Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Anticoagulación para la tromboprofilaxis perioperatoria en pacientes con cáncer

Appendices

Appendix 1. Full search strategies for the electronic databases: update 2010

Database

Strategy

CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library, latest issue)

#1 heparin OR low molecular weight heparin OR LMWH OR low‐molecular‐weight‐heparin OR nadroparin OR fraxiparin OR enoxaparin OR clexane OR lovenox OR dalteparin OR fragmin OR ardeparin OR normiflo OR tinzaparin OR logiparin OR innohep OR certoparin OR sandoparin OR reviparin OR clivarin OR danaproid OR orgaran
#2 Coumarins OR Warfarin OR coumadin OR acenocumarol OR phenprocumon OR 4‐hydroxicoumarins OR oral anticoagulant OR vitamin K antagonist OR VKA
#3 fondaparinux OR Arixtra
#4 ximelagatran OR Exanta
#5 Pradaxa or Dabigatran or rivaroxaban or Xarelto or apixaban

#6 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4 OR 5
#7 malignan$ OR neoplasm$ OR cancer OR carcinoma$ OR adenocarcinoma OR tumour OR tumor
#8 6 AND 7

MEDLINE

#1 Heparin/
#2 Heparin.tw
#3 Heparin, Low‐Molecular‐Weight/
#4 (LMWH OR low molecular weight heparin OR nadroparin OR fraxiparin OR enoxaparin OR clexane OR lovenox OR dalteparin OR fragmin OR ardeparin OR normiflo OR tinzaparin OR logiparin OR innohep OR certoparin OR sandoparin OR reviparin OR clivarin OR danaproid OR orgaran).tw
#5 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4
#6 Coumarins/
#7 Warfarin/
#8 (warfarin OR coumadin OR acenocumarol OR phenprocumon OR 4‐hydroxicoumarins OR oral anticoagulant OR vitamin K antagonist OR VKA).tw
#9 6 OR 7 OR 8
#10 (fondaparinux OR Arixtra).tw
#11 (ximelagatran OR Exanta).tw

#12 (Pradaxa or Dabigatran or rivaroxaban or Xarelto or apixaban).tw.
#13 5 OR 9 OR 10 OR 11 OR 12
#14 Neoplasms/
#15 (malignan$ OR neoplasm$ OR cancer OR carcinoma$ OR adenocarcinoma OR tumour OR tumor).tw
#16 14 OR 15
#17 clinical trial.pt. OR random:.tw. OR tu.xs.
#18 animals/ NOT human/
#19 17 NOT 18
#20 13 AND 16 AND 19

Embase

#1 Heparin/
#2 heparin.tw
#3 Low Molecular Weight Heparin/
#4 (LMWH OR low molecular weight heparin OR nadroparin OR fraxiparin OR enoxaparin OR clexane OR lovenox OR dalteparin OR fragmin OR ardeparin OR normiflo OR tinzaparin OR logiparin OR innohep OR certoparin OR sandoparin OR reviparin OR clivarin OR danaproid OR orgaran).tw
#5 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4
#6 Coumarin derivative/
#7 Warfarin/
#8 (warfarin OR coumadin OR acenocumarol OR phenprocumon OR 4‐hydroxicoumarins OR oral anticoagulant OR vitamin K antagonist OR VKA).tw
#9 6 OR 7 OR 8
#10 fondaparinux/
#11 (fondaparinux OR Arixtra).tw
#12 ximelagatran/
#13 (ximelagatran OR Exanta).tw

#14 (Pradaxa OR Dabigatran OR rivaroxaban OR Xarelto OR apixaban).tw.
#15 5 OR 9 OR 10 OR 11 OR 12 OR 13 OR 14
#16 Neoplasm/
#17 (malignan$ OR neoplasm$ OR cancer OR carcinoma$ OR adenocarcinoma OR tumour OR tumor).tw
#18 16 OR 17
#19 Random:.tw. OR clinical trial:.mp. OR exp health care quality
#20 animals/ NOT human/
#21 19 NOT 20
#22 15 AND 18 AND 21

ISI (International Scientific Information) the Web of Science

#1 heparin OR low molecular weight heparin OR LMWH OR low‐molecular‐weight‐heparin OR nadroparin OR fraxiparin OR enoxaparin OR clexane OR lovenox OR dalteparin OR fragmin OR ardeparin OR normiflo OR tinzaparin OR logiparin OR innohep OR certoparin OR sandoparin OR reviparin OR clivarin OR danaproid OR orgaran
#2 Coumarins OR Warfarin OR coumadin OR acenocumarol OR phenprocumon OR 4‐hydroxicoumarins OR oral anticoagulant OR vitamin K antagonist OR VKA
#3 fondaparinux OR Arixtra
#4 ximelagatran OR Exanta

# 5 Pradaxa OR Dabigatran OR rivaroxaban OR Xarelto OR apixaban
#6 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4 OR 5
#7 malignan$ OR neoplasm$ OR cancer OR carcinoma$ OR adenocarcinoma OR tumour OR tumor
#8 random$ OR placebo$ OR versus OR vs OR double blind OR double‐blind OR compar$ OR controlled
#9 6 AND 7 AND 8

Appendix 2. Full search strategies for the electronic databases: update 2013

Database

Strategy

CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library, latest issue)

#1 MeSH descriptor: [Heparin] explode all trees

#2 (LMWH or heparin or nadroparin or fraxiparin or enoxaparin or clexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin or danaproid or orgaran or bemiparin or hibor, badyket, semuloparin, parnaparin, fluxum)

#3 MeSH descriptor: [Coumarins] explode all trees

#4 (warfarin or coumadin or acenocumarol or phenprocumon or 4‐hydroxicoumarins or oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist or VKA)

#5 (fondaparinux or arixtra)

#6 (ximelagatran or exanta)

#7 (pradaxa or dabigatran or rivaroxaban or xarelto or apixaban or eliquis or edoxaban or lixiana or betrixaban or edoxaban or otamixaban)

#8 #1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7

#9 MeSH descriptor: [Neoplasms] explode all trees

#10 (malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor*)

#11 #9 or #10

#12 #8 and #10

MEDLINE

#1 exp Heparin/

#2 (LMWH or heparin or nadroparin or fraxiparin or enoxaparin or clexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin or danaproid or orgaran or bemiparin or hibor, badyket, semuloparin, parnaparin, fluxum).tw.

