Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Botulinum toxins for the prevention of migraine in adults

Collapse all Expand all

References

References to studies included in this review

Allergan 2015 {unpublished data only}

Allergan, Inc. Use of a treatment benefit questionnaire in patients with chronic migraine treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01833130 (first received 16 April 2013). CENTRAL

Anand 2006 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Anand KS, Prasad A, Singh MM, Sharma S, Bala K. Botulinum toxin type A in prophylactic treatment of migraine. American Journal of Therapeutics 2006;13(3):183‐7. CENTRAL

Aurora 2007 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Aurora SK, Gawel M, Brandes JL, Pokta S, Vandenburgh AM, Group BNAEMS. Botulinum toxin type a prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled exploratory study. Headache 2007;47(4):486‐99. CENTRAL

Aurora 2010 (PREEMPT 1) {published and unpublished data}

Allergan Inc. A study using botulinum toxin type A as headache prophylaxis for migraine patients with frequent headaches. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00156910 (first received 12 September 2005). CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Blumenfeld A, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: safety and tolerability of the effective treatment paradigm in the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:14‐5. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy and tolerability in patients who received all 5 treatment cycles in the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2011;51:61. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients who received all 5 treatment cycles in PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;14(Suppl 1):199. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients who received all five treatment cycles in the PREEMPT clinical program. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2014;129(1):61‐70. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30(7):793‐803. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Halker R, Pozo‐Rosich P, DeGryse RE, Adams AM, Matharu M. The impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on severe headache days: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled analysis. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2016;8(Suppl 9):S296. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Halker R, Pozo‐Rosich P, DeGryse RE, Adams AM, Matharu M. The impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on severe headache days: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled analysis. Headache 2016;56:27‐8. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Schim JD, Cutrer FM, Ward TN, Blumenfeld A, Lay C, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 1 trial double‐blind phase. Cephalalgia 2009;29:29. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin A for treatment of chronic migraine (CM): analysis of the PREEMPT chronic migraine subgroup with and without prior migraine prophylactic treatment. Cephalalgia 2011;31:18‐9. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Winner P, Freeman MC, Spierings EL, Heiring J, DeGryse RE, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: Pooled analyses of the PREEMPT clinical program 32‐week open‐label phase. Cephalalgia 2009;29:7‐8. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Winner P, Freeman MC, Spierings EL, Heiring JO, DeGryse RE, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Pooled analyses of the 56‐week PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2011;51(9):1358‐73. CENTRAL
Batty AJ, Hansen RN, Bloudek LM, Varon SF, Hayward EJ, Pennington BW, et al. The cost‐effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for the prophylaxis of headache in adults with chronic migraine in the UK. Journal of Medical Economics 2013;16(7):877‐87. CENTRAL
Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. Method of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: a safe, well‐tolerated, and effective treatment paradigm based on the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50(9):1406‐18. CENTRAL
Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for chronic migraine: PREEMPT trials establish a safe and effective dose and injection paradigm. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S12. CENTRAL
Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: PREEMPT trials establish a safe and effective dose and injection paradigm. Toxicon 2013;68:106‐7. CENTRAL
Chen SP, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. OnabotulinumtoxinA: Preventive treatment for chronic migraine. Current Pain and Headache Reports 2011;15(1):4‐7. CENTRAL
Diener HC, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients without medication overuse. European Journal of Neurology 2011;18:191. CENTRAL
Diener HC, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients without medication overuse. Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;14(Suppl 1):204. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for treatment of chronic migraine: Pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S14. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type a for treatment of chronic migraine: Double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled PREEMPT trials. Cephalalgia 2009;29(12):1350. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Toxicon 2013;68:110. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Degryse RE, Silberstein SD, Llpton RB, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: the double‐blind phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Cephalalgia 2009;29:34. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Headache symptoms of the PREEMPT population. Journal of Headache and Pain 2013;14(Suppl 1):99. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HC, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment reduces headache duration in adults with chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:58‐9. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HC, Turkel CC, DeGryse R, Brin M. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine treatment: 75% responder analysis from double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2013;14(Suppl 1):197. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HC, Turkel CC, Degryse RE, Brin MF. Onabotulinumtoxin A for treatment of chronic migraine: 75% responder analysis results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Cephalalgia 2011;31:87. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Brin M. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: 75% responder analysis results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Neurology 2012;78(1):03.227. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Smith TR, Becker WJ, Gendolla A, Relja M, Martin V, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 2 trial double‐blind phase. Cephalalgia 2009;29:29. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50(6):921‐36. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, Degryse RE, Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: a response. Headache 2011;51(6):1005‐8. CENTRAL
Gillard P, Devine B, Bloudek LM, Liu L, Varon SF, Lipton RB, et al. Quality of life among patients suffering from migraine: health utility by frequency of headache days. Value in Health 2011;14(3):A207. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Manack A, Aurora SK, Buse DC, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Demographic characteristics of chronic migraine sufferers in PREEMPT and the AMPP study. Headache 2010;50:32. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Rosen NL, Ailani J, DeGryse RE, Gillard PJ, Varon SF. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine over one year of treatment: pooled results from the PREEMPT randomized clinical trial program. Cephalalgia 2016;36(9):899‐908. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon S, Grosberg B, McAllister P J, Freltag F, Degryse RE, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A treatment improves health‐related quality of life and reduces the impact of chronic migraine: results from the double‐blind phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Cephalalgia 2009;29:32‐3. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment reduces adverse impact of chronic migraine (CM): PREEMPT clinical program HIT‐6 results. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S11. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Aurora SK, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment reduces adverse impact of chronic migraine (CM): PREEMPT clinical program HIT‐6 results. Headache 2010;50:47‐8. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Goadsby PJ, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment improves HRQOL and reduces the impact of chronic migraine: 56 week results from the PREEMPT clinical program. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S13. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Grosberg B, McAllister PJ, Freitag F, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine. Neurology 2011;77(15):1465‐72. CENTRAL
Matharu M, Halker R, Pozo‐Rosich P, DeGryse R, Manack Adams A, Aurora SK. The impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on severe headache days: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled analysis. Cephalalgia 2016;36(Suppl 1):34‐5. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment reduces pain intensity in adults with chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase of PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S12. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment reduces pain intensity and suffering in adults with chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:8. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld AM, Cady RK, Turner IM, Lipton RB, Diener HC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients who had acute headache medication overuse at baseline. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2013;331(1‐2):48‐56. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld AM, Cady RK, Turner IM, Lipton RB, Diener HC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients who had acute headache medication overuse at baseline. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2013;331(1‐2):48‐56. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld AM, Cady RK, Turner IM, Sirimanne M, DeGryse RE, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: analysis of the PREEMPT chronic migraine subgroup with baseline acute headache medication overuse. Cephalalgia 2009;29:31. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB, et al. Per cent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle: PREEMPT. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2015;86(9):996‐1001. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Saper JR, Stein MR, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for treatment of chronic migraine: 56‐week analysis of the PREEMPT chronic migraine subgroup with baseline acute headache medication overuse. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S13. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Varon SF, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment improves quality of life in patients with chronic migraine (CM): MSQ results from PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S11‐2. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Varon SF, Diener HC, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment improves quality of life in patients with chronic migraine (CM): MSQ results from PREEMPT. Headache 2010;50:30‐1. CENTRAL
Silberstein SW, Dodick DW, DeGryse R, Lipton R, Turkel CC. The percent of chronic migraine patients who responded to onabotulinumtoxinA treatment per treatment cycle in the PREEMPT clinical program. Neurology 2012;78(Suppl 1):200. CENTRAL
Silberstein SW, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, LiptonR, Turkel CC. The percent of chronic migraine patients who responded to onabotulinumtoxinA treatment per treatment cycle in the PREEMPT clinical program. Journal of Headache and Pain 2013;14(Suppl 1):200. CENTRAL

Barrientos 2003 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Barrientos N, Chana P. Botulinum toxin type A in prophylactic treatment of migraine headaches: a preliminary study. Journal of Headache and Pain 2003;4(3):146‐51. CENTRAL

Blumenfeld 2008 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Blumenfeld AM, Schim JD, Chippendale TJ. Botulinum toxin type A and divalproex sodium for prophylactic treatment of episodic or chronic migraine. Headache 2008;48(2):210‐20. CENTRAL

Blumenkron 2006 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Blumenkron D, Rivera C, Cuevas C. Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in patients with migraine [Eficacia del tratamiento con toxina botulinica tipo A en pacientes con migrana]. Medicina Interna de Mexico 2006;22(1):25‐31. CENTRAL

Cady 2008 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Cady R, Schreiber C. Botulinum toxin type A as migraine preventive treatment in patients previously failing oral prophylactic treatment due to compliance issues. Headache 2008;48(6):900‐13. CENTRAL

Cady 2011 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Cady RK, Schreiber CP, Porter JA, Blumenfeld AM, Farmer KU. A multi‐center double‐blind pilot comparison of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine. Headache 2011;51(1):21‐32. CENTRAL
Taylor FR. A comparison of the two evidence‐based drug therapies for chronic migraine. Current Pain and Headache Reports 2011;15(3):153‐6. CENTRAL

Cady 2014 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Cady R. Calcitonin gene‐related peptide levels in chronic migraine. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01071096 (first received 19 February 2010). CENTRAL
Cady R, Durham P, Turner I, Vause C, Harding T, Browning R. Analysis of salivary CGRP and cytokine levels in chronic migraine subjects treated with onabotulinumtoxinA. Headache 2012;52(5):893. CENTRAL
Cady R, Turner I, Dexter K, Beach ME, Cady R, Durham P. An exploratory study of salivary calcitonin gene‐related peptide levels relative to acute interventions and preventative treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine. Headache 2014;54(2):269‐77. CENTRAL
Turner IM, Cady RK, Durham P, Dexter JK, Cady R, Browning R. An exploratory study of calcitonin gene‐related peptide in chronic migraineurs receiving onabotulinumtoxinA: implications to pathophysiology and treatment responsiveness. Cephalalgia 2013;33:63‐4. CENTRAL

Chankrachang 2011 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Chankrachang S, Arayawichanont A, Poungvarin N, Nidhinandana S, Boonkongchuen P, Towanabut S, et al. Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) in the prophylaxis of migraine without aura. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2009;285(Suppl 1):S150. CENTRAL
Chankrachang S, Arayawichanont A, Poungvarin N, Nidhinandana S, Boonkongchuen P, Towanabut S, et al. Prophylactic botulinum type A toxin complex (Dysport) for migraine without aura. Headache 2011;51(1):52‐63. CENTRAL
Federal University of Bahia. Botulinum toxin type A in treatment of cranial allodynia in patients with headache. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01357798) first received (23 May 2011). CENTRAL
Ipsen. Dysport® in migraine without aura prophylaxis: DIMWAP Study. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00258609 (first received 24 November 2005). CENTRAL

Diener 2010 (PREEMPT 2) {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Allergan Inc. A study using botulinum toxin type A as headache prophylaxis for migraine patients with frequent headaches. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00168428 (first received 15 September 2005). CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Blumenfeld A, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: safety and tolerability of the effective treatment paradigm in the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:14‐5. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients who received all 5 treatment cycles in PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;14(Suppl 1):199. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxina for chronic migraine: efficacy and tolerability in patients who received all 5 treatment cycles in the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2011;51:61. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients who received all five treatment cycles in the PREEMPT clinical program. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2014;129(1):61‐70. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Halker R, Pozo‐Rosich P, DeGryse R, Adams A M, Matharu M. The impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on severe headache days: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled analysis. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2016;8(Suppl 9):S296. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Halker R, Pozo‐Rosich P, DeGryse R, Adams A, Matharu M. The impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on severe headache days: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled analysis. Headache 2016;56:27‐8. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin A for treatment of chronic migraine (CM): analysis of the PREEMPT chronic migraine subgroup with and without prior migraine prophylactic treatment. Cephalalgia 2011;31:18‐9. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Winner P, Freeman MC, Spierings EL, Heiring J, DeGryse RE, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled analyses of the PREEMPT clinical program 32‐week open‐label phase. Cephalalgia 2009;29:7‐8. CENTRAL
Aurora SK, Winner P, Freeman MC, Spierings EL, Heiring JO, DeGryse RE, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled analyses of the 56‐week PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2011;51(9):1358‐73. CENTRAL
Batty AJ, Hansen RN, Bloudek LM, Varon SF, Hayward EJ, Pennington BW, et al. The cost‐effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for the prophylaxis of headache in adults with chronic migraine in the UK. Journal of Medical Economics 2013;16(7):877‐87. CENTRAL
Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. Method of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: a safe, well‐tolerated, and effective treatment paradigm based on the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50(9):1406‐18. CENTRAL
Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for chronic migraine: PREEMPT trials establish a safe and effective dose and injection paradigm. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S12. CENTRAL
Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: PREEMPT trials establish a safe and effective dose and injection paradigm. Toxicon 2013;68:106‐7. CENTRAL
Chen SP, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. OnabotulinumtoxinA: preventive treatment for chronic migraine. Current Pain and Headache Reports 2011;15(1):4‐7. CENTRAL
Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30(7):804‐14. CENTRAL
Diener HC, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients without medication overuse. European Journal of Neurology 2011;18:191. CENTRAL
Diener HC, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients without medication overuse. Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;14(Suppl 1):204. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S14. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type a for treatment of chronic migraine: double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled PREEMPT trials. Cephalalgia 2009;29(12):1350. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Toxicon 2013;68:110. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Headache symptoms of the PREEMPT population. Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;14(Suppl 1):99. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HC, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment reduces headache duration in adults with chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:58‐9. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HC, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Brin M. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine treatment: 75% responder analysis from double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;14(Suppl 1):197. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HC, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Brin M. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: 75% responder analysis results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Neurology 2012;78(1):03.227. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Diener HC, Turkel CC, Degryse RE, Brin MF. Onabotulinumtoxin A for treatment of chronic migraine: 75% responder analysis results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Cephalalgia 2011;31:87. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Smith TR, Becker WJ, Gendolla A, Relja M, Martin V, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 2 trial double‐blind phase. Cephalalgia 2009;29:29. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Smith TR, Becker WJ, Gendolla A, Relja M, Martin V, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 2 trial double‐blind phase. Cephalalgia 2009;29:29. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50(6):921‐36. CENTRAL
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, Degryse RE, Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: a response. Headache 2011;51(6):1005‐8. CENTRAL
Dodlck DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Degryse RE, Silberstein SD, Llpton RB, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: The double‐blind phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Cephalalgia 2009;29:34. CENTRAL
Gillard P, Devine B, Bloudek LM, Liu L, Varon SF, Lipton RB, et al. Quality of life among patients suffering from migraine: Health utility by frequency of headache days. Value in Health 2011;14(3):A207. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Manack A, Aurora SK, Buse DC, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Demographic characteristics of chronic migraine sufferers in PREEMPT and the AMPP study. Headache 2010;50:32. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Rosen NL, Ailani J, DeGryse RE, Gillard PJ, Varon SF. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine over one year of treatment: Pooled results from the PREEMPT randomized clinical trial program. Cephalalgia 2016;36(9):899‐908. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon S, Grosberg B, McAllister PJ, Freltag F, Degryse RE, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A treatment improves health‐related quality of life and reduces the impact of chronic migraine: Results from the double‐blind phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Cephalalgia 2009;29:32‐3. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment reduces adverse impact of chronic migraine (CM): PREEMPT clinical program HIT‐6 results. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S11. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Aurora SK, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment reduces adverse impact of chronic migraine (CM): PREEMPT clinical program HIT‐6 results. Headache 2010;50:47‐8. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Goadsby PJ, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment improves HRQOL and reduces the impact of chronic migraine: 56 week results from the PREEMPT clinical program. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S13. CENTRAL
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Grosberg B, McAllister PJ, Freitag F, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine. Neurology 2011;77(15):1465‐72. CENTRAL
Matharu M, Halker R, Pozo‐Rosich P, DeGryse R, Manack Adams A, Aurora SK. The impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on severe headache days: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled analysis. Cephalalgia 2016;36(Suppl 1):34‐5. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment reduces pain intensity in adults with chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase of PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S12. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Aurora SK, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment reduces pain intensity and suffering in adults with chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:8. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld AM, Cady RK, Turner IM, Lipton RB, Diener HC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients who had acute headache medication overuse at baseline. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2013;331(1‐2):48‐56. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld AM, Cady RK, Turner IM, Lipton RB, Diener HC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients who had acute headache medication overuse at baseline. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2013;331(1‐2):48‐56. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld AM, Cady RK, Turner IM, Sirimanne M, DeGryse RE, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A for treatment of chronic migraine: analysis of the PREEMPT chronic migraine subgroup with baseline acute headache medication overuse. Cephalalgia 2009;29:31. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB, et al. Per cent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle: PREEMPT. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2015;86(9):996‐1001. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Lipton R, Turkel CC. The percent of chronic migraine patients who responded to onabotulinumtoxinA treatment per treatment cycle in the PREEMPT clinical program. Journal of Headache and Pain 2013;14(Suppl 1):200. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Saper JR, Stein MR, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A for treatment of chronic migraine: 56‐week analysis of the PREEMPT chronic migraine subgroup with baseline acute headache medication overuse. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S13. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Varon SF, Diener HC, DeGryse RE, Turkel CC. Onabotulinumtoxin‐A treatment improves quality of life in patients with chronic migraine (CM): MSQ results from PREEMPT. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11:S11‐2. CENTRAL
Silberstein SD, Varon SF, Diener HC, Degryse RE, Turkel CC. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment improves quality of life in patients with chronic migraine (CM): MSQ results from PREEMPT. Headache 2010;50:30‐1. CENTRAL
Silberstein SW, Dodick DW, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB, Turkel CC. The percent of chronic migraine patients who responded to onabotulinumtoxinA treatment per treatment cycle in the PREEMPT clinical program. Neurology 2012;78(Suppl 1):200. CENTRAL

