Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fibrinolytic agents for peripheral arterial occlusion

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001099.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 19 December 2013see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Vascular Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Iain Robertson

    Correspondence to: Department of Radiology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • David O Kessel

    Department of Clinical Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK

  • David C Berridge

    Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK

Contributions of authors

Iain Robertson selected the trials, wrote the text of the review, interpreted and extracted trial data, and worked on the review manuscript.

David C Berridge selected trials, interpreted and extracted trial data, and reviewed the manuscript.

David Kessel interpreted study data and reviewed the manuscript.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health Directorates, The Scottish Government, UK.

    The PVD Group editorial base is supported by the Chief Scientist Office.

Declarations of interest

David Berridge is an author of the Berridge 1991 study which is included in the review.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Disease Group for their assistance with this review and the Cochrane Consumer Network for providing a plain language summary.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2013 Dec 19

Fibrinolytic agents for peripheral arterial occlusion

Review

Iain Robertson, David O Kessel, David C Berridge

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001099.pub3

2010 Mar 17

Fibrinolytic agents for peripheral arterial occlusion

Review

Iain Robertson, David O Kessel, David C Berridge

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001099.pub2

1998 Apr 27

Fibrinolytic agents for acute arterial occlusion

Protocol

David C Berridge, David O Kessel, Iain Robertson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001099

Notes

This is the third of three reviews concerning surgical techniques for thrombolysis.

The first review is 'Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia' (Berridge 2013). The second review is 'Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis' (Kessel 2004).

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 1 Vessel Patency immediately post lysis.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 1 Vessel Patency immediately post lysis.

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 2 Asymptomatic Limb salvage at 30 days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 2 Asymptomatic Limb salvage at 30 days.

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 3 Amputation at 30 days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 3 Amputation at 30 days.

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 4 Death.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 4 Death.

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 5 Complications‐ major haemorrhage.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 5 Complications‐ major haemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 6 Complications‐ minor haemorrhage.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA, Outcome 6 Complications‐ minor haemorrhage.

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 1 Vessel patency immediately post lysis.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 1 Vessel patency immediately post lysis.

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 2 Asymptomatic Limb salvage at 30 days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 2 Asymptomatic Limb salvage at 30 days.

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 3 Amputation at 30 days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 3 Amputation at 30 days.

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 4 Death.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 4 Death.

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 5 Complications‐ major haemorrhage.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 5 Complications‐ major haemorrhage.

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 6 Complications‐ minor haemorrhage.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 6 Complications‐ minor haemorrhage.

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 1 Vessel patency immediately post lysis.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 1 Vessel patency immediately post lysis.

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 2 Limb salvage.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 2 Limb salvage.

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 3 Major amputation at 30 days‐6 months.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 3 Major amputation at 30 days‐6 months.

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 4 Death.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 4 Death.

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 5 Complications ‐ major haemorrhage.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 5 Complications ‐ major haemorrhage.

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 6 Complications ‐ minor haemorrhage.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA, Outcome 6 Complications ‐ minor haemorrhage.

Comparison 1. Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Vessel Patency immediately post lysis Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Asymptomatic Limb salvage at 30 days Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Amputation at 30 days Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Death Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Complications‐ major haemorrhage Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Complications‐ minor haemorrhage Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intravenous rt‐PA
Comparison 2. Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Vessel patency immediately post lysis Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Asymptomatic Limb salvage at 30 days Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Amputation at 30 days Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Death Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Complications‐ major haemorrhage Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Complications‐ minor haemorrhage Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Intra‐arterial streptokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA
Comparison 3. Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Vessel patency immediately post lysis Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Limb salvage Show forest plot

3

368

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [0.68, 4.15]

3 Major amputation at 30 days‐6 months Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Death Show forest plot

3

368

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.24, 2.54]

5 Complications ‐ major haemorrhage Show forest plot

3

298

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.19, 2.40]

6 Complications ‐ minor haemorrhage Show forest plot

3

386

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.20, 1.26]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Intra‐arterial urokinase versus intra‐arterial rt‐PA