#3 exp Coumarins/

#4 (warfarin or coumadin or acenocumarol or phenprocumon or 4‐hydroxicoumarins or oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist or VKA).tw.

#5 (fondaparinux or arixtra).tw.

#6 (ximelagatran or exanta).tw.

#7 (pradaxa or dabigatran or rivaroxaban or xarelto or apixaban or eliquis or edoxaban or lixiana or betrixaban or edoxaban or otamixaban).tw.

#8 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7

#9 exp Neoplasms/

#10 (malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor*).tw.

#11 9 or 10

#12 8 and 11

#13 randomized controlled trial.pt.

#14 controlled clinical trial.pt.

#15 randomized.ab.

#16 placebo.ab.

#17 drug therapy.fs.

#18 randomly.ab.

#19 trial.ab.

#20 groups.ab.

#21 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20

#22 12 and 21

#23 exp animals/ not humans.sh.

#24 22 not 23

Embase

#1 heparin/

#2 exp low molecular weight heparin/

#3 (LMWH or heparin or nadroparin or fraxiparin or enoxaparin or clexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin or danaproid or orgaran or bemiparin or hibor, badyket, semuloparin, parnaparin, fluxum).tw.

#4 exp coumarin derivative/

#5 (warfarin or coumadin or acenocumarol or phenprocumon or 4‐hydroxicoumarins or oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist or VKA).tw.

#6 (fondaparinux or arixtra).tw.

#7 (ximelagatran or exanta).tw.

#8 (pradaxa or dabigatran or rivaroxaban or xarelto or apixaban or eliquis or edoxaban or lixiana or betrixaban or edoxaban or otamixaban).tw.

#9 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8

#10 exp neoplasm/

#11 (malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor*).tw.

#12 10 or 11

#13 9 and 12

#14 crossover procedure/

#15 double‐blind procedure/

#16 randomized controlled trial/

#17 single‐blind procedure/

#18 random*.mp.

#19 factorial*.mp.

#20 (crossover* or cross over* or cross‐over*).mp.

#21 placebo*.mp.

#22 (double* adj blind*).mp.

#23 (singl* adj blind*).mp.

#24 assign*.mp.

#25 allocat*.mp.

#26 volunteer*.mp.

#27 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26

#28 13 and 27

#29 (exp animal/ or nonhuman/ or exp animal experiment/) not human/

#30 28 not 29

Appendix 3. Full search strategies for the electronic databases: update 2018

Database

Strategy

CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library, 2018, Issue 1)

#1 MeSH descriptor: [Anticoagulants] explode all trees

#2 (LMWH* or heparin* or nadroparin* or frixiparin* or enoxaparin* or clexane or klexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin* or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin* or danaproid or danaparoid or orgaran or antixarin or bemiparin* or hibor or zibor or ivor or badyket or semuloparin or parnaparin or tedelparin or fluxum or lohepa or lowhepa or parvoparin or seleparin* or tedelgliparin or lomoparan or orgaran or sulodexide or zivor or embolex or xaparin or clivarine or fondaparinux or Arixtra or UFH or Hepalean or Calcilean or Calciparine or Liquaemin or Liquemin or Multiparin or Novoheparin or Eparina or Hep‐lock or Heparinate or Heparinic acid or Panheprin or Hepalean or Heparin Leo or Heparin Lock)

#3 FR‐860 or FR 860 or FR860 or PK‐10,169 or PK 10,169 or PK10,169 or PK‐10169 or PK 10169 or PK10169 or EMT‐967 or EMT 967 or EMT967 or EMT‐966 or EMT 966 or EMT966 or CY 216 or CY‐216 or CY216 or LMF CY‐216 or LMF CY 216 or LMF CY216

#4 MeSH descriptor: [Coumarins] explode all trees

#5 (4‐Hydroxycoumarin* or warfarin* or acenocoumarol or nicoumalone or sinthrome or Sintrom or phenindione or dicoumarol or coumadin or phenprocoumon or phepromaron or ethyl‐biscoumacetate or phenindione or Diphenadione or Tioclomarol or Racumi or Marcoumar or Marcumar or Falithrom or Jantoven or vitamin K antagonist* or VKA or fluindione or difenacoum or coumatetralyl)

#6 (Dermatan Sulfate or (Chondroitin Sulfate adj B) or Dermatan Sulphate or DS 435 or MF‐701 or OP‐370 or b‐Heparin or Mistral or Venorix)

#7 thrombin near inhibitor*

#8 factor Xa inhibitor* or antithrombin* or anticoagul*

#9 rivaroxaban or Xarelto or apixaban or Eliquis or dabigatran etexilate or Edoxaban or Savaysa or Betrixaban or ximelagatran or pradaxa or lixiana or exanta or Darexaban or Otamixaban* or Razaxaban or Bivalirudin or Desirudin or Lepirudin or Melagatran or YM 150 or Iprivask or argatrovan or pradax or BIBR‐953 or BIBR‐953ZW or BAY 59‐7939 or BMS‐562247 or DU‐176 or DU‐176b

