratory infection and/or ear‐related symptoms and signs of tympanic membrane inflammation together with middle‐ear effusion at pneumatic otoscopy performed by a study physician

Exclusion criteria ‐ ventilation tubes (grommets), AOM complication, amoxicillin allergy, Down syndrome, congenital craniofacial abnormality and immunodeficiency

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ amoxicillin‐clavulanate for 7 days (amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day divided into 2 daily doses); N = 42 (N = 42 included in analysis)
C ‐ matching placebo in 2 doses for 7 days; N = 42 (N = 42 included in analysis)
Use of additional medication ‐ not described

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ time middle‐ear effusion disappearance defined as a normal tympanogram finding (A curve) from both ears on 2 consecutive measurement days (either at home or at the study clinic)

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) time to improved tympanogram findings (i.e. A or C curve) from both ears; (b) time to normal pneumatic otoscopy or otomicroscopy findings from both ears; (c) proportions of children with persistent middle‐ear effusion on days 7, 14 and 60; (d) disappearance of pain; (e) disappearance of fever; (f) use of pain medication; (g) possible adverse effects of antimicrobial treatment

Children were examined by the study physician with pneumatic otoscopy or otomicroscopy and tympanometry at study entry, after 3 and 7 days, and then weekly until both ears were healthy according to pneumatic otoscopy or otomicroscopy

Families were trained to perform tympanometry using a handheld tympanometer for daily follow‐up at home

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Block randomisation, computerised randomisation list

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation list was kept in the pharmacy, which delivered the study drugs to the families according to the consecutive study number

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Bottles containing amoxicillin‐clavulanate or placebo were indistinguishable, dosing was similar in both groups and placebo mixture was flavoured and sweetened to resemble the taste of amoxicillin‐clavulanate

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

All children were included in the analysis

Thalin 1985

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, block randomisation, method of random sequence generation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 293 children (N = 293 children included in analysis)

Age ‐ between 2 and 15 years

Setting ‐ secondary care: department of otorhinolaryngology in Halmstad (Sweden)

Inclusion criteria ‐ purulent acute otitis media (AOM) (no further criteria described)

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment or AOM episode < 4 weeks prior to randomisation, suspected penicillin allergy, presence of ventilation tubes, sensorineural hearing loss, existence of concomitant infection for which antibiotic treatment was required and chronic diseases

Baseline characteristics ‐ not described

Interventions

Tx ‐ phenoxymethyl penicillin 50 mg/kg/day twice daily for 7 days; N = 159 (N = 159 included in analysis)
C ‐ matching placebo in 2 doses for 7 days; N = 158 (N = 158 included in analysis)
Use of additional medication ‐ all children were given nose drops containing oxymetazoline chloride and, if needed, analgesics (paracetamol)

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ treatment failure (defined as remaining non‐negligible symptoms such as pain and fever, insufficient resolution of infectious signs during treatment period of 7 days, or both

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) resolution of symptoms over time; (b) AOM relapses; (c) tympanometry, audiometry, or both, results at 4 weeks

The children were examined at day 0, days 3 to 4, days 8 to 10 and at 4 weeks

Parents were instructed to record symptoms (i.e. temperature, otalgia, discharge from ear and consumption of supplied symptomatic drugs)

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Block randomisation, method of random sequence generation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation list was kept by the clinical pharmacologist of the hospital and not disclosed to the investigators until the clinical trial was completed

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear; baseline characteristics ‐ not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Placebo with same taste and appearance as penicillin

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

No children lost to follow‐up for primary analysis

Tähtinen 2011

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, computerised random number generator with block length of 10

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ yes

Loss to follow‐up ‐ described

Design ‐ parallel

Participants

N ‐ 322 children (N = 319 children were included in analysis)
Age ‐ between 6 months and 3 years

Setting ‐ general practice: healthcare centre of Turku (Finland)

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute otitis media (AOM) based on 3 criteria: (a) middle‐ear fluid had to be detected by means of pneumatic otoscopic examination that showed at least 2 of the following tympanic membrane findings: bulging position, decreased or absent mobility, abnormal colour or opacity not due to scarring, or air fluid interfaces; (b) at least 1 of the following acute inflammatory signs in the tympanic membrane had to be present: distinct erythematous patches or streaks or increased vascularity over full, bulging, or yellow tympanic membrane; (c) presence of acute symptoms such as fever, otalgia or respiratory symptoms

