Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Metformina durante la inducción de la ovulación con gonadotrofinas seguida del coito programado o la inseminación intrauterina para la subfertilidad asociada con el síndrome de ovario poliquístico

Collapse all Expand all

References

References to studies included in this review

Begum 2013 {published data only}

Begum MR, Akhter S, Ehsan M, Begum MS, Khan F. Pretreatment and co‐administration of oral anti‐diabetic agent with clomiphene citrate or rFSH for ovulation induction in clomiphene‐citrate‐resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2013;39:966‐73. CENTRAL

Palomba 2005 {published data only}

Palomba S, Falbo A, Orio F, Manguso F, Russo T, Tolino A, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating metformin pre‐treatment and co‐administration in non‐obese insulin‐resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with controlled ovarian stimulation plus timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Human Reproduction 2005;20(10):2879‐86. CENTRAL

Tasdemir 2004 {published data only}

Tasdemir S, Ficicioglu C, Yalti S, Gurbuz B, Basaran T, Yildirim G. The effect of metformin treatment to ovarian response in cases with PCOS. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2004;269(2):121‐4. CENTRAL

Van Santbrink 2005 {published data only}

van Santbrink EJ, Hohmann FP, Eijkemans MJ, Laven JS, Fauser BC. Does metformin modify ovarian responsiveness during exogenous FSH ovulation induction in normogonadotrophic anovulation? A placebo‐controlled double‐blind assessment. European Journal of Endocrinology 2005;152(4):611‐7. CENTRAL

Yarali 2002 {published data only}

Yarali H, Yildiz B. Metformin and FSH for induction of ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Human Reproduction 2002;17(11):3007‐8. CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Cheng 2010 {published data only}

Cheng J, Lv J, Li CY, Xue Y, Huang Z, Zheng W. Clinical outcomes of ovulation induction with metformin, clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin in polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of Internal Medicine Research 2010;38(4):1250‐8. CENTRAL

de Leo 1999 {published data only}

De Leo V, la Marca A, Ditto A, Morgante G, Cianci A. Effects of metformin on gonadotropin‐induced ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 1999;72(2):282‐5. CENTRAL

Raffone 2010 {published data only}

Raffone E, Rizzo P, Benedetto V. Insulin sensitiser agents alone and in co‐treatment with r‐FSH for ovulation induction in PCOS women. Gynecological Endocrinology 2010;26(4):275‐80. CENTRAL

Shihibara 2007 {published data only}

Shibahara H, Kikuchi K, Hirano Y, Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, Suzuki M. Increase of multiple pregnancies caused by ovulation induction with gonadotropin in combination with metformin in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 2007;87:1487‐90. CENTRAL

Additional references

Asuncion 2000

Asunción M, Calvo RM, San Millán JL, Sancho J, Avila S, Escobar‐Morreale HF. A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000;85:2434‐8.

Barbieri 1986

Barbieri RL, Makris A, Randall RW, Daniels G, Kistner RW, Ryan KW. Insulin stimulates androgen accumulation in incubations of ovarian stroma obtained from women with hyperandrogenism. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1986;62:904‐10.

Dunn 1995

Dunn CJ, Peters DH. Metformin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. Drugs 1995;49:721‐49.

ESHRE/ASRM 2004

The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM‐Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long‐term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Human Reproduction 2004;19(1):41.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Hojlund 2008

Højlund K, Glintborg D, Andersen NR, Birk JB, Treebak JT, Frøsig C, et al. Impaired insulin‐stimulated phosphorylation of Akt and AS160 in skeletal muscle of women with polycystic ovary syndrome is reversed by pioglitazone treatment. Diabetes 2008;57:357‐66.

Moll 2007

Moll E, van der Veen F, van Wely M. The role of metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 2007;13:527‐37.

Moll 2008

Moll E, Korevaar JC, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F. Does adding metformin to clomifene citrate lead to higher pregnancy rates in a subset of women with polycystic ovary syndrome?. Human Reproduction 2008;23:1830‐4.