#10 TSOAC* or NOAC* or DOAC*

#11 #1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7 or #8 or #9 or #10

#12 MeSH descriptor: [Neoplasms] explode all trees

#13 malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor* or glioma* or myeloma* or lymphoma* or leukemia* or leukaemia* or epithelioma* or adenoma*

#14 #13 or #14

#15 #11 and #14

MEDLINE

RCT search strategy:

1. exp Anticoagulants/

2. (LMWH* or heparin* or nadroparin* or frixiparin* or enoxaparin* or clexane or klexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin* or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin* or danaproid or danaparoid or orgaran or antixarin or bemiparin* or hibor or zibor or ivor or badyket or semuloparin or parnaparin or tedelparin or fluxum or lohepa or lowhepa or parvoparin or seleparin* or tedelgliparin or lomoparan or orgaran or sulodexide or zivor or embolex or xaparin or clivarine or fondaparinux or Arixtra or UFH or Hepalean or Calcilean or Calciparine or Liquaemin or Liquemin or Multiparin or Novoheparin or Eparina or Hep‐lock or Heparinate or Heparinic acid or Panheprin or Hepalean or Heparin Leo or Heparin Lock).mp.

3. (FR‐860 or FR 860 or FR860 or PK‐10,169 or PK 10,169 or PK10,169 or PK‐10169 or PK 10169 or PK10169 or EMT‐967 or EMT 967 or EMT967 or EMT‐966 or EMT 966 or EMT966 or CY 216 or CY‐216 or CY216 or LMF CY‐216 or LMF CY 216 or LMF CY216).mp.

4. exp Coumarins/

5. (4‐Hydroxycoumarin* or warfarin* or acenocoumarol or nicoumalone or sinthrome or Sintrom or phenindione or dicoumarol or coumadin or phenprocoumon or phepromaron or ethyl‐biscoumacetate or phenindione or Diphenadione or Tioclomarol or Racumi or Marcoumar or Marcumar or Falithrom or Jantoven or vitamin K antagonist* or VKA or fluindione or difenacoum or coumatetralyl).mp.

6. (Dermatan Sulfate or (Chondroitin Sulfate adj B) or Dermatan sulfate or DS 435 or MF‐701 or OP‐370 or b‐Heparin or Mistral or Venorix).mp.

7. (thrombin adj inhibitor*).mp.

8. (factor Xa inhibitor* or antithrombin* or anticoagul*).mp.

9. (rivaroxaban or Xarelto or apixaban or Eliquis or dabigatran etexilate or Edoxaban or Savaysa or Betrixaban or ximelagatran or pradaxa or lixiana or exanta or Darexaban or Otamixaban* or Razaxaban or Bivalirudin or Desirudin or Lepirudin or Melagatran or YM 150 or Iprivask or argatrovan or pradax or BIBR‐953 or BIBR‐953ZW or BAY 59‐7939 or BMS‐562247 or DU‐176 or DU‐176b).mp.

10. (TSOAC* or NOAC* or DOAC*).ti,ab,kw.

11. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12. exp Neoplasms/

13. (malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor* or glioma* or myeloma* or lymphoma* or leukemia* or leukaemia* or epithelioma* or adenoma*).tw.

14. 12 or 13

15. 11 and 14

16. randomized controlled trial.pt.

17. controlled clinical trial.pt.

18. randomized.ab.

19. placebo.ab.

20. clinical trials as topic.sh.

21. randomly.ab.

22. trial.ti.

23. 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22

24. (animals not (humans and animals)).sh.

25. 23 not 24

26. 15 and 25

Systematic Review search strategy:

1. exp Anticoagulants/

2. (LMWH* or heparin* or nadroparin* or frixiparin* or enoxaparin* or clexane or klexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin* or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin* or danaproid or danaparoid or orgaran or antixarin or bemiparin* or hibor or zibor or ivor or badyket or semuloparin or parnaparin or tedelparin or fluxum or lohepa or lowhepa or parvoparin or seleparin* or tedelgliparin or lomoparan or orgaran or sulodexide or zivor or embolex or xaparin or clivarine or fondaparinux or Arixtra or UFH or Hepalean or Calcilean or Calciparine or Liquaemin or Liquemin or Multiparin or Novoheparin or Eparina or Hep‐lock or Heparinate or Heparinic acid or Panheprin or Hepalean or Heparin Leo or Heparin Lock).mp.

3. (FR‐860 or FR 860 or FR860 or PK‐10,169 or PK 10,169 or PK10,169 or PK‐10169 or PK 10169 or PK10169 or EMT‐967 or EMT 967 or EMT967 or EMT‐966 or EMT 966 or EMT966 or CY 216 or CY‐216 or CY216 or LMF CY‐216 or LMF CY 216 or LMF CY216).mp.

4. exp Coumarins/

5. (4‐Hydroxycoumarin* or warfarin* or acenocoumarol or nicoumalone or sinthrome or Sintrom or phenindione or dicoumarol or coumadin or phenprocoumon or phepromaron or ethyl‐biscoumacetate or phenindione or Diphenadione or Tioclomarol or Racumi or Marcoumar or Marcumar or Falithrom or Jantoven or vitamin K antagonist* or VKA or fluindione or difenacoum or coumatetralyl).mp.

