Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006425.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 12 September 2012see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Pisake Lumbiganon

    Correspondence to: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

    [email protected]

  • Ruth Martis

    Faculty of Health, Humanities and Sciences, School of Applied Sciences and Allied Health, School of Midwifery, Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology (CPIT), Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Malinee Laopaiboon

    Department of Biostatistics and Demography, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Mario R Festin

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jacqueline J Ho

    Department of Paediatrics, Penang Medical College, Penang, Malaysia

  • Mohammad Hakimi

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Contributions of authors

P Lumbiganon (PL), R Martis (RM) and J Ho (JH) initiated the topic. PL, RM and M Laopaiboon (ML) drafted the protocol. All review authors approved the final version of the protocol. PL, RM, ML, JH, M Festin (MF) M Hakimi (MH) selected studies and extracted data. ML and PL conducted analysis and interpretation. PL and ML drafted the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

  • The University of Adelaide, Australia.

  • University of Philippines, Philippines.

  • Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.

  • Royal College of Medicine Perak, Malaysia.

  • Penang Medical College, Malaysia.

External sources

  • Thailand Research Fund (Senior Research Scholar), Thailand.

  • Wellcome Trust, UK.

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    NIHR Programme of centrally‐managed pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews of priority to the NHS and users of the NHS: 10/4001/02

  • Cochrane Health Promotion and Public Health (HPPH) Field, Australia.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We thank staff from the Australasian Cochrane Centre for technical support. We also sincerely thank Therese Dowswell (TD) for her helpful comments and suggestions for the completion of the review. TD is supported by a grant from the National Institute for Health Research.

The Cochrane Health Promotion and Public Health Field provided a bursary to support Ruth Martis to travel to Australia to attend a review authors' meeting during the development of this review. The bursary was administered by the SEA‐ORCHID project.

The World Health Organization retains copyright and all other rights in the manuscript of this Review as submitted for publication, including any revisions or updates to the manuscript which WHO may make from time to time.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by three peers (an editor and two referees who are external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Dec 06

Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration

Review

Pisake Lumbiganon, Ruth Martis, Malinee Laopaiboon, Mario R Festin, Jacqueline J Ho, Mohammad Hakimi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006425.pub4

2012 Sep 12

Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration

Review

Pisake Lumbiganon, Ruth Martis, Malinee Laopaiboon, Mario R Festin, Jacqueline J Ho, Mohammad Hakimi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006425.pub3

2011 Nov 09

Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration

Review

Pisake Lumbiganon, Ruth Martis, Malinee Laopaiboon, Mario R Festin, Jacqueline J Ho, Mohammad Hakimi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006425.pub2

2007 Apr 18

Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration

Protocol

Pisake Lumbiganon, Ruth Martis, Malinee Laopaiboon, Mario R Festin, Jacqueline J Ho, Mohammad Hakimi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006425

Differences between protocol and review

We added one more comparison of 'programmes involving multiple methods of providing education versus no formal education' to our subgroup analysis. We searched SCOPUS instead of EMBASE because our university subscribed to SCOPUS but not EMBASE.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.