Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 1 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 1 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected.

Comparison 1 Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 2 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) in proximal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 2 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) in proximal colon.

Comparison 1 Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 3 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) in distal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 3 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) in distal colon.

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 1 Total neoplastic lesions.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 1 Total neoplastic lesions.

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 2 Total neoplstic lesions in proximal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 2 Total neoplstic lesions in proximal colon.

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 3 Total neoplastic lesions in distal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 3 Total neoplastic lesions in distal colon.

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 4 Total neoplastic lesions (studies with experienced colonoscopists only included).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Total number of neoplastic lesions detected, Outcome 4 Total neoplastic lesions (studies with experienced colonoscopists only included).

Comparison 3 Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 1 Number of patients with at least 1 polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 1 Number of patients with at least 1 polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic).

Comparison 3 Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 2 Patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) in the proximal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 2 Patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) in the proximal colon.

Comparison 3 Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 3 Patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) in the distal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected, Outcome 3 Patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) in the distal colon.

Comparison 4 Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected, Outcome 1 Total patients with at least one neoplastic lesion.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected, Outcome 1 Total patients with at least one neoplastic lesion.

Comparison 4 Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected, Outcome 2 Patients with at least one neoplastic lesion in proximal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected, Outcome 2 Patients with at least one neoplastic lesion in proximal colon.

Comparison 4 Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected, Outcome 3 Patients with at least one neoplastic lesion in the distal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected, Outcome 3 Patients with at least one neoplastic lesion in the distal colon.

Comparison 5 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 1 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 1 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions.

Comparison 5 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 2 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions in the proximal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 2 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions in the proximal colon.

Comparison 5 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 3 Number if diminutive neoplastic lesions in the distal colon..
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 3 Number if diminutive neoplastic lesions in the distal colon..

Comparison 6 Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention, Outcome 1 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention, Outcome 1 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions.

Comparison 6 Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention, Outcome 2 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions in the proximal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention, Outcome 2 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions in the proximal colon.

Comparison 6 Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention, Outcome 3 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions in the distal colon.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention, Outcome 3 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions in the distal colon.

Comparison 7 Number of patients with more than 3 neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 1 Number of patients with 3 or more adenomas.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Number of patients with more than 3 neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention, Outcome 1 Number of patients with 3 or more adenomas.

Comparison 1. Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected Show forest plot

4

1009

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.52, 1.01]

2 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) in proximal colon Show forest plot

3

811

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.35, 0.62]

3 Total polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) in distal colon Show forest plot

3

811

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.21, 0.48]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Total number polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic) detected
Comparison 2. Total number of neoplastic lesions detected

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Total neoplastic lesions Show forest plot

4

1009

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.24, 0.49]

2 Total neoplstic lesions in proximal colon Show forest plot

3

811

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.16, 0.43]

3 Total neoplastic lesions in distal colon Show forest plot

3

811

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [‐0.02, 0.26]

4 Total neoplastic lesions (studies with experienced colonoscopists only included) Show forest plot

2

519

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.41, 0.75]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Total number of neoplastic lesions detected
Comparison 3. Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of patients with at least 1 polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) Show forest plot

2

457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.13 [1.47, 3.10]

2 Patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) in the proximal colon Show forest plot

1

259

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [1.10, 3.16]

3 Patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) in the distal colon Show forest plot

1

259

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [1.14, 3.24]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Total number of patients with at least one polyp (neoplastic or non‐neoplastic) detected
Comparison 4. Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Total patients with at least one neoplastic lesion Show forest plot

4

1009

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.61 [1.24, 2.09]

2 Patients with at least one neoplastic lesion in proximal colon Show forest plot

2

551

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.55 [1.04, 2.30]

3 Patients with at least one neoplastic lesion in the distal colon Show forest plot

2

551

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.79, 1.94]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Total number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion detected
Comparison 5. Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions Show forest plot

3

749

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.14, 0.40]

2 Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions in the proximal colon Show forest plot

2

551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.10, 0.44]

3 Number if diminutive neoplastic lesions in the distal colon. Show forest plot

2

551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.07, 0.26]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Number of diminutive neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention
Comparison 6. Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions Show forest plot

3

749

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [1.23, 2.37]

2 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions in the proximal colon Show forest plot

2

551

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [1.29, 3.15]

3 Patients with diminutive neoplastic lesions in the distal colon Show forest plot

2

551

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.81, 2.30]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 6. Number of patients with at least 1 diminutive neoplastic lesion detected with each intervention
Comparison 7. Number of patients with more than 3 neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of patients with 3 or more adenomas Show forest plot

4

1009

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.49, 4.36]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 7. Number of patients with more than 3 neoplastic lesions detected with each intervention