6. (Dermatan Sulfate or (Chondroitin Sulfate adj B) or Dermatan sulfate or DS 435 or MF‐701 or OP‐370 or b‐Heparin or Mistral or Venorix).mp.

7. (thrombin adj inhibitor*).mp.

8. (factor Xa inhibitor* or antithrombin* or anticoagul*).mp.

9. (rivaroxaban or Xarelto or apixaban or Eliquis or dabigatran etexilate or Edoxaban or Savaysa or Betrixaban or ximelagatran or pradaxa or lixiana or exanta or Darexaban or Otamixaban* or Razaxaban or Bivalirudin or Desirudin or Lepirudin or Melagatran or YM 150 or Iprivask or argatrovan or pradax or BIBR‐953 or BIBR‐953ZW or BAY 59‐7939 or BMS‐562247 or DU‐176 or DU‐176b).mp.

10. (TSOAC* or NOAC* or DOAC*).ti,ab,kw.

11. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12. exp Neoplasms/

13. (malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor* or glioma* or myeloma* or lymphoma* or leukemia* or leukaemia* or epithelioma* or adenoma*).tw.

14. 12 or 13

15. 11 and 14

16. (review or review, tutorial or review, academic).pt.

17. (medline or medlars or embase or pubmed or cochrane).tw,sh.

18. (scisearch or psychinfo or psycinfo).tw,sh.

19. (psychlit or psyclit).tw,sh.

20. cinahl.tw,sh.

21. ((hand adj2 search*) or (manual* adj2 search*)).tw,sh.

22. (electronic database* or bibliographic database* or computeri?ed database* or online database*).tw,sh.

23. (pooling or pooled or mantel haenszel).tw,sh.

24. (peto or dersimonian or der simonian or fixed effect).tw,sh.

25. (retraction of publication or retracted publication).pt.

26. 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25

27. 16 and 26

28. meta‐analysis.pt.

29. meta‐analysis.sh.

30. (meta‐analys* or meta analys* or metaanalys*).tw,sh.

31. (systematic* adj5 review*).tw,sh.

32. (systematic* adj5 overview*).tw,sh.

33. (quantitativ* adj5 review*).tw,sh.

34. (quantitativ* adj5 overview*).tw,sh.

35. (methodologic* adj5 review*).tw,sh.

36. (methodologic* adj5 overview*).tw,sh.

37. (integrative research review* or research integration).tw.

38. 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 or 35 or 36 or 37

39. 27 or 38

41. 15 and 39

Embase

RCT search strategy:

1. exp anticoagulant agent/

2. (LMWH* or heparin* or nadroparin* or frixiparin* or enoxaparin* or clexane or klexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin* or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin* or danaproid or danaparoid or orgaran or antixarin or bemiparin* or hibor or zibor or ivor or badyket or semuloparin or parnaparin or tedelparin or fluxum or lohepa or lowhepa or parvoparin or seleparin* or tedelgliparin or lomoparan or orgaran or sulodexide or zivor or embolex or xaparin or clivarine or fondaparinux or Arixtra or UFH or Hepalean or Calcilean or Calciparine or Liquaemin or Liquemin or Multiparin or Novoheparin or Eparina or Hep‐lock or Heparinate or Heparinic acid or Panheprin or Hepalean or Heparin Leo or Heparin Lock).mp.

3. (FR‐860 or FR 860 or FR860 or PK‐10,169 or PK 10,169 or PK10,169 or PK‐10169 or PK 10169 or PK10169 or EMT‐967 or EMT 967 or EMT967 or EMT‐966 or EMT 966 or EMT966 or CY 216 or CY‐216 or CY216 or LMF CY‐216 or LMF CY 216 or LMF CY216).mp.

4. exp coumarin derivative/

5. (4‐Hydroxycoumarin* or warfarin* or acenocoumarol or nicoumalone or sinthrome or Sintrom or phenindione or dicoumarol or coumadin or phenprocoumon or phepromaron or ethyl‐biscoumacetate or phenindione or Diphenadione or Tioclomarol or Racumi or Marcoumar or Marcumar or Falithrom or Jantoven or vitamin K antagonist* or VKA or fluindione or difenacoum or coumatetralyl).mp.

6. (Dermatan Sulfate or (Chondroitin Sulfate adj B) or Dermatan sulfate or DS 435 or MF‐701 or OP‐370 or b‐Heparin or Mistral or Venorix).mp.

7. (thrombin adj inhibitor*).mp.

8. (factor Xa inhibitor* or antithrombin* or anticoagul*).mp.

9. (rivaroxaban or Xarelto or apixaban or Eliquis or dabigatran etexilate or Edoxaban or Savaysa or Betrixaban or ximelagatran or pradaxa or lixiana or exanta or Darexaban or Otamixaban* or Razaxaban or Bivalirudin or Desirudin or Lepirudin or Melagatran or YM 150 or Iprivask or argatrovan or pradax or BIBR‐953 or BIBR‐953ZW or BAY 59‐7939 or BMS‐562247 or DU‐176 or DU‐176b).mp.

10. (TSOAC* or NOAC* or DOAC*).ti,ab,kw.

11. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12. exp neoplasm/

13. (malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor* or glioma* or myeloma* or lymphoma* or leukemia* or leukaemia* or epithelioma* or adenoma*).tw.

14. 12 or 13

15. 11 and 14

16. crossover procedure/

17. double‐blind procedure/

18. randomized controlled trial/

19. single‐blind procedure/

20. random*.mp.

21. factorial*.mp.

22. (crossover* or cross over* or cross‐over*).mp.

23. placebo*.mp.

24. (double* adj blind*).mp.

