Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra‐uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 18 October 2006see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Susanne M Veltman‐Verhulst

    Correspondence to: University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, Utrecht, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Ben J Cohlen

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Isala Clinics, Location Sophia, Zwolle, Netherlands

  • Edward Hughes

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, McMaster University,REI Consultant, ONE Fertility, Hamilton, Canada

  • Maas Jan Heineman

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

Susanne Veltman‐Verhulst: took the lead in rewriting the protocol and writing and updating the review. She completed the literature search and selection of the trials and performed the data extraction and analyses.

Ben Cohlen: was the primary author of the first publication of the protocol (1999). He worked as second reviewer on selection of the relevant trials and assisted with the writing of the document and updates of the article.

Edward Hughes: performed data extraction on the included trials and contributed to drafts of the review.

Maas Jan Heineman: initiated the process of writing the review and contributed to writing of the review and review updates.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Van Harreveld Stichting, Netherlands.

  • Marco Polo fonds, Netherlands.

  • Stichting de Korinthiers, Netherlands.

  • Jan Kornelis de Kock Stichting, Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

available in

None known

Acknowledgements

available in

We wish to thank all colleagues of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group for their help. Special thanks to Cindy Farquhar, Jane Marjoribanks, Anne Lethaby and statistician Andy Vail for all their advice and support. Thanks also to Egbert te Velde, who contributed to the first publication of the protocol in 1999.
Thanks are also expressed to all authors for their responses and additional information on their trials.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Mar 03

Intra‐uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

Review

Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke, Joyce Danielle Asseler, Ben J Cohlen, Susanne M Veltman‐Verhulst

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub6

2016 Feb 19

Intra‐uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

Review

Susanne M Veltman‐Verhulst, Edward Hughes, Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke, Ben J Cohlen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub5

2012 Sep 12

Intra‐uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

Review

Susanne M Veltman‐Verhulst, Ben J Cohlen, Edward Hughes, Maas Jan Heineman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub4

2006 Oct 18

Intra‐uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

Review

Susanne M Veltman‐Verhulst, Ben J Cohlen, Edward Hughes, Maas Jan Heineman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Intra‐uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

Protocol

Susanne M. Verhulst, Ben BJ Cohlen, Edward Hughes, Maas Jan Heineman, Egbert Te Velde

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub2

1999 Oct 25

Intra‐uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

Protocol

Ben J Cohlen, Edward Hughes, E R te Velde, Egbert Te Velde

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001838

Notes

This version of the review replaces the version published in The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2006. The inadvertent publication of the version published in Issue 4 occurred as a result of an error on the part of the Review Group Coordinator of the MDSG.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.