Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for unexplained subfertility: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 05 September 2019

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012692Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 22 June 2017see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Raissa I Tjon‐Kon‐Fat

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Rui Wang

    Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Marinus JC Eijkemans

    Department of Biostatistics and Research Support, Julius Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Patrick MM Bossuyt

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Ben Willem J Mol

    Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Fulco Van der Veen

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Siladitya Bhattacharya

    Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen, UK

  • Madelon van Wely

    Correspondence to: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

All authors contributed to the methodology and the writing of the protocol. MW and RT wrote the first draft of the protocol.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Other.

External sources

  • None, Other.

Declarations of interest

SB has not received money from any source to support the work leading up to this review. SB has received support for travel and accommodation for speaking at conferences. His institution and institutional colleagues have received support from pharmaceutical companies for educational activities such as hosting seminars and attendance at conferences. He receives an honorarium as Editor in Chief of Human Reproduction Open.

BM and his institution have received payment for consultancy from ObsEva Geneva, Guerbet and Merck. BM has received payment for review preparation from the European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and has received travel/accommodation/meeting expenses for various non‐commercial scientific meetings.

RT, RW, ME, PB, FV and MW have no interests to declare.

Acknowledgements

None.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Sep 05

Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Review

Rui Wang, Nora A Danhof, Raissa I Tjon‐Kon‐Fat, Marinus JC Eijkemans, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Monique H Mochtar, Fulco van der Veen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Ben Willem J Mol, Madelon van Wely

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012692.pub2

2017 Jun 22

Interventions for unexplained subfertility: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Protocol

Raissa I Tjon‐Kon‐Fat, Rui Wang, Marinus JC Eijkemans, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Ben Willem J Mol, Fulco Van der Veen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Madelon van Wely

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012692

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Female; Humans; Pregnancy;

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.