Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibióticos para la otitis media aguda en niños

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 31 enero 2013see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Roderick P Venekamp

    Correspondencia a: Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Sharon Sanders

    School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

  • Paul P Glasziou

    Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

  • Chris B Del Mar

    Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

  • Maroeska M Rovers

    Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

Chris Del Mar (CDM) and Paul Glasziou (PG) prepared the original version of the review.
Sharon Sanders (SLS) conducted searches, identified studies, extracted data and prepared manuscript for the updated reviews in 2003, 2007 and 2008.
Maroeska Rovers (MMR) participated in the 2007 update by providing data and information from the individual patient data meta‐analysis that has been included in this update.
Roderick Venekamp (RPV) conducted searches, identified studies, extracted data and prepared manuscript for the updated review in 2012.
PG, CDM, MMR, SLS and RPV have reviewed and provided comment on the updated version of the review.

Declarations of interest

None noted.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Charles Bridges‐Webb for stimulating initial discussions and for constructive advice on the protocol for this review and Professor Steve Berman for helpful comments on the draft review. We would like to thank Bruce Arroll and Tom Fahey for peer refereeing the 2005 updated review and Dilip Raghavan, Brian Westerberg, Mark Jones and Peter Morris for peer refereeing the 2009 updated review. We also thank Dilip Raghavan, Brian Westerberg, Teresa Neeman and Peter Morris for commenting on this 2012 updated review.

Thank you to David McCormick and his colleagues for allowing us to access raw study data from the trial comparing immediate antibiotics and expectant observation (McCormick 2005).

Thank you to Chris Cates for noticing and advising us of an error in the confidence intervals presented in the review.

We gratefully thank Sarah Thorning for her support with the search strategy and searches.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Nov 15

Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children

Review

Roderick P Venekamp, Sharon L Sanders, Paul P Glasziou, Maroeska M Rovers

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub5

2015 Jun 23

Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children

Review

Roderick P Venekamp, Sharon L Sanders, Paul P Glasziou, Chris B Del Mar, Maroeska M Rovers

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub4

2013 Jan 31

Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children

Review

Roderick P Venekamp, Sharon Sanders, Paul P Glasziou, Chris B Del Mar, Maroeska M Rovers

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub3

2004 Jan 26

Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children

Review

Sharon Sanders, Paul P Glasziou, Chris B Del Mar, Maroeska M Rovers

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub2

2000 Apr 28

Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children

Review

Paul Glasziou, M Hayem, B Del Mar C

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000219

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.