25. (singl* adj blind*).mp.

26. assign*.mp.

27. allocat*.mp.

28. volunteer*.mp.

29. 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26 or 27 or 28

30. 15 and 29

Systematic Review search strategy:

1. exp anticoagulant agent/

2. (LMWH* or heparin* or nadroparin* or frixiparin* or enoxaparin* or clexane or klexane or lovenox or dalteparin or fragmin or ardeparin* or normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin* or danaproid or danaparoid or orgaran or antixarin or bemiparin* or hibor or zibor or ivor or badyket or semuloparin or parnaparin or tedelparin or fluxum or lohepa or lowhepa or parvoparin or seleparin* or tedelgliparin or lomoparan or orgaran or sulodexide or zivor or embolex or xaparin or clivarine or fondaparinux or Arixtra or UFH or Hepalean or Calcilean or Calciparine or Liquaemin or Liquemin or Multiparin or Novoheparin or Eparina or Hep‐lock or Heparinate or Heparinic acid or Panheprin or Hepalean or Heparin Leo or Heparin Lock).mp.

3. (FR‐860 or FR 860 or FR860 or PK‐10,169 or PK 10,169 or PK10,169 or PK‐10169 or PK 10169 or PK10169 or EMT‐967 or EMT 967 or EMT967 or EMT‐966 or EMT 966 or EMT966 or CY 216 or CY‐216 or CY216 or LMF CY‐216 or LMF CY 216 or LMF CY216).mp.

4. exp coumarin derivative/

5. (4‐Hydroxycoumarin* or warfarin* or acenocoumarol or nicoumalone or sinthrome or Sintrom or phenindione or dicoumarol or coumadin or phenprocoumon or phepromaron or ethyl‐biscoumacetate or phenindione or Diphenadione or Tioclomarol or Racumi or Marcoumar or Marcumar or Falithrom or Jantoven or vitamin K antagonist* or VKA or fluindione or difenacoum or coumatetralyl).mp.

6. (Dermatan Sulfate or (Chondroitin Sulfate adj B) or Dermatan sulfate or DS 435 or MF‐701 or OP‐370 or b‐Heparin or Mistral or Venorix).mp.

7. (thrombin adj inhibitor*).mp.

8. (factor Xa inhibitor* or antithrombin* or anticoagul*).mp.

9. (rivaroxaban or Xarelto or apixaban or Eliquis or dabigatran etexilate or Edoxaban or Savaysa or Betrixaban or ximelagatran or pradaxa or lixiana or exanta or Darexaban or Otamixaban* or Razaxaban or Bivalirudin or Desirudin or Lepirudin or Melagatran or YM 150 or Iprivask or argatrovan or pradax or BIBR‐953 or BIBR‐953ZW or BAY 59‐7939 or BMS‐562247 or DU‐176 or DU‐176b).mp.

10. (TSOAC* or NOAC* or DOAC*).ti,ab,kw.

11. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12. exp neoplasm/

13. (malignan* or neoplasm* or cancer* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or tumour* or tumor* or glioma* or myeloma* or lymphoma* or leukemia* or leukaemia* or epithelioma* or adenoma*).tw.

14. 12 or 13

15. 11 and 14

16. exp review/

17. (literature adj3 review*).ti,ab.

18. exp meta analysis/

19. exp "Systematic Review"/

20. 16 or 17 or 18 or 19

21. (medline or medlars or embase or pubmed or cinahl or amed or psychlit or psyclit or psychinfo or psycinfo or scisearch or cochrane).ti,ab.

22. RETRACTED ARTICLE/

23. 21 or 22

24. 20 and 23

25. (systematic* adj2 (review* or overview)).ti,ab.

26. (meta?anal* or meta anal* or meta‐anal* or metaanal* or metanal*).ti,ab.

27. 24 or 25 or 26

28. 15 and 27

Appendix 4. Grade evidence profile: low‐molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin

Question: LMWH prophylaxis compared to UFH prophylaxis in patients with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgery (Q10a)

Setting: Inpatient surgical

Certainty assessment

№ of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

LMWH prophylaxis

UFH prophylaxis

Relative
(95% CI)

Absolute
(95% CI)

Mortality (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

8

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious a

None

88/2105 (4.2%)

109/2155 (5.1%)

RR 0.82
(0.63 to 1.07)

9 fewer per 1000
(from 4 more to 19 fewer)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Any PE (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

14

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

8/2759 (0.3%)

18/2829 (0.6%)

RR 0.49
(0.17 to 1.47)

3 fewer per 1000
(from 3 more to 5 fewer)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Symptomatic DVT (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

8

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious c

None

7/1106 (0.6%)

11/1144 (1.0%)

RR 0.67
(0.27 to 1.69)

3 fewer per 1000
(from 7 fewer to 7 more)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Symptomatic DVT measured as asymptomatic DVT (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

12

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Serious d

Serious e

None

169/2443 (6.9%)

198/2495 (7.9%)

RR 0.86
(0.71 to 1.05)

11 fewer per 1000
(from 4 more to 23 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CRITICAL

Major bleeding (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

9

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious f

None

53/1714 (3.1%)

54/1759 (3.1%)

RR 1.01
(0.69 to 1.48)

0 fewer per 1000
(from 10 fewer to 15 more)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Minor bleeding (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

2

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious g

None

85/594 (14.3%)

85/600 (14.2%)

RR 1.01
(0.76 to 1.33)

1 more per 1000
(from 34 fewer to 47 more)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Wound hematoma (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

6

Randomised trials

Not serious h

Not serious

Not serious

Serious i

None

83/1391 (6.0%)

123/1436 (8.6%)

RR 0.70
(0.54 to 0.92)

26 fewer per 1000
(from 7 fewer to 39 fewer)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Reoperation for bleeding (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

4

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious j

None

29/619 (4.7%)

32/627 (5.1%)

RR 0.93
(0.57 to 1.50)

4 fewer per 1000
(from 22 fewer to 26 more)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Intraoperative transfusion (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

2

Randomised trials

Not serious

Serious k

Not serious

Serious l

None

364

373

MD 35.36 lower
(253.19 lower to 182.47 higher)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CRITICAL

Postoperative transfusion (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

2

Randomised trials

Not serious

Serious m

Not serious

Serious n

None

363

371

MD 190.03 higher
(23.65 lower to 403.72 higher)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CRITICAL

Intraoperative blood loss (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

4

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious o

None

377

384

MD 6.75 lower
(85.49 lower to 71.99 higher)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Postoperative drain volume (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

3

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious p

None

725

734

MD 30.18 higher
(36.26 lower to 96.62 higher)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

Thrombocytopenia (follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months)

2

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious q

None

3/337 (0.9%)

1/346 (0.3%)

RR 3.07
(0.32 to 29.33)

6 more per 1000
(from 2 fewer to 82 more)

⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE

CRITICAL

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; MD: Mean difference

Explanations

a. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (19 fewer per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of no effect (4 more per 1000 absolute increase), including 197 events in total.

b. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 26 events in total

c. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 18 events in total

d. Downgraded by one level due to serious inconsistency, outcome measured as surrogate outcome

e. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility of important benefit (23 fewer more per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of harm (4 more per 1000 increase), including 367 events in total.

f. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility of important benefit (10 fewer more per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of harm (15 more per 1000 increase), including 107 events in total.

g. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (34 fewer per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of no effect (47 more per 1000 absolute increase), including 170 events in total.

h. Downgraded due to serious risk of bias; allocation concealment was not clear in 5 out of 6 studies.

i. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 206 events in total

j. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility of benefit (22 fewer per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (26 more per 1000 absolute increase), including 61 events in total.

k. Downgraded due to serious inconsistency. I2= 98%; Dahan 1990 included patients undergoing thoracic surgery for cancer whereas Koppenhagen 1992 included patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery

l. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (253.19 mL less) and possibility of harm (182.47 mL more)

m. Downgraded due to serious inconsistency. I2= 83%; Dahan 1990 included patients undergoing thoracic surgery for cancer whereas Koppenhagen 1992 included patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery

n. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (23.65mL less) and possibility of harm (40.3.72mL more)

o. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (85.49 mL less) and possibility of harm (71.99 mL more)

p. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (36.26 mL less) and possibility of harm (96.62 mL more)

q. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 4 events in total

Appendix 5. Grade evidence profile: low‐molecular weight heparin versus fondaparinux

Question: LMWH prophylaxis compared to Fondaparinux prophylaxis in patients with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgical procedure (Q10b)

Setting: Inpatient surgical

Certainty assessment

№ of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

LMWH prophylaxis

Fondaparinux prophylaxis

Relative
(95% CI)

Absolute
(95% CI)

Mortality ‐ not reported

CRITICAL

Any VTE (follow up: 3 months)

3

Randomised trials

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

65/907 (7.2%)

34/899 (3.8%)

RR 2.51
(0.89 to 7.03)

57 more per 1000
(from 4 fewer to 228 more) c

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CRITICAL

Major Bleeding (follow up: 3 months)

3

Randomised trials

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious d

None

26/1182 (2.2%)

34/1157 (2.9%)

RR 0.74
(0.45 to 1.23)

8 fewer per 1000
(from 7 more to 16 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CRITICAL

Minor Bleeding

2

Randomised trials

Serious e

Not serious

Not serious

Serious f

None

8/195 (4.1%)

10/203 (4.9%)

RR 0.83
(0.34 to 2.05)

8 fewer per 1000
(from 33 fewer to 52 more)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CRITICAL

Thrombocytopenia

1

Randomised trials

Serious g

Not serious

Not serious

Serious h

None

1/138 (0.7%)

3/144 (2.1%)

RR 0.35
(0.04 to 3.30)

14 fewer per 1000
(from 20 fewer to 48 more)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CRITICAL

Any Pulmonary embolism

1

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Very serious i

None

1/57 (1.8%)

0/59 (0.0%)

RR 3.10
(0.13 to 74.64)

0 fewer per 1000
(from 0 fewer to 0 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

0.1%

2 more per 1000
(from 1 fewer to 74 more)

Postoperative drain volume

1

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Very serious j

None

57

59

MD 20 ml lower
(114.34 lower to 74.34 higher)

⨁⨁◯◯
LOW

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; MD: Mean difference

Explanations

a. Downgraded by one level due to high risk of bias (lack of allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data in Agnelli 2005; lack of blinding of patients and personnel and incomplete outcome data in Hata 2016 unclear allocation concealment in song 2018)

b. Downgraded by one level for concerns about both imprecision and indirectness. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for benefit (4 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (22 per 1000 absolute increase), including 99 events in total. VTE events included both symptomatic and asymptomatic events for patients with cancer which introduces some level of indirectness.

c. Although the event rate used from the fondaprinux arm includes asymptomatic events, it is very close to rate of symptomatic VTE (3.1%) found in a retrospective cohort Changolkar 2014

d. Downgraded for serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (16 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (7 per 1000 absolute increase), including 60 events in total.