Elkind I 2006 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Elkind AH, O'Carroll P, Blumenfeld A, DeGryse R, Dimitrova R, BoNTASG. A series of three sequential, randomized, controlled studies of repeated treatments with botulinum toxin type A for migraine prophylaxis. Journal of Pain 2006;7(10):688‐96. CENTRAL

Elkind II 2006 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Elkind AH, O'Carroll P, Blumenfeld A, DeGryse R, Dimitrova R, Bo NTASG. A series of three sequential, randomized, controlled studies of repeated treatments with botulinum toxin type A for migraine prophylaxis. Journal of Pain 2006;7(10):688‐96. CENTRAL

Freitag 2008 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Freitag FG, Diamond S, Diamond M, Urban G. Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of chronic migraine without medication overuse. Headache 2008;48(2):201‐9. CENTRAL

Hollanda 2014 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Hollanda L, Monteiro L, Melo AS. Botulinum toxin type A for cephalic cutaneous allodynia in chronic migraine: a randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial. Neurology International 2014;6(4):70‐3. CENTRAL
Monteiro L, Hollanda L, Melo A. Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of cephalic cutaneous allodynia in chronic migraine: a randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled pilot trial. Movement Disorders 2013;28:S425. CENTRAL

Hou 2015 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Hou M, Xie JF, Kong XP, Zhang Y, Shao YF, Wang C, et al. Acupoint injection of onabotulinumtoxin A for migraines. Toxins 2015;7(11):4442‐54. CENTRAL
Shao YF, Zhang Y, Zhao P, Yan WJ, Kong XP, Fan LL, et al. Botulinum toxin type A therapy in migraine: preclinical and clinical trials. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 2013;15(10):e7704. CENTRAL

Jabbari 2014 {unpublished data only}

Jabbari B. Investigation of efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin A (BOTOX‐Allergan Inc.) in migraine headaches. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00660192 (first received 17 April 2008). CENTRAL
Richardson D, Jabbari B. Botulinum toxin treatment of chronic migraine‐a double blind study with a novel technique employing fewer injections. Neurology 2016;86(Suppl 16):4.124. CENTRAL

Jost 2011 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Jost W, Neidhardt S, Klasser M. Low‐dosed botulinum toxin in migraine without aura: a randomized, double‐blind placebo‐controlled crossover study. Klinische Neurophysiologie Conference 2010;41(1):2. CENTRAL
Jost WH. Low‐dosed botulinum toxin A in the prophylactic management of unilateral migraine: a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled crossover study. Open Pain Journal 2011;4(1):4‐7. CENTRAL

Lauretti 2014 {published and unpublished data}

Lauretti GR, Rosa CP, Kitayama A, Lopes BCP. Comparison of Botox or Prosigne and facial nerve blockade as adjuvant in chronic migraine. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering 2014;7:446‐52. CENTRAL
Lauretti GR, Rosa CP, Lima ICPR, Almeida R, Resende CS. Randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial of botulinum toxin type‐A (Prosigne‐Chinese or Botox) as coadjuvant for chronic daily headache. European Journal of Pain 2009;13:S126. CENTRAL

Mathew 2009 {published data only}

Mathew NT. A double‐blind comparison of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) and topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of transformed migraine headaches: a pilot study. European Journal of Neurology 2008;15(Suppl 3):328. CENTRAL
Mathew NT, Jaffri SF. A double‐blind comparison of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) and topiramate (TOPAMAX) for the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine: a pilot study. Headache 2009;49(10):1466‐78. CENTRAL

Mazza 2016 {published and unpublished data}

Mazza MR, Ferrigno G, Vescio B, Quattrone A, Bono F. Subcutaneous botulinum toxin type A treatment for prophylaxis of headaches in chronic migraine: a new therapeutic strategy. Cephalalgia2016; Vol. 36:35. CENTRAL

Millán‐Guerrero 2009 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Millán‐Guerrero RO, Isais‐Millán S, Barreto‐Vizcaíno S, Rivera‐Castaño L, Rios‐Madariaga C. Subcutaneous histamine versus botulinum toxin type A in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, double‐blind study. European Journal of Neurology 2009;16(1):88‐94. CENTRAL

Petri 2009 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Petri S, Tölle T, Straube A, Pfaffenrath V, Stefenelli U, Ceballos‐Baumann A, et al. Botulinum toxin as preventive treatment for migraine: a randomized double‐blind study. European Neurology 2009;62(4):204‐11. CENTRAL

Relja 2007 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Relja M, Poole AC, Schoenen J, Pascual J, Lei X, Thompson C, et al. A multicentre, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study of multiple treatments of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine headaches. Cephalalgia 2007;27(6):492‐503. CENTRAL

Saper 2007 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Saper JR, Mathew NT, Loder EW, DeGryse R, VanDenburgh AM, BoNTASG. A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled comparison of botulinum toxin type a injection sites and doses in the prevention of episodic migraine. Pain Medicine 2007;8(6):478‐85. CENTRAL

Silberstein 2000 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Silberstein S, Mathew N, Saper J, Jenkins S. Botulinum toxin type A as a migraine preventive treatment. Headache 2000;40(6):445‐50. CENTRAL

Vo 2007 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Vo AH, Satori R, Jabbari B, Green J, Killgore WD, Labutta R, et al. Botulinum toxin type‐a in the prevention of migraine: a double‐blind controlled trial. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 2007;78(Suppl 5):B113‐8. CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Cady 2012 {published data only}

Cady R. A study to evaluate the tolerability of Botox and topiramate or Botox and placebo and effect on cognitive efficiency. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01700387 (first received 4 October 2012). CENTRAL

De Tommaso 2016 {published data only}

Franco G, Vecchio E, Delussi M, Ricci K, Montemurno A, De Tommaso M. Mechanism of action and clinical evidence of botulinum toxin in chronic migraine. Journal of Headache and Pain 2015;16(Suppl 1):A138. CENTRAL
de Tommaso M, Delussi M, Ricci K, Montemurno A, Carbone I, Vecchio E. Effects of onabotulintoxinA on habituation of laser evoked responses in chronic migraine. Toxins 2016;8:163. CENTRAL

Evers 2004 {published data only}

Evers S, Vollmer‐Haase J, Schwaag S, Rahmann A, Husstedt I W, Frese A. Botulinum toxin A in the prophylactic treatment of migraine ‐ a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Cephalalgia 2004;24(10):838‐43. CENTRAL

Guyuron 2005 {published data only}

Guyuron B, Kriegler JS, Davis J, Amini SB. Comprehensive surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2005;115(1):1‐9. CENTRAL
Guyuron B, Kriegler JS, Davis J, Amini SB. Five‐year outcome of surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2011;127(2):603‐8. CENTRAL
Guyuron B, Tucker T, Davis J. Surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2002;109:2183‐9. CENTRAL

Ondo 2004 {published data only}

Ondo WG, Vuong KD, Derman HS. Botulinum toxin A for chronic daily headache: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel design study. Cephalalgia 2004;24(1):60‐5. CENTRAL

Ruggeri 2013 {published data only}

Ruggeri M, Carletto A, Marchetti M. Cost‐effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for the prophylaxis of chronic migraine [Valutazione economica della tossina botulinica per la profilassi dell'emicrania cronica]. Pharmaco Economics 2013;15(1):19‐33. CENTRAL

Schwedt 2007 {published data only}

Schwedt TJ, Hentz JG, Dodick DW. Factors associated with the prophylactic effect of placebo injections in subjects enrolled in a study of botulinum toxin for migraine. Cephalalgia 2007;27(6):528‐34. CENTRAL

References to studies awaiting assessment

Brin 2000 {published data only}

Brin M, Swope D, O'Brien C, Abbasi S, Pogoda JM. Botox for migraine: double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, region specific evaluation. Cephalalgia 2000;20:421‐2. CENTRAL

Ipsen 2006 {published data only}

Ipsen. Efficacy and safety study of Dysport used for migraine prophylaxis. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00301665 (first received 13 March 2006). CENTRAL

Kuper 2007 {published data only}

Kuper M, Diener H C. Botulinum toxin type A in migraine prophylaxis: placebo effect or efficacy? [Botulinumtoxin A in der migraneprophylaxe: plazeboeffekt oder wirksamkeit?]. Aktuelle Neurologie 2007;34(8):464‐5. CENTRAL

Mathew 2005 {published data only}

Dodick DW, Mauskop A, Elkind AH, DeGryse R, Brin MF, Silberstein SD, et al. Botulinum toxin type a for the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache: subgroup analysis of patients not receiving other prophylactic medications: a randomized double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Headache 2005;45(4):315‐24. CENTRAL
Mathew NT, Frishberg BM, Gawel M, Dimitrova R, Gibson J, Turkel C, et al. Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) for the prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Headache 2005;45(4):293‐307. CENTRAL

Silberstein 2005 {published data only}

Silberstein SD, Stark SR, Lucas SM, Christie SN, Degryse RE, Turkel CC, et al. Botulinum toxin type A for the prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2005;80(9):1126‐37. CENTRAL

NCT02074163 {published data only}

NCT02074163. ASIS for Botox in Chronic Migraine. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02074163 (first received 28 February 2014). CENTRAL

NCT02291380 {published data only}

NCT02291380. A study to evaluate botulinum toxin type A for injection(HengLi)for prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02291380. clinicaltrials.gov, (first received 14 November 2014):(NCT02291380). CENTRAL

NTR3440 {published data only}

NTR3440. Chronification and reversibility of migraine. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR3440 (first received 15 May 2012). CENTRAL

Aoki 2005

Aoki KR. Review of a proposed mechanism for the antinociceptive action of botulinum toxin type A. First International Porto Pirgos Conference on Advances in Neuroscience 2005;26(5):785‐93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2005.01.017]

Aurora 2010

Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. PREEMPT 1 Chronic Migraine Study Group. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30(7):793‐803. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102410364676]

Batty 2013

Batty AJ, Hansen RN, Bloudek LM, Varon SF, Hayward EJ, Pennington BW, et al. The cost‐effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for the prophylaxis of headache in adults with chronic migraine in the UK. Journal of Medical Economics 2013;16(7):877‐87.

Bigal 2008

Bigal ME, Serrano D, Reed M, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine in the population ‐ burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment. Neurology 2008;71(8):559‐66. [DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000323925.29520.e7]

BMA/RPS 2014

British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. British National Formulary (BNF). Available from www.bnf.org accessed 12 February 2015.

Brin 2002

Brin MF, Hallett M, Jankovic J. Scientific and Therapeutic Aspects of Botulinum Toxin. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.

Burstein 2014

Burstein R, Zhang X, Levy D, Aoki KR, Brin MF. Selective inhibition of meningeal nociceptors by botulinum neurotoxin type A: therapeutic implications for migraine and other pains. Cephalalgia 2014;34(11):853‐69. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102414527648]

Cherkin 1998

Cherkin DC, Wheeler KJ, Barlow W, Deyo RA. Medication use for low back pain in primary care. Spine 1998;23:607‐14. [DOI: 10.1097/00007632‐199803010‐00015]

Cui 2004

Cui M, Khanijou S, Rubino J, Aoki KR. Subcutaneous administration of botulinum toxin A reduces formalin‐induced pain. Pain 2004;107:125‐33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.008]

Dechartres 2013

Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ 2013;346:f2304.

Deeks 2011

Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Diener 2007

Diener HC, Bussone G, Van Oene JC, Lahaye M, Schwalen S, Goadsby PJ, et al. Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Cephalalgia 2007;27:814–23.

Diener 2010

Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30(7):804‐14. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102410364677]

Elkind 2006

Elkind AH, O'Carroll P, Blumenfeld A, DeGryse R, Dimitrova R, BoNTASG. A series of three sequential, randomized, controlled studies of repeated treatments with botulinum toxin type A for migraine prophylaxis. Journal of Pain 2006;7(10):688‐96.

GBD 2016

GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990‐2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1545‐602.

Giamberardino 2016

Giamberardino MA, Affaitati G, Curto M, Negro A, Costantini R, Martelletti P. Anti‐CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: current perspectives. Internal and Emergency Medicine 2016;11(8):1045‐57.

Goadsby 2002

Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD. Migraine: current understanding and treatment. Drug Therapy 2002;346:257‐70. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra010917]

Goadsby 2017

Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallstrom Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F, et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. New England Journal of Medicine 2017;377(22):2123‐32.

Goodsell 2013

Goodsell D. SNARE proteins. Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB). November 2013. Available from www.rcsb.org/pdb/101/motm.do?momID=167 [accessed on 27/07/2017]. [DOI: 10.2210/rcsb_pdb/mom_2013_11]

GRADEpro GDT 2015 [Computer program]

McMaster University. GRADEpro GDT. Version accessed 1 March 2017. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015.

Guyatt 2008

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7650):924‐6. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD]

Hawker 2011

Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short‐Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF‐MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form‐36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF‐36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care and Research 2011;63 Suppl 11:S240‐52.

Hayton 2005

Hayton MJ, Santini AJ, Hughes PJ, Frostick SP, Trail IA, Stanley JK. Botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of tennis elbow. A double‐blind, randomized, controlled, pilot study. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2005;87(3):503‐7. [DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.01896]

Hepp 2015

Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Gillard P, Hansen RN, Devine EB. Adherence to oral migraine‐preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2015;35(6):478‐88.

Hepp 2016

Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Chia J, Matthew N, Gillard P, et al. Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia 2016;37(5):470‐85.

Higgins 2003

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60.

Higgins 2011a

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Higgins 2011b

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Higgins 2011c

Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

IHS 1988

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988;8(Suppl. 7):1‐96. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.1991.tb00021.x/10.1111/j.1468‐2982.1991.tb00022.x]

IHS 2004

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition, 1st revision. Cephalalgia 2004;24(Suppl 1):1‐160. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2004.00653.x]

IHS 2013

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2013;33(9):629‐808. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102413485658]

Jankovic 1990

Jankovic J, Schwartz K. Botulinum toxin injections for cervical dystonia. Neurology 1990;40:277‐80. [DOI: 10.1212/WNL.40.2.277]

Keizer 2002

Keizer SB, Rutten HP, Pilot P, Morré HH, v Os JJ, Verburg AD. Botulinum toxin injection versus surgical treatment for tennis elbow: a randomized pilot study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2002;401:125‐31.

Lefebvre 2011

Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Linde 2004

Linde K, Rossnagel K. Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub2]

Linde 2012

Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, Katsarava Z, et al. The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project. European Journal of Neurology 2012;19:703‐11. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐1331.2011.03612.x]

Linde 2013a

Linde M, Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, McCrory DC. Gabapentin or pregabalin for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010609]

Linde 2013b

Linde M, Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, McCrory DC. Antiepileptics other than gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, and valproate for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010608]

Linde 2013c

Linde M, Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, McCrory DC. Topiramate for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010610]

Linde 2013d

Linde M, Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, McCrory DC. Valproate (valproic acid or sodium valproate or a combination of the two) for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010611]

Lipton 2007

Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007;68(5):343‐9.

