Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012968Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 24 February 2018see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Breast Cancer Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Anjolie Chhabra

    Correspondence to: Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

    [email protected]

  • Hemanshu Prabhakar

    Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • Rajeshwari Subramaniam

    Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • Mahesh Kumar Arora

    Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • Anurag Srivastava

    Department of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • Mani Kalaivani

    Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Contributions of authors

AC, HP, AS, and MK drafted the protocol. All review authors read and approved the final protocol version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, India.

External sources

  • None, India.

Declarations of interest

AC has registered for PhD thesis titled "Effect of paravertebral anaesthesia on quality of life scores and circulating tumour cells in breast cancer patients". AC has no known conflicts of interest.

HP has no known conflicts of interest.

RS is co‐guide of above mentioned thesis. RS has no known conflicts of interest.

MKA has no known conflicts of interest.

AS is co‐guide of above mentioned PhD thesis. AS has no known conflicts of interest.

MK has no known conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Melina Willson (Managing Editor), for her constant, tireless help right from title registration to protocol development; Nicholas Wilcken and Annabel Goodwin (Co‐ordinating Editors) for their help in improving the manuscript; and Ava Grace Tan‐Koay/Slavica Berber for helping us develop a search strategy. We would also like to acknowledge our peer‐reviewers ‐ Sam Egger (statistical editor), Matthew Rucklidge (expert clinical reviewer), Sara Yaron (consumer) and Dana Stewart (consumer) during the preparation of the protocol for this systematic review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Feb 25

Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery

Review

Anjolie Chhabra, Apala Roy Chowdhury, Hemanshu Prabhakar, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Mahesh Kumar Arora, Anurag Srivastava, Mani Kalaivani

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012968.pub2

2018 Feb 24

Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery

Protocol

Anjolie Chhabra, Hemanshu Prabhakar, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Mahesh Kumar Arora, Anurag Srivastava, Mani Kalaivani

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012968

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.