Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 14 January 2020

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012991Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 29 March 2018see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Stroke Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Luciana A Mendes

    Correspondence to: PneumoCardioVascular Lab, Onofre Lopes University Hospital, Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH) & Department of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

    [email protected]

  • Illia NDF Lima

    Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Brazil

  • Tulio Souza

    Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

  • George C do Nascimento

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

  • Vanessa R Resqueti

    PneumoCardioVascular Lab, Onofre Lopes University Hospital, Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH) & Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

  • Guilherme A F Fregonezi

    PneumoCardioVascular Lab, Onofre Lopes University Hospital, Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH) & Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

Contributions of authors

Luciana Mendes: conceived the review question; developed, completed and edited the first draft of the protocol; drafted the final protocol; and made an intellectual contribution to the protocol.

Íllia Lima: developed and completed part of the first draft of the protocol; and made an intellectual contribution to the protocol.

Túlio Souza: contributed with clinical expertise; advised on and developed the protocol; and made an intellectual contribution to the protocol.

George Nascimento: contributed with clinical expertise on devices; advised on and developed the protocol; made an intellectual contribution to the protocol; and approved the final version prior to submission.

Vanessa Resqueti: advised on and developed the protocol; participated as an arbiter; and made an intellectual contribution to the protocol.

Guilherme Fregonezi: developed and co‐ordinated the protocol; secured funding; advised on and made an intellectual contribution to the protocol; and approved the final version prior to submission.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Luciana Mendes: none known.

Íllia Lima: none known.

Túlio Souza: none known.

George Nascimento: none known.

Vanessa Resqueti: none known.

Guilherme Fregonezi: none known.

Acknowledgements

We thank Hazel Fraser, Cochrane Stroke Group Managing Editor; Joshua Cheyne, Cochrane Stroke Group Information Specialist; Peter Langhorne, Cochrane Stroke Group Co‐ordinating Editor; Jan Mehrholz, Cochrane Stroke Group Associate Editor; and Aryelly Rodriguez, Cochrane Stroke Group Statistical Editor, for their valuable advice on writing this Cochrane protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Jan 14

Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke

Review

Luciana A Mendes, Illia NDF Lima, Tulio Souza, George C do Nascimento, Vanessa R Resqueti, Guilherme AF Fregonezi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012991.pub2

2018 Mar 29

Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke

Protocol

Luciana A Mendes, Illia NDF Lima, Tulio Souza, George C do Nascimento, Vanessa R Resqueti, Guilherme A F Fregonezi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012991

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Table 1. Template for 'Summary of findings' table

Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke

Participants or population: people with stroke

Setting: community or home setting

Intervention: motor neuroprosthesis

Comparison: no treatment

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks (95% CI)

Relative effect (95% CI)

No of participants (studies)

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

No treatment

Corresponding
risk

Motor prosthesis

Independence in activities of daily living

Activities involving limbs

Participation

Exercise capacity

Balance

Adverse events

CI: confidence interval
Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Template for 'Summary of findings' table
Navigate to table in Protocol