Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 18 May 2017

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004948Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 18 October 2004see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Neonatal Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Colm PF O'Donnell

    Correspondence to: The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin 2, Ireland

    [email protected]

  • Peter G Davis

    Department of Paediatrics, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

  • Colin J Morley

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Australia

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

  • University of Melbourne, Australia.

External sources

  • Murdoch Childrens Reseacrh Institute, Australia.

  • National Health and Medical Reseach Council, Australia.

Declarations of interest

None

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 May 18

Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth

Protocol

Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004948.pub2

2004 Oct 18

Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth

Protocol

Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004948