Nardo 2001

Nardo LG, Rai R. Metformin therapy in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: endocrine, metabolic and reproductive effects. Gynecological Endocrinology 2001;15:373‐80.

Nestler 2002

Nestler JE. Should patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome be treated with metformin? An enthusiastic endorsement. Human Reproduction 2002;17:1950‐3.

NICE 2014

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 11 Clinical guideline. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London, 2014.

Palomba 2014

Palomba S, Falbo A, La Sala GB. Metformin and gonadotropins for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2014;13:3.

Tang 2012

Tang T, Lord JM, Norman RJ, Yasmin E, Balen AH. Insulin‐sensitising drugs (metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, D‐chiro‐inositol) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome, oligo amenorrhoea and subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003053]

Weiss 2015

Weiss NS, Nahuis M, Bayram N, Mol BW, Van der Veen F, van Wely M. Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010290]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Jump to:

Begum 2013

Methods

Randomised, prospective, non‐blinded, single‐centre trial

Method of randomisation: unclear

Duration, timing and location of the trial: between December 2004 and August 2009 at 1 outpatient fertility centre in Dhaka

Sample size calculation was not performed.

165 women were randomised, 110 women were randomised to FSH plus metformin or FSH solely, 55 women were randomised to CC and metformin.

Up to six cycles per woman

Ratio between metformin and placebo: 1:1

Intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed.

Participants

165 infertile women with CC‐resistant PCOS. Group A received CC + metformin, Group B FSH + metformin and Group C only FSH. All women had insulin resistance determined as a glucose‐to‐insulin ratio below 6.4, or a HOMA score above 47.

Mean age (±SD) of women was 26.8 (5.1) for the metformin group and 27.2 (4.2) for the FSH only group.

Body mass index (±SD) was 28.4 (4.5) and 29.0 (3.2), respectively.

Duration of infertility (±SD) was 5.1 (3.0) and 4.7 (2.8) years, respectively.

Infertility workup consisted of endocrinology, midcycle vaginal ultrasonography and progesterone measurement and semen analysis. Fasting glucose and insulin levels were measured, and a glucose tolerance test was performed.

Interventions

Along with metformin, group A received CC, and group B received rFSH. Group C was treated with rFSH only. Metformin 500 mg 3 times daily (1500 mg) was administered for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, the same dose was continued for another 6 months, along with scheduled rFSH (group B) 75 IU every alternate day, starting from day 3 of the cycle (then daily if necessary after first monitoring on day 12) until maturity of follicles or maximum of 15 doses of rFSH. Group C went without metformin and was scheduled for rFSH only 75 IU every alternate day. Dose and duration were adjusted by monitoring response on transvaginal sonography. Ovarian maturation was triggered by urinary hCG at a dosage of 10,000 IU. Metformin use continued until pregnancy test.

Treatment was terminated when no response occurred with maximum dose of CC, with maximum dose of rFSH, after six ovulatory cycles with no pregnancy or after a positive pregnancy test.

Outcomes

Pregnancy or live birth rate within six ovulatory cycles

OHSS

Ovulation rate

Spontaneous abortion

Ectopic pregnancy

Multiple pregnancies

Congenital anomalies

Adverse perinatal or obstetrical complications

Notes

PCOS was diagnosed according to revised Rotterdam criteria and included 2 of the following 3 findings: (1) oligo‐ or anovulation; (2) clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism; and (3) polycystic ovaries according to ultrasonography.

Clomiphene resistance was a specific inclusion criterion.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Sequence allocation was not described.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

High risk

Allocation was not described.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

No blinding was performed.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

No blinding was performed.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No indication of loss to follow‐up or drop‐out was reported. All randomised women were included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcomes described in the Methods section were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

In view of insecurities around randomisation and allocation

Palomba 2005

Methods

Randomised, prospective, double‐blinded, multi‐centre trial

Method of randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation list; further details unknown

Duration, timing and location of the trial: unknown

Sample size calculation was performed.