e. Downgraded for high risk of bias (lack of blinding of patients and personnel and incomplete outcome data in Hata 2016 and unclear allocation concealment in Song 2018)

f. Downgraded for serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (33 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (52 per 1000 absolute increase), including 18 events in total.

g. Downgraded for high risk of bias (lack of blinding of patients and personnel and incomplete outcome data in Hata 2016)

h. Downgraded for serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (20 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (48 per 1000 absolute increase), including 4 events in total.

i. Downgraded by two levels for very serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (1 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (78 per 1000 absolute increase), including 1 event in total.

j. Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (114.34 mL less) and possibility of harm (74.34 mL more)

Study flow diagram. CVC: central venous catheter; LMWH: low‐molecular weight heparin; RCT: randomized controlled trial; UFH: unfractionated heparin; VTE: venous thromboembolism.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram. CVC: central venous catheter; LMWH: low‐molecular weight heparin; RCT: randomized controlled trial; UFH: unfractionated heparin; VTE: venous thromboembolism.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 2 Pulmonary embolism (PE).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 2 Pulmonary embolism (PE).

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 3 Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 3 Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 4 Asymptomatic DVT.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 4 Asymptomatic DVT.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 5 Major bleeding.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 5 Major bleeding.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 6 Minor bleeding.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 6 Minor bleeding.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 7 Wound hematoma.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 7 Wound hematoma.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 8 Reoperation for bleeding.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 8 Reoperation for bleeding.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 9 Intraoperative transfusion.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 9 Intraoperative transfusion.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 10 Postoperative transfusion.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 10 Postoperative transfusion.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 11 Intraoperative blood loss.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 11 Intraoperative blood loss.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 12 Postoperative drain volume.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 12 Postoperative drain volume.

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 13 Thrombocytopenia.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), Outcome 13 Thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 1 Any pulmonary embolism.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 1 Any pulmonary embolism.

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 2 Any venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 2 Any venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 3 Major Bleeding.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 3 Major Bleeding.

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 4 Minor Bleeding.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 4 Minor Bleeding.

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 5 Postoperative drain volume.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 5 Postoperative drain volume.

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 6 Thrombocytopenia.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux, Outcome 6 Thrombocytopenia.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. LMWH prophylaxis compared to UFH prophylaxis in people with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgery

LMWH prophylaxis compared to UFH prophylaxis in people with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgery

Patient or population: People with cancer with perioperative thromboprophylaxis
Settings: Inpatient
Intervention: LMWH
Comparison: UFH

Outcomes

№ of participants
(studies)
Follow up

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Risk with UFH prophylaxis

Risk difference with LMWH prophylaxis

Mortality
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

4260
(8 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

RR 0.82
(0.63 to 1.07)

Study population

51 per 1000

9 fewer per 1000
(19 fewer to 4 more)

Any PE
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

5588
(14 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

RR 0.49
(0.17 to 1.47)

Study population

6 per 1000

3 fewer per 1000
(5 fewer to 3 more)

Symptomatic DVT
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

2250
(8 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 3

RR 0.67
(0.27 to 1.69)

Study population

10 per 1000

3 fewer per 1000
(7 fewer to 7 more)

Symptomatic DVT measured as asymptomatic DVT
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

4938
(12 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 4 5

RR 0.86
(0.71 to 1.05)

Study population

79 per 1000

11 fewer per 1000
(23 fewer to 4 more)

Major bleeding
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

3473
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 6

RR 1.01
(0.69 to 1.48)

Study population

31 per 1000

0 fewer per 1000
(10 fewer to 15 more)

Minor bleeding
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

1194
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 7

RR 1.01
(0.76 to 1.33)

Study population

142 per 1000

1 more per 1000
(34 fewer to 47 more)

Wound hematoma
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

2827
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 8 9

RR 0.70
(0.54 to 0.92)

Study population

86 per 1000

26 fewer per 1000
(39 fewer to 7 fewer)

Reoperation for bleeding
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

1246
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 10

RR 0.93
(0.57 to 1.50)

Study population

51 per 1000

4 fewer per 1000
(22 fewer to 26 more)

Intraoperative transfusion
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

737
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 11 12

MD 35.36 lower
(253.19 lower to 182.47 higher)

Postoperative transfusion
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

734
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 13 14

MD 190.03 higher
(23.65 lower to 403.72 higher)

Intraoperative blood loss
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

761
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 15

MD 6.75 lower
(85.49 lower to 71.99 higher)

Postoperative drain volume
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

1459
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 16

MD 30.18 higher
(36.26 lower to 96.62 higher)

Thrombocytopenia
follow up: range 1 weeks to 3 months

683
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 17

RR 3.07
(0.32 to 29.33)

Study population

3 per 1000

6 more per 1000
(2 fewer to 82 more)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (19 fewer per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of no effect (4 more per 1000 absolute increase), including 197 events in total.

2 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 26 events in total

3 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 18 events in total

4 Downgraded by one level due to serious inconsistency, outcome measured as surrogate outcome

5 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility of important benefit (23 fewer more per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of harm (4 more per 1000 increase), including 367 events in total.

6 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility of important benefit (10 fewer more per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of harm (15 more per 1000 increase), including 107 events in total.

7 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (34 fewer per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of no effect (47 more per 1000 absolute increase), including 170 events in total.

8 Downgraded due to serious risk of bias; allocation concealment was not clear in 5 out of 6 studies.

9 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 206 events in total

10 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility of benefit (22 fewer per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (26 more per 1000 absolute increase), including 61 events in total.

11 Downgraded due to serious inconsistency. I2= 98%; Dahan 1990 included patients undergoing thoracic surgery for cancer whereas Koppenhagen 1992 included patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery

12 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (253.19 mL less) and possibility of harm (182.47 mL more)

13 Downgraded due to serious inconsistency. I2 = 83%; Dahan 1990 included patients undergoing thoracic surgery for cancer whereas Koppenhagen 1992 included patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery

14 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (23.65mL less) and possibility of harm (40.3.72mL more)

15 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (85.49 mL less) and possibility of harm (71.99 mL more)

16 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (36.26 mL less) and possibility of harm (96.62 mL more)

17 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. Low event rate, 4 events in total

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. LMWH prophylaxis compared to UFH prophylaxis in people with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgery
Summary of findings 2. LMWH prophylaxis compared to fondaparinux prophylaxis in people with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgical procedure

LMWH prophylaxis compared to fondaparinux prophylaxis in people with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgical procedure

Patient or population: People with perioperative thromboprophylaxis in people with cancer
Settings: Inpatient
Intervention: LMWH
Comparison: Fondaparinux

Outcomes

№ of participants
(studies)
Follow up

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Risk with Fondaparinux prophylaxis

Risk difference with LMWH prophylaxis

Mortality ‐ not reported

Any VTE
follow up: 3 months

1806
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

RR 2.51
(0.89 to 7.03)

Study population

38 per 1000

57 more per 1000
(4 fewer to 228 more)

Major Bleeding
follow up: 3 months

2339
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2 4

RR 0.74
(0.45 to 1.23)

Study population

29 per 1000

8 fewer per 1000
(16 fewer to 7 more)

Minor Bleeding

398
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 5 6

RR 0.83
(0.34 to 2.05)

Study population

49 per 1000

8 fewer per 1000
(33 fewer to 52 more)

Thrombocytopenia

282
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 7 8

RR 0.35
(0.04 to 3.30)

Study population

21 per 1000

14 fewer per 1000
(20 fewer to 48 more)

Any Pulmonary embolism

116
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 9

RR 3.10
(0.13 to 74.64)

Study population

0 per 1000

0 fewer per 1000
(0 fewer to 0 fewer)

Low

1 per 1000

2 more per 1000
(1 fewer to 74 more)

Postoperative drain volume

116
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 10

The mean postoperative drain volume was 0 ml

MD 20 ml lower
(114.34 lower to 74.34 higher)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level for concerns about both imprecision and indirectness. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for benefit (4 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (22 per 1000 absolute increase), including 99 events in total. VTE events included both symptomatic and asymptomatic events for patients with cancer which introduces some level of indirectness.

2 Downgraded by one level due to high risk of bias (lack of allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data in Agnelli 2005; lack of blinding of patients and personnel and incomplete outcome data in Hata 2016 unclear allocation concealment in song 2018)

3 Although the event rate used from the fondaprinux arm includes asymptomatic events, it is very close to rate of symptomatic VTE (3.1%) found in a retrospective cohort Changolkar 2014

4 Downgraded for serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (16 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (7 per 1000 absolute increase), including 60 events in total.

5 Downgraded for high risk of bias (lack of blinding of patients and personnel and incomplete outcome data in Hata 2016 and unclear allocation concealment in Song 2018)

6 Downgraded for serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (33 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (52 per 1000 absolute increase), including 18 events in total.

7 Downgraded for high risk of bias (lack of blinding of patients and personnel and incomplete outcome data in Hata 2016)

8 Downgraded for serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (20 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (48 per 1000 absolute increase), including 4 events in total.

9 Downgraded by two levels for very serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (1 per 1000 absolute reduction) and possibility of important harm (78 per 1000 absolute increase), including 1 event in total.

10 Downgraded due to serious imprecision. 95% CI is consistent with the possibility for important benefit (114.34 mL less) and possibility of harm (74.34 mL more)

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 2. LMWH prophylaxis compared to fondaparinux prophylaxis in people with cancer without VTE undergoing a surgical procedure
Comparison 1. Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

8

4260

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.63, 1.07]

2 Pulmonary embolism (PE) Show forest plot

14

5588

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.17, 1.47]

3 Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) Show forest plot

8

2250

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.27, 1.69]

4 Asymptomatic DVT Show forest plot

12

4938

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.71, 1.05]

5 Major bleeding Show forest plot

9

3473

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.69, 1.48]

6 Minor bleeding Show forest plot

2

1194

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.76, 1.33]

7 Wound hematoma Show forest plot

6

2827

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.54, 0.92]

8 Reoperation for bleeding Show forest plot

4

1246

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.57, 1.50]

9 Intraoperative transfusion Show forest plot

2

737

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐35.36 [‐253.19, 182.47]

10 Postoperative transfusion Show forest plot

2

734

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

190.03 [‐23.65, 403.72]

11 Intraoperative blood loss Show forest plot

4

761

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.75 [‐85.49, 71.99]

12 Postoperative drain volume Show forest plot

3

1459

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

30.18 [‐36.26, 96.62]

13 Thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

2

683

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.07 [0.32, 29.33]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH)
Comparison 2. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Any pulmonary embolism Show forest plot

1

116

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.10 [0.13, 74.64]

2 Any venous thromboembolism (VTE) Show forest plot

3

1806

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.51 [0.89, 7.03]

3 Major Bleeding Show forest plot

3

2339

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.45, 1.23]

4 Minor Bleeding Show forest plot

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.34, 2.05]

5 Postoperative drain volume Show forest plot

1

116

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐20.0 [‐114.34, 74.34]

6 Thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

282

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.04, 3.30]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus Fondaparinux