Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intracystic bleomycin for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008890.pub4Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 14 July 2016see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Childhood Cancer Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Si Zhang

    Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Yuan Fang

    Correspondence to: Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    [email protected]

  • Bo Wen Cai

    Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Jian Guo Xu

    Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Chao You

    Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contributions of authors

S Zhang: searching for trials (this updated review), GRADE assessment and 'Summary of findings' table (this updated review).

Y Fang: searching for trials (previous publication and this updated version), GRADE assessment and 'Summary of findings' table (this updated review), 'Risk of bias' assessment (previous publication), data analyses (previous publication).

BW Cai: searching for trials (previous publication), 'Risk of bias' assessment (previous publication).

JG Xu: searching for trials (previous publication).

C You: protocol and review development, searching for trials (previous publication), 'Risk of bias' assessment (previous publication), data analyses (previous publication).

All authors approved the final version of this updated review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Research Grants No. 81001117, 30872646/H1618 and 30973082/H1618 from the National Natural Science Foundation, China.

Declarations of interest

S Zhang: nothing to declare.

Y Fang: nothing to declare.

BW Cai: nothing to declare.

JG Xu: nothing to declare.

C You: nothing to declare.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editorial Base of Cochrane Childhood Cancer for their advice and support.

The editorial base of Cochrane Childhood Cancer is funded by 'Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij' (KIKA), the Netherlands.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Jul 14

Intracystic bleomycin for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children

Review

Si Zhang, Yuan Fang, Bo Wen Cai, Jian Guo Xu, Chao You

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008890.pub4

2014 Sep 19

Intracystic bleomycin for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children

Review

Jun Zheng, Yuan Fang, Bo Wen Cai, Heng Zhang, Wenke Liu, Bo Wu, Jian Guo Xu, Chao You

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008890.pub3

2012 Apr 18

Intracystic bleomycin for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children

Review

Yuan Fang, Bo Wen Cai, Heng Zhang, Wenke Liu, Bo Wu, Jian Guo Xu, Chao You

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008890.pub2

2010 Dec 08

Intracystic bleomycin for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children

Protocol

Yuan Fang, Bo Wu, Chao You

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008890

Differences between protocol and review

We added "The dose, frequency and duration could vary" under the heading Types of interventions.

We added "or via neuroendoscopic technique" under the heading Types of interventions; this technique was not used for this procedure when we wrote the protocol and the original version of the review, but it is now.

We did not contact authors for missing data under the heading Dealing with missing data.

We deleted "We scanned the proceedings abstracts of the International Symposium of Pediatric Neuro‐Oncology (ISPNO) conferences and paediatric neurosurgical conferences (from 2005 to 2010)" under the heading Search methods for identification of studies and Results of the search.

We added "visual outcome" under the heading Secondary outcomes.

We added "cerebrovascular event" under the heading Secondary outcomes; since writing the protocol this adverse effect has been shown in non‐randomised studies.

As opposed to the earlier version of the review we now have prepared a 'Summary of findings' table and we have performed a GRADE assessment of the quality of the evidence.

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P, Outcome 1 Reduction of cyst size.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P, Outcome 1 Reduction of cyst size.

Comparison 1 Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P, Outcome 2 Fever.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P, Outcome 2 Fever.

Comparison 1 Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P, Outcome 3 Total adverse effects.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P, Outcome 3 Total adverse effects.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Intracystic bleomycin compared to other types of intracystic treatment for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children

Intracystic bleomycin compared to intracystic radiotherapy with 32P for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children

Patient or population: cystic craniopharyngiomas in children from birth to 18 years old
Setting: inpatients from 3 hospitals in China
Intervention: intracystic bleomycin
Comparison: intracystic radiotherapy with 32P

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with intracystic 32P

Risk with intracystic bleomycin

Survival

NA

NA

There was no information on overall survival and event‐free survival reported in this trial

Change in cyst size

Mean reduction in cyst size was 65.5%

Mean reduction in cyst size was 50.7%

MD ‐15% (‐69% to 39%)

7
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1

MD was 15% reduction in cyst size; the 95% CI mean a 69% reduction to a 39% increase in cyst size

Neurological status

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

Not estimable

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1

1 patient in the bleomycin group had left paralysis, while none of the patients in the 32P group had severe sequelae. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (Fisher's exact P value = 0.429).

Total number of adverse effects

500 per 1000

875 per 1000
(340 to 1000)

RR 1.75
(0.68 to 4.53)

7
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1

Adverse effects including fever, 3rd nerve paralysis, headache and vomiting were included in this outcome measure

Fever

250 per 1000

730 per 1000
(183 to 1000)

RR 2.92
(0.73 to 11.70)

7
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1

3rd nerve paralysis

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

7
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1

1 patient in the 32P group had 3rd nerve paralysis, while none of the patients in the bleomycin group suffered from this. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (Fisher's exact P value = 1.00).

Headache and vomiting

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

7
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1

All 3 patients in the bleomycin group had headache and vomiting, while none of the patients in the 32P group did. There was a significant difference in favour of the 32P group (Fisher's exact P value = 0.029).

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; NA: not available; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1We downgraded a total of 3 levels due to study limitations (the trial had a high risk of performance bias, detection bias and baseline imbalance bias, and an unclear risk of selection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and early stopping bias), small sample size (the current review includes only one trial with small sample size (n = 7)), and wide confidence intervals including 'no effect', 'appreciable harm' and 'appreciable benefit'.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Intracystic bleomycin compared to other types of intracystic treatment for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children
Comparison 1. Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reduction of cyst size Show forest plot

1

7

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.69, 0.39]

2 Fever Show forest plot

1

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.92 [0.73, 11.70]

3 Total adverse effects Show forest plot

1

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.68, 4.53]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Intracystic bleomycin versus intracystic 32P