Moher 2009

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine 6;7:e1000097. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed1000097]

Nguyen 2017

Nguyen TL, Collins GS, Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Daures JP, Landais P, et al. Simple randomization did not protect against bias in smaller trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2017;84:105‐13. [PUBMED: 28257927]

NICE 2012a

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Botulinum toxin type A for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine. NICE technology appraisal guidance [TA260]. Available from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta260 accessed 27 July 2017.

NICE 2012b

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Headaches: Diagnosis and management of headaches in young people and adults. NICE guidelines [CG150]. Available from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg150 accessed 27 July 2017.

Nüesch 2010

Nüesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Rutjes AW, Tschannen B, Altman DG, et al. Small study effects in meta‐analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ 2010;341:c3515.

Paterson 2014

Paterson K, Lolignier S, Wood JN, McMahon SB, Bennett DLH. Botulinum toxin‐A treatment reduces human mechanical pain sensitivity and mechanotransduction. Annals of Neurology 2014;75(4):591‐6. [DOI: 10.1002/ana.24122]

Pietrobon 2005

Pietrobon D. Migraine: new molecular mechanisms. Neuroscientist 2005;11(4):373‐86. [DOI: 10.1177/1073858405275554]

Porta 2000

Porta M. A comparative trial of botulinum toxin type A and methylprednisolone for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome and pain from chronic muscle spasm. Pain 2000;85:101‐5. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(99)00264‐X]

Ranoux 2008

Ranoux D, Attal N, Morain F, Bouhassira D. Botulinum toxin type A induces direct analgesic effects in chronic neuropathic pain. Annals of Neurology 2008;64:274‐83. [DOI: 10.1002/ana.21427]

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Rothrock 2014

Rothrock JF, Bloudek LM, Houle TT, Andress‐Rothrock D, Varon SF. Real‐world economic impact of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with chronic migraine. Headache 2014;54(10):1565‐73.

Schulz 2010

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.

Schünemann 2011

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and ‘Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Silberstein 2007

Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Freitag FG, Ramadan N, Mathew N, et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Headache 2007;47(2):170‐80.

Silberstein 2008

Silberstein S, Tfelt‐Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 2008;28(5):484‐95.

Silberstein 2013

Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld AM, Cady RK, Turner IM, Lipton RB, Diener HC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24‐week pooled subgroup analysis of patients who had acute headache medication overuse at baseline. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2013;331(1‐2):48‐56.

Silberstein 2017

Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, et al. Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. New England Journal of Medicine 2017;377(22):2113‐22.

Simpson 2016

Simpson DM, Hallett M, Ashman E, Comella CL, Green MW, Gronseth GS, et al. Practice guideline update summary: botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache. Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology2016; Vol. 86, issue 19:1818‐26.

Smith 2002

Smith HS, Audette J, Royal MA. Botulinum toxin in pain management of soft tissue syndromes. Clinical Journal of Pain 2002;18:S147‐54. [DOI: 10.1097/00002508‐200211001‐00006]

Stovner 2010

Stovner LJ, Andree C. Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11(4):289‐99. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194‐010‐0217‐0]

Tfelt‐Hansen 2012

Tfelt‐Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, Dahlof C, D'Amico D, Diener HC, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia2012; Vol. 32, issue 1:6‐38.

Victor 2010

Victor T, Hu X, Campbell J, Buse D, Lipton R. Migraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: a life‐span study. Cephalalgia 2010;30(9):1065‐72. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102409355601]

Wong 2005

Wong SM, Hui AC, Tong PY, Poon DW, Yu E, Wong LK. Treatment of lateral epicondylitis with botulinum toxin: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 2005;143:793‐7. [DOI: 10.7326/0003‐4819‐143‐11‐200512060‐00007]

Yuan 2009

Yuan RY, Sheu JJ, Yu JM, Chen WT, Tseng IJ, Chang HH, et al. Botulinum toxin for diabetic neuropathic pain: a randomised double‐blind crossover trial. Neurology 2009;72:1473‐8. [DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000345968.05959.cf]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Allergan 2015

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, sites unclear

2 treatments, 12 weeks FU per treatment

Fixed injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and at week 12, week 22, week 24

Participants

Inclusion criteria: history of CM for at least 6 months prior to the screening visit; ≥ 15 headache d during the 4‐week screening period; ≥ 4 headache episodes lasting ≥ 4 h and ≥ 50% of headache days were migraine

Exclusion criteria: conditions causing chronic facial pain such as temporomandibular disorder and fibromyalgia; use of headache prophylaxis medication within 4 weeks of the screening visit; diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, Eaton‐Lambert Syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; previous use of any BTX of any sero‐type for any reason; skin infections or acne that would interfere with the injection sites; acupuncture, TENS, cranial traction, dental splints for headache, nociceptive trigeminal inhibition, occipital nerve block treatments, or injection of anaesthetics/steroids within 4 weeks of screening

N = 52, mean age 43, M 13/F 39

CM only eligible, MOH eligible Y/N not reported

Baseline disease characteristics not stated

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 155 U, number and location of injection sites not reported

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Assessment of CM impacts questionnaire

Assessment of CM symptoms questionnaire

HIT‐6

Migraine‐specific questionnaire

Notes

Protocol NCT01833130

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

No diary data recorded

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: subject, caregiver and investigator blind, participant blinded with matched placebo injections; no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Dropouts at 56%

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Not yet published, information and data from trial registry only

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Anand 2006

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment, 3 months FU

Fixed injections of Botox vs placebo injections

Assessments at baseline and 1 month and 3 months post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐50 years; history of severe or moderately severe migraine with/without aura (criteria used IHS 1988); 4‐8 attacks per month or stable headache frequency and severity for the past 1 year; users of prophylactic medication such as beta‐blockers and flunarizine were not excluded.

Exclusion criteria: cardiovascular disease, peripheral venous disease and seizures; pregnancy or lactation; abused drugs or alcohol in the preceding 2 years; > 15 days headache per month or history of complicated migraine

N = 32, mean age not stated, M 8/F 24

CM excluded, MOH excluded

Baseline disease characteristics not stated

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 50 U, 10 injections (3 pericranial muscle regions)

Comparator: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of migraine days

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of responders

Use of rescue medication

Severity of migraine

Overall treatment effect

Quality‐of‐life questionnaire

Adverse events

Notes

Funding source unclear

Diary period 28 days

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Appears to be no dropouts

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Data reported in unusual format

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Aurora 2007

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

3 treatments, 90 days FU per treatment

'Follow the pain' (fixed for occipitalis) injections of Botox vs placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 30 days, 60 days and 90 days post‐treatment for each treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; average of at least 4 moderate‐to‐severe migraine episodes but ≤ 15 headache d/month (criteria used ICHD‐I); migraine episodes for at least 1 year prior to enrolment and first diagnosed before age 50 years; stable medical condition; chronic medication regimens, if any, stable including migraine prophylactic medications ≥ 3 months prior to baseline period; willing and able to stay on current medications during the course of the study

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition or used any agent that may have put them at risk with exposure to this formulation of Botox; infection or skin problem at any of the injection sites or a known allergy or sensitivity to the trial medication or its components; history of “complicated” migraine; inadequate response (in the investigator’s opinion) to ≥ 2 prophylactic treatments after an adequate trial; psychiatric problems severe enough to interfere with trial implementation; previous therapy with BTX of any sero‐type, or injection of anaesthetics or steroids into the trial‐targeted muscles during the 30 d immediately prior to initiation baseline period; overusing or abusing symptomatic medication, alcohol, or drugs; concurrent chronic use or chronic use in the 3 months prior to the screening period of muscle relaxants; concurrently participating in another investigational trial or participated in such a trial in the 30 d immediately prior to baseline; condition that in the investigator’s opinion might have put person at significant risk, might have confounded the trial or might have interfered with participation in the trial; pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the trial; unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the trial
N = 369, mean age 45 years, M 40/F 329

CM excluded, MOH excluded

Years since diagnosis of migraine 23 years, number migraine attacks during baseline diary period 6.5

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 110‐260 U, 23‐58 injections (frontal/glabellar 25‐40 U, occipitalis 20 U, temporalis 20‐50 U, masseter optional; 0‐50 U, trapezius 20‐60 U, semispinalis 10‐20 U, splenius capitis 10‐20 U)

Comparator: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of responders

Use of rescue medication

Severity of migraine

Patient global assessment

Adverse events

Notes

Trial includes 30‐day, single‐blind, placebo run‐in phase to identify placebo responders and placebo non‐responders

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Block randomisation used

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Neither the investigator nor the participant knew the treatment stratum or random block size. An individual with no other trial involvement reconstituted 3 vials of trial medication and drew the trial drug into the syringes for administration. The syringes were then given to the investigator for injection

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections, an individual with no other trial involvement reconstituted 3 vials of trial medication and drew the trial drug into the syringes for administration. The syringes were then given to the investigator for injection

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: an individual with no other trial involvement reconstituted 3 vials of trial medication and drew the trial drug into the syringes for administration. The syringes were then given to the investigator for injection

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Dropout rate per group not given

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Data not provided for secondary outcomes ‐ narrative description of results only

Study size

Unclear risk

50‐199 participants per arm

Aurora 2010 (PREEMPT 1)

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

2 treatments, 12 weeks FU per treatment

Fixed plus optional 'follow the pain' injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after each treatment out to 24 weeks, (further 3 treatments and 32 weeks of assessments in OL phase)

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; migraine meeting the diagnostic criteria listed in ICHD‐II (2004), migraine, with the exception of ‘‘complicated migraine’’ (i.e. hemiplegic migraine, basilar‐type migraine, ophthalmoplegic migraine, migrainous infarction); provided diary data on ≥ 20 of 28 days during baseline; ≥15 headache days with each day consisting of ≥ 4 h of continuous headache and with ≥ 50% of days being migraine or probable migraine days during baseline period; ≥ 4 distinct headache episodes, each lasting ≥ 4 h

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition that might put participants at increased risk if exposed to onabotulinumtoxinA (e.g. neuromuscular diseases); other primary or secondary headache disorders; use of any headache prophylactic medication within 28 days before start of baseline; Beck Depression Inventory score of > 24 at baseline; fibromyalgia; psychiatric disorders that could have interfered with trial participation; previous exposure to any botulinum neurotoxin sero‐type; women of childbearing potential must have had a negative urine pregnancy test prior to each injection and have been using a reliable means of contraception; investigators were trained not to enrol participants who frequently used opioids as acute pain medication

N = 679, mean age 42 years, M 85/F 594

CM only eligible, MOH eligible Y/N 462/217

Years since onset of CM 20, number of migraine days during baseline diary period 19

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 31 fixed injections, total 155 U, followed by 8 optional follow the pain injections, total 40 U. PREEMPT paradigm: frontalis 20 U in 4 sites; corrugator 10 U in 2 sites; procerus 5 U in 1 site; occipitalis 30 U in 6 sites up to 40 U in 8 sites; temporalis 40 U in 8 sites up to 50 U in 10 sites; trapezius 30 U in 6 sites; cervical paraspinal 20 U in 4 sites

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of migraine days

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)

Use of rescue medication

HIT‐6

Headache impact score

Migraine specific quality of life questionnaire

HRQoL

Adverse events

QALYs

Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio

Notes

Protocol NCT00156910

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 28 days

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Upon randomisation subject number was linked to next randomisation number grouped within strata for that site, site was then notified of medication kit assigned to that number

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: placebo arm, prepacked medication kits with number for assignment

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: placebo arm, prepacked medication kits with number for assignment

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Withdrawals balanced across groups and adjusted LOCF method used

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All expected outcomes reported

Study size

Low risk

≥ 200 participants per treatment arm

Barrientos 2003

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, sites unclear

Single treatment , 90‐day FU

Fixed injections of Botox vs placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 30, 60 and 90 days post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: history ≥ 1 year of EM, with/without aura (criteria used ICHD‐I), aged between 19 and 65 years

Exclusion criteria: > 15 headaches per month; a history of complicated migraine (with aura); previous treatment with BTX of any sero‐type; substance abuse, including overuse of analgesics and migraine treatments; current prophylactic treatment for migraine, and caffeine. Pregnancy or breastfeeding; any condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise the results of the trial

N = 30, mean age 41, M 6/F 24

CM excluded, MOH excluded

Years since diagnosis of migraine 16 years, number of migraine attacks 5 during baseline diary period

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 50 U, 15 injections (temporalis, 10 U total at 2 sites; frontalis, 10 U total at 4 sites; glabellar, 8 U total at 4 sites; procerus, 2 U at 1 site; trapezius, 10 U total at 2 sites; splenius capitis, 10 U total at 2 sites)

Comparator: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Duration of migraine

Use of rescue medication

Participant‐ and investigator‐related 6‐point global effectiveness evaluation scale

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Uncontactable

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of assessors

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All participants completed

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Group means reported without standard errors or standard deviations

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Blumenfeld 2008

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, active control, parallel‐group, single‐site

2 rounds of treatment, 3 months FU for first treatment and 6 months for second

Follow the pain injections of Botox plus placebo vs sodium valproate tablets plus placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: EM or CM (criteria used for diagnosis not clear, ICHD‐II cited in Background); aged between 18‐65 years with EM (defined for this trial as ≥ 3 migrainous headaches but < 15 d/month) or CM (defined for this trial as migrainous headaches on ≥ 15 d/month); stable headache severity and pattern

Exclusion Criteria: any medical condition or use of any agent that might expose them to risk if they received Botox; prior exposure, allergy, or sensitivity to any component of BTX of any sero‐type or to divalproex; skin problems, infections, profound atrophy, or excessive weakness in the target areas of the injection sites; concomitant prophylactic migraine therapy or a history of overusing symptomatic medication; headache disorders outside of the classification strata outlined; pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the trial

N = 59, mean age 42, M 9/F 50

EM/CM 45/14, MOH excluded

Number of headache days 11.7 during baseline diary period, headache severity 3.5 on 5‐point scale where 5 is most severe

Interventions

Intervention: Botox ≤ 100 U, number of injections unclear (procerus 2.5‐5 U, corrugators 2.5‐5U, frontalis 25 U, temporalis 7.5‐20 U, splenius capitis 2.5‐10 U, sternocleidomastoid 7.5‐15 U, trapezius 2.5‐5 U, occipitalis 2.5‐5 U, cervical paraspinalis 7.5‐15 U, semispinalis capitis 5‐10 U, masseter 5‐15 U

Comparator: sodium valproate tablets, 250 mg twice daily

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)

Headache severity

Headache index

MIDAS

HIT‐6

24 hr migraine QoL

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox).

