Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 01 August 2023

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 07 October 2009see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Attasit Srisubat

    Correspondence to: Institute of Medical Research and Technology Assessment, Dept of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Somkiat Potisat

    Institute of Medical Research and Technology Assessment, Dept of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand

  • Bannakij Lojanapiwat

    Department of Surgery, Chiangmai University, Chiangmai, Thailand

  • Vasun Setthawong

    Department of Surgery, Lerdsin Hospital, Bangrak, Thailand

  • Malinee Laopaiboon

    Department of Biostatistics and Demography, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Contributions of authors

  • Writing of protocol and review: AS, SP, BL, VS, ML

  • Screening of titles and abstracts: AS, SP, VS

  • Assessment for inclusion: BL, VS

  • Risk of bias assessment: AS, SP

  • Data extraction: AS, SP

  • Data entry into RevMan: ML

  • Data analysis: ML

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.

  • Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University, Thailand.

  • Department of Surgery, Lerdsin Hospital, Thailand.

  • Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

External sources

  • Thailand Research Fund (Senior Research Scholar), Thailand.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our sincere thanks to the Thai Cochrane Network for their continued support and suggestions. Our great appreciation also goes to Drs Benjamin Canales, Ghulam Nabi, Anup Patel and Hans‐Gran Tiselius who helped us during the preparation of this review. In addition, we are grateful to Professor Dr Wachira Kochakan for his kind advice.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Aug 01

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones

Review

Vasun Setthawong, Attasit Srisubat, Somkiat Potisat, Bannakij Lojanapiwat, Porjai Pattanittum

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4

2014 Nov 24

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones

Review

Attasit Srisubat, Somkiat Potisat, Bannakij Lojanapiwat, Vasun Setthawong, Malinee Laopaiboon

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones

Review

Attasit Srisubat, Somkiat Potisat, Bannakij Lojanapiwat, Vasun Setthawong, Malinee Laopaiboon

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for kidney stones

Protocol

Attasit Srisubat, Somkiat Potisat, Bannakij Lojanapiwat, Vasun Setthawong, Malinee Laopaiboon

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007044

Differences between protocol and review

With the introduction of RevMan 5 and the new risk of bias assessment criteria, the quality items that we assessed were different from those stated in the protocol. Sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of follow‐up and selective reporting were used to assess study quality.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.