Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sweet‐tasting solutions for needle‐related procedural pain in infants one month to one year of age

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008411.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 12 December 2012see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2019 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Manal Kassab

    Correspondence to: Department of Maternal and Child Health / Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Irbid, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Jann P Foster

    School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith DC, Australia

  • Maralyn Foureur

    Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Australia

  • Cathrine Fowler

    Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Australia

Contributions of authors

Manal Kassab (MK): undertook the administration of the review, protocol development, study searching, study retrieval, study selection, data extraction, data entry, statistical analyses, and report writing. She worked on drafting of the protocol; and for the review designing a search strategy, screening search results, selection of studies, writing to authors of papers for additional information, quality assessment, data extraction, carrying out the analysis, interpreting the analysis, drafting the final review and taking responsibility for any updates.

Jann Foster (JF): provided expertise in conducting systematic reviews, assisted with protocol development, study searching, study retrieval, study selection, data extraction, data entry, statistical analyses, and report writing, study selection, interpretation of results, report editing, statistical analyses, protocol development, reporting results and drafting of the final review.

Maralyn Fourer (MF): guided the process of drafting of the protocol, review of included studies, and for the review drafting and editing the final review.

Cathrine Fowler (CF): drafting the protocol; and for the review drafting and editing the final review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

The primary, third and fourth authors of this review are authors of one of the studies (Kassab 2012) included in this systematic

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the many authors we have contacted, and who provided us with data, clarifications, and helpful recommendations during the process of this review. We would like to thank the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care review group for their continued help and guidance during this process. We are also grateful for the support provided by the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) and Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Dec 12

Sweet‐tasting solutions for needle‐related procedural pain in infants one month to one year of age

Review

Manal Kassab, Jann P Foster, Maralyn Foureur, Cathrine Fowler

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008411.pub2

2010 Mar 17

Sweet‐tasting solutions for needle‐related procedural pain in infants one month to one year of age

Protocol

Manal Kassab, Jann P Foster, Maralyn Foureur, Cathrine Fowler

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008411

Differences between protocol and review

No differences.

Notes

2015

Updated searches in February and December 2015 did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. If appropriate, we will update the review if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitate major revisions.

2019

Updated searches in November 2018 did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. The review will be re‐assessed for updating in five years. If appropriate, we will update the review before this date if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitates major revisions.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.