Exclusion criteria ‐ ongoing antibiotic treatment; AOM with spontaneous perforation of the tympanic membrane; systemic or nasal steroid therapy within 3 preceding days; antihistamine, oseltamivir or a combination therapy within 3 preceding days; contraindication to penicillin or amoxicillin; presence of ventilation tube; severe infection requiring antibiotic treatment; documented Epstein‐Barr virus infection within 7 preceding days; Down's syndrome or other condition affecting middle‐ear diseases; known immunodeficiency

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ amoxicillin‐clavulanate 40‐5.7 mg/kg daily in 2 doses for 7 days; N = 162 (N = 161 included in analysis)
C ‐ matching placebo in 2 doses for 7 days; N = 160 (N = 158 included in analysis)
Use of additional medication ‐ the use of analgesics and antipyretic agents was encouraged and the use of analgesic ear drops and decongestive nose drops or sprays was allowed

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ time to treatment failure (i.e. a composite endpoint consisting of 6 independent components: (a) no improvement in overall condition at day 2, (b) worsening of the child's overall condition at any time, (c) no improvement in otoscopic signs at day 7, (d) perforation of tympanic membrane at any time, (e) severe infection (e.g. mastoiditis or pneumonia) necessitating systemic open‐label antimicrobial treatment at any time, (f) any other reason for stopping the study drug at any time

Secondary outcomes ‐ assessed by study physician ‐ (a) time to the initiation of rescue treatment; (b) time to development of contralateral AOM; ‐ diary symptom assessment; (c) resolution of symptoms; (d) use of analgesics

Parents were given a diary to record symptoms, doses of study drugs and any other medications and adverse events

First visit after enrolment (= day 0) was scheduled at day 2. End‐of‐treatment visit was scheduled at day 7

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computerised random number generator with block length of 10

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Concealment of allocation by the pharmacist (independent to trial team) by labelling the identical opaque study drug containers with allocation numbers; allocation list was kept at the paediatric infectious disease ward behind locked doors

Other bias

Low risk

ITT analysis ‐ yes, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Placebo with same taste and appearance as amoxicillin‐clavulanate

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Low risk

Loss to follow‐up ‐ treatment: N = 1 (1%) and placebo: N = 2 (1%)

van Buchem 1981a

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, method of randomisation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ reasons not described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Design ‐ 2 x 2 factorial design

Participants

N ‐ 202 children (N = 171 children included in analysis; N = 31 were excluded from the study)

Age ‐ between 2 and 12 years

Setting ‐ both general practice and secondary care: 12 general practitioners in or near Tilburg (the Netherlands) recruited patients and referred them to 1 of the 3 otorhinolaryngologists, which excluded those cases where there was disagreement with the diagnosis

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute otitis media (AOM) was based on history and clinical picture (i.e. diffuse redness, bulging of the eardrum, or both)

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 2 weeks prior to randomisation, chronic otitis or otitis media serosa, contraindication for antibiotic treatment

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ sham myringotomy and amoxicillin 250 mg 3 times daily for 7 days; N = 47
C ‐ sham myringotomy and matching placebo for 7 days; N = 40
Use of additional medication ‐ all participants were allowed to use decongestive nose drops and analgesic suppositories (i.e. children aged 2 to 7 years: acetylsalicylic acid 50 mg, phenacetin 50 mg, phenobarbitone 15 mg, codeine phosphate 2.5 mg, caffeine 1.25 mg; children aged 8 to 12 years: acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg, phenacetin 100 mg, phenobarbitone 30 mg, codeine phosphate 5 mg, caffeine 2.5 mg

Outcomes

Main outcomes ‐ (a) parent report of pain at day 0, 1 and 7; (b) otoscopic findings at day 0, 1 and 7; (c) discharge from ear at day 1, 7 and 14; (d) mean temperature at day 0, 1 and 7; (e) AOM relapses at 6 months; (f) audiogram findings after 4 and 8 weeks

