Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cafeína como adyuvante analgésico para el dolor agudo en adultos

Collapse all Expand all

References

References to studies included in this review

Ali 2007 {published data only}

Ali Z, Burnett I, Eccles R, North M, Jawad M, Jawad S, et al. Efficacy of a paracetamol and caffeine combination in the treatment of the key symptoms of primary dysmenorrhoea. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2007;23(4):841‐51. CENTRAL

Diamond 2000 {published data only}

Diamond S, Balm TK, Freitag FG. Ibuprofen plus caffeine in the treatment of tension‐type headache. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2000;68(3):312‐9. CENTRAL
Diamond S, Freitag FG. The use of ibuprofen plus caffeine to treat tension‐type headache. Current Pain and Headache Reports 2001;5(5):472‐8. CENTRAL

Diener 2005 {published data only}

Diener HC, Pfaffenrath V, Pageler L, Peil H, Aicher B. The fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine is more effective than single substances and dual combination for the treatment of headache: a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, single‐dose, placebo‐controlled parallel group study. Cephalalgia 2005;25(10):776‐87. CENTRAL
Pfaffenrath V, Diener HC, Pageler L, Peil H, Aicher B. OTC analgesics in headache treatment: open‐label phase vs randomized double‐blind phase of a large clinical trial. Headache 2009;49(5):638‐45. CENTRAL

Forbes 1990 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Jones KF, Kehm CJ, Smith WK, Gongloff CM, Zeleznock JR, et al. Evaluation of aspirin, caffeine, and their combination in postoperative oral surgery pain. Pharmacotherapy 1990;10(6):387‐93. CENTRAL

Forbes 1991 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Beaver WT, Jones KF, Kehm CJ, Smith WK, Gongloff CM, et al. Effect of caffeine on ibuprofen analgesia in postoperative oral surgery pain. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1991;49(6):674‐84. CENTRAL

Laska 1983 Study 1 {published data only}

Laska EM, Sunshine A, Zighelboim I, Roure C, Marrero I, Wanderling J, et al. Effect of caffeine on acetaminophen analgesia. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1983;33(4):498‐509. CENTRAL

Laska 1983 Study 2 {published data only}

Laska EM, Sunshine A, Zighelboim I, Roure C, Marrero I, Wanderling J, et al. Effect of caffeine on acetaminophen analgesia. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1983;33(4):498‐509. CENTRAL

Laska 1983 Study 3 {published data only}

Laska EM, Sunshine A, Zighelboim I, Roure C, Marrero I, Wanderling J, et al. Effect of caffeine on acetaminophen analgesia. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1983;33(4):498‐509. CENTRAL

Laska 1983 Study 4 {published data only}

Laska EM, Sunshine A, Zighelboim I, Roure C, Marrero I, Wanderling J, et al. Effect of caffeine on acetaminophen analgesia. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1983;33(4):498‐509. CENTRAL

McQuay 1996 {published data only}

McQuay HJ, Angell K, Carroll D, Moore RA, Juniper RP. Ibuprofen compared with ibuprofen plus caffeine after third molar surgery. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):247‐51. CENTRAL

Migliardi 1994 Study 1 {published data only}

Migliardi JR, Armellino JJ, Friedman M, Gillings DB, Beaver WT. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant in tension headache. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1994;56(5):576‐86. CENTRAL

Migliardi 1994 Study 2 {published data only}

Migliardi JR, Armellino JJ, Friedman M, Gillings DB, Beaver WT. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant in tension headache. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1994;56(5):576‐86. CENTRAL

Peroutka 2004 {published data only}

Peroutka SJ, Lyon JA, Swarbrick J, Lipton RB, Kolodner K, Goldstein J. Efficacy of diclofenac sodium softgel 100 mg with or without caffeine 100 mg in migraine without aura: a randomized, double‐blind, crossover study. Headache 2004;44(2):136‐41. CENTRAL

Schachtel 1991a {published data only}

Schachtel BP, Fillingim JM, Lane AC, Thoden WR, Baybutt RI. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant. A double‐blind study comparing aspirin with caffeine to aspirin and placebo in patients with sore throat. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991;151(4):733‐7. CENTRAL

Sunshine 1996 {published data only}

Sunshine A, Zighelboim I, Bartizek RD. A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, single‐dose comparison study of ibuprofen, and ibuprofen in combination with caffeine, in the treatment of postepisiotomy pain. Royal Society of Medicine International Congress and Symposium Series 218 1996;218:105‐88. CENTRAL

Tokola 1984 {published data only}

Tokola RA, Kangasniemi P, Neuvonen PJ, Tokola O. Tolfenamic acid, metoclopramide, caffeine and their combinations in the treatment of migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 1984;4(4):253‐63. CENTRAL

Ward 1991 {published data only}

Ward N, Whitney C, Avery D, Dunner D. The analgesic effects of caffeine in headache. Pain 1991;44(2):151‐5. CENTRAL

Winter 1983 {published data only}

Winter L, Appleby F, Ciccone PE, Pigeon JG. A double‐blind, comparative evaluation of acetaminophen, caffeine, and the combination of acetaminophen and caffeine in outpatients with post‐operative oral surgery pain. Current Therapeutic Research 1983;33(1):115‐22. CENTRAL

Wójcicki 1977 study 1 {published data only}

Wójcicki J, Samochowiec L, Lawczyński L, Szwed G, Olszewska M. A double‐blind comparative evaluation of aspirin, paracetamol and paracetamol + caffeine (Finimal) for their analgesic effectiveness. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 1977;25(2):175‐9. CENTRAL

Wójcicki 1977 Study 2 {published data only}

Wójcicki J, Samochowiec L, Lawczyński L, Szwed G, Olszewska M. A double‐blind comparative evaluation of aspirin, paracetamol and paracetamol + caffeine (Finimal) for their analgesic effectiveness. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 1977;25(2):175‐9. CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

BMS summary {unpublished data only}

Anon. Citizen Petition Summary. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/77n0094/77n‐0094‐cp00015_01.pdf (accessed 5 December 2014). CENTRAL

Jain 1988 {published data only}

Jain AK, McMahon FG, Ryan JR, Narcisse C. A double‐blind study of ibuprofen 200 mg in combination with caffeine 100 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, and placebo in episiotomy pain. Current Therapeutic Research 1988;43(4):762‐9. CENTRAL

Laska 1984 {published data only}

Laska EM, Sunshine A, Mueller F, Elvers WB, Siegel C, Rubin A. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant. JAMA 1984;251(13):1711‐8. CENTRAL

Migliardi 1994a {published data only}

Migliardi JR, Armellino JJ, Friedman M, Gillings DB, Beaver WT. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant in tension headache. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1994;56(5):576‐86. CENTRAL

Mitchell 2008 {published data only}

Mitchell A, van Zanten SV, Inglis K, Porter G. A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine after outpatient general surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2008;206(3):472‐9. CENTRAL

Schachtel 1991b {published data only}

Schachtel BP, Thoden WR, Konerman JP, Brown A, Chaing DS. Headache pain model for assessing and comparing the efficacy of over‐the‐counter analgesic agents. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 1991;50(3):322‐9. CENTRAL

References to studies awaiting assessment

IRCT201306121760N24 {published data only}

Comparison of analgesic effect ‐ the combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen in the presence and absence of caffeine on pain after root canal treatment. who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT201306121760N24 2014 (accessed 28 August 2014). [IRCT: IRCT201306121760N24]CENTRAL

NCT00471952 {published data only}

Maxalt 10 mg plus caffeine 75 mg in the acute treatment of migraine headache. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT00471952&Search=Search 2014 (accessed 28 August 2014). [NCT: NCT00471952]CENTRAL

NCT01172405 {published data only}

Efficacy and safety study to compare ibuprofen + caffeine with ibuprofen alone in the treatment of headache. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT01172405&Search=Search 2014 (accessed 28 August 2014). [NCT: NCT01172405]CENTRAL

NCT01929031 {published data only}

A single‐centre, double‐blind, randomised, two‐stage, parallel‐group study to assess the efficacy and safety of the fixed dose combination of ibuprofen 400 mg and caffeine 100 mg versus ibuprofen 400 mg, caffeine 100 mg and placebo in patients with postoperative dental pain. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT01929031&Search=Search 2014 (accessed 28 August 2014). [NCT: NCT01929031]CENTRAL

NCT02183688 {published data only}

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) + paracetamol + caffeine combination compared with ASA + paracetamol as well as ASA, paracetamol, and caffeine in headache patients. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02183688?term=NCT02183688&rank=1 2014 (accessed 28 August 2014). [NCT: NCT02183688]CENTRAL

Basurto Ona 2013

Basurto Ona X, Uriona Tuma SM, Martínez García L, Solà I, Bonfill Cosp X. Drug therapy for preventing post‐dural puncture headache. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001792.pub3]

Beaver 1984

Beaver WT. Caffeine revisited. JAMA 1984;251(13):1732‐3.

Cook 1995

Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995;310(6977):452‐4.

Cooper 1991

Cooper SA. Single‐dose analgesic studies: the upside and downside of assay sensitivity. The Design of Analgesic Clinical Trials. Advances in Pain Research Therapy 1991;18:117‐24.

Dechartres 2013

Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ 2013;346:f2304. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2304]

Donovan 2001

Donovan JL, DeVane CL. A primer on caffeine pharmacology and its drug interactions in clinical psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 2001;35(3):30‐48.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Jadad 1996a

Jadad AR, Carroll D, Moore RA, McQuay H. Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):239‐46.

Jadad 1996b

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12.

Jain 1978

Jain AK, McMahon FG, Ryan JR, Unger D, Richard W. Aspirin and aspirin‐caffeine in postpartum pain relief. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1978;24(1):69‐75.

Juliano 2004

Juliano LM,  Griffiths RR. A critical review of caffeine withdrawal: empirical validation of symptoms and signs, incidence, severity, and associated features. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2004;176(1):1‐29. [DOI: 10.1007/s00213‐004‐2000‐x]

L'Abbé 1987

L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107:224‐33.

Li Wan Po 1998

Li Wan Po A, Zhang WY. Analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen alone and in combination with codeine or caffeine in post‐surgical pain: a meta‐analysis. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1998;53:303‐11.