Diary period 1 month

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: double dummy, participant blinded with matched placebo injections or placebo tablets, no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: double dummy, no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Dropouts at 44%

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Some time points not reported for some outcomes

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Blumenkron 2006

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, unclear sites

Single treatment, appears to be 3 months FU

Fixed injections of Botox 100 U vs matched placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: age > 18 years; migraine (IHS 1988); previous history of conventional treatment failure and functional disability

Exclusion criteria: non adherence to the protocol and non‐acceptance by participant; pregnancy; lactation; treatment with aminoglycosides; acne conglobata; Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome; history of hypersensitivity to the components of the BTX and secondary headache

N = 30, mean age not stated, M 5/F 25

EM/CM unclear, MOH eligibility unclear

Baseline disease characteristics not stated

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 100 U from 25 injections (4 front points total 10 U, 1 application in procerus muscle and 1 application in each corrugator muscle total 10 U, 3 points each temporalis muscle total 30 U, 5 points in each trapezius muscle total 50 U)

Comparator: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

MIDAS

MIGSEV

Quality‐of‐life measure

Adverse events

Notes

Funding source unclear

No diary data

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Dropouts not mentioned

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

No protocol and no migraine frequency data

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Cady 2008

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, single‐site

Single treatment, 3‐month FU (optional OL treatment at end of trial for placebo arm)

Fixed injections of Botox versus placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: age > 18 years; history (≥ 6 months) of headache (ICHD‐II diagnosis 1.1 (migraine without aura), 1.2 (migraine with aura), 1.7 (migrainous disorder not fulfilling above criteria), or 2.2 (chronic tension‐type headache)); onset before the age of 50 years; HIT‐6 score > 56; episodic chronic headache; stable headache severity and pattern; failed at least 1 attempt with preventive medications because of compliance, adherence, or AE issues; women of childbearing potential taking approved birth control measures and having a negative urine pregnancy test prior to administration of trial medications

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition that might put them at risk with Botox exposure (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Eaton‐Lambert Syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis); any disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function; uncontrolled systemic disease; abnormal pathology contributing to headaches; concurrent infection at proposed injection sites; pregnant or breast‐feeding; currently using aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare‐like agents, or other agents that might interfere with neuromuscular function; undergone injection of anaesthetics or steroids, within 1 month immediately prior to enrolment, into the muscles to be injected in the trial; previous BTX treatment with any sero‐type; currently participating in another drug or device trial or had done so within the 30 days before the baseline period; suspected hypersensitivity to Botox or any of the ingredients in the proprietary formulation; known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse

N = 61, mean age 42 years, M 9/F 52

EM/CM unclear, MOH eligibility unclear

Number of headache days 8 during baseline diary period, severity of migraine (max recorded during baseline period) 2.2 (scale unclear)

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 139 U, 17 injections (corrugator 2 applications of 6 U, splenius capitis 2 applications of 10 U, trapezius 4 applications of 10 U, temporalis 4 applications of 10 U, procerus 1 application of 3 U, frontalis 4 applications of 6 U)

Comparator: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache episodes

Number of headache days

Number of headache‐free days

Percentage of headache episodes with aura

Severity of headaches

HIT‐6 (mean in 30 days compared to baseline)

MIQ (MIDAS & QoL)

Notes

The trial received enrolment of subjects with diagnostic criteria 1.1 and 1.2 only

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation of participants was performed by a supervisory individual not associated with the trial

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections, research co‐ordinator, who was not involved with the participants prepared the injections

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: research co‐ordinator, who was not involved with the participants prepared the injections

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Treatment of missing data not described

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Full data not given (P values only, no AE data given)

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Cady 2011

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, active controlled, parallel‐group multi‐site

Single treatment, 12‐week FU (additional treatment for all participants in OL phase)

Fixed plus follow the pain injections of Botox plus placebo tablets vs placebo injections and topiramate tablets

Assessments carried out at baseline and 4 weeks and 12 weeks post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: CM (criteria used ICHD‐II); aged 18‐65 years; female participants of child‐bearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test who practiced reliable contraception throughout the trial period

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy during the time frame of the trial; headache disorders other than CM; medical disorders that increase risk with exposure to Botox; significant liver or renal impairment including kidney stones; ketogenic diets; previous use of BTX or topiramate; recent alcohol/drug abuse or overuse of acute medication

N = 59, mean age 40 years, M 5/F 54

CM only eligible, MOH excluded

Years since diagnosis of migraine 16 years, severity of migraine 2.8 on 3‐point scale

Interventions

Intervention: Botox up to 200 U, number and location of injections not reported (100 U fixed locations + up to 100 U in follow the pain), average dose 109 U

Comparator: topiramate 25 mg escalated to max 200 mg (average 136 mg)

Outcomes

Number headache days

Number migraine attacks

Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)

Money spent on rescue medication

Physician's global assessment

HIT‐6

MIDAS

MIQ

Severity of migraine

Notes

Funding source unclear

Diary period 28 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A sealed card marked with participant's trial number was delivered via FedEx to the trial site. A research co‐ordinator, not involved with the trial, would open the card, note the treatment assignment, prepare treatment, and hand to trial co‐ordinator, who assisted the investigator with the injections

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections, research co‐ordinator, who was not involved with the trial, prepared the injections

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: research co‐ordinator, who was not involved with the trial, prepared the injections

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear reporting of attrition

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

Some outcomes missing from results (severity/MIQ/AEs)

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Cady 2014

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over, multi‐site

Single treatment, 3‐month FU (additional treatment given post cross‐over)

Fixed plus follow the pain injections of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: CM (criteria used ICHD‐II); aged 18‐65; history of CM according to the criteria proposed as an appendix diagnosis in 2006 by the Headache Classification Committee; preventive medications were of a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to screening and maintained throughout trial period; women of childbearing potential agreed to urine pregnancy test at screening and a medically acceptable form of contraception

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, planning pregnancy during the trial period, breastfeeding, or of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable form of birth control (see inclusion criteria); headache disorders outside IHS‐defined CM; evidence of underlying pathology contributing to headaches; pathology of the salivary glands such as sialadenitis (e.g. Sjorgen’s syndrome, viral or bacterial sialadenitis) or condition or symptom that would alter the content of saliva; any medical condition that may increase their risk with exposure to BTX‐A including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton–Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other significant disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function; profound atrophy or weakness of muscles in the target areas of injection; skin conditions or infections at any of the injection sites; allergy or sensitivities to any component of test medications; active major psychiatric or depressive disorders including alcohol/drug abuse; met IHS criteria for Medication Overuse with opioid‐ or butalbital‐containing products; planning or requiring surgery during the trial; history of poor compliance with medical treatment as determined by the investigator; currently participating in an investigational drug trial or had participated in an investigational drug trial within the previous 30 days of the screening visit

N = 20, mean age 49, M 5/F 15

CM only eligible, MOH eligibility unclear

Baseline disease characteristics not stated

Interventions

Intervention: Botox ≥ 155 U, 31 injections following PREEMPT paradigm with optional follow the pain injections in occipitalis, temporalis, and trapezius

Comparator: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Notes

Protocol NCT01071096

Funding source unclear

Diary period 1 month

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Third party responsible for generation of number and preparation of medications

Quote: "Randomisation of subjects was performed by a supervisory individual not associated with the trial, who numbered trial medications in a manner which was blinded to subject, coordinator, and investigator"

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections, trial medications were numbered by a supervisory individual not associated with the trial in a manner which was blind to subject, co‐ordinator and investigator

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: trial medications were numbered by a supervisory individual not associated with the trial in a manner which was blind to subject, co‐ordinator and investigator

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Only 1 participant dropped out

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All protocol outcomes reported

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Chankrachang 2011

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment, 3‐month FU

Fixed injections with Dysport vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; experienced an average of 2‐8 migraine attacks per month over the 3 months prior to a screening period; 2‐8 migraine attacks occurred during the 4‐week screening period; medication for acute migraine and prophylactic treatment was permitted if doses were stable.

Exclusion criteria: pure migraine with aura as defined by ICHD‐II; history of complicated migraine; pregnancy; lactation; not using adequate contraception; history of drug abuse; treatment with Botox within the past 6 months; previously experienced an adverse reaction to Botox; history of botulism or other neuromuscular disorders; current treatment with aminoglycoside antibiotics or other agents that could affect neuromuscular transmission; received unlicensed medication or investigational drugs within 6 months of the screening visit; any other clinically significant medical conditions that could influence trial results; liver transaminase levels had to be less than twice the upper normal values

N = 128, mean age 39, M 7/F 120 (ITT population (127) used for baseline characteristics)

EM/CM unclear, MOH eligibility unclear

Years since diagnosis migraine 5, number of migraine attacks during baseline diary period 5

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): Dysport 120 U, 6 injections ‐ 2 x frontal, 2 x temporal, 2 x occipital

Intervention (arm 2): Dysport 240 U, 6 injections ‐ 2 x frontal, 2 x temporal, 2 x occipital

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks
Total intensity score

MIDAS

Duration of migraine
Number of hours per month with moderate‐to‐severe headache
Global assessment score

Adverse events

Notes

Protocol NCT00258609

Funder: IPSEN Group (manufacturer of Dysport)

Diary period 28 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed envelopes with allocation, nurse performed reconstitution and had no further involvement with participants

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participants and all other personnel, apart from nurse who performed reconstitution of drug, were blind to allocation

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participants and all other personnel, apart from nurse who performed reconstitution of drug, were blind to allocation

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

ITT with no description of method of imputation, stated dropouts 1/3/5

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All expected outcomes discussed but data not always provided

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Diener 2010 (PREEMPT 2)

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

2 treatments, 12 weeks FU per treatment

Fixed plus optional follow the pain injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after each treatment out to 24 weeks, (further 3 treatments and 32 weeks of assessments in OL phase)

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; migraine meeting the diagnostic criteria listed in ICHD‐II (2004) section 1, migraine (1), with the exception of ‘‘complicated migraine’’ (i.e., hemiplegic migraine, basilar‐type migraine, ophthalmoplegic migraine, migrainous infarction); provided diary data on ≥ 20 of 28 days during baseline; ≥ 15 headache days with each day consisting of ≥ 4 h of continuous headache and with ≥ 50% of days being migraine or probable migraine days during baseline period; ≥ 4 distinct headache episodes, each lasting ≥ 4 h

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition that might put participants at increased risk if exposed to Botox (e.g. neuromuscular diseases); other primary or secondary headache disorders; use of any headache prophylactic medication within 28 days before start of baseline; Beck Depression Inventory score of > 24 at baseline; fibromyalgia; psychiatric disorders that could have interfered with trial participation; previous exposure to any botulinum neurotoxin sero‐type; Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative urine pregnancy test prior to each injection and have been using a reliable means of contraception; investigators were trained not to enrol participants who frequently used opioids as acute pain medication

N = 705, mean age 41 years, M 103/F 602

CM only eligible, MOH eligible Y/N 444/261

Years since onset of CM 18, number of migraine days during baseline diary period 19

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 31 fixed injections (total 155 U) followed by 8 optional follow the pain injections (total 40 U). PREEMPT paradigm: frontalis 20 U in 4 sites; corrugator 10 U in 2 sites; procerus 5 U in 1 site; occipitalis 30 U in 6 sites up to 40 U in 8 sites; temporalis 40 U in 8 sites up to 50 U in 10 sites; trapezius 30 U in 6 sites; cervical paraspinal 20 U in 4 sites

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of migraine days

Number of headache episodes

Monthly cumulation of headache hours

Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)

Use of rescue medication

HIT‐6

Headache impact score

Migraine specific quality of life questionnaire

HRQoL

Adverse events

QALYs

Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio

Notes

Protocol NCT00156910

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 28 days

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Upon randomisation subject number was linked to next randomisation number grouped within strata for that site, site was then notified of medication kit assigned to that number

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: placebo arm, prepacked medication kits with number for assignment

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: placebo arm, prepacked medication kits with number for assignment

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Withdrawals balanced across groups and adjusted LOCF method used

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All expected outcomes reported

Study size

Low risk

≥ 200 participants per treatment arm

Elkind I 2006

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

4‐arm trial.

2 arms received 1 treatment before being re‐randomised, 2 arms received 3 treatments before being re‐randomised, 120 days FU per treatment

This paper comprised 3 trials of which this is the first. (Elkind II 2006 ‐ included, Elkind Study III 2006 (Elkind 2006)‐ excluded)

3 arms with varying doses of fixed injections of Botox vs placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 30 days, 60 days, 90 days and 120 days post‐treatment for each treatment cycle

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; IHS–defined migraines with or without aura; average of 4‐8 moderate‐severe migraines per month that occurred with a stable frequency and severity and had begun at least 1 year prior to the trial; first diagnosed with migraine before age 50 years; able to distinguish between migraine and non migraine headaches; stable medical condition; if taking chronic medications (including prophylactic migraine medications), on stable doses and regimens for at least 3 months prior to enrolment, to be continued throughout the trial

Exclusion criteria: > 15 headache d/month; history of complicated migraine or typical migraine pain localised predominantly to the occipital or suboccipital region; consistently refractory to multiple acute therapies or had never tried any acute therapies; overuse of symptomatic medications; excessive use of caffeine; alcohol/drug abuse; any medical condition or use of any agent that might have put the participant at increased risk with exposure to Botox or interfered with trial participation or the results; pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the trial period; previous injection with any BTX or allergy to any of the components of the trial medication; prior injection of anaesthetic or steroid into the muscles to be injected in the month immediately prior to enrolment; participation in another investigational drug or device clinical trial either concurrently or in the month immediately prior to enrolment; infection or skin problems at the injection site

Participants with migraine headache at the time of treatment may have been randomised/injected at a later date within 2 weeks of the scheduled visit

N = 418, mean age 44 years, M 64/F 354

Some CM inadvertently included against protocol EM/CM 409/9, MOH excluded

Years since onset of migraine 21, number of migraine attacks in baseline diary period 6

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): 50 U Botox total of 11 injections ‐ frontal 4 sites, temporal 2 sites, glabellar 5 sites

Intervention (arm 2): 25 U Botox total of 11 injections ‐ frontal 4 sites, temporal 2 sites, glabellar 5 sites

Intervention (arm 3): 7.5 U Botox total of 11 injections ‐ frontal 4 sites, temporal 2 sites, glabellar 5 sites

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks
Secondary endpoint:
Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)
Maximum migraine headache severity
Use of rescue medication
Severity of migraine
Maximum migraine duration
Number of days with aura
Number of days with migraine‐associated symptoms
Patient global assessment score
SF‐36
Migraine‐Specific Measure of Quality of Life
Migraine Impact Questionnaire
Headache Pain Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Missing data low and balanced across groups

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All expected outcomes discussed but data not always provided

Study size

Unclear risk

50‐199 participants per arm

Elkind II 2006

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

2 treatment cycles, 120 days FU per treatment. Follows on from Elkind I 2006

Fixed injections of Botox dosing trial

Assessments carried out at baseline and 30 days, 60 days, 90 days and 120 days post‐treatment for each treatment cycle

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; IHS–defined migraines with or without aura; average of 4‐8 moderate‐severe migraines per month that occurred with a stable frequency and severity and had begun at least 1 year prior to the trial; first diagnosed with migraine before age 50 years; able to distinguish between migraine and non migraine headaches; stable medical condition; if taking chronic medications (including prophylactic migraine medications), on stable doses and regimens for at least 3 months prior to enrolment, to be continued throughout the trial

Exclusion criteria: > 15 headache d/month; history of complicated migraine or typical migraine pain localised predominantly to the occipital or suboccipital region; consistently refractory to multiple acute therapies or had never tried any acute therapies; overuse of symptomatic medications; excessive use of caffeine; alcohol/drugs abuse; any medical condition or use of any agent that might have put the participant at increased risk with exposure to Botox or interfered with trial participation or the results; pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the trial period; previous injection with any BTX or allergy to any of the components of the trial medication; prior injection of anaesthetic or steroid into the muscles to be injected in the month immediately prior to enrolment; participation in another investigational drug or device clinical trial either concurrently or in the month immediately prior to enrolment; infection or skin problems at the injection site

participants with migraine headache at the time of treatment may have been randomised/injected at a later date within 2 weeks of the scheduled visit

N = 183, baseline data given for Elkind I 2006 participant set only. Some attrition of participants between end of study I and start of study II not described in detail

Some CM inadvertently included against protocol EM/CM unclear, MOH excluded

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): 50 U Botox total of 11 injections ‐ frontal 4 sites, temporal 2 sites, glabellar 5 sites

Intervention (arm 2): 25 U Botox total of 11 injections ‐ frontal 4 sites, temporal 2 sites, glabellar 5 sites

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks
Secondary endpoint:
Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)
Maximum migraine headache severity
Use of rescue medication
Severity of migraine
Maximum migraine duration
Number of days with aura
Number of days with migraine‐associated symptoms
Patient global assessment score
SF‐36
Migraine‐Specific Measure of Quality of Life
Migraine Impact Questionnaire
Headache Pain Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Missing data at 22% vs 16% of total participant numbers balanced across groups

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All expected outcomes discussed but data not always provided

Study size

Unclear risk

50‐199 participants per arm

Freitag 2008

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment, 16‐week FU

Fixed injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: 6‐month history, prior to baseline, of CM; migraine episodes meeting the criteria 1.1 or 1.2 of the ICHD‐I; 15 headache days during the prospective baseline phase; anyone taking preventive medications must have been on stable dosages for 60 days prior to trial entry and willing to remain at same doses for the duration of the trial; women were required to be practicing an acceptable method of contraception and have a pregnancy test or to be incapable of pregnancy