70 women were randomised.

Three cycles per participant

Ratio between metformin and placebo: 1:1

Intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed.

Participants

70 non‐obese insulin‐resistant primary infertile women with clomiphene‐resistant PCOS

Mean age (±SD) was 26.2 (2.7) for the metformin group and 26.9 (2.8) for the placebo group.

Body mass index (±SD) was 26.5 (2.7) and 26.4 (2.5), respectively.

Duration of infertility (±SD) was 26.1 (4.7) and 24.8 (4.9) months, respectively.

Infertility workup consisted of endocrinology, vaginal ultrasonography and semen analysis. Fasting glucose and insulin levels were measured, and a glucose tolerance test was performed. Each woman received 75 grams of glucose, and at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes, glucose and insulin concentrations were determined.

Interventions

The women took metformin 850 mg 2 times daily or placebo for 3 months. After 3 months, ovulation induction was started. Metformin or placebo was continued during ovarian stimulation with FSH and was stopped when women conceived.

All women underwent ovulation induction according to a low‐dose step‐up protocol, started with 75 IU hpFSH (fostimon) for 14 days. If no ovarian response was detected, this dose was increased by 37.5 IU hpFSH each week until follicular development was observed on ultrasonography. Maximum dose was 225 IU daily.

Treatment was discontinued if no follicular response was detected after 35 days of treatment, or if more then 3 follicles > 14 mm were present.

hCG was given when the diameter of the dominant follicle was > 17 mm.  

Women with PCOS who in previous ovulation induction failed to ovulate underwent timed intercourse, whereas those who were ovulating who did not conceive underwent intrauterine insemination.

Outcomes

(Ongoing) pregnancy rate per woman

OHSS

Cycle cancellation

Ovulation rate

Number of oocytes produced per cycle

Monofollicular development and multi‐follicular development.

Miscarriage rate per woman

Live birth rate

Quantity of gonadotrophins used per woman per cycle (total dose in IU (international units))
Duration (days) of ovarian stimulation per woman per cycle
Serum oestradiol level on the day of hCG trigger injection

Notes

PCOS: Diagnosis was based on National institutes of Health criteria (Zawadski and Dunaif, 1992).

Insulin resistance was defined according to Legro et al (1998).

Clomiphene‐resistant: failure to ovulate or conceive, ovulating during 6 previous cycles of clomiphene citrate with incremental doses of clomiphene citrate up to 150 mg/d for 5 days alone or in combination with metformin (1700 mg daily)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation was performed by computer‐generated randomisation list.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No further information was provided.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Women and operators were blinded for the whole treatment period. Drug and placebo were packaged in identical form in the pharmacy and were labelled according to participant number.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Women and operators were blinded for the whole treatment period. Drug and placebo were packaged in identical form in the pharmacy and were labelled according to participant number.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No indication of loss to follow‐up or drop‐out was reported. All randomised women were included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcomes described in the Methods section were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Obese women were excluded.

Tasdemir 2004

Methods

Randomised, prospective, multi‐centre trial

Method of randomisation: unknown

Duration, timing and location of the trial: between September 2000 and December 2001 at 1 IVF centre in Turkey   

Sample size calculation was not performed.

32 women were randomised.

No drop‐out. One cycle per participant

Ratio between metformin and placebo: 1:1

Intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed. 

Participants

Clomiphene‐resistant women with PCOS . Women with type 1 or 2 diabetes were excluded.

Mean age (±SD) was 31.8 (2.7) for the metformin group and 30.6 (3.2) for the placebo group.

Body mass index (±SD) was 28.5 (3.5) and 29 (2.1), respectively.

Duration of infertility (±SD) was 3.2 (0.9) and 3.8 (0.7) years, respectively.

Infertility workup consisted of endocrinology, vaginal ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy and semen analysis.    

Interventions

Women took metformin 850 mg 2 times daily or placebo for 8 weeks.

Metformin was continued daily during ovarian stimulation with rFSH until the day of hCG administration.