McQuay 2007

McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Dose‐response in direct comparisons of different doses of aspirin, ibuprofen and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in analgesic studies. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2007;63(3):271‐8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐2125.2006.02723.x]

Moore 1996

Moore A, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):229‐37. [DOI: 10.1016/0304‐3959(96)03032‐1]

Moore 1997a

Moore A, Moore O, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales. Pain 1997;69(3):311‐5. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(96)03306‐4]

Moore 1997b

Moore A, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: verification from independent data. Pain 1997;69(1‐2):127‐30. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(96)03251‐4]

Moore 1998

Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramer MR, Collins SL, McQuay HJ. Size is everything‐large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 1998;78(3):209‐16. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(98)00140‐7]

Moore 2008

Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐24. [ISBN: 978‐0‐931092‐69‐5]

Moore 2014

Moore RA, Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Straube S, Bendtsen L. Evidence for efficacy of acute treatment of episodic tension‐type headache: methodological critique of randomised trials for oral treatments. Pain 2014 Aug 17 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.009]

Morris 1995

Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratio and standardised ratios and rates. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with Confidence ‐ Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. London: BMJ Books, 1995:50‐63.

Nüesch 2010

Nüesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Rutjes AW, Tschannen B, Altman DG, et al. Small study effects in meta‐analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ 2010;341:c3515. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c3515]

Palmer 2010

Palmer H, Graham G, Williams K, Day R. A risk‐benefit assessment of paracetamol (acetaminophen) combined with caffeine. Pain Medicine 2010;11(6):951‐65. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4637.2010.00867.x]

Renner 2007

Renner B, Clarke G, Grattan T, Beisel A, Mueller C, Werner U, et al. Caffeine accelerates absorption and enhances the analgesic effect of acetaminophen. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2007;47(6):715‐26.

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Sawynok 1993

Sawynok J, Yaksh TL. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant: a review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action. Pharmacological Reviews 1993;45(1):43‐85.

Sawynok 2011a

Sawynok J. Methylxanthines and pain. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 2011;200:311‐29. [DOI: 10.1007/978‐3‐642‐13443‐2_11]

Sawynok 2011b

Sawynok J. Caffeine and pain. Pain 2011;152(4):726‐9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.011]

Sawynok 2011c

Sawynok J, Reid AR. Caffeine inhibits antinociception by acetaminophen in the formalin test by inhibiting3 spinal adenosine A1 receptors. European Journal of Pharmacology 2011 Nov 7 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.10.036]

Schachtel 1991

Schachtel BP, Fillingim JM, Lane AC, Thoden WR, Baybutt RI. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant. A double‐blind study comparing aspirin with caffeine to aspirin and placebo in patients with sore throat. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991;151(4):733‐7.

Tramèr 1997

Tramèr MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate results on meta‐analysis: a case study. BMJ 1997;315(7109):635‐40.

Zhang 1996

Zhang WY, Li Wan Po A. Analgesic efficacy of paracetamol and its combination with codeine and caffeine in surgical pain ‐ a meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1996;21(4):261‐82.

Zhang 1997

Zhang WY, Po AL. Do codeine and caffeine enhance the analgesic effect of aspirin? A systematic overview. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1997;22(2):79‐97.

Zhang 2001

Zhang WY. A benefit‐risk assessment of caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant. Drug Safety 2001;24(15):1127‐42.

References to other published versions of this review

Derry 2012

Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant for acute pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009281.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Ali 2007

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, 3‐way cross‐over study, with a single oral dose administered at the onset of moderate or severe menstrual pain (and no later than 24 h after the onset of menstrual flow)

Duration: 6 h, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h post dose

Participants

Primary dysmenorrhoea ‐ graded 2 or 3 on the Andersch and Milsom scoring system over 3 of the 4 previous menstrual cycles and requiring medication with OTC analgesics. Menstrual cycle duration between 21 and 35 days, and adequate past response to OTC analgesics for treatment of dysmenorrhoea

Participants aged 18 years or older

N = 320 (310 for efficacy)

All F

Mean age 21 years

Interventions

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 320 (310 for efficacy)

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 320 (310 for efficacy)

Caffeine 130 mg, n = 160 (155 for efficacy)

Placebo, n = 160 (155 for efficacy)

No alcohol or caffeine within the 6 h before and after dosing. No concomitant use of analgesics, psychoactive drugs, antispasmodics, natural treatments, or devices such as hot water bottles and heated pads within 6 h before or after dosing

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation schedule

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All treatments were supplied unmarked and blister packed. "caffeine and placebo tablets custom manufactured ... and matched the size and shape of the paracetamol‐containing caplets"

Size

Low risk

> 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Diamond 2000

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study, with a single oral dose administered (baseline pain intensity not reported)

Duration: 6 h, with assessments at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, then hourly through to 6 h post dose

Participants

Acute tension‐type headache ‐ in accordance with IHS criteria, with 3 to 15 tension‐type headaches every month for ≥ 1 year, and ≥ 75% of headaches responsive to non‐prescription‐strength analgesics

Participants with occasional migraine headaches (< 2 per month) were not excluded provided they could differentiate the two types of headache

No alcohol, caffeine‐containing foods/beverages, or any other analgesic within 4 h before dosing

Participants at least 18 years of age

N = 331 (301 for efficacy)

M 57, F 244

Mean age 37 years

Interventions

Ibuprofen 400 mg + caffeine 200 mg, n = 97 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 400 mg, n = 99 for efficacy