Exclusion criteria: previous treatment with BTX of any sero‐type for any therapeutic reason; history of myasthenia gravis, Eaton‐Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or other disorder of neuromuscular function; concomitant use of aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare‐like agents or other agents that might interfere with neuromuscular function; diagnoses of migraine beginning for the first time after age 50 years; cluster headaches or basilar, ophthalmoplegic, hemiplegic migraine, or exclusively having migraine aura without headache; more painful condition than their migraine pain, progressive neurological disorders, or a structural disorder of the brain from birth, trauma, or past infection; received injections or oral corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the baseline diary initiation visit; significant major psychiatric disorder; receiving antipsychotic medication; Beck Inventory of Depression Scores > 24; received an investigational drug or used an investigational device within 30 days of trial entry; taking triptans > 3 days per week, ergotamine > 2 days per week, or dihydroergotamine > 2 days per week or any combination of the above medications > 3 days per week; consuming caffeine from dietary and medicinal sources > 500 mg/d on a daily basis > 28 days prior to trial enrolment; taking opioids > 2 days per week; taking simple analgesics on average > 2 tablets/d ≥ 5 days per week for at least 28 days; taking combination analgesics on average > 3 tablets per day and ≥ 3 days per week for at least 28 days; using a combination of any of the previous on ≥ 4 days per week for at least 28 days

N = 41, mean age 42 years, M 11/F 30

CM only eligible, MOH excluded

Baseline disease characteristics not stated

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 100 U, 22 injections (glabella 20 U, 4 sites; temporal 20 U, 4 sites; frontal 10 U, 4 sites; suboccipital 30 U, 6 sites; trapezius 20 U, 4 sites)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine episodes
Number of headache days
Headache index (HAI)
Proportion of 50% responders
Use of rescue medication
MIDAS
Headache Pain Specific Quality of Life measure

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 28 days

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded, with matched placebo injections, research nurse who was not involved with the trial participants prepared the injections, trial medication was delivered to treating physician in identical looking syringes

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: research nurse, who was not involved with the trial participants prepared the injections, trial medication was delivered to treating physician in identical looking syringes

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Missing data low and balanced across groups at 10% vs 14% of total participant numbers

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All expected outcomes reported but standard errors or equivalent not reported and some interim time points missing

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Hollanda 2014

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, single‐site

3 cycles of treatment at 4‐week intervals (some uncertainty as to whether participants were treated at each visit or just at first visit), trial length 12 weeks in total

Follow the pain injections of Prosigne vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐85 years; diagnosis of CM associated with cutaneous allodynia, according to the ICHD (edition revised, 2006)

Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases (myasthenia gravis, Eaton‐Lambert syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis); conditions that could affect pericranial muscles; other primary or secondary headaches; complicated migraine; CM associated with analgesic overuse; severe systemic diseases; other neurologic or psychiatric disorders; fibromyalgia; myofascial syndrome; temporomandibular disorder

N = 38, mean age 45, M 9/F 29

CM only eligible, MOH excluded

Severity of migraine 7.3 cm on 10 cm VAS

Interventions

Intervention: Prosigne 12‐24 injections, maximum dose 96 U (frontal 2‐4 sites on each side 3 U per site; temporal 2‐4 sites on each side 4 U per site; occipital 2‐4 sites on each side 5 U per site)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine episodes with cutaneous allodynia

Severity of headache pain (VAS)

Use of rescue medication

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Brazilian National Institutes of Science

Diary period 30 days

Protocol NCT01357798

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded, with matched placebo injections, 1 designated investigator who had access to randomisation sequence provided the trial medication to the principal investigator according to the allocation list generated

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: 1 designated investigator who had access to randomisation sequence provided the trial medication to the principal investigator according to the allocation list generated

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Appear to be no dropouts

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcomes in protocol and methods reported

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Hou 2015

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, single‐site

Single treatment with 4‐month FU

3‐arm trial, HengLi fixed muscle site injections vs HengLi acupoint site injections vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 4 months postbaseline

Participants

Inclusion criteria: EM and CM, criteria used ICHD‐I; aged 18‐57 years; history of migraines with or without aura for 1‐16 years; experienced headache ≥ 15 d/month were diagnosed as CM; women of childbearing potential were required to be taking approved birth control measures and to have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to administration of trial medications

Exclusion criteria: any medical or neurological conditions that might put them at risk with Botox exposure, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, Eaton‐Lambert Syndrome; any disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function; abnormal pathology contributing to migraine; uncontrolled systemic disease; concurrent infection at proposed injection sites; pregnant or breast‐feeding; currently using aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare‐like agents, or other agents that might interfere with neuromuscular function; undergone injection of anaesthetics or steroids, within 1 month immediately prior to enrolment, into the muscles to be injected in the trial; previously received Botox treatment with any sero‐type; currently participating in another drug or device trial or had done so within the 30 days before the baseline period; suspected hypersensitivity to Botox or any of the ingredients in the proprietary formulation; known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse

N = 102, mean age 41, M 21/F 81

EM/CM 66/36, MOH eligibility unclear

Years since diagnosis of migraine 6, number of migraine attacks during baseline diary period 7, severity of migraine 7.4 cm on 10 cm VAS

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): HengLi fixed muscle site, 10 injections of 2.5 U each, total dose 25 U (1 on each side for frontal and occipital belly of occipitofrontalis, corrugator supercilii, temporalis and superior part of trapeziuem)

Intervention (arm 2): HengLi acupoint site, 10 injections of 2.5 U each, total dose 25 U (Yintang EX‐HN3, at the midpoint of the line connecting the 2 medial ends of eyebrows; Taiyang EX‐HN5, at the point of intersection of the continuations of the eyebrow and the lower eyelid in the lateral direction, on the lateral border of the orbit; Baihui GV20, at the middle of the vertex, on the line connecting the apexes of the 2 ears; Shuaigu GB8, directly above the ear apex, 1.5 inches above the hairline; Fengchi GB20, at the posterior lateral aspect of the neck, in the fossa between the superior margins of the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles; and Tianzhu BL10, 1.3 inches lateral to the point 0.5 inches directly above the midpoint of the posterior hairline, in the depression lateral to the border of the trapezius muscle

Control: placebo injections matched to fixed muscle site arm

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Duration of migraine

Severity of migraine

Frequency of migraine symptoms

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Scientific and Technique Support Project of Gansu Province (090NKCA112), China

Diary period 1 month

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind

Quote: "participant blind with matched placebo injections, a research coordinator who was not directly involved with the subjects managed the randomisation and preparation of injections."

Since dummy injections are not mentioned it cannot be the case that personnel carrying out injections are blind to active assignment

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: a research co‐ordinator who was not directly involved with the participants managed the randomisation and preparation of injections, analysis of the diary data was conducted by investigators who did not know the exact group of each participant

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Appear to be no dropouts

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

Use of rescue medications recorded but not reported

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Jabbari 2014

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group unclear sites

Single treatment 4 weeks FU

Fixed injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 4 weeks post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged ≥ 18 years; migraine for > 3 months that fail to respond to ≥ 2 major anti‐migraine drugs; meeting criteria of CM

Exclusion criteria: pregnant or may become pregnant; disease of neuromuscular junction or drugs that affect neuromuscular junction; allergy to Botox; previous use of Botox for migraine by similar methodology

N = 25, mean age 60, M 13/F 12

CM only eligible, MOH eligibility unclear

Severity of migraine 8.2 on 10 cm VAS

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 200‐300 U depending on neck and body size, 22‐24 injections (frontalis 20 U, 5 sites/side; temporalis 30 U, 2 sites/side; occipitalis 5 U, 1 site/side); cervical region: splenius cervicis, semispinalis capitis, trapezius muscles 45‐60 U 3‐5 sites/side)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Severity of migraine

Global assessment score

Pain impact questionnaire

HIT‐6

Migraine‐specific quality of life

Adverse events

Notes

Protocol NCT00660192

Funding source unclear

Diary period 28 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant and investigator blind

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant and investigator blind

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

20% dropped out N = 5

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Not yet published, information and data from trial registry only

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Jost 2011

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over, unclear sites

Single treatment with 4 months FU precross‐over

Unclear method of injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 6 weeks and 4 months post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐70 years; clinically confirmed diagnosis of migraine without aura, criteria used ICHD, edition not stated; duration of illness, so far refractory to conservative treatment (physiotherapy, massages, stretching exercises, peroral medication) at least 2 years

Exclusion criteria: participation in another clinical trial within the past 3 months; specific pain in neck/shoulder region in need of different specific treatment (i.e. acute nerve irritation with disc prolapse, manifest inflammatory processes etc.); contraindication of treatment with BTX (ascertained sensitivity to clostridial toxin or to 1 of the other ingredients and generalised disorders of muscular activity, e.g. myasthenia gravis or Lambert‐Eaton syndrome); pregnancy or breastfeeding or inadequate or no contraception in women of childbearing age; serious concomitant illnesses involving the internal organs in particular; systemic diseases; serious neurologic disorders; abuse of alcohol, drugs and narcotics; medication with anticoagulants and heparin preparation (topically applied heparin unguents excluded), thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors, amino‐glycoside antibiotics, spectinomycin or muscle relaxants of the tubocurarine type

N = 22, mean age 45, M 5/F 17

EM/CM unclear, MOH eligibility unclear

Baseline disease characteristics not stated

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 10 U 2 injections in total into corrugator muscle and occipitalis muscle of the side affected

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Pain intensity (severity) VAS

Number of headache attacks

Duration of headache attacks

Use of rescue medication

Short form‐McGill Pain Questionnaire

Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire

International quality of life assessment

SF 36

Scale of attitudes toward disabled persons

Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: German society of Neurology (statistical analysis only). States no funds came from manufacturers of BTX

Diary period unclear

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not stated from which group dropouts (3) occurred. Participants lost to FU not analysed

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

AEs recorded but not reported or commented upon

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Lauretti 2014

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, single‐site

Single treatment with 12 weeks FU

4‐arm trial fixed injections Botox vs Prosigne (2 dosing arms) vs saline

Assessments carried out at baseline and 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 21‐60 years; chronic daily unilateral headache characterised as CM > 12 months' duration and not responding to standard treatment with antidepressants, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agents or anticonvulsants or beta‐blockers

Exclusion criteria: presence of an infectious process at the site of application; associated immunological diseases; previous history of allergy to Botox; application of Botox during the last year; diabetes mellitus

N = 40, mean age 46 years, M 14/F 26

CM only eligible, MOH eligibility unclear

Years since diagnosis of CM 16, severity of migraine 10.0 on 10 cm VAS

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): Botox 10 injections, total dose 25 U (8 different sites in the frontal region and 2 sites in the temporal region, 1 site on each side)

Intervention (arm 2): Prosigne 10 injections, total dose 25 U (8 different sites in the frontal region and 2 sites in the temporal region, 1 site on each side)

Intervention (arm 3): Prosigne 10 injections, total dose 33.3 U (8 different sites in the frontal region and 2 sites in the temporal region, 1 site on each side)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache attacks

Severity of headache

Time to 50% pain relief

Notes

Funding source unclear

Diary period 4 weeks

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blind with matched placebo injections, 1 of the trial authors prepared injections and a second trial author, who was unaware of the content of the previously prepared syringes delivered the treatment

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: 1 of the trial authors prepared injections and a second trial author, who was unaware of the content of the previously prepared syringes delivered the treatment, data were evaluated by a third trial author

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Missing data balanced across groups (1/1/0/1)

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

AEs not mentioned at all in report

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Mathew 2009

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, active control, parallel‐group, single site

2 treatments with 3 months between treatments and 6 months FU after second treatment

Fixed plus follow the pain injections of Botox 200 U plus placebo tablets vs TOPAMAX (topiramate) tablets plus placebo injections

Assessments carried out at baseline and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after first treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: outpatient; aged 18‐65 years; diagnosed CM not attributable to another cause; CM headache was defined as migraine headache with or without aura occurring on ≥ 15 d/month for > 3 months in the absence of medication overuse with at least 2 of the following characteristics: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate or severe pain intensity, and/or aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity (e.g. walking or climbing stairs); at least 1 of the following occurred during headache: nausea and/or vomiting or photophobia and/or phonophobia; stable headache severity and pattern; headache data for at least 6 months prior to trial drug administration

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the trial period; breastfeeding; of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control; people with chronic tension‐type headaches based on recognised criteria; evidence of underlying conditions judged to preclude treatment with either test medication; previously used trial medications for any reason; unable to discontinue any prohibited medication(s), including carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g. acetazolamide, dichlorphenamide), digoxin, metformin, central nervous system depressants (including alcohol), non‐trial migraine prophylaxis medications (e.g. propranolol, amitriptyline, sodium valproate), non‐trial anticonvulsant or antiepileptic medications, agents that might interfere with neuromuscular function (e.g. aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare‐like agents),or hormonal contraceptives; evidence of recent alcohol/drug abuse or acute medication overuse

N = 60, mean age 37, M 6/F 54

CM only eligible, MOH eligibility unclear

Number of headache/migraine days during baseline period 16, migraine severity 2.9 on 5‐point scale

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 200 U, 100 U fixed site and 100 U follow the pain, number and location of injection sites not reported plus placebo tablets

Control: TOPAMAX (topiramate) 100‐200 mg/d, plus matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of 50% responders

Severity of migraine

Use of rescue medication

MIDAS

MIQ

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 1 month

Uncontactable

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: double dummy, participant blinded with matched placebo injections or placebo tablets, no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: double dummy, no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Numbers analysed and numbers imputed unclear. Dropouts excluded from analysis higher than 10% for all outcomes

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All expected outcomes reported

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Mazza 2016

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled,parallel‐group, unclear sites

2 treatments, 90‐day FU, unclear at what point second treatment occurred

Follow the pain injections of BTX‐A vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline, 30 days, 60 days and 90 days

Participants

Inclusion criteria: CM with no response to intramuscular injections of BTX‐A

Exclusion criteria not stated

N = 94, mean age and M/F ratio not stated

Duration of disease 18 years

Interventions

Intervention: subcutaneous injection of BTX‐A, up to 200 U into trigeminal or occipital area

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine days

Proportion of 50% responders

Other outcomes not yet reported

Notes

Publication due in 2017, only skeletal information available. Unpublished information provided through correspondence with trial author

Funding source unclear

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: the research assistant, who had access to the randomisation list, delivered verum or placebo injections to the investigator. The investigator who injected the headache sufferers, the participants, and the investigator who assessed outcome were all blinded

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: the research assistant, who had access to the randomisation list, delivered verum or placebo injections to the investigator. The investigator who injected the headache sufferers, the participants, and the investigator who assessed outcome were all blinded

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Number of dropouts not stated

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Not yet published, information and data from abstract and brief trial author correspondence only

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Millán‐Guerrero 2009

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, active‐control, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment, 12‐week FU

Fixed injections of Botox vs histamine. Double dummy

Assessments carried out at baseline and every 30 days out to 12 weeks post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; history of migraine for several years; diagnosed migrainous using criteria ICHD‐II; unresponsive to available abortive (acetaminophen (paracetamol), ergotamine, dexamethasone, sumatriptan) and/or prophylactic agents (beta blocker, amitriptyline, sodium valproate, topiramate) without sustained pain‐free response; attack frequency of 4‐6 per month; severity of 2–3; overuse of acute pharmacotherapy

Exclusion criteria: pregnant women; daily headaches; radiological tests revealing any pathology, including computer‐assisted tomography

N = 100, mean age 35, M 9/F 92

EM/CM unclear, MOH Y only eligible

Years since diagnosis of migraine 15, number of headache attacks during baseline diary period 4, severity of migraine 2.9 on 3‐point scale

Interventions

Intervention: Botox, 50 U, 10 injections into fixed sites including procerus, corrugator, frontalis, temporalis and occipitalis plus placebo injections into upper arm

Control: histamine, 1‐10 µg injected into upper arm twice a week for 12 weeks plus placebo injections into head and neck sites

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Duration of migraine

Severity of migraine

se of rescue medication

MIDAS

Adverse events

Notes

Funding source unclear

Diary period 4 weeks

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Block randomisation

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind, double dummy, research collaborator prepared injections and placebos for both histamine and BTX in numbered matching vials so that neither participants nor physicians were able to identify drug

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind, double dummy, research collaborator prepared injections and placebos for both histamine and BTX in numbered matching vials so that neither participants nor physicians were able to identify drug

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Dropouts uneven 10% vs 20% of total participant numbers and imputation method not stated

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All expected outcomes reported

Study size

Unclear risk

50‐199 participants per arm

Petri 2009

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment, 12‐week FU

Fixed injections of Dysport (2 dosing arms) vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; at least a 1‐year history of migraine with or without aura; first manifestation under 50 years of age; stable frequency of 3–6 attacks per month ICHD‐I; not previously received Botox; no concomitant prophylactic migraine treatment was allowed during the trial; acute medication for migraine allowed for a maximum of 10 d/month; participants restricted to only 1 type of escape medication that they preferably used (either analgesic or triptan)

Exclusion criteria: non‐migraine headaches for > 10 d/month before, but not after, injection; women who were pregnant or not using adequate contraception; history of alcohol or other drug abuse; previously experienced an adverse reaction to Botox; treated with aminoglycoside antibiotics (or other medication affecting neuromuscular transmission), antidepressants, neuroleptics, antiepileptics or anticoagulants; severe psychiatric disturbance, a skin disorder at the injection site, a predisposition to bleeding, or an anticipated lack of compliance and cooperation

N = 127, mean age 46, M 20/F 102 (characteristics given for analysed population ‐ 122)

CM excluded, MOH excluded

Years since onset of migraine 27, number of migraine attacks during baseline diary period 5

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): Dysport 210 U from 18 injections, trapezius 45 U, splenius capitis 20 U, temporalis 20 U, frontalis 10 U, corrugator 10 U

Intervention (arm 2): Dysport 80 U from 18 injections, trapezius 45 U, splenius capitis 20 U, temporalis 20 U, frontalis 10 U, corrugator 10 U

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of migraine attacks

Duration of migraine

Severity of migraine

Use of rescue medication

Migraine related disability

Becks depression inventory

Total tenderness score

Patient global evaluation of treatment efficacy

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen, Germany (manufacturer of Dysport)

Diary period 28 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed envelopes, drug prepared by third person

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections, third person, who was not involved with the trial prepared the injections in a separate room

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: third person, who was not involved with the trial prepared the injections in a separate room

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

LOCF but unclear how often this had to be used

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Secondary outcomes analysed descriptively

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Relja 2007

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

3 treatment cycles, 3 months FU per treatment

Fixed injections of Botox (3 dosing arms) vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 30 days, 60 days, 90 days post‐treatment per cycle

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; average of at least 3 moderate‐severe untreated migraine episodes per month (ICHD‐I); or at least 3 treated migraine episodes of any severity per month; ≤ 15 headache d/month as confirmed by a headache diary during the baseline period; migraine episodes must have occurred for at least 1 year prior to enrolment and be first diagnosed before age 50 years; stable medical condition and acceptable blood haematology and chemistry results; willing to discontinue headache prophylactic medications for at least 3 months immediately prior to the initiation of the baseline period and had to be willing and able to stay on current medications (other than headache prophylaxis) during the course of the trial

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition or used any agent that may have put them at risk with exposure to Botox; an infection or skin problem at any of the injection sites or a known allergy or sensitivity to the trial medication or its components; inadequate response to ≥ 3 prophylactic treatments after an adequate trial; Beck Depression Inventory score of > 24; psychiatric problems severe enough to interfere with trial participation or results; previous therapy with BTX of any sero‐type; been injected with anaesthetics or steroids into the trial‐targeted muscles during the 30 days immediately prior to initiation of the baseline period; overusing or abusing symptomatic medication, alcohol or drugs; concurrent chronic use or chronic use in the 3 months prior to the screening period of muscle relaxants; concurrently participating in another investigational trial or who had participated in such a trial in the 30 days immediately prior to baseline period; uncontrolled systemic disease or any condition that might have put the participant at significant risk, might have confounded the trial, or might have interfered significantly with participation in the trial; women who were pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the trial or who were unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the trial

N = 495, mean age 43, M 60/F 435

CM excluded, MOH excluded

Years since onset of migraine 23

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): Botox 255 U, 20 injections, frontalis 30 U, 4 sites; corrugator 15 U, 2 sites; temporalis 30 U, 4 sites; splenius capitis 30 U, 2 sites; trapezius 60 U, 4 sites; semispinalis capitis 30 U, 2 sites; suboccipital region 30 U, 2 sites

Intervention (arm 2): Botox 150 U, 20 injections, frontalis 20 U, 4 sites; corrugator 10 U, 2 sites; temporalis 20 U, 4 sites; splenius capitis 20 U, 2 sites; trapezius 40 U, 4 sites; semispinalis capitis 20 U, 2 sites; suboccipital region 20 U, 2 sites

Intervention (arm 3): Botox 75 U, 20 injections, frontalis 10 U, 4 sites; corrugator 5 U, 2 sites; temporalis 10 U, 4 sites; splenius capitis 10 U, 2 sites; trapezius 20 U, 4 sites; semispinalis capitis 10 U, 2 sites; suboccipital region 10 U, 2 sites

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of migraine days

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of 50% responders

Severity of migraine

Use of rescue medication

MIDAS

Headache pain specific quality of life measure

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded, with matched placebo injections, an individual with no other trial involvement reconstituted vials of trial medication with all dilutions carried out so that total volume in each vial was the same, vials numbered according to randomisation and reconstituted according to volume of diluent assigned to each randomisation number

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind: an individual with no other trial involvement reconstituted vials of trial medication with all dilutions carried out so that total volume in each vial was the same, vials numbered according to randomisation and reconstituted according to volume of diluent assigned to each randomisation number

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Method of imputation not stated and group split of dropouts not given

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All expected outcomes reported, primary outcome data given but secondary data showing no significant between‐group differences not fully reported

Study size

Unclear risk

50‐199 participants per arm

Saper 2007

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment, 90‐day FU

Fixed injections of Botox, 4 arms with different doses and sites vs placebo in all 3 muscle sites

Assessment at baseline and at 30 days, 60 days and 90 days post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: stable medical condition with migraine headaches as defined by the ICHD ‐ edition not stated; with or without aura; average of 4‐8 moderate‐severe migraine headaches per month; aged 18‐65 years; first diagnosed before age 50; able to distinguish migraine from non migraine headaches; acute migraine therapy must have typically relieved their migraines to an acceptable level; headache frequency/severity must have been stable; chronic medications (if needed) must have been stable for ≥ 3 months prior to enrolment; prophylactic medications had been discontinued must have been at least 3 months before enrolment; previous medications, including any migraine prophylaxis treatments, stay on the same dose and regimen during the course of the trial

Exclusion criteria: typical migraine pain was localised predominantly to the occipital or suboccipital regions; > 15 headache d/month (any type); history of complicated migraine; migraine at the time of treatment were ineligible to be treated that day but could return to be enrolled on a subsequent day; infection or skin problem at the injection site; other medical condition that might have put a person at increased risk with exposure to Botox or that was severe enough to interfere with trial participation or results; using agents that interfered with neuromuscular function; overusing symptomatic medications; abusing alcohol or drugs; previously received BTX therapy; known allergy or sensitivity to the trial medication or its components; women who were pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the trial period; received an injection of anaesthetic or steroid into the muscles to be injected in the month prior to enrolment; participated in another investigational drug or device clinical trial within the past month

N = 232, mean age 44, M 33/F 199

CM excluded, MOH excluded

Years since onset of migraine 24, number of migraine attacks during baseline diary period 6

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): Botox 25 U in all 3 muscle areas, 11 sites

Intervention (arm 2): Botox 10 U in frontal muscle area, 4 sites, plus matched placebo injections into temporal and glabellar muscles

Intervention (arm 3): Botox 6 U in temporal muscle area, 2 sites, plus matched placebo injections into frontal and glabellar muscles

Intervention (arm 4): Botox 9 U in glabellar muscle, 5 sites, plus matched placebo injections into frontal and temporal muscles

Control: placebo in all 3 muscle sites

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Severity of migraine

Duration of migraine

Number of nonmigraine headaches

Use of rescue medications

Presence or absence of aura

Presence or absence of associated symptoms

Patient global assessment of response to treatment

Headache pain‐specific quality‐of‐life questionnaire

Migraine‐specific measure of quality of life

Migraine impact questionnaire

SF‐36

Treatment assessment questionnaire

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections, no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not stated from which group dropouts (7) occurred. ITT analysis stated

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All expected outcomes reported, primary outcome data given but secondary data with none statistically significant results were reported narratively only

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Silberstein 2000

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment, 3‐month FU

Fixed injections of Botox (2 dosing arms) vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and at 1 month, 2 months and 3 months post‐treatment

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; history of ICHD‐1 defined migraine, with or without aura; average of 2‐8 moderate‐severe migraines per month over the previous 3 months; 2‐8 such migraines during the 1‐month baseline period; first diagnosis of migraine before the age of 50 years; able to distinguish migraine from non‐migraine headaches; stable frequency and severity of migraines; no unstable medical conditions; migraines relieved to an acceptable level by acute migraine therapy; doses of concurrent prophylactic medications for migraine stable for at least 3 months immediately prior to enrolment

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition or the use of any agent that may have put the participant at risk with exposure to Botox; history of complicated migraine; typical migraine pain localised predominantly to the occipital or suboccipital region of the cranium; planned or actual pregnancy or lactation; known allergy or sensitivity to the trial medication or its components; injection of anaesthetic or steroid into the muscles to be injected in the month immediately prior to enrolment; > 15 headache d/month; symptomatic medication overuse

N = 123, mean age 44, M 18/F 105

CM excluded, MOH excluded

Years since onset of migraine 23, number of migraine attacks during baseline diary period 4

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): Botox 75 U in 11 injection sites (frontalis 30 U, 4 sites; temporalis 18 U, 2 sites; glabellar 27 U, 5 sites)

Intervention (arm 2): Botox 25 U in 11 injection sites (frontalis 10 U, 4 sites; temporalis 6 U, 2 sites; glabellar 9 U, 5 sites)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of 50% responders

Severity of migraine

Use of rescue medication

Patient global assessment of response to treatment

Adverse events

Notes

Funder: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California (manufacturer of Botox)

Diary period 30 days

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Only 1 participant dropped out

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Incomplete reporting of outcomes

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

Vo 2007

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, single‐site

Single treatment, 3‐month FU

Fixed injections of BTX‐A (brand not reported) vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months postbaseline

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65; migraine headaches occurring > 5 times/month and meeting ICHD‐I criteria for migraine headache with or without aura

Exclusion criteria: none stated

N = 49, (analysed population used for baseline characteristics N = 32) mean age 42, M 5/F 27

EM/CM unclear, MOH eligibility unclear

Years with migraine 20, number of migraine days during baseline diary period 19, severity of migraine 5.2 on 10 cm VAS

Interventions

Intervention: BTX‐A (brand not reported), weight‐based dosing, < 65 kg: 135 U, ≥ 65 kg: 210 U, 22 injection sites (corrugator 2 sites 5 U/5 U, frontalis 4 sites 20 U/20 U, temporalis 4 sites 20 U/40 U, posterior neck 6 sites 60 U/90 U, occipitalis 2 sites 10 U/10 U, sternocleidomastoid 4 sites 20 U/40 U)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Severity of migraine

Duration of migraine

Use of rescue medication

Migraine‐specific questionnaire

Notes

Funder: Comprehensive Neuroscience Program and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences award

Diary period 30 days

Contacted without response

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: participant blinded with matched placebo injections no methods given for blinding of personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐blind: no methods given for blinding of personnel

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Numbers randomised to each group and dropouts per group not stated

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All expected outcomes reported, primary outcome data given but some secondary data with no significant between group differences were not fully reported

Study size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment arm

AE: adverse event; BTX: botulinum toxin; BTX‐A: botulinum toxin type A; CM: chronic migraine; EM: episodic migraine; F: female; FU: follow‐up; LOCF: last observation carried forward; HIT‐6: Headache Impact Test ‐ 6 question version; HRQoL: Health‐Related Quality‐of‐Life score; ICHD: International Classification of Headache Disorders; IHS: International Headache Society ITT: intention‐to‐treat; M: male; MIDAS: Migraine Disability Assessment Score; MIGSEV: migraine severity scale; MIQ: Migraine Impact Questionnaire; MOH: medication overuse headache; OL: open‐label; QUALY: quality adjusted life years; SF‐36: 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey; TENS: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; VAS: visual analogue scale

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Cady 2012

No relevant comparison, BTX used in both arms

De Tommaso 2016

Clinical assessments carried out at baseline and after all participants had crossed over to receive BTX, no precross‐over recording of clinical outcomes took place

Evers 2004

Some included participants had tension‐type headache and migraine; contact with trial author confirmed that data for migraine‐only participants were not available

Guyuron 2005

Surgical removal of trigger sites in addition to BTX treatment

Ondo 2004

Trial of people with chronic daily headache; contact with trial author confirmed that data for migraine‐only participants were not available

Ruggeri 2013

Health economics paper, data sourced from trial publications

Schwedt 2007

Report of placebo‐treated participants only

BTX: botulinum toxin

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

Brin 2000

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Single treatment with 12‐week FU

4 arms of injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks

Participants

Inclusion criteria not stated

Exclusion criteria not stated

N = 48

CM/EM eligibility unclear, MOH eligibility unclear

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): injections of Botox (dose and number of injections unclear) into frontal and temporal sites

Intervention (arm 2): matched injections of Botox into frontal sites and injections of placebo into temporal sites

Intervention (arm 3): matched injections of placebo into frontal sites and injections of Botox into temporal sites

Control: matched injections of placebo into frontal and temporal sites

Outcomes

Frequency of migraine

Duration of migraine

Severity of migraine

Notes

Abstract only

Funder: Allergan Inc

Diary period not stated

Ipsen 2006

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

Number of treatment sessions not stated, 3‐month time frame

Injections of Dysport (fixed or follow the pain not stated) vs placebo

Assessment time points not stated

Participants

Inclusion criteria: migraine without aura or with typical aura as defined by IHS criteria, migraine attacks persisting for > 1 year; 2‐6 migraine attacks/month of at least moderate severity over the 3 months preceding the pre‐inclusion visit; 2‐6 migraine attacks of at least moderate severity during the screening period

Exclusion criteria: non‐migraine headaches such as tension‐type headaches; migraine with prolonged aura, familial hemiplegic migraine, basilar migraine, migraine aura without headache, migraine with acute onset aura, ophthalmoplegic migraine, retinal migraine, complications of migraine; onset of migraine is after age of 50; overuse of acute migraine medications (individuals who take medications for acute migraine > 10 d/month) or have a history of drug or alcohol abuse

Target N = 150

CM/EM included, MOH excluded

Interventions

Intervention: Dysport injections into pericranial muscles, number and dose not stated

Control: placebo

Outcomes

Number of migraine attacks

Intensity of the migraine attacks

Duration of the migraine attacks

Use of rescue medication

Quality‐of‐life measure (instrument unspecified)

Notes

Protocol (NCT00301665) only, enrolment completed 2005

Funder Ipsen

Diary period not stated

Kuper 2007

Methods

Not stated if randomised but is stated as double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, number of sites unclear

2 treatment cycles, 90 days between treatments

Fixed injections of Botox vs placebo

Assessments carried out at 3 months after each treatment session

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; 3‐15 days migraine per month; suffered migraines for at least 1 year

Exclusion criteria not stated

Target N = 90

CM excluded, MOH eligibility unclear

Interventions

Intervention: Botox (25 U) in fixed muscle injection sites (temporalis, frontalis, procerus, corrugator)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Frequency of migraine (unit not stated)

Use of rescue medication

Quality‐of‐life measure (instrument unspecified)

Notes

Trial design publication only

Funder: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Diary period not stated

Mathew 2005

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

3 treatment cycles, 90 days between treatments

Follow the pain injections of Botox vs placebo following a single‐blind placebo run‐in phase to classify participants as placebo responders or nonresponders

Assessments carried out at baseline, and every 30 days out to day 270. An additional assessment for days ‐60 to ‐30 was carried out to make the placebo response classification

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; headaches on > 15 days of the 30‐day baseline period; any combination of migraines, with/without aura, migrainous/probable migraine, and/or episodic/chronic tension‐type headaches defined by ICHD‐I criteria; stable medical condition; chronic medication regimens, including prophylactic medications, had to be stable for at least 3 months prior to baseline period; willing and able to stay on current medications during the course of the trial

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition or used any agent that may have put them at risk with exposure to Botox; infection or skin problem at any of the injection sites; known allergy or sensitivity to the trial medication or its components; history of “complicated” migraine; Beck Depression inventory score > 24; previous therapy with BTX of any serotype, an injection of anaesthetics or steroids into the trial‐targeted muscles during the 30 days prior to baseline period; overusing or abusing symptomatic medication, alcohol, or drugs; concurrent chronic use or chronic use in the 3 months prior to the screening period of muscle relaxants; women who were pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the trial, or who were unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the trial

N = 355, mean age 43.5 years, M 55/F 300 (inclusive of all headache types)

Baseline characteristics for migraine‐only participants not stated

Interventions

Intervention: Botox 105‐200 U, number of injections per site determined by treating physician (frontal/glabellar 25‐40 U, occipitalis 20 U, temporalis 20‐50 U, masseter optional; 0‐50 U, trapezius 20‐60 U, semispinalis 10‐20 U, splenius capitis 10‐20 U)

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache‐free days

Proportion of responders

Number of headache attacks

Use of rescue medication

MIDAS

Headache Pain‐Specific Quality of life questionnaire

Adverse events

Notes

Data for migraine‐only participants required for inclusion

Funder: Allergan Inc

Diary period 30 days

Silberstein 2005

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐site

3 treatment cycles, 90 days between treatments

Fixed injections of Botox (3 dosing arms) vs placebo following a single‐blind placebo run‐in phase to classify participants as placebo responders or nonresponders

Assessments carried out at baseline, and every 30 days out to day 270. An additional assessment for days ‐60 to ‐30 was carried out to make the placebo response classification

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; headaches on > 15 days during a 30‐day baseline period; headaches could include any combination of migraines: those with/without aura, migrainous headache, probable migraine, and/or episodic or chronic tension‐type headaches according to ICHD‐I criteria; medically stable; long‐term medication (including long‐term prophylactic headache medications) had to be stable for at least 3 months immediately before the baseline period; acute headache pain medication could be taken as needed; willing to continue taking current medications during the course of the trial

Exclusion criteria: any medical condition (e.g. neuromuscular disorders) or used any agent that might expose them to risk if they received Botox; infection or skin problem at any of the injection sites, known allergy or sensitivity to the trial medication or to its components; cluster headache or chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, analgesic rebound headache, headache secondary to head trauma or whiplash injury, a history of “complicated” migraine (e.g. migrainous infarction, hemiplegic migraine, ophthalmoplegic migraine, or basilar migraine), a Beck Depression Inventory score > 24, previous therapy with BTX of any serotype, an injection of anaesthetics or corticosteroids into the trial‐targeted muscles during the 30 days immediately before the baseline period; abuse of symptomatic medication, alcohol, or drugs; concurrent or long‐term use of muscle relaxants (e.g. cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol, or benzodiazepines) during the 3 months before the screening period was prohibited; women who were pregnant or nursing or unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the trial

N = 702, mean age 43.4 years, M 120/F 582 (inclusive of all headache types)

Baseline characteristics for migraine‐only participants not stated

Interventions

Intervention (arm 1): Botox 255 U, 20 injections, frontalis 30 U, 4 sites; corrugator 15 U, 2 sites; temporalis 30 U, 4 sites; splenius capitis 30 U, 2 sites; trapezius 60 U, 4 sites; semispinalis capitis 30 U, 2 sites; suboccipital region 30 U, 2 sites

Intervention (arm 2): Botox 150 U, 20 injections, frontalis 20 U, 4 sites; corrugator 10 U, 2 sites; temporalis 20 U, 4 sites; splenius capitis 20 U, 2 sites; trapezius 40 U, 4 sites; semispinalis capitis 20 U, 2 sites; suboccipital region 20 U, 2 sites

Intervention (arm 3): Botox 75 U, 20 injections, frontalis 10 U, 4 sites; corrugator 5 U, 2 sites; temporalis 10 U, 4 sites; splenius capitis 10 U, 2 sites; trapezius 20 U, 4 sites; semispinalis capitis 10 U, 2 sites; suboccipital region 10 U, 2 sites

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache‐free days

Proportion of responders

Number of headache attacks

Number of moderate‐severe migraines

Use of rescue medication

MIDAS

Headache Pain‐Specific Quality of life questionnaire

AE

Notes

Data for migraine‐only participants required for inclusion

Funder: Allergan Inc

Diary period 30 days

AE: adverse event; BTX: botulinum toxin; CM: chronic migraine; EM: episodic migraine; F: female; FU: follow‐up; ICHD: International Classification of Headache Disorders; IHS: International Headache Society M: male; MIDAS: Migraine Disability Assessment Score; MOH: medication overuse headache

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

NCT02074163

Trial name or title

ASIS for Botox in chronic migraine (ASISinCM)

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, active control, parallel‐group

Aim 2 only relevant to this review: guided delivery of Botox into subdermal bloodless space, between the skin and muscle vs Botox injected intramuscularly

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐65 years; history of chronic migraine (with/without aura) according to the criteria proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the IHS for at least 3 months prior to enrolment; preventive medication, if taking, must be stable for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria: headache disorders outside IHS‐defined chronic migraine definition; evidence of underlying pathology contributing to their headaches; any pathology of the salivary glands such as sialadenitis or condition or symptom that would alter the content of saliva; any medical condition that may increase their risk with exposure to Botox including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton‐Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other significant disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function; profound atrophy or weakness of muscles in the target areas of injection

Target N = 60

Interventions

Intervention: Botox injection guided by device to delivery into subdermal bloodless space between skin and muscle at 6 muscle group sites (glabella, frontal, temporal, occipital, paraspinal, and trapezius)

Control: conventional intramuscular injections of Botox in same muscle groups (Gglabella, frontal, temporal, occipital, paraspinal, and trapezius)

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Total cumulative hours of headache on headache days

AE

Starting date

January 2016

Contact information

Li Nguyen, MD (714)‐453‐7857 dr.li.nguyen@asis‐inc.com

Thanh Phung, MD 714‐893‐1915 thanhphung@idit‐inc.com

Notes

The recruitment status of this trial is unknown. The completion date has passed and the status has not been verified in more than two years

Protocol: NCT:02074163

Funder: ASIS Corporation listed as sponsors and collaborators

NCT02291380

Trial name or title

A study to evaluate botulinum toxin type A for injection HengLi for prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group

Hypothesis relating to this review: that Botox for injection (HengLi) for prophylactic treatment with chronic migraine in adults is safe and efficacious

Participants

Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65, male or female; complying with the ICHD‐3(β) diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the trial period, or women of childbearing potential, not using a reliable means of contraception; known allergy or sensitivity to trial medication or its component; accepted prophylactic treatments of migraine within the 4 weeks before screening; cardiac functional insufficiency; renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 1.5 times upper limit of normal); hepatic diseases (alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase > twice upper limit of normal); systemic myoneural junction diseases (e.g. myasthenia, Eaton‐Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc.); history of facial palsy; infection or dermatological condition at the injection sites;

other types of migraine that do not comply with the diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine; BTX therapy in the past 6 months; used aminoglycoside antibiotics in the recent week or need to use aminoglycoside antibiotics during conduct of the clinical trial; severe cognitive disorder or mental illness, alcohol or drug abuse; involved in other clinical trials over the 3 months prior to this trial

Target N = 288

Interventions

Intervention: Botox for injection in these trials, minimum intramuscular dose of 155 U of Botox (HengLi) administered to 31 injection sites across 7 head and neck muscles using a fixed‐site, fixed‐dose injection paradigm (each injection was 5 U in 0.1 mL). In addition, up to 40 U Botox, administered intramuscularly to 8 additional injection sites across 3 head and neck muscles, was allowed, using a follow‐the‐pain approach. Thus, the minimum dose was 155 U and the maximum dose was 195 U

Control: matched placebo injections

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of headache attacks

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)

Use of rescue medications

Severity of migraine

Duration of migraine

MIDAS

HIT‐6

Starting date

September 2014

Contact information

Lanzhou Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd

Notes

Protocol NCT02291380

Funder: Lanzhou Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd listed as Sponsors and Collaborators

NTR3440

Trial name or title

Chronification and reversibility of migraine (CHARM)

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group

Hypothesis relating to this review: treatment with BTX‐A injections (at the start of the therapy) will increase the success rate of withdrawal therapy or will improve quality of life during the withdrawal period

Participants

Inclusion criteria: suffering from chronic migraine according to the ICHD‐II criteria for chronic migraine with medication overuse according to the ICHD‐II criteria

Exclusion criteria: age under 18 years; other neurological conditions that may interfere with the trial; any oncological or psychiatric disease, any cognitive disorders and/or behavioural problems which may interfere with the trial; substance abuse; use of non‐triptan or non‐analgesic acute anti‐headache medication; pregnancy, planned pregnancy, current nursing; specific risk factors for BTX and magnetic resonance imaging

Target N = 180

Interventions

Intervention: withdrawal therapy with 1‐time concomitant BTX‐A injections in 31 locations according to the injection protocol by Allergan (total 155U)
Placebo: withdrawal therapy with 1‐time concomitant low‐dose BTX‐A injections in the facial region and NaCl injections in the other regions according to the injection protocol by Allergan (Total 17.5U)
Withdrawal therapy is considered standard treatment for this group and takes 3 months. During this time, participants will be guided by a trained headache‐nurse

Outcomes

Number of headache days

Number of migraine days

Number of migraine attacks

Proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in migraine)

HIT‐6

Depression scales

SF‐36 questionnaire

Starting date

1 September 2012

Contact information

[email protected]

Notes

Full publication due in 2017

Protocol NTR3440

Funder: NWO (VIDI grant)

AE: adverse events; BTX: botulinum toxin; BTX‐A: botulinum toxin type A HIT‐6: Headache Impact Test‐6 question version; ICHD: International Classification of Headache Disorders; IHS: International Headache Society; MIDAS: Migraine Disability Assessment

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of migraine days Show forest plot

5

1915

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.39 [‐4.02, ‐0.76]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.

1.1 Chronic migraine

4

1497

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.07 [‐4.73, ‐1.41]

1.2 Episodic migraine

1

418

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.77, 0.37]

2 Number of headache days Show forest plot

2

1384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.86 [‐2.74, ‐0.98]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of headache days.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of headache days.

2.1 Chronic migraine

2

1384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.86 [‐2.74, ‐0.98]

3 Number of migraine attacks Show forest plot

6

2004

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.46 [‐1.34, 0.41]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 3 Number of migraine attacks.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 3 Number of migraine attacks.

3.1 Chronic migraine

1

679

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.71, 0.91]

3.2 Episodic migraine

3

1096

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.17, 0.43]

3.3 Mixed

2

229

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.08 [‐6.78, 2.63]

4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10) Show forest plot

4

209

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.30 [‐4.16, ‐2.45]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10).

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10).

4.1 Chronic migraine

2

75

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.70 [‐3.31, ‐2.09]

4.2 Episodic migraine

1

32

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐4.9 [‐6.56, ‐3.24]

4.3 Mixed

1

102

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.5 [‐4.52, ‐2.48]

5 Use of rescue medication Show forest plot

2

717

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.29 [‐3.09, 0.52]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 5 Use of rescue medication.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 5 Use of rescue medication.

5.1 Chronic migraine

2

717

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.29 [‐3.09, 0.52]

6 Total adverse events Show forest plot

13

3325

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.12, 1.47]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 6 Total adverse events.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 6 Total adverse events.

6.1 Chronic migraine

5

1494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [1.07, 1.40]

6.2 Episodic migraine

6

1673

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.02, 1.60]

6.3 Mixed

2

158

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.47 [0.57, 3.76]

7 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis Show forest plot

7

1867

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

7.29 [3.18, 16.73]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.

7.1 Episodic migraine

5

1637

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

9.53 [3.87, 23.44]

7.2 Mixed

2

230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.58 [0.18, 13.59]

8 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness Show forest plot

6

2602

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

13.67 [6.73, 27.75]

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 8 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 8 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.

8.1 Chronic migraine

2

1379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

12.68 [3.49, 46.05]

8.2 Episodic migraine

4

1223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

14.12 [6.05, 32.94]

9 Adverse event ‐ neck pain Show forest plot

6

2424

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.98 [2.06, 4.32]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 9 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 9 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.

9.1 Chronic migraine

3

1432

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.47 [1.48, 4.12]

9.2 Episodic migraine

2

864

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.93 [2.27, 6.79]

9.3 Mixed

1

128

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.09, 10.47]

10 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain Show forest plot

8

1332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.02, 4.33]

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.

10.1 Chronic migraine

3

115

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.57 [0.81, 8.15]

10.2 Episodic migraine

3

987

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.23 [1.14, 9.13]

10.3 Mixed

2

230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.03, 1.58]

11 Total treatment related adverse events Show forest plot

6

2893

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.18 [1.73, 2.75]

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 11 Total treatment related adverse events.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 11 Total treatment related adverse events.

11.1 Chronic migraine

2

1379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.32 [1.85, 2.91]

11.2 Episodic migraine

4

1514

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.06 [1.37, 3.08]

12 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment. Show forest plot

4

2248

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.28 [1.52, 7.07]

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 12 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 12 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..

12.1 Chronic migraine

2

1384

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.71 [1.38, 9.98]

12.2 Episodic migraine

2

864

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.73 [0.81, 9.19]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Migraine impact and disability assessment scores Show forest plot

2

101

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.27 [‐28.15, 36.69]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 1 Migraine impact and disability assessment scores.

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 1 Migraine impact and disability assessment scores.

1.1 Chronic migraine

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

22.8 [‐2.56, 48.16]

1.2 Mixed

1

59

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐10.50 [‐23.23, 2.23]

2 Total adverse events Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.37, 1.88]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 2 Total adverse events.

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 2 Total adverse events.

2.1 Chronic migraine

1

55

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.94, 1.14]

2.2 Mixed

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.44, 1.00]

3 Total treatment related adverse events Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.59, 0.98]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 3 Total treatment related adverse events.

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 3 Total treatment related adverse events.

3.1 Chronic migraine

1

55

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.60, 1.08]

3.2 Mixed

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.38, 1.09]

4 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment. Show forest plot

2

119

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.10, 0.79]

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 4 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 4 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..

4.1 Chronic migraine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.11, 1.28]

4.2 Mixed

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.02, 0.91]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Dysport ≥ 150 U versus Dysport < 150 U

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Total adverse events Show forest plot

2

150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.47, 5.32]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Dysport ≥ 150 U versus Dysport < 150 U, Outcome 1 Total adverse events.

Comparison 3 Dysport ≥ 150 U versus Dysport < 150 U, Outcome 1 Total adverse events.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Botox dosing studies

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of migraine days Show forest plot

2

353

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [‐0.19, 0.99]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.

1.1 Episodic migraine Botox ≥ 50 U vs Botox < 50

2

353

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [‐0.19, 0.99]

2 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness Show forest plot

1

754

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.84, 1.39]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 2 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 2 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.

2.1 Botox ≥ 200 U versus Botox < 200 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.73, 1.47]

2.2 Botox ≥ 150 U versus Botox < 150 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.78, 1.64]

3 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 3 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 3 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.

3.1 ≥ 50 U versus < 50 U in frontalis and/or corrugator

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.31 [1.20, 4.43]

3.2 ≥ 30 U versus < 30 U in frontalis and/or corrugator

2

459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.36 [0.58, 9.65]

3.3 ≥ 10 U versus < 10 U in frontalis and/or corrugator

2

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.42 [0.99, 5.94]

4 Adverse event ‐ neck pain Show forest plot

1

754

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.91, 1.65]

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 4 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 4 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.

4.1 Botox ≥ 200 U versus Botox < 200 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.83, 1.89]

4.2 Botox ≥ 150 U versus Botox < 150 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.76, 1.86]

5 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain Show forest plot

2

959

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.52, 2.51]

Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 5 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 5 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.

5.1 Botox ≥ 200 U versus Botox < 200 U

2

500

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.13, 11.97]

5.2 Botox ≥150 U versus Botox <150 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.48, 4.41]

5.3 Botox ≥ 50 U versus Botox < 50 U

1

82

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.34, 4.12]

Study flow diagram
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.

Forest plot of comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Number of migraine days. Mazza 2016 and Cady 2014 removed for sensitivity analysis of small trial effect. Data for Mazza 2016 is endpoint data.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Number of migraine days. Mazza 2016 and Cady 2014 removed for sensitivity analysis of small trial effect. Data for Mazza 2016 is endpoint data.

Forest plot of comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, outcome: 1.4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10)
Figures and Tables -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, outcome: 1.4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10)

Forest plot of comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, outcome: 1.6 Total adverse events
Figures and Tables -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, outcome: 1.6 Total adverse events

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of headache days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of headache days.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 3 Number of migraine attacks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 3 Number of migraine attacks.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10).

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 5 Use of rescue medication.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 5 Use of rescue medication.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 6 Total adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 6 Total adverse events.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 8 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 8 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 9 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 9 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 11 Total treatment related adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 11 Total treatment related adverse events.

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 12 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo, Outcome 12 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 1 Migraine impact and disability assessment scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 1 Migraine impact and disability assessment scores.

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 2 Total adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 2 Total adverse events.

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 3 Total treatment related adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 3 Total treatment related adverse events.

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 4 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent, Outcome 4 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment..

Comparison 3 Dysport ≥ 150 U versus Dysport < 150 U, Outcome 1 Total adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Dysport ≥ 150 U versus Dysport < 150 U, Outcome 1 Total adverse events.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 1 Number of migraine days.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 2 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 2 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 3 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 3 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 4 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 4 Adverse event ‐ neck pain.

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 5 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Botox dosing studies, Outcome 5 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Botulinum toxin type A compared to placebo for the prevention of migraine in adults

Botulinum toxin type A compared to placebo for the prevention of migraine in adults

Patient or population: adults with migraine
Setting: outpatient clinic
Intervention: botulinum toxin type A
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Result with placebo

Result with botulinum toxin type A

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Number of migraine days per month: chronic migraine only

The mean number of migraine days (chronic migraine only) ranged from 12 to 20 days

MD 3.1 days lower
(4.7 lower to 1.4 lower)

1497
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b

Number of migraine days per month

The mean number of migraine days ranged from 4 to 20 days

MD 2.4 days lower
(4.0 lower to 0.8 lower)

1915
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b,c

Number of headache days per month: chronic migraine only

The mean number of headache days (chronic migraine only) ranged from 13 to 13.4 days

MD 1.9 days lower
(2.7 lower to 1.0 lower)

1384
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

Number of migraine attacks

The mean number of migraine attacks ranged from 1.9 to 7.8 attacks

MD 0.5 attacks lower
(1.3 lower to 0.4 higher)

2004
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd,e

Headache intensity measure (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10)

The mean severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10) ranged from 6.2 to 9.2 cm

MD 3.3 cm lower
(4.2 lower to 2.5 lower)

209
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowf,g

Global impression scale
assessed with Headache Impact Test‐6

The mean global impression scale was 58.6 points

MD 1.6 points higher
(2.1 lower to 5.3 higher)

45
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowf,g

Total number of participants experiencing an adverse event

Trial population

RR 1.28
(1.12 to 1.47)

3325
(13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderateh

471 per 1000

603 per 1000
(528 to 693)

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded once due to inconsistency: statistical heterogeneity observed despite similarities in populations and doses.
bDowngraded once due to imprecision: sensitivity analysis testing robustness of result suggested small trials may be overestimating treatment effect. The result of this sensitivity analysis for the chronic migraine group (MD 2 days lower, 95% CI 2.8 days lower to 1.1 days lower, 2 RCTs, N = 1384, results with placebo 12‐13 days) is not affected by imprecision and so we judged it to be moderate‐quality evidence.
cDowngraded once due to indirectness: insufficient evidence to form subgroups representing our distinct populations of interest.
dDowngraded once due to indirectness: sensitivity of this outcome measure at risk of being too low to detect clinically meaningful differences.
eDowngraded once due to publication bias: evidence found of trials that have never been published that record this outcome.
fDowngraded once due to risk of bias: high or unclear risk of selective reporting bias and poor reporting of this outcome measure had a large effect on numbers analysed.
gDowngraded twice due to imprecision: trial size small, new trial evidence likely to change result.
hDowngraded once due to imprecision: trial size small, new trial evidence likely to change result.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Botulinum toxin type A compared to placebo for the prevention of migraine in adults
Summary of findings 2. Botulinum toxin type A compared to other established prophylactic agent for the prevention of migraine in adults

Botulinum toxin type A compared to other established prophylactic agent for the prevention of migraine in adults

Patient or population: adults with migraine
Setting: outpatient clinic
Intervention: botulinum toxin type A
Comparison: other established prophylactic agent

Outcomes

Result with other established prophylactic agent

Result with botulinum toxin type A

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Number of migraine days per month: chronic migraine only

One trial using topiramate in its comparison arm reported narratively on this outcome stating that there was no significant difference between groups.

43
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b,c

Number of headache days per month

The mean number of headache days was 6.6 days

MD 1 day lower
(4.3 lower to 2.3 higher)

59
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b

Number of migraine attacks per month

Headache intensity measure
assessed with 5‐point scale, 5 being severe, 1 being mild: chronic migraine only

The mean severity of migraine was 2.3 points

MD 0.4 points lower
(0.79 lower to 0.01 lower)

46
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b

Global impression of disease
assessed with Migraine impact and disability assessment scores

The mean global impression of disease ranged from 9.8 to 16.5 points

MD 4.3 points higher
(28 lower to 37 higher)

101
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b

Total number of participants experiencing an adverse event

Trial population

RR 0.76
(0.59 to 0.98)

114
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b

862 per 1000

724 per 1000
(319 to 1000)

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded once due to risk of bias: unclear or high risk for selection, performance, detection and attrition bias.
bDowngraded twice due to imprecision: trial sizes small, new trial evidence likely to change result.
cDowngraded once due to imprecision: narrative description only.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 2. Botulinum toxin type A compared to other established prophylactic agent for the prevention of migraine in adults
Table 1. Glossary of terms

Term

Definition

Chronic migraine (IHS 1988)

Not defined

Chronic migraine (IHS 2004)

Description: migraine headache occurring on ≥ 15 days per month for > 3 months in the absence of medication overuse

Diagnostic criteria
A. Headache fulfilling criteria C and D for 1.1 migraine without aura on 15 days/month for more than 3 months
B. Not attributed to another disorder

Chronic migraine (IHS 2013)

Description: headache occurring on ≥ 15 days per month for > 3 months, which has the features of migraine headache on at least 8 days per month

Diagnostic criteria

A. Headache (tension‐type‐like and/or migraine‐like on ≥ 15 days/month for > 3 months and fulfilling criteria B and C

B. Occurring in a patient who has had at least 5 attacks fulfilling criteria B‐D for migraine without aura and/or criteria B and C for migraine with aura

C. On 8 days per month for > 3 months, fulfilling any of the following:

  • criteria C and D for migraine without aura;

  • criteria B and C for migraine with aura;

  • believed by the patient to be migraine at onset and relieved by a triptan or ergot derivative.

D. Not better accounted for by another ICHD‐III diagnosis

Medication overuse headache (IHS 1988)

Not defined

Medication overuse headache (IHS 2004)

Diagnostic criteria
A. Headache present on ≥ 15 days/month fulfilling criteria C and D
B. Regular overuse for > 3 months of one or more drugs that can be taken for acute and/or symptomatic treatment of headache
C. Headache has developed or markedly worsened during medication overuse
D. Headache resolves or reverts to its previous pattern within 2 months after discontinuation of overused medication

Medication overuse headache (IHS 2013)

Description: headache occurring on ≥ 15 days/month developing as a consequence of regular overuse of acute or symptomatic headache medication (on ≥ 10, or ≥ 15 days/month, depending on the medication) for > 3 months. It usually, but not invariably, resolves after the overuse is stopped.

Diagnostic criteria
A. Headache occurring on 15 days/month in a patient with a pre‐existing headache disorder
B. Regular overuse for more than 3 months of ≥ 1 drugs that can be taken for acute and/or symptomatic treatment of headache
C. Not better accounted for by another ICHD‐III diagnosis

Migraine (IHS 2013)

Migraine has 2 major subtypes.

Migraine without aura is a clinical syndrome characterised by headache with specific features and associated symptoms.

Migraine with aura is primarily characterised by the transient focal neurological symptoms that usually precede or sometimes accompany the headache.

Migraine with aura (IHS 2013)

Description: recurrent attacks, lasting minutes, of unilateral fully reversible visual, sensory or other central nervous system symptoms that usually develop gradually and are usually followed by headache and associated migraine symptoms

Diagnostic criteria
A. At least 2 attacks fulfilling criteria B and C
B. One or more of the following fully reversible aura symptoms: 1. visual, 2. sensory, 3. speech and/or language, 4. motor, 5. brainstem, 6. retinal

C. At least 2 of the following 4 characteristics:

  • at least 1 aura symptom spreads gradually over 5 minutes, and/or ≥ 2 symptoms occur in succession;

  • each individual aura symptom lasts 5‐60 minutes;

  • at least one aura symptom is unilateral;

  • the aura is accompanied, or followed within 60 minutes, by headache.

D. Not better accounted for by another ICHD‐3 diagnosis, and transient ischaemic attack has been excluded.

Migraine without aura (IHS 2013)

Description: recurrent headache disorder manifesting in attacks lasting 4‐72 h. Typical characteristics of the headache are unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate or severe intensity, aggravation by routine physical activity and association with nausea and/or photophobia and phonophobia.

Diagnostic criteria

A. At least 5 attacks1 fulfilling criteria B–D
B. Headache attacks lasting 4‐72 h (untreated or unsuccessfully treated)
C. Headache has at least 2 of the following 4 characteristics:

  • unilateral location;

  • pulsating quality;

  • moderate or severe pain intensity;

  • aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity (e.g. walking or climbing stairs).

D. During headache at least one of the following: 1. nausea and/or vomiting, 2. photophobia and phonophobia

E. Not better accounted for by another ICHD‐III diagnosis.

SNARE complex (Goodsell 2013)

Soluble NSF‐attachment protein receptor (NSF: N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive factor)

SNAP‐25 (Goodsell 2013)

Synaptosomal‐associated protein‐25

Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Glossary of terms
Table 2. FDA‐issued names for botulinum toxin products

Trade name

Manufacturer

FDA‐issued name

Sero‐type

Botox

Allergan

OnabotulinumtoxinA

Botulinum toxin type A

Botox cosmetic

Allergan

OnabotulinumtoxinA

Botulinum toxin type A

Dysport

Ipsen

AbobotulinumtoxinA

Botulinum toxin type A

HengLi

Lanzhou Institute of biological products

Not issued

Botulinum toxin type A

Myobloc

Solstice

RimabotulinumtoxinB

Botulinum toxin type B

Prosigne

Lanzhou Institute of biological products

Not issued

Botulinum toxin type A

Xeomin

Merz

IncobotulinumtoxinA

Botulinum toxin type A

Allergan, Ipsen and Galderma all responded but were unable to provide additional eligible data. Merz, Solstice, and Lanzhou Institute of biological products were contacted without response.

Figures and Tables -
Table 2. FDA‐issued names for botulinum toxin products
Comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of migraine days Show forest plot

5

1915

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.39 [‐4.02, ‐0.76]

1.1 Chronic migraine

4

1497

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.07 [‐4.73, ‐1.41]

1.2 Episodic migraine

1

418

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.77, 0.37]

2 Number of headache days Show forest plot

2

1384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.86 [‐2.74, ‐0.98]

2.1 Chronic migraine

2

1384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.86 [‐2.74, ‐0.98]

3 Number of migraine attacks Show forest plot

6

2004

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.46 [‐1.34, 0.41]

3.1 Chronic migraine

1

679

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.71, 0.91]

3.2 Episodic migraine

3

1096

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.17, 0.43]

3.3 Mixed

2

229

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.08 [‐6.78, 2.63]

4 Severity of migraine (Visual Analogue Score 0‐10) Show forest plot

4

209

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.30 [‐4.16, ‐2.45]

4.1 Chronic migraine

2

75

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.70 [‐3.31, ‐2.09]

4.2 Episodic migraine

1

32

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐4.9 [‐6.56, ‐3.24]

4.3 Mixed

1

102

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.5 [‐4.52, ‐2.48]

5 Use of rescue medication Show forest plot

2

717

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.29 [‐3.09, 0.52]

5.1 Chronic migraine

2

717

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.29 [‐3.09, 0.52]

6 Total adverse events Show forest plot

13

3325

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.12, 1.47]

6.1 Chronic migraine

5

1494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [1.07, 1.40]

6.2 Episodic migraine

6

1673

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.02, 1.60]

6.3 Mixed

2

158

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.47 [0.57, 3.76]

7 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis Show forest plot

7

1867

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

7.29 [3.18, 16.73]

7.1 Episodic migraine

5

1637

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

9.53 [3.87, 23.44]

7.2 Mixed

2

230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.58 [0.18, 13.59]

8 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness Show forest plot

6

2602

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

13.67 [6.73, 27.75]

8.1 Chronic migraine

2

1379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

12.68 [3.49, 46.05]

8.2 Episodic migraine

4

1223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

14.12 [6.05, 32.94]

9 Adverse event ‐ neck pain Show forest plot

6

2424

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.98 [2.06, 4.32]

9.1 Chronic migraine

3

1432

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.47 [1.48, 4.12]

9.2 Episodic migraine

2

864

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.93 [2.27, 6.79]

9.3 Mixed

1

128

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.09, 10.47]

10 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain Show forest plot

8

1332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.02, 4.33]

10.1 Chronic migraine

3

115

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.57 [0.81, 8.15]

10.2 Episodic migraine

3

987

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.23 [1.14, 9.13]

10.3 Mixed

2

230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.03, 1.58]

11 Total treatment related adverse events Show forest plot

6

2893

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.18 [1.73, 2.75]

11.1 Chronic migraine

2

1379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.32 [1.85, 2.91]

11.2 Episodic migraine

4

1514

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.06 [1.37, 3.08]

12 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment. Show forest plot

4

2248

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.28 [1.52, 7.07]

12.1 Chronic migraine

2

1384

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.71 [1.38, 9.98]

12.2 Episodic migraine

2

864

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.73 [0.81, 9.19]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Botulinum toxin type A versus placebo
Comparison 2. Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Migraine impact and disability assessment scores Show forest plot

2

101

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.27 [‐28.15, 36.69]

1.1 Chronic migraine

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

22.8 [‐2.56, 48.16]

1.2 Mixed

1

59

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐10.50 [‐23.23, 2.23]

2 Total adverse events Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.37, 1.88]

2.1 Chronic migraine

1

55

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.94, 1.14]

2.2 Mixed

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.44, 1.00]

3 Total treatment related adverse events Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.59, 0.98]

3.1 Chronic migraine

1

55

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.60, 1.08]

3.2 Mixed

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.38, 1.09]

4 Withdrawals due to adverse events in trials with multiple rounds of treatment. Show forest plot

2

119

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.10, 0.79]

4.1 Chronic migraine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.11, 1.28]

4.2 Mixed

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.02, 0.91]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Botulinum toxin type A versus other established prophylactic agent
Comparison 3. Dysport ≥ 150 U versus Dysport < 150 U

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Total adverse events Show forest plot

2

150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.47, 5.32]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Dysport ≥ 150 U versus Dysport < 150 U
Comparison 4. Botox dosing studies

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of migraine days Show forest plot

2

353

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [‐0.19, 0.99]

1.1 Episodic migraine Botox ≥ 50 U vs Botox < 50

2

353

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [‐0.19, 0.99]

2 Adverse event ‐ muscle weakness Show forest plot

1

754

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.84, 1.39]

2.1 Botox ≥ 200 U versus Botox < 200 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.73, 1.47]

2.2 Botox ≥ 150 U versus Botox < 150 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.78, 1.64]

3 Adverse event ‐ blepharoptosis Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 ≥ 50 U versus < 50 U in frontalis and/or corrugator

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.31 [1.20, 4.43]

3.2 ≥ 30 U versus < 30 U in frontalis and/or corrugator

2

459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.36 [0.58, 9.65]

3.3 ≥ 10 U versus < 10 U in frontalis and/or corrugator

2

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.42 [0.99, 5.94]

4 Adverse event ‐ neck pain Show forest plot

1

754

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.91, 1.65]

4.1 Botox ≥ 200 U versus Botox < 200 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.83, 1.89]

4.2 Botox ≥ 150 U versus Botox < 150 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.76, 1.86]

5 Adverse event ‐ injection site pain Show forest plot

2

959

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.52, 2.51]

5.1 Botox ≥ 200 U versus Botox < 200 U

2

500

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.13, 11.97]

5.2 Botox ≥150 U versus Botox <150 U

1

377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.48, 4.41]

5.3 Botox ≥ 50 U versus Botox < 50 U

1

82

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.34, 4.12]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Botox dosing studies