Notes

van Buchem 1981a is the 2 arms without myringotomy

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation performed by otorhinolaryngologists; general practitioner and parent/child were outcome assessors and remained blinded

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Sham myringotomy and placebo was similar with amoxicillin with regard to appearance and taste

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Loss to follow‐up/exclusions ‐ N = 31 (15%). Reasons not described

van Buchem 1981b

Methods

Randomised ‐ yes, method of randomisation not described

Concealment of allocation ‐ adequate
Double‐blind ‐ yes

Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) ‐ unclear

Loss to follow‐up ‐ reasons not described, unclear from which treatment group patients were excluded

Design ‐ 2 x 2 factorial design

Participants

N ‐ 202 children (N = 171 children included in analysis; N = 31 were excluded from the study)

Age ‐ between 2 and 12 years

Setting ‐ both general practice and secondary care: 12 general practitioners in or near Tilburg (the Netherlands) recruited patients and referred them to 1 of the 3 otorhinolaryngologists who excluded those cases where there was disagreement with the diagnosis

Inclusion criteria ‐ acute otitis media (AOM) was based on history and clinical picture (i.e. diffuse redness, bulging of the eardrum, or both)

Exclusion criteria ‐ antibiotic treatment < 2 weeks prior to randomisation, chronic otitis or otitis media serosa, contraindication for antibiotic treatment

Baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Interventions

Tx ‐ myringotomy and amoxicillin 250 mg 3 times daily for 7 days; N = 48
C ‐ myringotomy and matching placebo for 7 days; N = 36
Use of additional medication ‐ all participants were allowed to use decongestive nose drops and analgesic suppositories (i.e. children aged 2 to 7 years: acetylsalicylic acid 50 mg, phenacetin 50 mg, phenobarbitone 15 mg, codeine phosphate 2.5 mg, caffeine 1.25 mg; children aged 8 to 12 years: acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg, phenacetin 100 mg, phenobarbitone 30 mg, codeine phosphate 5 mg, caffeine 2.5 mg

Outcomes

Main outcomes ‐ (a) parent report of pain at day 0, 1 and 7; (b) otoscopic findings at day 0, 1 and 7; (c) discharge from ear at day 1, 7 and 14; (d) mean temperature at day 0, 1 and 7; (e) AOM relapses at 6 months; (f) audiogram findings after 4 and 8 weeks

Notes

van Buchem 1981b is the 2 arms with myringotomy

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation performed by otorhinolaryngologists; general practitioner and parent/child were outcome assessors and remained blinded

Other bias

Unclear risk

ITT analysis ‐ unclear, baseline characteristics ‐ balanced

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Low risk

Sham myringotomy and placebo was similar with amoxicillin with regard to appearance and taste

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Unclear risk

Loss to follow‐up/exclusions ‐ N = 31 (15%). Reasons not described

AOM: acute otitis media
AOM‐SOS: otitis media ‐ severity of symptoms
C: control
ITT: intention‐to‐treat
Tx: treatment

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Arguedas 2011

No comparison of antibiotic to placebo or expectant observation: trial comparing single‐dose, extended‐release azithromycin versus a 10‐day regimen of amoxicillin/clavulanate

Casey 2012

No comparison of antibiotic to placebo or expectant observation: trial comparing high‐dose amoxicillin/clavulanate versus cefdinir

Chaput 1982

Short versus long course of therapy

Engelhard 1989

No comparison of antibiotic to placebo; the 3 arms were Augmentin, myringotomy, or both

Liu 2011

No comparison of antibiotic to placebo or expectant observation: trial comparing single oral doses azithromycin in extended‐release versus immediate‐release formulations

Ostfeld 1987

Non‐randomised study

Rudberg 1954

Non‐randomised study: assigned "randomly" based on case number but then allowed to change groups

Ruohola 2003

Conducted in children with ventilation tubes

Sarrell 2003

No comparison of antibiotic to placebo. Method of randomisation not provided and groups appear to be unbalanced at baseline

Tähtinen 2012

Secondary analysis of placebo‐controlled trial. This study included the total group of children allocated to immediate antimicrobial treatment (N = 161) and a subgroup of children from the placebo group that received delayed antibiotics (N = 53). As a consequence, comparability of prognosis achieved through randomisation is violated, producing groups of children that are incomparable, which may lead to biased effect estimates

van Buchem 1985

Non‐randomised study

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

ACTRN12608000424303

Trial name or title

Antibiotics for asymptomatic acute otitis media

Methods

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled randomised clinical trial

Participants

Aboriginal children aged between 6 and 30 months diagnosed with asymptomatic acute otitis media defined as a bulging tympanic membrane without associated symptoms (including ear pain, fever or ear discharge) at the time of diagnosis

Interventions

Azithromycin 30 mg/kg divided into 2 doses or placebo for 7 days

Outcomes

Primary outcome ‐ proportion of children with a bulging tympanic membrane or ear discharge or withdrawn due to complications or side effects at 14 days (all children who are lost to follow‐up are considered clinical failures)

Secondary outcomes ‐ (a) proportion of children with unresolved bulging at 7 and 30 days; (b) proportion of children with a bulging tympanic membrane or ear discharge or withdrawn due to complications or side effects at 7, 14 and 30 days (not including children who are lost to follow‐up); (c) proportion of children who develop an illness requiring additional medical treatment at 7, 14 and 30 days; (d) proportion of children who develop an illness requiring cessation of prescribed antibiotics at 30 days; (e) proportion of children who have no improvement in other conditions recorded, like skin sores and rhinosinusitis, at 7, 14 and 30 days; (f) microbiological outcomes including carriage and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae at 7, 14 and 30 days

Starting date

March 2007

Contact information

Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina NT 0811, Australia

Notes

ACTRN12608000424303

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Antibiotics versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain Show forest plot

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain.

1.1 Pain at 24 hours

6

1394

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.78, 1.01]

1.2 Pain at 2 to 3 days

7

2320

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.57, 0.86]

1.3 Pain at 4 to 7 days

8

1347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.63, 0.91]

1.4 Pain at 10 to 12 days

1

278

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.17, 0.66]

2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash Show forest plot

8

2107

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [1.19, 1.59]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.

3 Abnormal tympanometry Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry.

3.1 2 to 4 weeks

7

2138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.74, 0.90]

3.2 6 to 8 weeks

3

953

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.78, 1.00]

3.3 3 months

3

809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.76, 1.24]

4 Tympanic membrane perforation Show forest plot

5

1075

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.18, 0.76]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.

5 Contralateral otitis (in unilateral cases) Show forest plot

4

906

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.25, 0.95]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 5 Contralateral otitis (in unilateral cases).

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 5 Contralateral otitis (in unilateral cases).

6 Late AOM recurrences Show forest plot

6

2200

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.78, 1.10]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 6 Late AOM recurrences.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 6 Late AOM recurrences.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 1 Pain.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 1 Pain.

1.1 Pain at 3 to 7 days

4

959

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.50, 1.12]

1.2 Pain at 11 to 14 days

1

247

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.75, 1.10]

2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash Show forest plot

2

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [1.24, 2.36]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.

3 Abnormal tympanometry at 4 weeks Show forest plot

1

207

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.78, 1.35]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry at 4 weeks.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry at 4 weeks.

4 Tympanic membrane perforation Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.

5 AOM recurrences Show forest plot

1

209

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.74, 2.69]

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 5 AOM recurrences.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 5 AOM recurrences.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

L'Abbé plot of the rates of pain at 24 hours for the placebo (control) versus antibiotic (experimental) group.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

L'Abbé plot of the rates of pain at 24 hours for the placebo (control) versus antibiotic (experimental) group.

L'Abbé plot of the rates of pain at two to three days for the placebo (control) versus antibiotic (experimental) group.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

L'Abbé plot of the rates of pain at two to three days for the placebo (control) versus antibiotic (experimental) group.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Pain.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Pain.

Percentage with pain based on the subset of six studies included in the IPD meta‐analysis (Rovers 2006).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Percentage with pain based on the subset of six studies included in the IPD meta‐analysis (Rovers 2006).

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 5 Contralateral otitis (in unilateral cases).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 5 Contralateral otitis (in unilateral cases).

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 6 Late AOM recurrences.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo, Outcome 6 Late AOM recurrences.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 1 Pain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 1 Pain.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 3 Abnormal tympanometry at 4 weeks.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 4 Tympanic membrane perforation.

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 5 AOM recurrences.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation, Outcome 5 AOM recurrences.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antibiotics versus placebo for acute otitis media in children

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute otitis media in children

Patient or population: children with acute otitis media
Settings: primary care and secondary care
Intervention: antibiotics versus placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Antibiotics versus placebo

Pain ‐ pain at 24 hours

Study population

RR 0.89
(0.78 to 1.01)

1394
(5 studies)1

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

426 per 1000

379 per 1000
(332 to 431)

Pain ‐ pain at 2 to 3 days

Study population

RR 0.70
(0.57 to 0.86)

2320
(7 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

159 per 1000

111 per 1000
(90 to 137)

Pain ‐ pain at 4 to 7 days

Study population

RR 0.76
(0.63 to 0.91)

1347
(7 studies)1

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

241 per 1000

183 per 1000
(152 to 220)

Pain ‐ pain at 10 to 12 days

Study population

RR 0.33
(0.17 to 0.66)

278
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

216 per 1000

71 per 1000
(37 to 142)

Abnormal tympanometry ‐ 2 to 4 weeks

Study population

RR 0.82
(0.74 to 0.90)

2138
(7 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

481 per 1000

395 per 1000
(356 to 433)

Abnormal tympanometry ‐ 3 months

Study population

RR 0.97
(0.76 to 1.24)

809
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

241 per 1000

234 per 1000
(183 to 299)

Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash

Study population

RR 1.38
(1.19 to 1.59)

2107
(8 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

196 per 1000

270 per 1000
(233 to 311)

*The basis for the assumed risk for ‘Study population’ was the average risk in the control groups (i.e. total number of participants with events divided by total number of participants included in the meta‐analysis). The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1The number of studies reported in the 'Summary of findings' table for the outcomes 'Pain at 24 hours' and 'Pain at 4 to 7 days' differ slightly from those reported in the Data Analysis Table 1 ‐ Antibiotics versus placebo (five versus six studies and seven versus eight studies, respectively). This is due to the van Buchem trial. This trial is included as one study in our review (and in the 'Summary of findings' table), but we included data from two different comparisons from this 2 x 2 factorial design trial in our analyses (van Buchem 1981a; van Buchem 1981b).

2We downgraded the evidence for pain at days 10 to 12 from high quality as this outcome was not specified a priori in this trial (secondary analysis).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antibiotics versus placebo for acute otitis media in children
Comparison 1. Antibiotics versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain Show forest plot

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Pain at 24 hours

6

1394

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.78, 1.01]

1.2 Pain at 2 to 3 days

7

2320

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.57, 0.86]

1.3 Pain at 4 to 7 days

8

1347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.63, 0.91]

1.4 Pain at 10 to 12 days

1

278

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.17, 0.66]

2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash Show forest plot

8

2107

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [1.19, 1.59]

3 Abnormal tympanometry Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 2 to 4 weeks

7

2138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.74, 0.90]

3.2 6 to 8 weeks

3

953

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.78, 1.00]

3.3 3 months

3

809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.76, 1.24]

4 Tympanic membrane perforation Show forest plot

5

1075

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.18, 0.76]

5 Contralateral otitis (in unilateral cases) Show forest plot

4

906

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.25, 0.95]

6 Late AOM recurrences Show forest plot

6

2200

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.78, 1.10]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Antibiotics versus placebo
Comparison 2. Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Pain at 3 to 7 days

4

959

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.50, 1.12]

1.2 Pain at 11 to 14 days

1

247

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.75, 1.10]

2 Vomiting, diarrhoea or rash Show forest plot

2

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [1.24, 2.36]

3 Abnormal tympanometry at 4 weeks Show forest plot

1

207

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.78, 1.35]

4 Tympanic membrane perforation Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 AOM recurrences Show forest plot

1

209

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.74, 2.69]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Immediate antibiotics versus expectant observation