Ovulation was induced with rFSH (follitropin alpha, gonal F). Treatment was started on day 3 after a spontaneous or induced menses. Starting dose was 75 IU rFSH (SC)/d for 7 days. If no ovarian response was noted, dose was increased until ovarian response was observed on ultrasonography.

Treatment was discontinued if more than 6 follicles > 17 mm were present.

hCG was given when 1 follicle of 17 mm developed.  

Ovulation was assumed when progesterone level was > 5 ng/mL 6‐8 days after hCG.

Outcomes

Ongoing pregnancy rate per woman

Ovulation rate

Number of oocytes produced per cycle

Monofollicular development and multi‐follicular development.

Miscarriage rate per woman

Quantity of gonadotrophins used per woman per cycle (total dose in IU (international units))
Duration (days) of ovarian stimulation per woman per cycle
Serum oestradiol level on the day of hCG trigger injection
Fasting insulin and glucose levels

Notes

PCOS: oligomenorrhoea and clinical or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism

Clomiphene‐resistant: failure to ovulate with incremental doses of clomiphene citrate up to 150 mg/d between 5th and 10th days of the cycle for 3 successive cycles

Anovulation: progestogen levels < 5 ng/mL

Oligomenorroe: fewer than 6 menstruations per year

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation was unknown.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Blinding was not performed.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Blinding was not performed.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No indication of loss to follow‐up or drop‐out was reported. All randomised women were included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Not sure owing to missing details

Other bias

Unclear risk

Not sure owing to missing details

Van Santbrink 2005

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, prospective, multi‐centre trial

Method of randomisation: sealed, opaque and numbered envelopes

Duration, timing and location of the trial: All women attending the outpatient clinic of the Erasmus Medical Centre (a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands) were approached between July 1999 and June 2001. 

Sample size calculation was performed.

20 women were randomised.

One cycle per participant. One woman was pregnant with metformin alone, before ovulation induction. Two women presented with an ovarian cyst on the day on which ovulation induction should be started and were excluded from analysis.

Ratio between metformin and placebo: 11:9

Intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed. 

Participants

Clomiphene‐resistant WHO group II anovulatory women. Women with diabetes were excluded.

Median age (range) was 28 (22‐32) for the metformin group and 28 (24‐34) for the placebo group.

Body mass index (range) was 38 (28‐51) and 34 (27‐44), respectively.

Duration of infertility was unknown.

Infertility workup consisted of endocrinology and vaginal ultrasonography. A glucose tolerance test was performed.    

Interventions

After initial workup and menses induced with Duphaston, women started with metformin or placebo. They took metformin 850 mg 2 times daily or placebo.

Women were subsequently monitored every 1‐2 days. In cases of ovarian response, no FSH was administered. In cases of absent response 25 days after randomisation, ovulation induction with FSH (follitropin alpha, gonal F) was started. Starting dose was 50 IU rFSH (SC)/d for 7 days. If no ovarian response was noted after this period, the first dose was increased with 25 IU rFSH. A further dose increase of 37.5 IU rFSH was performed, with a maximum dosage of 225 IU rFSH daily. Metformin or placebo was continued daily during ovulation induction with rFSH until the day of hCG administration.

Treatment was discontinued without follicular response after 225 IU rFSH daily, or if more than 3 follicles > 15 mm were present.

hCG was given when 1 follicle of at least 18 mm developed.  

Ovulation was assumed with direct signs on ultrasonography. After ovulation, metformin or placebo was stopped.

