Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Asthma self management education with regular healthcare professional review or written action plans or both in adults

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009479Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 07 December 2011see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Airways Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Kristin V Carson-Chahhoud

    Correspondence to: School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Timothy J Schultz

    Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Zoe Kopsaftis

    Respiratory Medicine Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia

  • Malcolm P Brinn

    Habit Research Group, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

  • Christopher Barton

    Department of General Practice, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

  • Ahad Ali

    Clinical Practice Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

  • Brian J Smith

    Respiratory Medicine Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia

  • E Haydn Walters

    NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence for Chronic Respiratory Disease, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

  • Kelsey J Sharrad

    School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

Contributions of authors

Anil Roy, Tim Schultz and Kristin Carson contributed equally to the development of this protocol, including design of methodology, literature searching and writing of the background and drafting the manuscript.

Haydn Walters, Peter Gibson and Brian Smith provided feedback on the methodology to effectively conduct this review during its construction.

Brian Smith, Phil Haywood, Heather Powell, Haydn Walters, Amanda Wilson and Peter Gibson all reviewed a final draft of the manuscript and provided constructive feedback prior to editorial review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Australia

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the Cochrane Airways Group for their assistance, particularly Dr Chris Cates and managing editor Emma Welsh for their guidance during the preparation of this protocol.

We also wish to acknowledge the work by authors of the review titled 'Self‐management eduction and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma' (Gibson 2009), as this review will be merged with the results of the current protocol, to provide consumers with a clear and comprehensive summary of the evidence available for the treatment of asthma. The original review authors were Gibson PG, Powell H, Wilson A, Abramson MJ, Haywood P, Bauman A, Hensley MJ, Walters EH and Roberts JJL.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 May 18

Asthma self management education with regular healthcare professional review or written action plans or both in adults

Protocol

Kristin V Carson-Chahhoud, Timothy J Schultz, Zoe Kopsaftis, Malcolm P Brinn, Christopher Barton, Ahad Ali, Brian J Smith, E Haydn Walters, Kelsey J Sharrad

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009479.pub2

2011 Dec 07

Asthma self management education with regular healthcare professional review or written action plans or both in adults

Protocol

Kristin V Carson-Chahhoud, Timothy J Schultz, Zoe Kopsaftis, Malcolm P Brinn, Christopher Barton, Ahad Ali, Brian J Smith, E Haydn Walters, Kelsey J Sharrad

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009479

Notes

The protocol was withdrawn because the review was not completed and the methods are now out of date.