Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial‐thickness burns

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 12 December 2012see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Wounds Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Jo C Dumville

    Correspondence to: Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

    [email protected]

  • Christopher Munson

    Plastic Surgery Department, St John's Hospital at Howden, Livingston, UK

Contributions of authors

Jo Dumville: literature searching, study selection, risk of bias assessment, writing and updating review.
Christopher Munson: literature searching, study selection, drafting written submission of review update.

Contributions of editorial base

Nicky Cullum: edited the review, advised on methodology, interpretation and review content. Approved the final review and review update prior to submission.
Sally Bell‐Syer: co‐ordinated the editorial process. Advised on methodology, interpretation and content. Edited the review and the updated review, checked the search results for the update and actioned feedback from the copy editors.
Ruth Foxlee: designed the search strategy, ran the searches and edited the search methods section for the updates.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • NIHR/Department of Health (England), (Cochrane Wounds Group), UK.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sally Bell‐Syer for her ongoing support and commitment, and acknowledge the Wounds Group Editors (Nicky Cullum, Andrea Nelson and Gill Worthy) and referees (Susanne Hempel, Tom Potokar and Durhane Wong‐Rieger) for their comments on both the protocol and review. The first update of this review was copy edited by Helena Mullineaux and Nancy Owens. This update was copy edited by Elizabeth Royle.

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Jason Wasiak and Heather Cleland who drafted the protocol, undertook study selection and wrote the original version of the review (Wasiak 2007). They did not wish to be involved in the current and future updates of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Dec 15

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial‐thickness burns

Review

Jo C Dumville, Christopher Munson, Janice Christie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub4

2012 Dec 12

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial‐thickness burns

Review

Jo C Dumville, Christopher Munson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub3

2007 Jul 18

Topical negative pressure (TNP) for partial thickness burns

Review

Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub2

2006 Oct 18

Topical negative pressure for partial thickness burns

Protocol

Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.