Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

available in

Background

Gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) ‐ reflux of stomach contents +/‐ bile into the oesophagus causing symptoms such as heartburn and acid reflux ‐ is a common relapsing and remitting disease which often requires long‐term maintenance therapy. Patients with GORD may have oesophagitis (inflammation of the oesophagus) or a normal endoscopy (endoscopy negative reflux disease or ENRD).

Objectives

To assess the effects of continuous maintenance therapy in adults with GORD (both ENRD and healed oesophagitis).

Search methods

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003), CINAHL (1982‐2003), and the National Research Register (Issue 2, 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled studies comparing PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo in adults with reflux oesophagitis and ENRD.

Data collection and analysis

One author extracted data from included trials and a second author carried out an unblinded check. Two authors independently assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

Main results

Maintenance of patients with healed oesophagitis:
For a healing dose of PPI (generally the standard dose given by the manufacturer) versus placebo, the relative risk (RR) for oesophagitis relapse was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.36); versus H2RAs the RR was 0.36 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.46) and versus maintenance PPIs the RR was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.73). However overall adverse effects were also more common and headaches were more common when comparing healing PPIs to H2RAs.

For a maintenance dose of PPI (half of the standard dose) versus placebo, the RR for oesophagitis relapse was 0.46 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57) and versus H2RAs the RR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.69). Overall adverse effects were more common.

H2RAs were of marginal help but beneficial for symptomatic relief. Prokinetics and sucralfate were also more effective than placebo.

For ENRD patients:
Limited data with one RCT showed benefit for omeprazole 10 mg once daily over placebo (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.53).

Authors' conclusions

The findings in this review support the long‐term treatment of oesophagitis to prevent relapse, both endoscopically and symptomatically. Healing doses of PPIs are more effective than all other therapies, although there is an increase in overall adverse effects compared to placebo, and headache occurrence compared to H2RAs. H2RAs prevent relapse more effectively than placebo, demonstrating a role for PPI‐intolerant patients. Prokinetics and sucralfate both show benefit over placebo, but the former is no longer licenced. There is only limited data for ENRD.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease

Gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common disease. GORD is usually due to acid and bile refluxing through the lower oesophageal sphincter and produces symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and less commonly chest and abdominal pain. The main treatments available concentrate on reducing acid secretion by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), increasing the pressure at the lower oesophageal sphincter, enhancing gastric emptying with prokinetics and protecting mucosa from acid damage with sucralfate.

This review is a systematic review of randomised controlled trials examining the efficacy of continuous PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetic therapy and sucralfate in the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopy negative reflux disease. While intermittent or 'on‐demand' therapy is increasingly being used, it is not covered by the scope of this review.

The findings of this review support the long‐term treatment of oesophagitis to prevent relapse. Healing doses of PPIs are more effective than all other therapies, although there is an increase in overall adverse effects compared to placebo, and headache occurrence compared to H2RAs. H2RAs prevent relapse more effectively than placebo, demonstrating a role for PPI‐intolerant patients. Prokinetics and sucralfate both show benefit over placebo, but the former is no longer licenced.