Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacotherapy for hyperuricaemia in hypertensive patients

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008652.pub4Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 02 September 2020see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Hypertension Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

Contributions of authors

Drafting the protocol

Pedro Gois and Edison Souza

Obtaining copies of studies

Pedro Gois

Selecting which studies to include

Pedro Gois and Edison Souza

Extracting data from studies

Pedro Gois and Edison Souza

Entering data into RevMan 5

Pedro Gois

Carrying out the analysis

Pedro Gois

Interpreting the analysis

Pedro Gois and Edison Souza

Drafting the final review

Pedro Gois

Updating the review

Pedro Gois

Declarations of interest

Gois P: nothing to declare

Souza E: nothing to declare

Acknowledgements

This protocol of this systematic review was based on a work undertaken as part of the postgraduate course in Evidence‐Based Health, which was organized by Sírio‐Libanês Hospital‐Sao Paulo, Brazil. We are sincerely grateful to the Cochrane Hypertension Review Group (especially to Mr Douglas M Salzwedel for the valuable contribution with the search strategies, Mr Ciprian Jauca, and Dr James M Wright for their inestimable assistance).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Sep 02

Pharmacotherapy for hyperuricaemia in hypertensive patients

Review

Pedro Henrique França Gois, Edison Regio de Moraes Souza

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008652.pub4

2017 Apr 13

Pharmacotherapy for hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients

Review

Pedro Henrique França Gois, Edison Regio de Moraes Souza

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008652.pub3

2013 Jan 31

Pharmacotherapy for hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients

Review

Pedro Henrique França Gois, Edison Regio de Moraes Souza

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008652.pub2

2010 Aug 04

Pharmacotherapy for hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients

Protocol

Pedro Henrique França Gois, Edison Regio de Moraes Souza, Carolina Urbini dos Santos

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008652

Differences between protocol and review

The affiliation and contact information for the review contact person changed. We amended the study protocol to allow the inclusion of studies involving people with prehypertension. Due to lack of data, we were unable to perform sensitivity analyses in this update. Due to insufficient data, subgroup analysis with different UA‐lowering drugs vs. placebo was not performed. Data on clinic‐measured BP was only available for adolescents with prehypertension or newly diagnosed stage 1 hypertension. GRADE was incorporated in the review update to assess the certainty of evidence.

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Flow diagram of the study selection

Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Flow diagram of the study selection

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 1: 24‐h ambulatory systolic blood pressure

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 1: 24‐h ambulatory systolic blood pressure

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 2: 24‐h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 2: 24‐h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 3: Clinic‐measured systolic blood pressure

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 3: Clinic‐measured systolic blood pressure

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 4: Clinic‐measured diastolic blood pressure

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 4: Clinic‐measured diastolic blood pressure

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 5: Serum uric acid

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 5: Serum uric acid

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 6: Adverse events

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 6: Adverse events

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 7: 24‐h ambulatory systolic blood pressure in adolescents (subgroup analysis)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 7: 24‐h ambulatory systolic blood pressure in adolescents (subgroup analysis)

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 8: 24‐h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure in adolescents (subgroup analysis)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1: Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 8: 24‐h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure in adolescents (subgroup analysis)

Summary of findings 1. Uric acid‐lowering drug compared to placebo for people with hyperuricaemia

Uric acid‐lowering drug compared to placebo for hyperuricaemia in people with hypertension

Patient or population: hyperuricaemia in people with hypertension
Setting: several sites in the USA
Intervention: uric acid‐lowering drugs
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Matched placebo

Risk difference with UA‐lowering drug

24‐h ambulatory systolic BP

The mean change in BP across control groups ranged from: ‐3.4 to 1.9 mmHg

MD was 6.19 mmHg lower

(12.82 lower to 0.45 higher)

229 participants' data
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b

24‐h ambulatory diastolic BP

The mean change in BP across control groups ranged from: ‐2.7 to 1.3 mmHg

MD was 3.92 mmHg lower

(9.19 lower to 1.36 higher)

229 participants' data
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b

Clinic‐measured systolic BP

The mean change in BP across control groups ranged from: ‐2 to 1.7 mmHg

MD was 8.43 mmHg lower

(15.24 lower to 1.62 lower)

120 participants' data
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b

Clinic‐measured diastolic BP

The mean change in BP across control groups ranged from: ‐2.4 to 1.6 mmHg

MD was 6.45 mmHg lower

(13.6 lower to 0.7 higher)

120 participants' data
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b

Serum UA

The mean change in serum UA across control groups ranged from: ‐0.3 to 0.2 mg/dL

MD was 3.09 mg/dL lower

(3.76 lower to 2.43 lower)

223 participants' data
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

Adverse events

(withdrawals due to side effects)

18 per 1000

34 per 1000
(8 to 147)

RR 1.86
(95% CI 0.43 to 8.10)

241 participants' data
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,c

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RR: risk ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; UA: uric acid; BP: blood pressure; h: hour.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

aDowngraded for wide CIs
bDowngraded for high unexplained heterogeneity
cDowngraded for small number of events and incomplete reporting

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 1. Uric acid‐lowering drug compared to placebo for people with hyperuricaemia
Comparison 1. Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 24‐h ambulatory systolic blood pressure Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.19 [‐12.82, 0.45]

1.2 24‐h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.92 [‐9.19, 1.36]

1.3 Clinic‐measured systolic blood pressure Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.43 [‐15.24, ‐1.62]

1.4 Clinic‐measured diastolic blood pressure Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.45 [‐13.60, 0.70]

1.5 Serum uric acid Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.20 [‐3.60, ‐2.80]

1.6 Adverse events Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.7 24‐h ambulatory systolic blood pressure in adolescents (subgroup analysis) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐9.43 [‐13.12, ‐5.74]

1.8 24‐h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure in adolescents (subgroup analysis) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.30 [‐9.91, ‐2.69]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo