Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled nitric oxide for the postoperative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005055.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 19 October 2005see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Anaesthesia Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Matthew Bizzarro

    Correspondence to: Department of Pediatrics, Yale‐New Haven Hospital, New Haven, USA

    [email protected]

  • Ian Gross

    Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: Dr Matthew J. Bizzarro (MB)
Co‐ordinating the review: (MB)
Undertaking manual searches: (MB)
Screening search results:(MB) and Dr Ian Gross (IG)
Organizing retrieval of papers: (MB)
Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: D (MB)
Appraising quality of papers: (MB and IG)
Abstracting data from papers: (MB)
Writing to authors of papers for additional information: (MB)
Providing additional data about papers: (MB)
Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: (MB)
Data management for the review: (MB)
Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 4.2): (MB)
RevMan statistical data: (MB)
Other statistical analysis not using RevMan:(MB)
Double entry of data: (MB and IG)
Interpretation of data: (MB and IG)
Statistical inferences: (MB)
Writing the review: (MB)
Securing funding for the review: N/A
Performing previous work that was the foundation of the present study: (MB)
Guarantor for the review (one author): (MB)
Person responsible for reading and checking review before submission: (MB and IG)

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Yale University School of Medicine, USA.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

available in

None known

Acknowledgements

available in

We would like to thank Dr Mathew Zacharias, Prof. Marcus Müllner, Dr Tom Pedersen, Dr Karen Burns, Dr Keith Barrington, and The Cochrane Heart Group peer reviewers and consumer panel for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of our protocol. We would also like to thank Dr Mathew Zacharias, Dr Keith Barrington, Dr Ronald Day, Dr Robert Tulloh, Prof Nathan Pace, Kathie Godfrey, Janet Wale, and Jane Cracknell for their assistance and editorial comments during the preparation of this review.

We would like to thank Dr Ronald Day for the contribution of his individual patient data for analysis and inclusion in this review.

We would also like to thank Dr Michael Bracken for his instruction in the concepts and principles of evidence‐based medicine and the preparation of a systematic review in addition to his statistical assistance with the analyses of data.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Jul 03

Inhaled nitric oxide for the postoperative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease

Review

Matthew Bizzarro, Ian Gross, Fabiano T Barbosa

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005055.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Inhaled nitric oxide for the postoperative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease

Review

Matthew Bizzarro, Ian Gross

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005055.pub2

2004 Apr 19

Inhaled nitric oxide for the postoperative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease

Protocol

Matthew Bizzarro, Ian Gross

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005055

Differences between protocol and review

No data were available for some of the outcomes desired for analysis, including long‐term mortality, length of hospital stay, and incidence and severity of neurodevelopmental disability.

Notes

None

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.