Caffeine 200 mg, n = 57 for efficacy

Placebo, n = 48 for efficacy

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

PGE: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1. Total = 3/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Method not described

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Diener 2005

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. Participants treated 2 headache episodes, each with a single oral dose administered when pain at least mild (≥ 30 mm on 100 mm VAS)

Duration: 4 h, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post dose

Participants

Episodic tension‐type headache (13%) or migraine with or without aura (84%) ‐ in accordance with IHS criteria, with a history of ≥ 12 months and ≥ 2 headache episodes in previous 3 months

Participants were excluded if they: treated headaches with prescription analgesics or migraine drugs, required higher single doses of non‐prescription analgesics than indicated in the patient information leaflet, normally treated headaches with non‐prescription analgesics in effervescent tablet form, had > 10 days of headache per month, suffered possible menstrual migraine, or whose headaches normally spontaneously resolved within 4 h

Participants aged 18 to 65 years

N = 1889 (1743 for efficacy)

M 453, F 1436

Mean age not reported

Mean baseline pain intensity 64 mm on 100 mm VAS

Interventions

Aspirin 500 mg + paracetamol 400 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 521 (482 for efficacy)

Aspirin 500 mg + paracetamol 400 mg, n = 538 (498 for efficacy)

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 276 (252 for efficacy)

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 275 (251 for efficacy)

Caffeine 100 mg, n = 141 (132 for efficacy)

Placebo, n = 138 (128 for efficacy)

No concomitant treatment with prescription or non‐prescription analgesics, antidepressants, or antipsychotic medication, or migraine prophylaxis

Outcomes

PI: 100 mm VAS

PGE: 4‐point scale ('very good', 'good', 'less good', 'poor')

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation list

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Consecutive participants assigned in sequential order

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Medication was "identical in colour, size, shape and taste"

Size

Low risk

> 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Forbes 1990

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study, with a single oral dose administered at the onset of steady moderate or severe pain

Duration: 6 h, with assessments at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h post dose

Participants

Dental surgery: third molar removal

Patients were ≥ 15 years of age

N = 401 (350 for efficacy)

M 147, F 203

Mean age 21 years

Interventions

Aspirin 650 mg + caffeine 65 mg, n = 66 for efficacy

Aspirin 650 mg, n = 68 for efficacy

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 71 for efficacy

Caffeine 65 mg, n = 70 for efficacy

Placebo, n = 75 for efficacy

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

PGE: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation schedule

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"all tablets were identical in appearance"

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Forbes 1991

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study, with a single oral dose administered at the onset of moderate or severe pain

Duration: 8 h, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 h post dose

Participants

Dental surgery: third molar removal

Patients were at least 15 years of age

N = 362 (298 for efficacy)

M 121, F 177

Mean age 22 years

Interventions

Ibuprofen 100 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 49 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 100 mg, n = 49 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 44 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 200 mg, n = 48 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 50 mg, n = 57 for efficacy

Placebo, n = 51 for efficacy

Caffeine‐containing foods and beverages were prohibited for 4 h before taking study medication and for the following 8‐h study period

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

PGE: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Gives reference to methods in earlier reports that are low risk

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"identically appearing capsules"

Size

High risk

< 50 participants in relevant treatment groups

Laska 1983 Study 1

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose administered after onset of moderate or severe pain

Almost identical protocols for Studies 1, 2, 3

Duration: 4 h, with assessments baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post‐dose

Participants

Postpartum pain: postepisiotomy, postsurgical, or uterine cramping

N = 480 (373 in final analysed sample)

No further participant characteristics reported

Interventions

Paracetamol 500 mg + caffeine 65 mg, n = 56

Paracetamol 500 mg, n = 54

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 57

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 50

Paracetamol 1500 mg + caffeine 195 mg, n = 56

Paracetamol 1500 mg, n = 60

Placebo, n = 40

Numbers of participants are those in final analysed sample

Medications that might alter the response to the study analgesic during the study or in the 4 h preceding were prohibited. Participants who had taken caffeine during the 3 h before and after dosing were excluded

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"sequentially assigned from individual packages prepared in random order"

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Test medication prepared to look exactly like the standard paracetamol 500 mg tablet. Equal numbers of tablets given to each group in any study

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Laska 1983 Study 2

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose administered after onset of moderate or severe pain

Almost identical protocols for Studies 1, 2, 3

Duration: 4 h, with assessments baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post dose

Participants

Postpartum pain: postepisiotomy, postsurgical, or uterine cramping

N = 577 (434 in final analysed sample)

No further participant characteristics reported

Interventions

Paracetamol 500 mg + caffeine 65 mg, n = 62

Paracetamol 500 mg, n = 68

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 62

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 68

Paracetamol 1500 mg + caffeine 195 mg, n = 64

Paracetamol 1500 mg, n = 66

Placebo, n = 44

Numbers of participants are those in final analysed sample

Medications that might alter the response to the study analgesic during the study or in the 4 h preceding were prohibited Participants who had taken caffeine during the 3 h before and after dosing were excluded

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"sequentially assigned from individual packages prepared in random order"

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Test medication prepared to look exactly like the standard paracetamol 500 mg tablet. Equal numbers of tablets given to each group in any study

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Laska 1983 Study 3

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose administered after onset of moderate or severe pain

Almost identical protocols for Studies 1, 2, 3

Duration: 4 h, with assessments baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post dose

Participants

Postpartum pain: postepisiotomy or postsurgical

N = 552 (538 in final analysed sample)

Interventions

Paracetamol 500 mg + caffeine 65 mg, n = 80

Paracetamol 500 mg, n = 81

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 78

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 81

Paracetamol 1500 mg + caffeine 195 mg, n = 80

Paracetamol 1500 mg, n = 81

Placebo, n = 57

Numbers of participants are those in final analysed sample

Medications that might alter the response to the study analgesic during the study or in the 4 h preceding were prohibited Participants who had taken caffeine during the 3 h before and after dosing were excluded

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"sequentially assigned from individual packages prepared in random order"

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Test medication prepared to look exactly like the standard paracetamol 500 mg tablet. Equal numbers of tablets given to each group in any study

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Laska 1983 Study 4

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, active‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose administered after onset of moderate or severe pain

Duration 4 h, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post‐dose

Participants

Dental surgery: third molar removal

N = 200 (173 in final analysed sample)

Interventions

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 45

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 46

Paracetamol 2000 mg + caffeine 260 mg, n = 40

Paracetamol 2000 mg, n = 42

Numbers of participants are those in final analysed sample

Medications that might alter the response to the study analgesic during the study or in the 4 h preceding were prohibited. Participants who had taken caffeine during the 3 h before and after dosing were excluded

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"sequentially assigned from individual packages prepared in random order"

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Test medication prepared to look exactly like the standard paracetamol 500 mg tablet. Equal numbers of tablets given to each group in any study

Size

High risk

< 50 participants in relevant treatment arms

McQuay 1996

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose administered after onset of moderate or severe pain

Duration: 8 h, with first 2 h in hospital. Time points of individual assessments not reported

Participants

Dental surgery: third molar removal

N = 164 (161 for efficacy)

M 59, F 102

Mean age 25 years

Interventions

Ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine 50 mg, n = 30 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 30 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine 200 mg, n = 29 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 200 mg, n = 31 for efficacy

Ibuprofen 400 mg, n = 30 for efficacy

Placebo, n = 11 for efficacy

No caffeine‐containing products from midnight on the evening before surgery and no other analgesics in the 12 h before surgery

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale, an 8‐word scale (randomly placed words ranging from 'no pain' to 'excruciating', scored 0 to 7), and a 100 mm VAS

PR: standard 5‐point scale and a 100 mm VAS

PGE: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomised using a random number computer program

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Remote packaging, labelled only with treatment number

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"identical matching capsules"

Size

High risk

< 50 participants in relevant treatment arms

Migliardi 1994 Study 1

Methods

6 individual studies reported, only the 2 'APAP/CAF' studies included

Both multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 2‐period, cross‐over studies. Single oral dose taken at the onset of at least moderate headache pain to treat 2 separate attacks per treatment period (ie 4 attacks in total). At least 48 h between first and second treatment in each period, and at least 7 day washout period before cross‐over

4‐h study period, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post‐dose

Participants

Tension headache ‐ in accordance with IHS criteria and criteria established by the Ad Hoc Committee on the Classification of Headache. 6 to 7 tension headaches per month for at least 1 year that usually responded to OTC analgesics

Participants with histories of other types of headache (for example, chronic, recurrent, continuous, migraine, or post‐traumatic) were excluded

No other analgesics in the 8 h before treatment, or alcoholic beverages in the 6 h before. Caffeine was allowed before treatment, but any caffeine consumed in the preceding 4 h was noted at baseline

Participants aged 18 to 65 years

APAP/CAF Study 1:

N = 441 (415 for efficacy)

M 79, F 362

Mean age 33 years

Interventions

APAP/CAF Study 1:

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 336

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 332

Placebo, n = 162

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"double dummy technique"

Size

Low risk

> 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Migliardi 1994 Study 2

Methods

6 individual studies reported, only the 2 'APAP/CAF' studies included

Both multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 2‐period cross‐over studies. Single oral dose taken at the onset of at least moderate headache pain to treat 2 separate attacks per treatment period (ie 4 attacks in total). At least 48 h between first and second treatment in each period, and at least a 7‐day washout period before cross‐over

4‐h study period, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post‐dose

Participants

Tension headache ‐ in accordance with IHS criteria and criteria established by the Ad Hoc Committee on the Classification of Headache. 6 to 7 tension headaches per month for at least 1 year that usually responded to OTC analgesics

Participants with histories of other types of headache (for example, chronic, recurrent, continuous, migraine, or post‐traumatic) were excluded

No other analgesics in the 8 h before treatment, or alcoholic beverages in the 6 h before. Caffeine was allowed before treatment, but any caffeine consumed in the preceding 4 h was noted at baseline

Participants aged 18 to 65 years

APAP/CAF Study 2:

N = 442 (423 for efficacy)

M 75, F 367

Mean age 33 years

Interventions

APAP/CAF Study 2:

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 339

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 337

Placebo, n = 170

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"double dummy technique"

Size

Low risk

> 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Peroutka 2004

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 3‐period cross‐over study

Single oral dose administered at the onset of moderate or severe pain

Duration: 24 h, with assessments at baseline, 1, 6, and 24 h post dose

Participants

Acute migraine attack without aura, in accordance with IHS criteria, with a history of ≥ 12 months

Participants were 18 to 60 years of age

N = 72 enrolled (52 treated first attack, 46 treated second attack, 39 treated the third attack); treated a total of 134 attacks

M 10, F 62

Mean age 45 years

Interventions

Numbers of attacks treated:

Diclofenac sodium softgel 100 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 43

Diclofenac sodium softgel 100 mg, n = 46

Placebo, n = 45

Outcomes

Headache relief at 1 h

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1. Total = 3/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Method not described

Size

High risk

< 50 participants in relevant treatment arms

Schachtel 1991a

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose after onset of relatively severe throat pain (> 66 mm on 100 mm VAS).

Duration: 2 h, with assessments at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post dose

Participants

Acute sore throat, with a score of ≥ 4 on 12‐point tonsillopharyngitis assessment and pain intensity > 66/100 on VAS

Participants at least 18 years of age

N = 210 (207 for efficacy)

M 69, F 138

Mean age 30 years

Interventions

Aspirin 800 mg + caffeine 64 mg, n = 70 for efficacy

Aspirin 800 mg, n = 68 for efficacy

Placebo, n = 69 for efficacy

No "cold medication", mood‐altering drugs, or alcohol within 8 h, or caffeine‐containing medication or beverages within 12 h of dosing

Outcomes

PI: 100 mm VAS

PR: 6‐point categorical scale (from 'no relief' to 'complete relief')

Withdrawals and dropouts

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB1, W1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation code

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Method not described

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Sunshine 1996

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose administered after the onset of severe pain

Duration: 6 h, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h post dose

Participants

Postepisiotomy pain

Participants aged 18 years or older

N = 305 (302 for efficacy)

All F

Mean age 24 years

Interventions

Ibuprofen 100 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 50

Ibuprofen 100 mg, n = 51

Ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 50

Ibuprofen 200 mg, n = 50

Ibuprofen 50 mg, n = 51

Placebo, n = 50

No medications that might confound the interpretation of efficacy, or caffeine‐containing food and beverages were permitted during the 6 h before and after dosing

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

PGE: 4‐point categorical scale (0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = excellent)

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"All medications were dispensed as capsules"

Size

High risk

All relevant treatment groups borderline at 50 or 51 participants each

Tokola 1984

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study

Each participant treated up to 12 consecutive migraine attacks with up to 2 oral doses of medication; first dose taken at first warning of pain, second dose available after 1.5 h if the response to the first was not good enough

Assessment at baseline and 1.5 h, but total study duration and other assessment time points not reported

Participants

Migraine as defined by the Ad Hoc Committee on the Classification of Headache

Participants at least 18 years of age

N = 49 (with a total of 482 attacks treated)

M 3, F 46

Mean age 37 years

Interventions

Numbers of attacks treated:

Tolfenamic acid 200 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 79

Tolfenamic acid 200 mg, n = 200 mg, n = 85

Tolfenamic acid 200 mg + metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 80

Caffeine 100 mg, n = 81

Metoclopramide, n = 75

Placebo, n = 82

Outcomes

Severity of attack at 1.5 h: 4‐point scale (no symptoms, slight, moderate, severe)

Baseline pain intensity not reported so unable to determine level of pain relief from reported pain intensity data at 1.5 h

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"assigned sequentially from individual packages prepared in random order"

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Capsules of identical appearance"

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants in relevant treatment arms

Ward 1991

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 6‐period cross‐over study

Single oral dose administered to treat a headache rated ≥ 2 on the McGill Pain Questionnaire

Only 1 test dose could be taken on any given day

Duration: 2 h, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2 h

Participants

Headache: participants with no history of migraines and with headaches that had no migrainous features

≥ 6 headaches per month during the past 3 months with pain severity averaging ≥ 2 on a 5‐point scale

Participants were 18 to 60 years of age

N = 60 completed the study (53 for efficacy)

M 17, F 36

Mean age 37 years

Interventions

Paracetamol 648 mg + caffeine 65 mg, n = 53

Paracetamol 648 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 53

Paracetamol 648 mg, n = 53

Caffeine 65 mg, n = 53

Caffeine 130 mg, n = 53

Placebo, n = 53

No caffeine or other analgesics during the 2‐h study period. Participants documented any caffeine consumed in the 24 h before dosing

Outcomes

PI: 100 mm VAS ('no pain' at left end, 'pain as bad as it could be' at right end' and 'mild, moderate, severe' in sequence below the line)

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W0. Total = 2/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Method not described

Size

High risk

All relevant treatment groups borderline at 53 participants each

Winter 1983

Methods

Single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single oral dose administered after the onset of moderate or severe pain

Duration: 4 h, with assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post dose

Participants

Oral surgery, including multiple bony impactions, single bony impaction, single tissue impaction, multiple tissue impactions, multiple extractions, alveolectomy, and difficult (complicated) extraction

Participants were 16 to 75 years of age

N = 167 (164 for efficacy)

M 67, 97

Mean age 27 years

Interventions

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 130 mg, n = 40 for efficacy

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 41 for efficacy

Caffeine 130 mg, n = 42 for efficacy

Placebo, n = 41 for efficacy

No analgesic agent for ≥ 4 h before taking test medication

Outcomes

PI: standard 4‐point scale

PR: standard 5‐point scale

PGE: standard 5‐point scale

Withdrawals and dropouts

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method not described

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"identically appearing 2‐capsule doses"

