Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mobile‐based technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012927Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 19 January 2018see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Daniela C Gonçalves‐Bradley

    Correspondence to: Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    [email protected]

  • Brian S Buckley

    Department of Surgery, University of Phillipines, Manila, Philippines

  • Marita S Fønhus

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

  • Claire Glenton

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

  • Nicholas Henschke

    Cochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK

  • Simon Lewin

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

    Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa

  • Nicola Maayan

    Cochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK

  • Garrett L Mehl

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Tigest Tamrat

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Sasha Shepperd

    Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Contributions of authors

Conceiving and designing the protocol: MF, DGB, CG, SL, GM, SS, TT

Co‐ordinating the protocol: DGB, SS

Writing the protocol: DGB, SS

Providing general advice on the protocol: BB, MF, CG, SL, NH, GM, NM, TT

Securing funding for the protocol: GM, TT

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • National Institute of Medical Research, UK.

External sources

  • UNDP‐UNFPA‐UNICEF‐WHO‐World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored program executed by the World Health Organization (WHO), Switzerland.

    Provided funding for the review.

Declarations of interest

DGB: I was commissioned by the WHO to conduct this review.

BB: none known.

CG: none known.

NH: since June 2016 I have been employed by Cochrane Response, an evidence services unit operated by the Cochrane Collaboration and contracted by the WHO to produce this review.

SL: I am the Joint Co‐ordinating Editor for the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group.

NM: I previously worked for Enhanced Reviews Ltd, a company that conducts systematic reviews mostly for the public sector. Since June 2016 I have be employed by Cochrane Response, an evidence services unit operated by the Cochrane Collaboration and contracted by the WHO to produce this review.

GM: owns stock in Apple Computer.

MF: none known.

TT: none known.

SS: none known.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help and support of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), through the editorial input of the following editors and peer referees, who provided comments to improve the protocol: Julia Worswick (EPOC managing editor); Paul Miller (EPOC information specialist); and Brian McKinstry and Marco Bardus (external referees). The authors would also like to thank John Eyers for designing the search strategies and Meggan Harris for copy‐editing the protocol.

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service (NHS) or the Department of Health.

We are grateful to the Guideline Development Group of the Digital Health Guidelines (World Health Organization) for their constructive feedback in formulating the guiding questions for this systematic review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Aug 18

Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care

Review

Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley, Ana Rita J Maria, Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Gemma Villanueva, Marita S Fønhus, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Nicholas Henschke, Brian S Buckley, Garrett L Mehl, Tigest Tamrat, Sasha Shepperd

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012927.pub2

2018 Jan 19

Mobile‐based technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care

Protocol

Daniela C Gonçalves‐Bradley, Brian S Buckley, Marita S Fønhus, Claire Glenton, Nicholas Henschke, Simon Lewin, Nicola Maayan, Garrett L Mehl, Tigest Tamrat, Sasha Shepperd

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012927

Notes

This protocol is based on standard text and guidance provided by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC).

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.