Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010211.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 24 August 2017see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Joanna Tieu

    Correspondence to: ARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Emily Shepherd

    ARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Philippa Middleton

    Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

  • Caroline A Crowther

    Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Contributions of authors

Emily Shepherd wrote the update of this review with regular input and feedback from Joanna Tieu, Philippa Middleton and Caroline Crowther.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • ARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

External sources

  • Department of Health and Ageing, Australia.

  • NHMRC: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

    Funding for the Pregnancy and Childbirth Australian and New Zealand Satellite

  • NIHR: National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/05 – Pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines

Declarations of interest

Joanna Tieu: is supported by an NHMRC postgraduate scholarship and Arthritis Australia Ken Muirden fellowship (jointly funded by the Australian Rheumatology Association and Roche).

Emily Shepherd: none known.

Philippa Middleton: none known.

Caroline A Crowther: none known.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support from the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth editorial team in Liverpool, and the Australia and New Zealand Satellite of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth (funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)).

We thank Therese Dowswell from Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth who provided support for this update. Therese Dowswell's contribution to this project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane programme grant funding to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Aug 24

Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Review

Joanna Tieu, Emily Shepherd, Philippa Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010211.pub3

2013 Jun 05

Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Review

Joanna Tieu, Emily Bain, Philippa Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010211.pub2

2012 Nov 14

Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Protocol

Joanna Tieu, Philippa Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010211

Differences between protocol and review

In this update of the review:

  • we updated the outcomes, using the standard outcome set agreed by consensus between review authors of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth systematic reviews for prevention and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus and pre‐existing diabetes (which we adapted, as appropriate for this review question);

  • we updated the planned methods to be in line with those in the standard template used by Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth (including use of the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the body of evidence and the use of ’Summary of findings’ tables).

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Female; Humans; Infant; Pregnancy;

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.