Size

High risk

< 50 participants in relevant treatment arms

Wójcicki 1977 study 1

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

If, 4 h after administration of a single dose of study medication, participants required additional analgesia, they were crossed‐over to receive one of the other study medications (only data from the first dose useable)

Duration: 4 h if only first dose taken, or 8 h if both doses taken, with assessments at baseline, 4 h and, if required, 8 h

Participants

Idiopathic headache: severe and frequently occurring

Participants were 19 to 85 years of age

N = 144

Mean age 46 years

Interventions

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 36

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 36

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 36

Placebo, n = 36

No narcotic analgesics in the 24 h before dosing

Outcomes

PR: 4‐point non‐standard scale ('no more pain', 'pain greatly improved', 'pain slightly improved', and 'pain unchanged')

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1. Total = 3/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Inadequate description of concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Method not described

Size

High risk

< 50 participants in relevant treatment arms

Wójcicki 1977 Study 2

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

If, 4 h after administration of a single dose of study medication, participants required additional analgesia, they were crossed‐over to receive one of the other study medications (only data from the first dose useable)

Duration: 4 h if only first dose taken, or 8 h if both doses taken, with assessments at baseline, 4 h and, if required, 8 h

Participants

Orthopedic surgery: ≥ 24 h after completion of surgery, suffering at least moderate pain and for whom an analgesic would normally be prescribed

Participants were 18 to 91 years of age

N = 72

Mean age 44 years

Interventions

Paracetamol 1000 mg + caffeine 100 mg, n = 18

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 18

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 18

Placebo, n = 18

No narcotic analgesics in the 24 h before dosing

Outcomes

PR: 3‐point non‐standard scale ('no more pain', 'pain improved', and 'pain unchanged')

Serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1. Total = 3/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method used to generate random sequence not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Inadequate description of concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Method not described

Size

High risk

< 50 participants in relevant treatment arms

APAP: paracetamol (American); CAF: caffeine; DB: double‐blinding; F: female; h: hours; IHS: International Headache Society; M: male; OTC: over‐the‐counter; PGE: patient global evaluation; PI: pain intensity; PR: pain relief; R: randomisation; VAS: visual analogue scale; W: withdrawals

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

BMS summary

170‐01‐88, 170‐02‐88, and 171‐01‐88: number of participants in each treatment arm not reported

Remaining studies: no usable data, only summary statistics reported

Jain 1988

Invalid comparison: ibuprofen 400 mg compared with ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine 100 mg

Laska 1984

Studies 1 to 17 and 30 excluded due to invalid comparison, for example aspirin compared with aspirin + acetaminophen + caffeine.

Studies 18 to 29 make a valid comparison, but fail to report the number of participants in each treatment arm. Four of these are believed to have been reported in full (Laska 1983 Study 1; Laska 1983 Study 2; Laska 1983 Study 3; Laska 1983 Study 4)

Migliardi 1994a

Only the 4 APAP/ASA/CAF studies excluded. Invalid comparison: paracetamol 1000 mg compared with paracetamol 500 mg + aspirin 500 mg + caffeine 130 mg

Mitchell 2008

Invalid comparison: paracetamol 300 mg + caffeine 15 mg + codeine 30 mg compared with paracetamol 325 mg + ibuprofen 400 mg. In addition, no single‐dose outcome data

Schachtel 1991b

Invalid comparison ‐ paracetamol 1000 mg compared with aspirin 1000 mg + caffeine 64 mg

APAP: paracetamol (American); ASA: aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid); CAF: caffeine;

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

IRCT201306121760N24

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single dose

Study medication provided in capsules, placed in envelope

Participants

Root canal treatment (acute apical periodontitis of pulpal origin)

N = 45

Age 18 to 65 years

M and F

Pain intensity ≥ moderate (≥ 4/10)

Interventions

Paracetamol 325 mg + ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine 40 mg, n = 15

Paracetamol 325 mg + ibuprofen 200 mg, n = 15

Placebo

Outcomes

Pain intensity (VAS) at 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 h

Notes

Recruitment due to end April 2008

Email sent to contact person (Dr Ali Bijani) on 28 August 2014. No response by date of submission of update

Sponsor: Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran

NCT00471952

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind (double‐dummy), placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study

Participants

Migraine, with or without aura. History ≥ 1 year, with 1 to 6 attacks per month in previous 3 months, and successfully treated a migraine attack with a triptan

N = 50

Age 18 to 65 years

M and F

Interventions

Rizatriptan 10 mg + caffeine 75 mg

Rizatriptan 10 mg + placebo

Placebo + placebo

Rizatriptan given as orally disintegrating tablets

Any preventive medication stable for ≥ 1 month

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 h

Pain‐free at 2 h and remaining pain‐free up to 24 h

Resolution of migraine‐associated symptoms

Adverse events

Patient Global Evaluation

Notes

Study completed; final collection date for primary outcome scheduled February 2008

Sponsor: Diamond Headache Clinic

Collaborator: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

NCT01172405

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Probably single dose

Participants

Headache (migraine or tension). Pain intensity mild to moderate, 2 to 5 headache attacks in previous 30 days

Estimated N = 144

Age 18 to 65 years

M and F

Interventions

Ibuprofen 400 mg + caffeine 200 mg

Ibuprofen 400 mg

1 or 2 tablets when presenting headache (sic)

Outcomes

Intensity of headache before and after initiation of treatment, using Functional Disabling Scale

Tolerability ‐ assessed by investigator

Notes

Unclear if completed; estimated final collection date for primary outcome October 2012

Email to Claudia Domingues (contact person) on 28 August 2014 bounced: "address failed"

Sponsor: Mantecorp Industria Quimica e Farmaceutica Ltd.