Outcomes

Ongoing pregnancy rate per woman

Ovulation rate

Number of oocytes produced per cycle

Monofollicular development and multi‐follicular development

Miscarriage rate per woman
Quantity of gonadotrophins used per woman per cycle (total dose in IU (international units))
Duration (days) of ovarian stimulation per woman per cycle
Serum oestradiol level on the day of hCG trigger injection
Fasting insulin and glucose levels

Notes

PCOS: peripubertal onset of oligo‐amenorrhoea, elevated serum testosterone levels and ultrasonographic evidence of polycystic ovaries

Clomiphene‐resistant: failure to ovulate with incremental doses of clomiphene citrate up to 250 mg/d for 5 days

Anovulation: progestogen levels < 5 ng/mL

Oligomenorroe: fewer than 6 bleeding episodes per year

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated list

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation was performed with sealed, opaque and numbered envelopes by the pharmacy of Erasmus University.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Blinding was performed, but the method was unclear.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Blinding was performed, but the method was unclear.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No indication of loss to follow‐up or drop‐out was reported. All randomised women were included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcomes described in the Methods section were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Very small study

Yarali 2002

Methods

Randomised, open‐label, prospective, multi‐centre trial

Method of randomisation: computer‐generated numbers, preparation unknown

Duration, timing and location of the trial: unknown  

Sample size calculation was not performed.

32 women were randomised.

No drop‐out. One cycle per participant

Ratio between metformin and placebo: 1:1

Intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed. 

Participants

Clomiphene‐resistant WHO group II anovulatory women. All women underwent a 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test and were shown to have normal glucose tolerance.

Mean age (±SD) was 27.9.(5.6) for the metformin group and 28.4 (5.1) for the placebo group.

Body mass index (±SD) was 28.6 (4.0) and 29.6 (4.8), respectively.

Duration of infertility (±SD) was 57.8 (37.9) and 62.3 (41.9) months, respectively.

Infertility workup consisted of endocrinology, vaginal ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy.    

Interventions

Women took metformin 850 mg 2 times daily or placebo for 6 weeks.

Metformin was continued daily during ovulation induction with rFSH until the day of hCG administration.

Ovulation was induced with rFSH (follitropin alpha, gonal F). Treatment was started within 2‐5 days after spontaneous or induced menses. Starting dose was 75 IU rFSH (SC)/d for 14 days. If no ovarian response was noted after this period, a weekly increase of 37.5 IU to a maximum of 187.5 was provided.

Treatment was discontinued without follicular response after 35 days of gonadotrophins, if more than 3 follicles > 15 mm were present.

hCG was given when 1 follicle of 17 mm developed.  

Ovulation was assumed when progesterone level was > 5 ng/mL 6‐8 days after hCG.

Outcomes

Ongoing pregnancy rate per woman

Ovulation rate

Number of oocytes produced per cycle

Monofollicular development and multi‐follicular development

Miscarriage rate per woman

Quantity of gonadotrophins used per woman per cycle (total dose in IU (international units))
Duration (days) of ovarian stimulation per woman per cycle
Serum oestradiol level on the day of hCG trigger injection
Fasting insulin and glucose levels

Notes

PCOS: peripubertal onset of oligo‐amenorrhoea, elevated serum testosterone levels and ultrasonographic evidence of polycystic ovaries

Clomiphene‐resistant: failure to ovulate with incremental doses of clomiphene citrate up to 250 mg/d for 5 days

Anovulation: progestogen levels < 5 ng/mL

Oligomenorroe: fewer than 6 bleeding episodes per year

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation was performed by computer‐generated numbers

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not stated

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Blinding was not performed.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not stated

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No indication of loss to follow‐up or drop‐out was reported. All randomised women were included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcomes described in the Methods section were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Very small study

CC: clomiphene citrate.

FSH: follicle‐stimulating hormone.

hCG: human chorionic gonadotropin.

HOMA: Homeostasis Model Assessment.

hpFSH: human pituitary follicle‐stimulating hormone.

IVF: in vitro fertilisation.

OHSS: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

PCOS: polycystic ovary syndrome.

rFSH: recombinant follicle‐stimulating hormone.

SD: standard deviation.

WHO: World Health Organization.

