Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Derivación sistemática o selectiva de la arteria carótida para la endarterectomía carotídea (y otros métodos de control en la derivación selectiva)

Appendices

Appendix 1. MEDLINE search strategy

MEDLINE 2013 to 2021

Term used "carotid endarterectomy"

MEDLINE (Ovid) 2013 to 2021 and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (lines 1 to 12)

1. Endarterectomy, Carotid/

2. exp Carotid Arteries/su [Surgery]

3. exp Carotid Artery Diseases/su [Surgery]

4. exp carotid arteries/

5. exp carotid artery diseases/

6. carotid.tw.

7. 4 or 5 or 6

8. endarterectomy/

9. (endarterectom$ or surg$).tw.

10. 8 or 9

11. 7 and 10

12. 1 or 2 or 3 or 11

13. randomized controlled trial.pt.

14. controlled clinical trial.pt.

15. randomized.ab.

16. placebo.ab.

17. clinical trials as topic.sh.

18. random$.ab.

19. shunt$.tw.

20. trial.ti.

21. or/13‐20

22. exp animals/ not humans.sh.

23. 21 not 22

Appendix 2. Embase search strategy

Embase 2013 to 2021

Terms used "carotid endarterectomy" and "carotid surgery"

Embase (Ovid) 2013 to 2021

1 carotid endarterectomy/

2 carotid artery surgery/

3 exp carotid artery disease/su

4 exp carotid artery/5 exp carotid artery disease/
6 4 or 5

7 artery surgery/ or endarterectomy/ or vascular surgery/ or surgery/

8 6 and 7

9 (carotid adj5 (endarterect$ or surgery)).tw.

10 1 or 2 or 3 or 8 or 9

11 Randomized Controlled Trial/ or "randomized controlled trial (topic)"/

12 Randomization/

13 Controlled clinical trial/ or "controlled clinical trial (topic)"/

14 control group/ or controlled study/

15 clinical trial/ or "clinical trial (topic)"/ or phase 1 clinical trial/ or phase 2 clinical trial/ or phase 3 clinical trial/ or

phase 4 clinical trial/

16 crossover procedure/

17 single blind procedure/ or double blind procedure/ or triple blind procedure/

18 placebo/ or placebo effect/

19 (random$ or RCT or RCTs).tw.

20 (controlled adj5 (trial$ or stud$)).tw.

21 (clinical$ adj5 trial$).tw.

22 clinical trial registration.ab.

23 ((control or treatment or experiment$ or intervention) adj5 (group$ or subject$ or patient$)).tw.

24 (quasi‐random$ or quasi random$ or pseudo‐random$ or pseudo random$).tw.

25 ((control or experiment$ or conservative) adj5 (treatment or therapy or procedure or manage$)).tw.

26 ((singl$ or doubl$ or tripl$ or trebl$) adj5 (blind$ or mask$)).tw.

27 (cross‐over or cross over or crossover).tw.

28 (placebo$ or sham).tw.

29 trial.ti.

30 (assign$ or allocat$).tw.

31 controls.tw.

32 shunting/ or shunt$.tw.

33 or/11‐32

34 10 and 33

Appendix 3. Search strategy for other resources

ClinicalTrial.gov (2013 to 2021)

AREA[StudyType] EXPAND[Term] COVER[FullMatch] "Interventional" AND AREA[ConditionSearch] carotid endarterectomy AND AREA[StdAge] EXPAND[Term] COVER[FullMatch] ( "Adult" OR "Older Adult" )

WHO ICTRP (2013 to 2021)

Intervention: carotid endarterectomy; Recruitment Status is: ALL

Flow diagram for updated systematic reviews

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Flow diagram for updated systematic reviews

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 1: Death from all causes within 30 days of surgery

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 1: Death from all causes within 30 days of surgery

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 2: Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 2: Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 3: Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 3: Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 4: Any stroke during surgery (best‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 4: Any stroke during surgery (best‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 5: Any stroke during surgery (worst‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 5: Any stroke during surgery (worst‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 6: Any stroke within 24 hours of surgery

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 6: Any stroke within 24 hours of surgery

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 7: Any stroke within 30 days of surgery

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 7: Any stroke within 30 days of surgery

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 8: Ipsilateral stroke during surgery (best‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 8: Ipsilateral stroke during surgery (best‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 9: Ipsilateral stroke during surgery (worst‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 9: Ipsilateral stroke during surgery (worst‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 10: Ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (best‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 10: Ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (best‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 11: Ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 11: Ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 12: Stroke or death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 12: Stroke or death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 13: Stroke or death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 13: Stroke or death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case)

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 14: Haemorrhage from operation site

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 14: Haemorrhage from operation site

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 15: Infection of operation site

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 15: Infection of operation site

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 16: Nerve palsy postoperatively

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1: Routine shunting versus no shunting, Outcome 16: Nerve palsy postoperatively

Summary of findings 1. Shunting compared with no shunting for carotid endarterectomy

Shunting compared with no shunting for carotid endarterectomy

Patient or population: patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease

Settings: hospital

Intervention: shunting

Comparison: no shunting

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk (no shunting)

Corresponding risk (shunting)

Death from all causes within 30 days of surgery

21 per 1000

4 per 1000
(1 to 14)

OR 0.45 (0.13 to 1.59)

655 participants
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b

Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case)

12 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

OR 0.13 (0.02 to 0.96)

655 participants
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b

Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case)

9 per 1000

1 per 1000
(0 to 8)

OR 0.37 (0.05 to 2.62)

655 participants
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b

Any stroke during surgery (best‐case)

39 per 1000

7 per 1000
(3 to 17)

OR 0.42 (0.16 to 1.07)

655 participants
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b

Any stroke during surgery (worst‐case)

24 per 1000

41 per 1000
(16 to 105)

OR 1.32 (0.52 to 3.38)

655 participants
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b

Any stroke within 24 hours of surgery

53 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

OR 0.15 (0.03 to 0.78)

214 participants
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b

Any stroke within 30 days of surgery

45 per 1000

26 per 1000
(12 to 57)

OR 0.77 (0.35 to 1.69)

655 participants
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b

*The basis for the assumed risk is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk and the relative effect of the intervention group (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; GRADE: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation; OR: odds ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

a Downgraded by one level due to serious risk of bias as evidence used an inappropriate random sequence generation, had imbalanced surgeon assignment between groups, and had imbalance in the baseline characteristics between groups

b Downgraded by one level due to imprecision as the evidence had a wide CI

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Shunting compared with no shunting for carotid endarterectomy
Comparison 1. Routine shunting versus no shunting

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Death from all causes within 30 days of surgery Show forest plot

3

655

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.13, 1.59]

1.2 Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case) Show forest plot

3

655

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.02, 0.96]

1.3 Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case) Show forest plot

3

655

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.05, 2.62]

1.4 Any stroke during surgery (best‐case) Show forest plot

3

655

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.16, 1.07]

1.5 Any stroke during surgery (worst‐case) Show forest plot

3

655

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.57, 5.09]

1.6 Any stroke within 24 hours of surgery Show forest plot

2

214

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.03, 0.78]

1.7 Any stroke within 30 days of surgery Show forest plot

3

655

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.35, 1.69]

1.8 Ipsilateral stroke during surgery (best‐case) Show forest plot

3

737

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.17, 1.08]

1.9 Ipsilateral stroke during surgery (worst‐case) Show forest plot

3

737

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.58, 5.09]

1.10 Ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (best‐case) Show forest plot

3

737

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.18, 0.97]

1.11 Ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case) Show forest plot

3

737

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.46, 3.23]

1.12 Stroke or death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case) Show forest plot

3

655

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.31, 1.27]

1.13 Stroke or death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case) Show forest plot

3

655

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.40, 1.66]

1.14 Haemorrhage from operation site Show forest plot

2

641

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.07, 19.47]

1.15 Infection of operation site Show forest plot

2

641

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.00, 8.12]

1.16 Nerve palsy postoperatively Show forest plot

1

138

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.81 [0.30, 10.82]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Routine shunting versus no shunting