NCT01929031

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Single and multiple dose phases

Participants

Third molar extraction (3 to 4 molars, ≥ 2 mandibular)

N = 561

Age 18 to 55 years

M and F

Pain intensity moderate (≥ 5/10)

Interventions

Ibuprofen 400 mg + caffeine 100 mg

Ibuprofen 400 mg

Caffeine 100 mg

Placebo

Outcomes

SPRID 0 to 2 h

Time to rescue medication

Notes

Completed; estimated final collection date for primary outcome March 2014

Sponsor: Boehringer Ingelheim

NCT02183688

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study

Participants

Migraine or tension‐type headache (IHS). History ≥ 1 year, ≥ 2 episodes per month in previous 3 months, usually treated successfully with non‐prescription analgesics

N = 1889

Age 18 to 65 years

M and F

Interventions

Low dose aspirin + low dose paracetamol + caffeine

Low dose aspirin + low dose paracetamol

High dose aspirin

High dose paracetamol

Caffeine

Placebo

Outcomes

50% pain relief at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h

%max SPID

Impairment of daily activities (4‐point scale)

Patient global assessment of efficacy (4‐point scale)

Adverse events

Notes

Completed; estimated final collection date for primary outcome January 2003

Sponsor: Boehringer Ingelheim

F: female; IHS: International Headache Society; M: male; N: number of participants in study; SPID: weighted sum of pain intensity difference; SPRID: weighted sum of pain relief and pain intensity difference

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by pain condition

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Primary outcome Show forest plot

16

4262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.11, 1.26]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by pain condition, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

Comparison 1 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by pain condition, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

1.1 Postoperative/postpartum

10

2139

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [1.08, 1.25]

1.2 Headache

5

1503

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.11, 1.52]

1.3 Dysmenorrhoea

1

620

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.92, 1.34]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by drug

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Primary outcome Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by drug, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

Comparison 2 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by drug, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

1.1 Paracetamol

8

2186

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [1.06, 1.22]

1.2 Ibuprofen

4

707

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.52 [1.25, 1.84]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Primary outcome Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

Comparison 3 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

1.1 Caffeine < 70 mg

5

596

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.97, 1.34]

1.2 Caffeine 70 mg to 150 mg

14

2983

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [1.12, 1.32]

1.3 Caffeine > 150 mg

6

745

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [1.07, 1.35]

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Individual studies comparing the primary outcome for analgesic + caffeine versus analgesic alone ‐ any pain condition
Figures and Tables -
Figure 4

Individual studies comparing the primary outcome for analgesic + caffeine versus analgesic alone ‐ any pain condition

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine, outcome: 3.1 Primary outcome.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine, outcome: 3.1 Primary outcome.

Comparison 1 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by pain condition, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by pain condition, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

Comparison 2 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by drug, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by drug, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

Comparison 3 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine, Outcome 1 Primary outcome.

Analgesic plus caffeine compared with analgesic alone for acute pain

Patient or population: adults with acute pain

Settings: community

Intervention: analgesic plus caffeine

Comparison: same dose of analgesic alone

Outcomes

Outcome with analgesic alone

Outcome with analgesic plus caffeine

RR and NNT
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Effective pain relief

41%

48%

RR 1.2 (1.1 to 1.3)

NNT 14 (9.9 to 24)

4262

(27 separate comparisons)

High

Small effect size but large numbers of participants contributing. There is a large amount of data that cannot be incorporated into this review, but this result is robust to analysis assuming all missing data show no effect. In fact, the results of this review are consistent with an almost completely different analysis in 10,000 participants demonstrating the effect of caffeine to have a similar effect size

Serious adverse events

1 event

1 event

Not calculated

Not calculated

Very low

Neither event judged related to study medication. Single dose studies are not powered to assess serious adverse events

CI: confidence interval; NNT: number needed to treat to benefit; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by pain condition

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Primary outcome Show forest plot

16

4262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.11, 1.26]

1.1 Postoperative/postpartum

10

2139

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [1.08, 1.25]

1.2 Headache

5

1503

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.11, 1.52]

1.3 Dysmenorrhoea

1

620

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.92, 1.34]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by pain condition
Comparison 2. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by drug

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Primary outcome Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Paracetamol

8

2186

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [1.06, 1.22]

1.2 Ibuprofen

4

707

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.52 [1.25, 1.84]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by drug
Comparison 3. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Primary outcome Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Caffeine < 70 mg

5

596

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.97, 1.34]

1.2 Caffeine 70 mg to 150 mg

14

2983

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [1.12, 1.32]

1.3 Caffeine > 150 mg

6

745

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [1.07, 1.35]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Analgesic plus caffeine versus analgesic alone by dose of caffeine