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Jump to:

Study

Reason for exclusion

Cheng 2010

This randomised pilot study was performed to assess whether the effect of coadministration of metformin, CC and hMG was superior to that of CC plus hMG in women with CC‐resistant PCOS. Ovulation induction was provided with CC and hMG together. No woman was treated with hMG solely.

de Leo 1999

Two cycles of FSH stimulation, then metformin for 1 month before a third treatment cycle vs treatment with 1500 mg of metformin/d for at least 1 month before a single cycle of FSH stimulation. All cycles of FSH were compared with 1 cycle of metformin in a relatively unfavourable group of women without pregnancy after 2 cycles of ovulation induction.

Raffone 2010

Women were randomly treated with metformin 1500 mg/d orally or 4 grams myo‐inositol. No comparison was made vs placebo or no treatment.

Shihibara 2007

This is a retrospective, non‐randomised comparison between ovulation induction with gonadotrophin, with and without metformin.

CC: clomiphene citrate.

FSH: follicle‐stimulating hormone.

hMG: human menopausal gonadotropin.

PCOS: polycystic ovary syndrome.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Live birth rate (per woman) Show forest plot

2

180

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.31 [1.23, 4.34]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 1 Live birth rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 1 Live birth rate (per woman).

2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman) Show forest plot

4

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.15, 1.95]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).

3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman) Show forest plot

4

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.46 [1.36, 4.46]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).

4 Clinical pregnancy rate Show forest plot

5

264

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.51 [1.46, 4.31]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 4 Clinical pregnancy rate.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 4 Clinical pregnancy rate.

5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy) Show forest plot

3

84

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.19, 2.01]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy).

6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle) Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle).

7 OHSS rate (per woman) Show forest plot

2

180

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 8.23]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 7 OHSS rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 7 OHSS rate (per woman).

8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle) Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle).

9 Adverse effects Show forest plot

2

90

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.39, 8.09]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 9 Adverse effects.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 9 Adverse effects.

10 FSH dose per cycle Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 10 FSH dose per cycle.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 10 FSH dose per cycle.

11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle.

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 dichotomous outcome, outcome: 1.1 live birth rate (per woman).
Figures and Tables -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 dichotomous outcome, outcome: 1.1 live birth rate (per woman).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figures and Tables -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figures and Tables -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.4 Clinical pregnancy rate.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.4 Clinical pregnancy rate.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 1 Live birth rate (per woman).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 1 Live birth rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 4 Clinical pregnancy rate.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 4 Clinical pregnancy rate.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 7 OHSS rate (per woman).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 7 OHSS rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 9 Adverse effects.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 9 Adverse effects.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 10 FSH dose per cycle.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 10 FSH dose per cycle.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

Patient or population: patients with subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome
Settings: outpatient
Intervention: metformin vs placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo co‐treatment

Metformin co‐treatment

Live birth rate (per woman)
Follow‐up: 3‐6 months

267 per 1000

457 per 1000

190 more per 1000 (42 to 345)

OR 2.31
(1.24 to 4.33)

180
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman)

52 per 1000

26 per 1000

23 fewer per 1000 (44 fewer to 25 more)

OR 0.55

(0.15 to 1.95)

232
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b

Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman)

217 per 1000

393 per 1000

189 more per 1000 (57 to 336)

OR 2.46
(1.36 to 4.46)

232
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

Clinical pregnancy rate (per woman)

252 per 1000

444 per 1000

206 more per 1000 (78 to 340)

OR 2.51
(1.46 to 4.31)

264
(5 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aLimited sample size, limited precision, lack of blinding of participants and of outcome assessors.
bMultiple pregnancy had a very low incidence.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome
Comparison 1. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Live birth rate (per woman) Show forest plot

2

180

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.31 [1.23, 4.34]

2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman) Show forest plot

4

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.15, 1.95]

3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman) Show forest plot

4

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.46 [1.36, 4.46]

4 Clinical pregnancy rate Show forest plot

5

264

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.51 [1.46, 4.31]

5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy) Show forest plot

3

84

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.19, 2.01]

6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle) Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 OHSS rate (per woman) Show forest plot

2

180

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 8.23]

8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle) Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Adverse effects Show forest plot

2

90

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.39, 8.09]

10 FSH dose per cycle Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction