Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Tratamiento con células madre para la cardiopatía isquémica crónica y la insuficiencia cardíaca congestiva

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search strategies (March 2013)

THE COCHRANE LIBRARY

#1 STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION explode all trees (MeSH)
#2 HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL MOBILIZATION single term (MeSH)
#3 STEM CELLS explode all trees (MeSH)
#4 CELL TRANSPLANTATION single term (MeSH)
#5 haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or marrow NEAR cell* or stem cell* or progenitor cell* or precursor cell* or cell* therapy
#6 ((myoblast* or cell*) NEAR (transplant* or graft* or implant*))
#7 #1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6
#8 MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA explode all trees (MeSH)
#9 HEART FAILURE explode all trees (MeSH)
#10 HEART DISEASES single term (MeSH)
#11 (myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) NEAR (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi* or failure* or decompensation or insufficien*)
#12 heart disease* or coronary disease* or IHD or CIHD
#13 chronic myocardial dysfunction or angina or stenocardia
#14 (ischemi* or ischaemi*) NEAR (myocardium or myocardial or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial or cardiomyopath*)
#15 (artery occlusion* or artery disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) NEAR coronary
#16 (heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) NEAR (repair* or reparation or improve* or regenerat*)
#17 #8 or #9 or #10 or #11 or #12 or #13 or #14 or #15 or #16
#18 #7 AND #17
#19 (cellular NEXT cardiomyoplast*) or (cardiomyocyte* NEAR transplant*) or (intramyocardial* NEAR (transplant* or stem or bone marrow)) or (transendocardial* NEAR stem NEXT cell*) or (intracoronary NEAR progenitor NEXT cell*) or (transcoronary NEAR transplant*)
#20 #18 or #19 

MEDLINE (Ovid)

1. CELL TRANSPLANTATION/
2. exp STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION/
3. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION//
4. exp STEM CELLS/
5. (haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or (marrow adj2 cell*) or stem cell* or progenitor cell* or precursor cell* or cell* therapy or bone marrow).ti,ab.
6. ((mesenchymal or stromal) AND marrow).ti,ab.
7. (cell*) adj3 (transplant* or graft* or implant*)).ti,ab
8. cell transplantation.jn. or cell stem cell.jn. or stem cell reviews.jn. or bone marrow transplantation.jn.
9. or/1‐8
10. exp MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA/
11. exp HEART FAILURE/
12. HEART DISEASES/
13. ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) adj2 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi* or failure* or decompensation or insufficien*)).ti,ab.
14. (heart disease* or coronary disease* or IHD or CIHD).ti,ab.
15. (myocardial dysfunction or angina or stenocardia).ti,ab.
16. ((ischemi* or ischaemi*) adj2 (myocardium or myocardial or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial or cardiomyopath*)).ti,ab.
17. ((end stage or endstage) adj cardiomyopath*).ti,ab.
18. ((artery occlusion* or artery disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) adj2 coronary).ti,ab.
19. ((heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) adj3 (repair* or reparation or improve* or regenerat*)).ti,ab.
20. or/10‐19
21. 9 and 20
22. ((cellular adj cardiomyoplast*) or (cardiomyocyte* adj5 transplant*) or (intramyocardial* adj6 (transplant* or stem or bone marrow)) or (transendocardial* adj5 stem adj cell*) or (intracoronary adj5 progenitor adj cell*) or (transcoronary adj3 transplant*)).mp.
23. 21 or 22 

EMBASE (Ovid)

1. exp CELL THERAPY/
2. exp STEM CELL/
3. BONE MARROW CELL/
4. ((mesenchymal or stromal) AND marrow).ti,ab.
5. (haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or marrow adj2 cell* or stem cell* or progenitor cell* or precursor cell* or cell* therapy or bone marrow).ti,ab.
6. (cell* adj3 (transplant* or graft* or implant*)).ti,ab.
7. cell transplantation.jn. or cell stem cell.jn. or stem cell reviews.jn.
8. or/1‐7
9. exp ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE/
10. exp HEART FAILURE/
11. exp MYOCARDIAL DISEASE/
12. ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) adj2 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi* or failure* or decompensation or insufficien*).ti,ab.
13. (heart disease* or coronary disease* or IHD or CIHD).ti,ab.
14. (chronic myocardial dysfunction or angina or stenocardia).ti,ab.
15. ((ischemi* or ischaemi*) adj2 (myocardium or myocardial or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial or cardiomyopath*)).ti,ab.
16. ((artery occlusion* or artery disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) adj2 coronary).ti,ab.
17. ((end stage or endstage) adj cardiomyopath*).ti,ab.
18. ((heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) adj3 (repair* or reparation or improve* or regenerat*)).ti,ab.
19. or/9‐18
20. 8 AND 19
21. ((cellular adj cardiomyoplast*) or (cardiomyocyte* adj5 transplant*) or (intramyocardial adj6 (transplant* or stem or bone marrow)) or (transendocardial adj5 stem adj cell*) or (intracoronary adj5 progenitor adj cell*) or (transcoronary adj3 transplant*)).mp.
22. 20 or 21 

CINAHL (EBSCOhost)

S1 (MH "Cell Transplantation+")
S2 (MH "Stem Cells+")
S3 TI ( (haematopoietic OR hematopoietic OR haematopoetic OR hematopoetic OR hemopoietic OR haemopoietic OR (marrow N2 cell*) OR "stem cell*" OR "progenitor cell*" OR "precursor cell*" OR "cell* therapy" OR "bone marrow") ) OR AB ( (haematopoietic OR hematopoietic OR haematopoetic OR hematopoetic OR hemopoietic OR haemopoietic OR (marrow N2 cell*) OR "stem cell*" OR "progenitor cell*" OR "precursor cell*" OR "cell* therapy" OR "bone marrow") )
S4 TX ((mesenchymal or stromal) AND marrow)
S5 TI ( ((cell* N3 transplant*) OR (cell* N3 graft*) OR (cell* N3 implant*)) ) OR AB ( ((cell* N3 transplant*) OR (cell* N3 graft*) OR (cell* N3 implant*)) )
S6 S1 OR S2 OR S3 OR S4 OR S5
S7 (MH "Heart Diseases") OR (MH "Heart Failure+") OR (MH "Heart Valve Diseases+") OR (MH "Myocardial Diseases+") OR (MH "Myocardial Ischemia+")
S8 TI ( (myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) N6 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi* or failure* or decompensation or insufficien*) ) OR AB ( (myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) N6 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi* or failure* or decompensation or insufficien*) )
S9 TI ( ("heart disease*" or "coronary disease*" or IHD or CIHD) ) AND AB ( ("heart disease*" or "coronary disease*" or IHD or CIHD) )
S10 TI ( ("chronic myocardial dysfunction" OR angina OR stenocardia) ) OR AB ( ("chronic myocardial dysfunction" OR angina OR stenocardia) )
S11 TI ( ((ischemi* or ischaemi*) N5 (myocardium or myocardial or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial or cardiomyopath*)) ) OR AB ( ((ischemi* or ischaemi*) N5 (myocardium or myocardial or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial or cardiomyopath*)) )
S12 TI ( ((chronic or artery occlusion* or artery disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) AND coronary) ) OR AB ( ((chronic or artery occlusion* or artery disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) AND coronary) )
S13 TI ( ((heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) AND (repair* or reparation or improve* or regenerat*)) ) OR AB ( ((heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) AND (repair* or reparation or improve* or regenerat*)) )
S14 S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11 OR S12 OR S13
S15 S6 AND S14
S16 TX (transplant* N5 (cardiomyocyte* or transcoronary)) or (cellular N2 cardiomyoplast*) or (intramyocardial* N6 (transplant* or stem or marrow)) or (transendocardial* N5 stem cell*) or (intracoronary N5 progenitor cell*)
S17 S15 OR S16

TRANSFUSION EVIDENCE LIBRARY (www.transfusionevidencelibrary.com)

("marrow cell*" OR "stem cell*" OR "progenitor cell*" OR "precursor cell*") AND (infarct* OR coronar* OR myocard* OR heart OR cardiac* OR cardiomyo* OR intramyocardial* OR ischemi* OR ischaemi* OR angina)

PubMed (epublications only)

(stem[TI] OR marrow[TI] OR progenitor[TI] OR precursor[TI] OR cell[TI] OR cells[TI]) AND (infarct*[TI] OR coronar*[TI] OR heart*[TI] OR myocard*[TI] OR cardial[TI] OR cardiac[TI] OR transmural*[TI] OR ischemia[TI] OR ischemic[TI] OR subendocardial[TI] OR cardiomyopath*[TI] OR angina[TI]) AND (random* OR blind* OR control group* OR controlled OR placebo OR trial) AND (publisher[sb] NOT pubstatusnihms)

LILACS

("marrow cell$" OR "stem cell$" OR "progenitor cell$" OR "precursor cell$") AND (infarct$ OR coronar$ OR myocard$ OR heart OR cardiac$ OR cardiomyo$ OR intramyocardial$ OR ischemi$ OR ischaemi$ OR angina) AND (random$ OR blind$ OR control$ OR placebo$ OR trial)

KoreaMed & PakMediNet

(stem or marrow or progenitor or precursor or cell or cells) AND random*

IndMed

((marrow OR stem OR progenitor OR precursor) AND (infarct$ OR coronar$ OR myocard$ OR heart OR cardiac$ OR cardiomyo$ OR intramyocardial$ OR ischemi$ OR ischaemi$) AND (random$ OR blind$ OR control$ OR placebo$ OR trial))

ISRCTN Register (Current Controlled Trials)

("stem cells" or "stem cell" or marrow or "progenitor cells" or "precursor cells") and (infarction or infarct or coronary or myocardial or heart or myocardium or cardial or transmural or ischemia or ischemic or subendocardial or cardiomyopathy OR angina)

ClinicalTrials.gov

Study Type: Intervention Studies
Conditions: heart failure
Search Terms: marrow OR stem OR progenitor OR precursor OR myoblast OR myocell OR mesenchymal OR stromal

WHO ICTRP

Title: marrow OR stem OR progenitor OR precursor OR myoblast OR myocell OR mesenchymal OR stromal
Condition: heart OR cardiac OR myocardial
Recruitment Status: ALL

Appendix 2. Search strategies (June 2014; March/December 2015)

CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library

#1 MeSH descriptor: [Stem Cell Transplantation] explode all trees
#2 MeSH descriptor: [Bone Marrow Cells] explode all trees
#3 MeSH descriptor: [Stem Cells] explode all trees
#4 MeSH descriptor: [Cell Transplantation] this term only
#5 MeSH descriptor: [Bone Marrow Transplantation] this term only
#6 MeSH descriptor: [Stromal Cells] explode all trees
#7 ((stem or haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or progenitor or precursor or bone marrow or mononuclear or "adipose tissue" or mesenchymal or stromal or autologous or allogeneic or allogenic or ALDH* or C‐KIT*) next/2 cell*)
#8 "cell transplantation":so or "stem cell":so or "bone marrow transplantation":so
#9 (autologous next/3 transplant*) or "cell* therap*"
#10 ((cell* or myoblast*) near/3 (autologous or transplant* or autotransplant* or allotransplant* or graft* or implant*))
#11 #1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7 or #8 or #9 or #10
#12 MeSH descriptor: [Heart Diseases] explode all trees
#13 ((ischemi* or ischaemi* or nonischemi* or nonischaemi*) near/2 (myocardium or myocardial or cardiomyopath* or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial))
#14 ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) near/2 (failure* or decompensation or insufficien*))
#15 (IHD or CIHD or DCM or IDCM)
#16 ((myocardial near/3 dysfunction*) or stenocardia or angina*)
#17 ((end stage or endstage or dilated or idiopathic or congestive) near/2 cardiomyopath*)
#18 (arter* occlusion* or arter* disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) near/2 coronary
#19 ((heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) near/3 (repair* or reparation or improv* or regenerat*))
#20 (heart disease* or coronary disease* or cardiovascular disease*)
#21 ((end stage or endstage or dilated or idiopathic or congestive) near/2 cardiomyopath*)
#22 ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart or acute) near/3 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi*))
#23 heart attack* or coronary attack* or acute coronary syndrome* or AMI
#24 #12 or #13 or #14 or #15 or #16 or #17 or #18 or #19 or #20 or #21 or #22 or #23
#25 #11 and #24
#26 cellular cardiomyoplast* or ((cardiomyocyte* or cardiac cell*) near/6 transplant*) or ((intramyocardial* or intracoronary or transendocardial* or transcoronary) near/6 (transplant* or stem or bone marrow or marrow cell* or BMC* or stromal or mesenchymal or progenitor cell* or precursor cell*))
#27 #25 or #26 [Publication Year from 2014 to 2015]

MEDLINE (OvidSP)

1. exp STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION/
2. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION/
3. CELL TRANSPLANTATION/
4. exp STEM CELLS/
5. BONE MARROW CELLS/
6. exp STROMAL CELLS/
7. ((stem or haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or progenitor or precursor or bone marrow or mononuclear or adipose tissue or mesenchymal or stromal or autologous or allogeneic or allogenic or ALDH* or C‐KIT*) adj2 cell*).ti,ab.
8. (cell transplantation or stem cell* or bone marrow transplantation).jn.
9. ((autologous adj3 transplant*) or cell* therap*).tw.
10. ((cell* or myoblast*) adj3 (autologous or transplant* or autotransplant* or allotransplant* or graft* or implant*)).ti,ab.
11. or/1‐10
12. exp HEART DISEASES/
13. ((ischemi* or ischaemi* or nonischemi* or nonischaemi*) adj2 (myocardium or myocardial or cardiomyopath* or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial)).ti,ab.
14. ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) adj2 (failure* or decompensation or insufficien*)).ti,ab.
15. (IHD or CIHD or DCM or IDCM).ti,ab.
16. ((myocardial adj3 dysfunction*) or stenocardia or angina*).ti,ab.
17. ((arter* occlusion* or arter* disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) adj2 coronary).ti,ab.
18. (heart disease* or coronary disease* or cardiovascular disease*).ti,ab.
19. ((end stage or endstage or dilated or idiopathic or congestive) adj2 cardiomyopath*).ti,ab.
20. ((heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) adj3 (repair* or reparation or improv* or regenerat*)).ti,ab.
21. ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart or acute) adj3 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi*)).ti,ab.
22. (heart attack* or coronary attack* or acute coronary syndrome* or AMI).ti,ab.
23. or/12‐22
24. 11 and 23
25. (cellular cardiomyoplast* or ((cardiomyocyte* or cardiac cell*) adj6 transplant*) or ((intramyocardial* or intracoronary or transendocardial* or transcoronary) adj6 (transplant* or stem or bone marrow or marrow cell* or BMC* or stromal or mesenchymal or progenitor cell* or precursor cell*))).mp.
26. 24 or 25

Embase (OvidSP)

1. exp STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION/
2. exp BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION/
3. exp STEM CELL/
4. BONE MARROW CELL/
5. exp STROMA CELLS/
6. ((stem or haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or progenitor or precursor or bone marrow or mononuclear or adipose tissue or mesenchymal or stromal or autologous or allogeneic or allogenic or ALDH* or C‐KIT*) adj2 cell*).ti,ab.
7. (cell transplantation or stem cell* or bone marrow transplantation).jn.
8. ((autologous adj3 transplant*) or cell* therap*).tw.
9. ((cell* or myoblast*) adj3 (autologous or transplant* or autotransplant* or allotransplant* or graft* or implant*)).ti,ab.
10. or/1‐9
11. exp ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE/
12. exp HEART FAILURE/
13. exp MYOCARDIAL DISEASE/
14. ((ischemi* or ischaemi* or nonischemi* or nonischaemi*) adj2 (myocardium or myocardial or cardiomyopath* or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial)).ti,ab.
15. ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) adj2 (failure* or decompensation or insufficien*)).ti,ab.
16. (IHD or CIHD or DCM or IDCM).ti,ab.
17. ((myocardial adj3 dysfunction*) or stenocardia or angina*).ti,ab.
18. ((arter* occlusion* or arter* disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) adj2 coronary).ti,ab.
19. (heart disease* or coronary disease* or cardiovascular disease*).ti,ab.
20. ((end stage or endstage or dilated or idiopathic or congestive) adj2 cardiomyopath*).ti,ab.
21. ((heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) adj3 (repair* or reparation or improv* or regenerat*)).ti,ab.
22. ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart or acute) adj3 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi*)).ti,ab.
23. (heart attack* or coronary attack* or acute coronary syndrome* or AMI).ti,ab.
24. 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23
25. 10 and 24
26. (cellular cardiomyoplast* or ((cardiomyocyte* or cardiac cell*) adj6 transplant*) or ((intramyocardial* or intracoronary or transendocardial* or transcoronary) adj6 (transplant* or stem or bone marrow or marrow cell* or BMC* or stromal or mesenchymal or progenitor cell* or precursor cell*))).mp.
27. 25 or 26

PubMed (epublications)

#1 (stem[TI] OR haematopoietic[TI] OR hematopoietic[TI] OR haematopoetic[TI] OR hematopoetic[TI] OR hemopoietic[TI] OR haemopoietic[TI] OR progenitor[TI] OR precursor[TI] OR bone marrow[TI] OR mononuclear[TI] OR "adipose tissue"[TI] OR mesenchymal[TI] OR stromal[TI] OR autologous[TI] OR allogeneic[TI] OR allogenic[TI] OR ALDH*[TI] OR C‐KIT*[TI]) AND cell*[TI]
#2 cell transplantation[TA] OR stem cell*[TA] OR bone marrow transplant*[TA]
#3 "autologous transplant*"[TI] OR "cell therapy"[TI] OR "cell therapies"[TI] OR "cellular therapy"[TI]
#4 (cell[TI] OR cells[TI] OR cellular[TI] OR myoblast*[TI]) AND (transplant[TI] OR transplantation[TI] OR transplants[TI] OR transplanting[TI] OR transplanted[TI] OR autotransplant*[TI] or allotransplant*[TI] or graft*[TI] or implant[TI] OR implants[TI] OR implantation[TI] OR implanted[TI])
#5 #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4
#6 (ischemi*[TI] OR ischaemi*[TI] OR nonischemi*[TI] OR nonischaemi*) AND (myocardium[TI] OR myocardial[TI] OR cardiomyopath*[TI] OR heart[TI] OR coronary[TI] OR cardiac[TI] OR cardial[TI] OR subendocardial[TI])
#7 (myocardial[TI] OR myocardium[TI] OR subendocardial[TI] OR transmural[TI] OR cardiac[TI] OR cardial[TI] OR coronary[TI] OR heart) AND (failure*[TI] OR decompensation[TI] OR insufficien*[TI])
#8 "myocardial dysfunction*"[TI] OR stenocardia[TI] OR angina*[TI] OR IHD[TI] OR CIHD[TI] OR DCM[TI] OR IDCM[TI] OR "heart disease"[TI] OR "coronary disease"[TI] OR "coronary artery disease"[TI] OR "cardiovascular disease"[TI]
#9 ("arterial occlusion*"[TI] OR "arterial disease*"[TI] OR arterioscleros*[TI] OR atheroscleros*[TI]) AND coronary[TI]
#10 ("end stage"[TI] OR endstage[TI] OR dilated[TI] OR idiopathic[TI] OR congestive[TI]) AND cardiomyopath*[TI]
#11 (heart[TI] OR cardiac[TI] OR cardial[TI] OR myocardium[TI] OR myocardial[TI]) AND (repair*[TI] OR reparation[TI] OR improv*[TI] OR regenerat*[TI])
#12 (myocardial[TI] OR myocardium [TI] OR subendocardial [TI] OR transmural [TI] OR cardiac [TI] OR cardial [TI] OR coronary [TI] OR heart [TI] OR acute[TI]) AND (infarct* [TI] OR postinfarct* [TI] OR hypoxi* [TI] OR anoxi*)
#13 heart attack* [TI] OR coronary attack* [TI] OR acute coronary syndrome* [TI] OR AMI[TI]
#14 #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13
#15 #5 AND #14
#16 (cellular cardiomyoplast* OR ((cardiomyocyte* OR cardiac cell*) AND transplant*) OR ((intramyocardial* OR intracoronary OR transendocardial* OR transcoronary) AND (transplant* OR stem OR bone marrow OR marrow cell* OR BMC* OR stromal OR mesenchymal OR progenitor cell* OR precursor cell*)))
#17 #15 OR #16
#18 (random* OR blind* OR control group* OR placebo OR controlled trial OR controlled study OR trials OR systematic review OR meta‐analysis OR metaanalysis OR literature search OR medline OR cochrane OR embase) AND ((publisher[sb] OR inprocess[sb]) NOT pubstatusnihms)
#19 #17 AND #18

CINAHL (EBSCOhost)

S1 (MH "Cell Transplantation+")
S2 (MH "Stem Cells+")
S3 TI ( (stem or haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or progenitor or precursor or bone marrow or mononuclear or adipose tissue or mesenchymal or stromal or autologous or allogeneic or allogenic or ALDH* or C‐KIT*) N2 cell* ) OR AB ( (stem or haematopoietic or hematopoietic or haematopoetic or hematopoetic or hemopoietic or haemopoietic or progenitor or precursor or bone marrow or mononuclear or adipose tissue or mesenchymal or stromal or autologous or allogeneic or allogenic or ALDH* or C‐KIT*) N2 cell)
S4 TX ( (autologous N3 transplant*) or cell* therap* )
S5 TI ( (cell* or myoblast*) N3 (autologous or transplant* or autotransplant* or allotransplant* or graft* or implant*) ) OR AB ( (cell* or myoblast*) N3 (autologous or transplant* or autotransplant* or allotransplant* or graft* or implant*) )
S6 S1 OR S2 OR S3 OR S4 OR S5
S7 (MH "Heart Diseases+")
S8 TI ( (myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart or acute) N3 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi*) ) OR AB ( (myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart or acute) N3 (infarct* or postinfarct* or hypoxi* or anoxi*) )
S9 TI ( ("heart disease*" or "coronary disease*" or IHD or CIHD or DCM or IDCM) ) AND AB ( ("heart disease*" or "coronary disease*" or IHD or CIHD or DCM or IDCM) )
S10 TI ( ((myocardial N3 dysfunction) OR angina OR stenocardia) ) OR AB ( ((myocardial N3 dysfunction) OR angina OR stenocardia) )
S11 TI ( ((ischemi* or ischaemi* or nonischemi* or nonischaemi*) N5 (myocardium or myocardial or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial or cardiomyopath*)) ) OR AB ( ((ischemi* or ischaemi* or nonischemi* or nonischaemi*) N5 (myocardium or myocardial or heart or coronary or cardiac or cardial or subendocardial or cardiomyopath*)) )
S12 TI ( ((arter* occlusion* or arter* disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) N2 coronary) ) OR AB ( ((arter* occlusion* or arter* disease* or arterioscleros* or atheroscleros*) N2 coronary) )
S13 TI ( ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) N2 (failure* or decompensation or insufficien*)) ) OR AB ( ((myocardial or myocardium or subendocardial or transmural or cardiac or cardial or coronary or heart) N2 (failure* or decompensation or insufficien*)) )
S14 TI ( (end stage or endstage or dilated or idiopathic or congestive) N2 cardiomyopath* ) OR AB ( (end stage or endstage or dilated or idiopathic or congestive) N2 cardiomyopath* )
S15 TI ( (heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) N3 (repair* or reparation or improv* or regenerat*) ) OR AB ( (heart or cardiac or cardial or myocardium or myocardial) N3 (repair* or reparation or improv* or regenerat*) )
S16 TI (heart attack* or coronary attack* or acute coronary syndrome* or AMI) OR AB (heart attack* or coronary attack* or acute coronary syndrome* or AMI)
S17 S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11 OR S12 OR S13 OR S14 OR S15 OR S16
S18 S6 AND S17
S19 TI ( cellular cardiomyoplast* or ((cardiomyocyte* or cardiac cell*) N6 transplant*) or ((intramyocardial* or intracoronary or transendocardial* or transcoronary) N6 (transplant* or stem or bone marrow or marrow cell* or BMC* or stromal or mesenchymal or progenitor cell* or precursor cell*)) ) OR AB ( cellular cardiomyoplast* or ((cardiomyocyte* or cardiac cell*) N6 transplant*) or ((intramyocardial* or intracoronary or transendocardial* or transcoronary) N6 (transplant* or stem or bone marrow or marrow cell* or BMC* or stromal or mesenchymal or progenitor cell* or precursor cell*))
S20 S18 OR S19 {Limiters ‐ Published Date: 20140101‐20151214}

LILACS

(tw:((infarct OR infarction OR coronary OR myocardial OR heart OR cardiac OR cardiomyopathy OR myocardial OR subendocardial OR intramyocardial OR intracoronary OR ischemia OR ischemic OR nonischemic))) AND (tw:((bone marrow OR marrow cell OR marrow cells OR stem cell OR stem cells OR progenitor cells OR precursor cells OR cell therapy OR cellular therapy OR cell‐based therapy OR mononuclear cells OR mesenchymal cells OR stromal cells))) AND (instance:"regional") AND ( db:("LILACS") AND type_of_study:("clinical_trials"))

IndMED

(bone marrow OR marrow cell OR marrow cells OR stem cell OR stem cells OR progenitor cell OR precursor cell OR cell therapy OR cellular therapy OR mesenchymal cells OR stromal cells) AND (infarct OR infarction OR coronary OR intracoronary OR myocardial OR heart OR cardiac OR congestive OR cardiomyopathy OR intramyocardial OR intracoronary OR ischemia OR ischemic OR ischaemia OR ischaemic OR nonischemic OR nonischaemic) AND (randomised OR randomly OR randomized OR blind OR blinded OR trial OR study OR control group)

KoreaMed [N.B. Search lines run separately: presented this way for brevity]

(stem [ALL] OR marrow [ALL] OR mesenchymal[ALL] OR stromal[ALL]) AND (myocardial [ALL] OR heart[ALL] OR cardiac[ALL] OR coronary[ALL] OR cardiomyopathy[ALL]) AND "Randomized Controlled Trial" [PT]

PakMediNet

Combinations of the following free text terms were used:
stem cell, stem cells, bone marrow, marrow cells, progenitor cells, precursor cells, mesenchymal cells, stromal cells
AND
myocardial infarction, heart attack, cardiac ischemia, coronary ischemia, myocardial ischemia, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, cardiac failure, angina, coronary artery disease

Web of Science CPCI‐S

TI=("cardiac failure" OR "heart attack" OR "heart failure" OR "coronary disease" OR "cardiovascular disease" OR "coronary artery" OR "coronary arterial" OR "myocardial infarction" OR cardiomyopathy OR "heart disease" OR "heart diseases" OR "cardiac insufficiency" OR AMI OR IHD OR CIHD OR DCM OR IDCM OR "myocardial dysfunction" OR stenocardia OR angina) AND TI=("stem cell" OR "stem cells" OR "bone marrow" OR "marrow cells" OR "cellular therapy" OR "mesenchymal cells" OR "stromal cells" OR "cell transplant" OR "precursor cells" OR "progenitor cells" OR (c‐kit* NEAR/5 cells) OR HSCT OR SCT OR MSC OR MSCs OR BMT OR BMC OR BMAC OR BMCs OR HST OR HSTs) AND TS=(randomised OR randomly OR randomized OR blind OR blinded OR trial OR study OR "control group" OR groups)

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search Terms: randomized OR randomised OR random OR randomly
Study Type: Intervention Studies
Condition: cardiac OR heart attack OR heart failure OR coronary OR myocardial OR cardiomyopathy OR heart disease OR angina
Intervention: stem cells OR bone marrow cells OR cellular therapy OR mesenchymal cells OR stromal cells OR cell transplant OR marrow transplant OR precursor cells OR progenitor cells OR HSCT OR SCT OR MSC OR MSCs OR BMT OR BMC OR BMAC OR BMCs OR HST OR HSTs

ISRCTN Register

(("marrow cell" OR "marrow cells" OR "stem cell" OR "stem cells" OR "progenitor cells" OR "precursor cells" OR "mesenchymal cells" OR "stromal cells") AND ("myocardial infarction" OR "heart attack" OR cardiomyopathy OR intramyocardial OR intracoronary))
OR
(("marrow cell" OR "marrow cells" OR "stem cell" OR "stem cells" OR "progenitor cells" OR "precursor cells" OR "mesenchymal cells" OR "stromal cells") AND ("cardiac ischemia" OR "coronary ischemia" OR "myocardial ischemia" OR "heart failure" OR "cardiac failure" OR congestive OR "coronary artery disease"))
OR
(("cell therapy" OR "cellular therapy" OR "cell transplant" OR "marrow transplant") AND ("myocardial infarction" OR "heart attack" OR cardiomyopathy OR intramyocardial OR intracoronary OR "cardiac ischemia" OR "coronary ischemia" OR "myocardial ischemia" OR "heart failure" OR "cardiac failure" OR congestive OR "coronary artery disease" OR angina))

WHO ICTRP Search Portal

Intervention OR Title: stem cells OR bone marrow cells OR cellular therapy OR mesenchymal cells OR stromal cells OR cell transplant OR marrow transplant OR precursor cells OR progenitor cells OR HSCT OR SCT OR MSC OR MSCs OR BMT OR BMC OR BMAC OR BMCs OR HST OR HSTs
Condition OR Title: cardiac OR heart OR coronary OR myocardial OR angina OR cardiomyopathy
Recruitment Status: ALL

Hong Kong Clinical Trials Registry

Combinations of the following free text terms were used:
stem cell, stem cells, bone marrow, marrow cells, progenitor cells, precursor cells, mesenchymal cells, stromal cells
AND
myocardial infarction, heart attack, cardiac ischemia, coronary ischemia, myocardial ischemia, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, cardiac failure, angina, coronary artery disease

PRISMA flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Stem cells versus no stem cells, outcome: 1.1 Mortality.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Stem cells versus no stem cells, outcome: 1.1 Mortality.

Trial sequential analysis: Mortality at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 4

Trial sequential analysis: Mortality at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.

Trial sequential analysis: Non‐fatal myocardial infarction at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 5

Trial sequential analysis: Non‐fatal myocardial infarction at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.

Trial sequential analysis: Rehospitalisation due to heart failure at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 6

Trial sequential analysis: Rehospitalisation due to heart failure at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.

Trial sequential analysis: Arrhythmias at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 7

Trial sequential analysis: Arrhythmias at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.

Trial sequential analysis: Composite MACE at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 8

Trial sequential analysis: Composite MACE at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.

Trial sequential analysis: Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by MRI at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 9

Trial sequential analysis: Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by MRI at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). TSMB = trial sequential monitoring boundary; horizontal red lines indicate conventional significance threshold.

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 2 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 2 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction.

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 3 Rehospitalisation due to heart failure.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 3 Rehospitalisation due to heart failure.

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 4 Arrhythmias.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 4 Arrhythmias.

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 5 Composite MACE.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 5 Composite MACE.

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 6 MLHFQ: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 6 MLHFQ: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 7 MLHFQ: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 7 MLHFQ: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 8 Seattle Angina Questionnaire: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 8 Seattle Angina Questionnaire: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 9 Angina episodes per week: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 9 Angina episodes per week: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 10 NYHA classification: short‐term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 10 NYHA classification: short‐term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 11 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 11 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 12 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 12 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 13 CCS class: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 13 CCS class: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 14 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 14 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 15 Exercise capacity: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 15 Exercise capacity: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 16 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 16 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 17 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 17 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 18 LVEF (%) measured by echocardiography: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 18 LVEF (%) measured by echocardiography: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 19 LVEF (%) measured by echocardiography: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 19 LVEF (%) measured by echocardiography: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 20 LVEF (%) measured by SPECT: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 20 LVEF (%) measured by SPECT: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 21 LVEF (%) measured by SPECT: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 21 LVEF (%) measured by SPECT: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 22 LVEF (%) measured by LV angiography: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 22 LVEF (%) measured by LV angiography: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 23 LVEF (%) measured by LV angiography: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Cells versus no cells, Outcome 23 LVEF (%) measured by LV angiography: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Cell dose: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis, Outcome 7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis, Outcome 7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Cell type: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis, Outcome 7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 2 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 2 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction.

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 3 Rehospitalisation due to heart failure.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 3 Rehospitalisation due to heart failure.

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 4 Arrhythmias.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 4 Arrhythmias.

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 5 Composite MACE.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 5 Composite MACE.

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 6 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 6 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 7 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.7

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 7 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 8 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.8

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 8 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months).

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 9 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.9

Comparison 8 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias, Outcome 9 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months).

Comparison 9 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of performance bias, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of performance bias, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).

Comparison 10 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of attrition bias, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of attrition bias, Outcome 1 Mortality (all‐cause).

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Bone marrow‐derived cell therapy for people with chronic ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure

Bone marrow‐derived cell therapy for people with chronic ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure

Patient or population: people with chronic ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure
Settings: hospitalisation
Intervention: bone marrow‐derived cell therapy

Comparison: no cell therapy

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

No cell therapy

Bone marrow‐derived cell therapy

Mortality (all cause)

Long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

102 per 1000

43 per 1000
(21 to 89)

RR 0.42
(0.21 to 0.87)

491
(9 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

The required information size of 1899 participants to detect a RRR of 35% has not been reached.

Periprocedural adverse events

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

1695

(34 studies)

See comment

Adverse events occurring during the mapping or cell/placebo injection procedure included ventricular tachycardia (7), ventricular fibrillation (1), atrial fibrillation (1), transient complete heart block (1), transient pulmonary oedema (3), thrombus on mapping catheter tip (1), visual disturbances (2), myocardial perforation (2), limited retrograde catheter‐related dissection of the abdominal aorta (1).

Non‐fatal myocardial infarction

Long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

83 per 1000

31 per 1000
(12 to 80)

RR 0.38
(0.15 to 0.97)

345
(5 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3

The required information size of 2383 participants to detect a RRR of 35% has not been reached.

Rehospitalisation due to heart failure

Long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

155 per 1000

98 per 1000
(56 to 169)

RR 0.63
(0.36 to 1.09)

375
(6 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,4

The required information size of 1193 participants to detect a RRR of 35% has not been reached.

Arrhythmias

Long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

333 per 1000

140 per 1000
(60 to 330)

RR 0.42
(0.18 to 0.99)

82
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low5,6

The required information size of 461 participants to detect a RRR of 35% has not been reached.

Composite MACE

Long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

350 per 1000

224 per 1000
(133 to 378)

RR 0.64
(0.38 to 1.08)

141
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low7,8

The required information size of 431 participants to detect a RRR of 35% has not been reached.

LVEF (%) measured by MRI

Long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

The mean LVEF (%) measured by MRI in the intervention groups was 1.6 lower (8.7 lower to 5.5 higher).

25
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low6,7

The required information size of 322 participants to detect a mean difference of 4% has not been reached.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Only studies with a low risk of selection bias are included.
CI: confidence interval; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE: major adverse clinical events; MD: mean difference; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NYHA: New York Heart Assocation; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio; RRR: relative risk reduction

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Six trials received full or partial commercial funding, which could have resulted in a biased assessment of the intervention effect and were therefore deemed to have a high risk of bias. One trial was not blinded (high risk of performance bias) and had a high risk of attrition bias.
2The number of observed events was low, leading to imprecision.
3Four studies received full or partial commercial funding with a high risk of bias.
4Five trials received full or partial commercial funding with a high risk of bias.
5The included trial received partial commercial funding with a high risk of bias.
6Only one trial with a low number of observed events was included in the analysis, leading to imprecision.
7All three included trials received partial commercial funding with a high risk of bias.
8The number of included studies was low with a low number of observed events, leading to imprecision.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Bone marrow‐derived cell therapy for people with chronic ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants

Study ID

Country of study

Patient population

Mean (SD) age of participants (years)

% Male

No. randomised participants receiving intervention

No. randomised participants receiving comparator

Mean duration of follow‐up

Ang 2008

UK

CIHD (> 1 chronic myocardial scar; elective CABG)

BMMNC‐IM: 64.7 (8.7)

BMMNC‐IC: 62.1 (8.7)

Controls: 61.3 (8.3)

BMMNC‐IM: 71.4%

BMMNC‐IC: 90.5%

Controls: 90.0%

42 (21 IM, 21 IC)

21

6 months

Assmus 2006

Germany

CIHD (MI > 3 months; LV dysfunction)

BMMNC: 59 (12)

CPC: 54 (12)

Controls: 61 (9)

BMMNC: 89%

CPC: 79%

Controls: 100%

52 (28 MNC, 24 CPC)

23

3 months

Assmus 2013

Germany

CIHD (MI > 3 months; LVEF < 50%; NYHA class II or greater)

BMMNC‐LDSW: 65 (12)

BMMNC‐HDSW: 58 (11)

Controls‐LDSW: 60 (10)

Controls‐HDSW: 63 (10)

BMMNC‐LDSW: 77%

BMMNC‐HDSW: 86%

Controls‐LDSW: 80%

Controls‐HDSW: 90%

43 (22 LDSW, 21 HDSW)

39 (20 LDSW, 19 HDSW)

45.7 (17) months

Bartunek 2012

Belgium/

Serbia/

Switzerland

HF (LVEF 15% to 40%; ischaemic event > 2 months)

BM‐MSC: 55.3 (SE 10.4)

Controls: 58.7 (SE 8.2)

BM‐MSC: 90.5%

Controls: 86.7%

32

15

24 months

Chen 2006

China

CIHD (isolated, chronic LAD; LVEF < 40%)

BM‐MSC: 59.3 (6.8)

Controls: 57.8 (7.2)

BM‐MSC: 88%

Controls: 92%

24

24

12 months

Erbs 2005

Germany

CIHD (chronic total occlusion; myocardial ischaemia)

CPC: 63 (7)

Controls: 61 (9)

CPC: 71%

Controls: 86%

14

14

15 months

Hamshere 2015_IC

UK

HF (NYHA class II‐IV; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC: n/r

Controls: n/r

BMMNC: n/r

Controls: n/r

15

15

12 months

Hamshere 2015_IM

UK

HF (NYHA class II‐IV; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC: n/r

Controls: n/r

BMMNC: n/r

Controls: n/r

15

15

12 months

Heldman 2014_BMMNC

USA

CIHD (chronic MI; LV dysfunction)

BMMNC: 61.1 (8.4)

Controls: 61.3 (9.0)

BMMNC: 89.5%

Controls: 100%

22

10

12 months

Heldman 2014_BM‐MSC

USA

CIHD (chronic MI; LV dysfunction)

BM‐MSC: 57.1 (10.6)

Controls: 60.0 (12.0)

BM‐MSC: 94.7%

Controls: 90.9%

22

11

12 months

Hendrikx 2006

Belgium

CIHD (transmural MI; LV dysfunction; elective CABG)

BMMNC: 63.2 (8.5)

Controls: 66.8 (9.2)

BMMNC: 100%

Controls: 70%

11

12

4 months

Honold 2012

Germany

CIHD (MI > 3 months; LV regional wall motion abnormality)

CPC: 53.4 (12.3)

Controls: 58.8 (7.3)

CPC: 82%

Controls: 100%

23

10

60 months

Hu 2011

China

HF (MI > 3 months; LVEF < 30%; elective CABG)

BMMNC: 56.6 (9.7)

Controls: 58.3 (8.9)

BMMNC: 88%

Controls: 96%

31

29

12 months

Jimenez‐Quevedo 2011

Spain

Refractory angina (CCS class II‐IV)

CD133+: median 70.0

Controls: median 58.2

CD133+: 78.9%

Controls: 100%

19

9

6 months

Losordo 2007

USA

Refractory angina (CCS class III‐IV)

CD34+/controls pooled: 62.4 (range 48 to 84)

CD34+/controls pooled: 80%

18 (6 LD, 6 MD 6, HD)

6

6 months

Losordo 2011

USA

Refractory angina (CCS class III‐IV)

CD34+/LD: 61.3 (9.1)

CD34+/HD: 59.8 (9.2)

Controls: 61.8 (8.5)

CD34+/LD: 83.6%

CD34+/HD: 87.5%

Controls: 89.3%

112 (56 LD, 56 HD)

56

12 months

Mathiasen 2015

Denmark

HF (NYHA class II‐III; LVEF < 45%; no revascularisation options)

BM‐MSC: 66.1 (7.7)

Controls: 64.2 (10.6)

BM‐MSC: 90%

Controls: 70%

40

20

6 months

Mozid 2014_IC

UK

HF (NYHA class II‐IV; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC/controls pooled (16 participants): 70 (10)

BMMNC/controls pooled (16 participants): 94%

14

2

6 months

Mozid 2014_IM

UK

HF (NYHA class II‐IV; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC/controls pooled (18 participants): 64 (9)

BMMNC/controls pooled (18 participants): 100%

10

8

6 months

Nasseri 2012

Germany

HF (LVEF < 35%; elective CABG)

CD133+: 61.9 (7.3)

Controls: 62.7 (10.6)

CD133+: 93%

Controls: 97%

30

30

6 months

Patel 2005

Argentina

HF (LVEF < 35%; NYHA class III‐IV; elective CABG)

CD34+: 64.8 (7.1)

Controls: 63.6 (5.2)

CD34+: 80%

Controls: 80%

25

25

10 years

Patel 2015

USA/Germany/India

HF (LVEF < 40%; NYHA class III‐IV)

BMAC: 58.5 (12.7)

Controls: 52.7 (8.5)

BMAC: 91.7%

Controls: 100%

24

6

12 months

Patila 2014

Finland

HF (LVEF 15% to 40%; NYHA class II‐IV; elective CABG)

BMMNC: median 65 (range 57 to 73)

Controls: median 64 (range 58 to 70)

BMMNC: 94.7%

Controls: 95.0%

20

19

12 months

Perin 2011

USA

HF (angina/HF symptoms; chronic CAD; LVEF < 40%; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC: 56.3 (8.6)

Controls: 60.5 (6.4)

BMMNC: 50%

Controls: 80%

20

10

6 months

Perin 2012a

USA

HF (CCS class II‐IV or NYHA class II‐III, or both; LVEF < 45%; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC: 64.0 (10.9)

Controls: 62.3 (8.3)

BMMNC: 86.9%

Controls: 93.7%

61

31

6 months

Perin 2012b

USA

HF (CCS class II‐IV or NYHA class II‐III, or both; LVEF < 45%; no revascularisation options)

ALDH+: 58.2 (6.1)

Controls: 57.8 (5.5)

ALDH+: 90%

Controls: 80%

10

10

6 months

Pokushalov 2010

Russia

HF (LVEF < 35%; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC: 61 (9)

Controls: 62 (5)

BMMNC: 87%

Controls: 85%

55

54

12 months

Santoso 2014

Indonesia/China

HF (NYHA class III‐IV; LVEF < 40%; no revascularisation options)

BMMNC: 58 (5.9)

Controls: 60 (5.6)

BMMNC: 95%

Controls: 100%

19

9

6 months

Trifunovic 2015

Serbia

CIHD (MI < 30 days; LVEF < 40%; NYHA class III‐IV; elective CABG)

BMMNC: 53.8 (10.1)

Controls: 60.0 (6.8)

BMMNC: 93.3%

Controls: 93.3%

15

15

Median 5 years (IQR 2.5 to 7.5)

Tse 2007

China/Australia

Refractory angina (CCS class III‐IV)

BMMNC: 65.2 (8.3)

Controls: 68.9 (6.3)

BMMNC: 79%

Controls: 88%

19

9

6 months

Turan 2011

Germany

CIHD (MI > 3 months; LV dysfunction)

BMMNC: 62 (10)

Controls: 60 (9)

BMMNC: 52.6%

Controls: 55.6%

38

18

12 months

Van Ramshorst 2009

The Netherlands

Refractory angina (CCS class II‐IV)

BMMNC: 64 (8)

Controls: 62 (9)

BMMNC: 92%

Controls: 80%

25

25

6 months

Wang 2009

China

Refractory angina (MI > 1 month)

CD34+: 60.6 (n/r)

Controls: 60.0 (n/r)

CD34+: 56.3%

Controls: 63.3%

16

16

6 months

Wang 2010

China

Refractory angina (CCS class III‐IV)

CD34+: range 42 to 80

Controls: range 43 to 80

CD34+: 51.8%

Controls: 50.0%

56

56

6 months

Wang 2014

China

CIHD (LVEF < 35%)

CD133+: n/r

Controls: n/r

CD133+: n/r

Controls: n/r

35

35

6 months

Wang 2015

China

CIHD (multivessel disease; MI > 4 weeks; elective CABG)

BMMNC: 61.4 (7.5)

Controls: 62.9 (6.9)

BMMNC: 82%

Controls: 78%

45

45

6 months

Yao 2008

China

CIHD (MI > 6 months)

BMMNC: 54.8 (11.5)

Controls: 56.3 (7.9)

BMMNC: 96%

Controls: 96%

24

23

6 months

Zhao 2008

China

HF (LVEF < 40%; elective CABG)

BMMNC: 60.3 (10.4)

Controls: 59.1 (15.7)

BMMNC: 83.3%

Controls: 83.3%

18

18

6 months

ALDH: aldehyde dehydrogenase
BMAC: bone marrow aspirate concentrate
BMMNC: bone marrow mononuclear cells
BM‐MSC: bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells
CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting
CCS: Canadian Cardiovascular Society
CIHD: chronic ischaemic heart disease
CPC: circulating progenitor cells
EF: ejection fraction
HD: high dose
HDSW: high dose shockwave
HF: heart failure
IC: intracoronary
IM: intramyocardial
IQR: interquartile range
LAD: left ventricular assist device
LD: low dose
LDSW: low dose shockwave
LV: left ventricular
LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction
MD: medium dose
MI: myocardial infarction
MNC: mononuclear cells
n/r: not reported
NYHA: New York Heart Association
SD: standard deviation
SE: standard error
SW: shockwave

Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants
Table 2. Characteristics of study interventions

Study ID

Co‐intervention

Intervention given by:

Route of cell administration

Intervention cell type

How are cells obtained?

What were they resuspended in?

Dose administered?

Comparator arm (placebo or control)

Ang 2008

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IC or IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Autologous serum

IM: 84 (56) million cells

IC: 115 (73) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Assmus 2006

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

BMMNC or CPC

BM aspiration (**) for BMMNC. Vein puncture, mononuclear cell isolation by gradient centrifugation and culture for 3 days for CPC

n/r

BMMNC: 205 (110) million cells

CPC: 22 (11) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Assmus 2013

Shockwave

Cardiologist

IC

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

X‐VIVO 10 medium and autologous serum

HDSW: 123 (69) million cells

LDSW: 150 (77) million cells

Placebo (10 mL X‐VIVO 10 medium and autologous serum)

Bartunek 2012

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

BM‐MSC (cardiopoietic cells)

BM aspiration (**), culture for 6 days and exposure to cardiopoietic factors

Preservation solution (no details)

733 (range 605 to 1168) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Chen 2006

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

BM‐MSC

BM aspiration (**), culture for 7 days to select MSC

Heparinised saline

5 million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Erbs 2005

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IC

CPC

G‐CSF infusion for 4 days prior to vein puncture, mononuclear cell isolation by gradient centrifugation and culture for 3 days for CPC

Saline and 10% autologous serum

69 (14) million cells

Placebo (cell‐free serum solution)

Hamshere 2015_IC

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IC

BMMNC

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days and BM aspiration (**)

Autologous serum

n/r

Placebo (10 mL autologous serum)

Hamshere 2015_IM

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days and BM aspiration (**)

Autologous serum

n/r

Placebo (2 mL autologous serum)

Heldman 2014_BMMNC

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

n/r

n/r

Placebo (vehicle medium)

Heldman 2014_BM‐MSC

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BM‐MSC

BM aspiration (**), culture to select MSC

n/r

n/r

Placebo (vehicle medium)

Hendrikx 2006

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Heparinised saline

60 (31) million cells

Placebo (heparinised saline)

Honold 2012

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IC

CPC

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days prior to vein puncture, mononuclear cell isolation by gradient centrifugation and culture for 4 days for CPC

n/r

29 (12) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Hu 2011

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IC

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Saline solution and 20% autologous serum

132 (107) million cells

Placebo (8 mL saline; 2 mL autologous serum)

Jimenez‐Quevedo 2011

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IM

CD133+

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days prior to leukapheresis, mononuclear cell isolation by gradient centrifugation immunomagnetic selection to isolate CD133+ cells

Normal saline solution

20 to 30 million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Losordo 2007

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IM

CD34+

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days prior to leukapheresis, mononuclear cell isolation by gradient centrifugation immunomagnetic selection to isolate CD34+ cells

Saline solution and 5% autologous serum

LD: 0.05 million cells

MD: 0.1 million cells

HD: 0.5 million cells

Placebo (0.9% sodium chloride; 5% autologous plasma)

Losordo 2011

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IM

CD34+

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days prior to leukapheresis, mononuclear cell isolation by gradient centrifugation immunomagnetic selection to isolate CD34+ cells

Saline solution and 5% autologous serum

LD: 0.1 million cells

HD: 0.5 million cells

Placebo (0.9% sodium chloride; 5% autologous plasma)

Mathiasen 2015

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BM‐MSC

BM aspiration (**), culture for 14 to 35 days to select MSC

Phosphate buffered saline with a drop of the participant’s blood

77.5 (68) million cells

Placebo (phosphate buffered saline mixed with drop of participant’s blood)

Mozid 2014_IC

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IC

BMMNC

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days and BM aspiration (**)

Autologous serum

86 (110) million cells

Placebo (10 mL autologous serum)

Mozid 2014_IM

G‐CSF

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

G‐CSF infusion for 5 days and BM aspiration (**)

Autologous serum

52 (53) million cells

Placebo (2 mL autologous serum)

Nasseri 2012

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IM

CD133+

BM aspiration (**), immunomagnetic selection to isolate CD133+ cells

Sodium chloride and 10% autologous serum

Median 5.1 million cells

Placebo (isotonic saline solution; 10% autologous serum)

Patel 2005

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IM

CD34+

BM aspiration (**), immunomagnetic selection to isolate CD34+ cells

Heparinised saline and autologous serum

Median 22 million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Patel 2015

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

BMAC

BM aspiration (**) and concentration

Autologous serum

3700 (900) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Patila 2014

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Medium 199 containing albumin, heparin

Median 840 (range 52 to 135) million cells

Placebo (vehicle medium)

Perin 2011

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Saline containing 5% human serum albumin

2 million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Perin 2012a

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Saline containing 5% human serum albumin

100 million cells

Placebo (cell‐free suspension in same volume)

Perin 2012b

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

ALDH+

BM aspiration (**) and cell sorting

Pharmaceutical grade human serum albumin

2.4 (1.3) million cells

Placebo (5% pharmaceutical serum albumin)

Pokushalov 2010

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Heparinised saline

41 (16) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Santoso 2014

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Phosphate buffered saline with 10% autologous plasma

n/r

Placebo (phosphate buffered saline; 10% autologous plasma)

Trifunovic 2015

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

n/r

70.7 (32.4) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Tse 2007

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Phosphate buffered saline with 10% autologous plasma

15 million cells

Placebo (8 ‐ 12 x 0.1 mL phosphate buffered saline with 10% autologous serum)

Turan 2011

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

n/r

99 (25) million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Van Ramshorst 2009

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Phosphate buffered saline with 0.5% human serum albumin

98 (6) million cells

Placebo (0.9% sodium chloride; 0.5% human serum albumin)

Wang 2009

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

CD34+

BM aspiration (**), immunomagnetic selection to isolate CD34+ cells

Normal saline

Range 1.0 to 6.1 million cells

No additional therapy (control)

Wang 2010

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

CD34+

BM aspiration (**), immunomagnetic selection to isolate CD34+ cells

Saline and human serum albumin

56 (23) million cells

Placebo (saline; human serum albumin)

Wang 2014

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IM

CD133+

n/r

n/r

n/r

Placebo (n/r)

Wang 2015

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Heparinised saline

521 (44) million cells

Placebo (saline solution)

Yao 2008

Standard medical therapy

Cardiologist

IC

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Heparinised saline

72 million cells

Placebo (0.9% sodium chloride containing heparin)

Zhao 2008

CABG

Cardiothoracic surgeon

IM

BMMNC

BM aspiration (**)

Heparinised saline

659 (512) million cells

Placebo (saline)

**BM aspiration ‐ bone marrow aspiration and isolation of bone marrow mononuclear cells by gradient centrifugation.

ALDH: aldehyde dehydrogenase
BM: bone marrow
BMAC: bone marrow aspirate concentrate
BMMNC: bone marrow mononuclear cells
BM‐MSC: bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells
CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting
CPC: circulating progenitor cells
G‐CSF: granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor
HD: high dose
HDSW: high dose shockwave
IC: intracoronary
IM: intramyocardial
LD: low dose
LDSW: low dose shockwave
MD: medium dose
MSC: mesenchymal stem cells
n/r: not reported
SW: shockwave

Figures and Tables -
Table 2. Characteristics of study interventions
Table 3. Summary of outcome reporting

Study ID

Primary outcomes

Secondary outcomes

All‐cause mortality

Non‐fatal MI

Hospital readmission for HF

Composite MACEa

Arrhythmias

NYHA class

CCS class

Angina frequency

Exercise tolerance

Quality of life

LVEFb

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

ST

LT

Ang 2008

FR

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Assmus 2006

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Assmus 2013

FR

FR

NR

FR

FR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Bartunek 2012

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

PR

PR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

PR

NR

FR

NR

Chen 2006

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

FR

FR

Erbs 2005

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

FR

FR

Hamshere 2015_IC

PR*

PR*

PR*

FR

PR*

PR*

PR*

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

PR

Hamshere 2015_IM

PR*

PR*

PR*

PR*

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

PR

Heldman 2014_BMMNC

PR*

PR*

NR

PR*

NR

FR

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

FR

FR

NR

PR

Heldman 2014_BM‐MSC

PR*

FR

NR

PR*

NR

PR*

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

FR

FR

NR

PR

Hendrikx 2006

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Honold 2012

PR*

FR

FR

FR

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

FR

FR

Hu 2011

FR

FR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

Jimenez‐Quevedo 2011

FR

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

Losordo 2007

PR*

PR*

PR*

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

Losordo 2011

FR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

PR

FR

NR

FR

FR

FR

FR

NR

NR

Mathiasen 2015

FR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

FR

NR

Mozid 2014_IC

FR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Mozid 2014_IM

FR

NR

PR*

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Nasseri 2012

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

PR

NR

FR

NR

Patel 2005

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

PR

Patel 2015

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

PR

PR

Patila 2014

NR

PR*

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

FR

Perin 2011

PR*

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

Perin 2012a

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Perin 2012b

PR*

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Pokushalov 2010

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

PR*

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

FR

Santoso 2014

PR*

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Trifunovic 2015

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

FR

FR

Tse 2007

PR*

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Turan 2011

PR*

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

FR

Van Ramshorst 2009

FR

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

FR

Wang 2009

PR*

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Wang 2010

PR*

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Wang 2014

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Wang 2015

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Yao 2008

PR*

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

PR

NR

Zhao 2008

FR

NR

PR*

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

FR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

FR

NR

Total (%) analysedc

1637

(85.8)

1010

(53.0)

881

(46.2)

461 (24.2)

482

(25.3)

495

(26.0)

288 (15.1)

201

(10.5)

959

(50.3)

363

(19.0)

741

(38.9)

346

(18.1)

608

(31.9)

142 (7.4)

428

(22.4)

82 (4.3)d

535

(28.1)

227

(11.9)

197

(10.3)e

151

(7.9)e

439

(23.0)f

110

(5.8)f

CCS: Canadian Cardiovascular Society; FR: full reporting, outcome included in analysis; HF: heart failure; LT: long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months); LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE: major adverse clinical events; MI: myocardial infarction; NR: outcome not reported; NYHA: New York Heart Association; PR: partial reporting with insufficient information on outcome reported for inclusion in analysis; PR*: no incidence of outcome observed; ST: short‐term follow‐up (< 12 months)

aComposite measure of mortality, reinfarction, or rehospitalisation for heart failure.
bLVEF measured by any method.
cTotal number of participants included in meta‐analysis of outcome (% of total number of participants from all included studies).
dNo meta‐analysis was performed, as only one study reported values suitable for inclusion.
eMinnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
fTotal number analysed given for LVEF measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

Figures and Tables -
Table 3. Summary of outcome reporting
Table 4. Clinical (dichotomous) outcomes

Study ID

Number of analysed participants

All‐cause mortality events

Non‐fatal MI events

Hospital readmission for HF

Composite MACEa

Arrhythmia events

Cells

No cells

Cells

No cells

Length of follow‐up

Cells

No cells

Length of follow‐up

Cells

No cells

Length of follow‐up

Cells

No cells

Length of follow‐up

Cells

No cells

Length of follow‐up

Ang 2008

42

19

1

1

6 mthsa

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Assmus 2006

52

23

0

1

3 mths

1

0

3 mths

1

1

3 mths

1

1

3 mths

0

1

3 mths

Assmus 2013

43

39

6

8

45.7 (17) mths

1

4

45.7 (17) mths

8

13

45.7 (17) mths

14

19

45.7 (17) mths

6

13

45.7 (17) mths

Bartunek 2012

21

15

1

2

24 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

6

4

24 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Chen 2006

22

23

2

4

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Erbs 2005

13

12

0

1

15 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Hamshere 2015_IC

15

15

0

0

12 mths

1

0

12 mths

0

0

12 mths

1

0

12 mths

1

1

12 mths

Hamshere 2015_IM

15

15

0

0

12 mths

0

0

12 mths

1

1

12 mths

1

1

12 mths

0

1

12 mths

Heldman 2014_BMMNC

19

10

0

0

12 mths

0

0

12 mths

0

1

12 mths

0

1

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

Heldman 2014_BM‐MSC

19

11

1

1

12 mths

0

0

12 mths

0

0

12 mths

1

1

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

Hendrikx 2006

11

12

1

1

4 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Honold 2012

23

9

0

1

60 mths

1

2

60 mths

0

2

60 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Hu 2011

31

29

1

2

12 mths

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

3

4

6 mths

1

0

12 mths

Jimenez‐Quevedo 2011

19

9

1

1

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

1

1

6 mths

Losordo 2007

18

6

0

0

12 mths

0

0

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

1

12 mths

Losordo 2011

112

56

0

3

12 mths

6

7

12 mths

3

4

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Mathiasen 2015

40

20

1

1

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

6

2

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

3

1

6 mths

Mozid 2014_IC

14

2

0

1

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

1

0

6 mths

1

1

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

Mozid 2014_IM

10

8

0

3

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

0

3

6 mths

2

2

6 mths

Nasseri 2012

30

30

1

3

34 mthsb

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Patel 2005

25

25

3

10

10 yrs

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Patel 2015

22

6

5

2

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

2

0

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

12 mths

Patila 2014

13c

17c

0

0

Median 60 mths

0

0

Median 60 mths

1

1

Median 60 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Perin 2011

20

10

0

0

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Perin 2012a

61

31

1

0

6 mths

1

0

6 mths

3

5

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Perin 2012b

10

10

0

0

6 mths

1

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

3

2

6 mths

Pokushalov 2010

55

54

6

21

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

12 mths

Santoso 2014

19

9

0

2

23 (8) mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

1

1

6 mths

Trifunovic 2015

15

15

2

4

Median 5 yrs

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Tse 2007

19

9

0

1

19 (9) mths

0

1

3 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Turan 2011

38

18

0

0

12 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Van Ramshorst 2009

25

25

1

0

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Wang 2009

16

16

0

0

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Wang 2010

56

56

0

0

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

1

6 mthsd

Wang 2014

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Wang 2015

45

45

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

Yao 2008

24

23

0

0

6 mths

0

1

6 mths

1

2

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

0

0

6 mths

Zhao 2008

18

18

2

0

6 mths

0

0

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

n/r

1

0

6 mths

HF: heart failure; MACE: major adverse clinical events; MI: myocardial infarction; n/r: not reported

aAng 2008: participants followed up for six months; mortality reported as “death within 30 days of treatment”.
bNasseri 2012: deaths reported “beyond follow‐up period” occurred at 31 and 34 months.
cPatila 2014: mortality rates reported in 20/19 participants at 12 months and 13/17 participants at 60 months.
dWang 2010: values are for ventricular arrhythmia (atrial arrhythmia also reported but unclear whether any participant overlap).

Figures and Tables -
Table 4. Clinical (dichotomous) outcomes
Table 5. Periprocedural adverse events

Study ID

Periprocedural adverse events

Ang 2008

2 deaths (1 control, 1 intracoronary cell therapy) occurred within 30 days of treatment. Reasons were not given, but neither was considered to be related to cell therapy.

Assmus 2006

In‐hospital events: MI occurred in 1 CPC participant and ventricular arrhythmia detected during monitoring in 1 control participant.

Assmus 2013

n/r (only safety of shockwave procedure reported)

Bartunek 2012

In the cell therapy group, 1 participant had ventricular tachycardia during procedure which was resolved by cardioversion, and 1 participant had blurred vision after intervention (participant had pre‐existing ophthalmic migraines). Other reported adverse events (gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, respiratory, thoracic, mediastinal, and peripheral vascular disorders) were not considered to be related to cell therapy.

Chen 2006

3 participants in cell therapy group experienced a transient episode of pulmonary oedema during the injection of stem cells. No sustained arrhythmias were monitored during the procedure.

Erbs 2005

1 cell therapy and 1 control participant reported headache, and 1 control participant developed fever during G‐CSF stimulation. G‐CSF resulted in comparable increases in serum C‐reactive protein levels and blood leukocyte count in both CPC and control groups (returned to baseline values within 4 days after G‐CSF). Neither G‐CSF injection nor intracoronary transplantation of CPC caused any elevation in troponin T levels.

Hamshere 2015_IC

n/r

Hamshere 2015_IM

n/r

Heldman 2014_BMMNC

No participant had significant postprocedural pericardial effusion. Small transient increases in CK‐MB and serum troponin I were observed. There were no treatment emergent serious adverse events among any of participants who received cell therapy.

Heldman 2014_BM‐MSC

No participant had significant postprocedural pericardial effusion. Small transient increases in CK‐MB and serum troponin I were observed. There were no treatment emergent serious adverse events among any of participants who received cell therapy.

Hendrikx 2006

1 cell therapy participant died on postoperative day 7 from a perforated oesophageal ulcer complicated by mediastinitis. 1 control participant died on the 5th postoperative day from multiorgan failure secondary to low cardiac output syndrome.

Honold 2012

Mild cephalgies and episodes of mild to moderate bone and muscular pain were reported during 5‐day course of G‐CSF. No participant developed chest pain episodes or clinical signs of decompensated HF. No novel ischaemia‐related ECG changes were observed during G‐CSF treatment and after intracoronary CPC infusion. Troponin T levels remained unchanged. Moreover, no specific G‐CSF‐mediated severe complications occurred. Intracoronary infusions were successfully performed without any procedural complications.

Hu 2011

2 participants (unclear which treatment arm) had neurological complications but recovered and were discharged. No participants had arrhythmia.

Jimenez‐Quevedo 2011

G‐CSF treatment was well tolerated, all participants presented bone pain as the only symptom. After cell injection, none of the participants had a significant rise in creatine phosphokinase, symptoms, ECG changes, or echocardiographic abnormalities.

Losordo 2007

13 participants reported transient increase in angina frequency after administration of G‐CSF. There were no cardiac enzyme elevations, MIs, acute coronary syndromes, or deaths. 1 participant in the placebo group developed ventricular tachycardia during the mapping procedure. No arrhythmias were detected by implantable cardioverter defibrillator, LifeVest, or Holter monitoring in any participant during or after the injection procedure.

Losordo 2011

Administration of G‐CSF was associated with bone pain (20.1%), angina (17.4%), CHF (2 participants), and 8 participants had troponin elevations consistent with non‐STEMI. In 1 participant a thrombus was observed on the mapping catheter tip as it was removed. 2 participants experienced an apparent myocardial perforation during the injection procedure (1 resulted in haemothorax, which was successfully treated; 1 resulted in cardiac tamponade; this participant died after unsuccessful pericardiocentesis procedure). Elevated troponin levels were observed in 28% of participants at some point during the mobilisation and injection period, all of which were minor and subclinical except for those mentioned above.

Mathiasen 2015

1 participant with a history of episodic ventricular tachycardia developed ventricular tachycardia during the NOGA mapping procedure. Another participant experienced double vision and dizziness during the injection procedure; cerebral‐CT afterwards was normal, but the incident was diagnosed as a minor stroke by the neurologist. 1 participant from the treatment group suffered a stroke 12 days after treatment.

Mozid 2014_IC

The most common side effects from G‑CSF were bone pain (22%) and low grade pyrexia (65%) (reported in all G‐CSF groups combined). Bleeding from the arterial access site did not differ significantly between the 2 intervention arms. All episodes were minor and resolved with conservative treatment within 24 h of the procedure. As expected, there were increases in troponin and creatine kinase levels postprocedure in both arms.

Mozid 2014_IM

The most common side effects from G‑CSF were bone pain (22%) and low grade pyrexia (65%) (reported in all G‐CSF groups combined). There were 3 cases of arrhythmia during the intramyocardial procedure that required treatment. Of these, 1 participant developed atrial fibrillation, which reverted to sinus rhythm within 24 h of the procedure. Another participant developed transient complete heart block periprocedure requiring temporary pacing only. The final participant suffered an episode of pulse­less ventricular tachycardia following intramyocardial injection, which was successfully cardioverted with a single 200 J external defibrillation and remained haemodynamically stable afterwards. 1 participant died from suspected acute LV failure 6 days after discharge. Bleeding from the arterial access site did not differ significantly between the two intervention arms. All episodes were minor and resolved with conservative treatment within 24 h of the procedure. As expected, there were increases in troponin and creatine kinase levels postprocedure in both arms.

Nasseri 2012

2 participants in the placebo group died early postoperatively: 1 died on day 8 after developing Candida sepsis following LV failure despite intra‐aortic balloon pump and catecholamine treatment and mechanical assist device implantation, and 1 died on day 22 (reason not given).

Patel 2005

1 participant in the OPCAB plus stem cell therapy group had a haematoma at the bone marrow harvest site. There were no other adverse events in either group (i.e. neurologic, haematologic, vascular, death, or infection events). No participants had any postoperative arrhythmias.

Patel 2015

5 participants who received BMAC experienced “non‐serious adverse events possibly related to the procedure”. Procedure‐related complications included haematomas at the catheterisation site and elevated serum creatinine levels.

Patila 2014

There were no differences between treatment groups in participants’ haemodynamics, arterial blood gases, systemic vein oxygen level, blood glucose, acid–base balance, lactate, haemoglobin, body temperature, and diuresis, as well as medications needed. Perioperative measures are reported in detail in Lehtinen 2014.

Perin 2011

No perforations or arrhythmias were associated with cell injection procedures. Postprocedural transient left bundle‐branch block (resolved in 24 h) was seen in 1 treated and 1 control participant. 1 treated participant had non‐significant pericardial effusion. No sustained ventricular arrhythmias were observed by Holter monitoring in any participant. Transient fever but no sepsis occurred in 1 control participant.

Perin 2012a

1 participant experienced a limited retrograde catheter‐related dissection of the abdominal aorta (withdrawn from study). 1 participant experienced recurrent ventricular tachycardia with hypotension (and received only a small volume of cell product).

Perin 2012b

No major adverse clinical cardiac events were associated with the cell injection procedures, including no perforations. Electromechanical mapping–related ventricular tachycardia occurred in 2 control participants, and ventricular fibrillation occurred in 1 control participant. No deaths occurred, and HF was not exacerbated in any participant. Holter monitoring showed no sustained ventricular arrhythmia in any participant.

Pokushalov 2010

No periprocedural complications occurred in participants who received cell therapy. 2‐dimensional echocardiography did not reveal postprocedural pericardial effusion. Creatine kinase activity and peak troponin T level remained unaltered. No new periprocedural arrhythmias were recorded during 24 h of consecutive electrocardiographic monitoring. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator was implanted to 2 participants with ventricular tachycardia prior to cell injections.

Santoso 2014

There were no acute procedural‐related complications, including stroke, transient ischaemic attack, ECG changes, sustained ventricular or atrial arrhythmias, and elevation of CPK‐MB. There was also no echocardiographic evidence of pericardial effusion in any participant within the first 24 h of the procedure.

Trifunovic 2015

The early postoperative course was uneventful in both groups with no significant differences between them with regard to adverse side effects during hospital stay. There were no significant differences in cardiac‐specific enzymes activities after the operation or the number of atrial fibrillation episodes or appearance of pericardial effusion between the groups.

Tse 2007

There were no acute procedure‐related complications, including stroke, transient ischaemic attack, ECG changes, sustained ventricular or atrial arrhythmias, elevation of CPK‐MB, or echocardiographic evidence of pericardial effusion within the first 24 h after the procedure.

Turan 2011

There was no inflammatory response or myocardial reaction (white blood cell count, C‐reactive protein, CK, troponin) after cell therapy. There were no immediate pre‐ or postprocedure adverse complications, new electrocardiographic changes, or significant elevations in CK or troponin, and no inflammatory response was observed in participants with bone marrow cell transplant.

Van Ramshorst 2009

In the placebo group, a greater than 0.5‐centimetre pericardial effusion was detected on 2‐dimensional echocardiography in an asymptomatic participant 2 days after the injection procedure, and pericardiocentesis was subsequently performed.

Wang 2009

No periprocedural adverse events; cardiac proteins in normal range.

Wang 2010

No increase in angina frequency or usage of sublingual NTG was observed in participants of either group. There were no cardiac enzyme elevations, MIs, acute coronary syndromes, or deaths. No participants from either group developed ventricular tachycardia during the cell or saline infusion procedure. No arrhythmias were detected by Holter monitoring in any participant during or after the infusion process.

Wang 2014

n/r

Wang 2015

Predischarge arrhythmias were reported (as number of events) in both cell therapy and control participants.

Yao 2008

Intracoronary application of BMC was performed without any acute or long‐term side effects. There was no inflammatory response or myocardial reaction (i.e. white blood cell count, C‐reactive protein, and creatinine phosphokinase) after cell therapy.

Zhao 2008

In the perioperative period, sporadic ventricular premature beats and self terminating bouts of rapid atrial fibrillation were observed in both groups. However, 2 participants developed VF, and 1 died in the BMMNC group: 1 participant developed VF on the 5th day postoperatively but was successfully resuscitated and VF well‐controlled, and the other developed refractory VF 5 hours' postoperatively with death on postoperative day 3. There were no ventricular arrhythmias in the control group.

AMI: acute myocardial infarction
BM: bone marrow
BMAC: bone marrow aspirate concentrate
BMC: bone marrow cells

BMMNC: bone marrow mononuclear cells
CHF: congestive heart failure
CK‐MB: creatine kinase‐MB
CPC: circulating progenitor cells
CPK‐MB: creatine phosphokinase‐MB
CT: computed tomography
ECG: electrocardiogram
G‐CSF: granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor
HF: heart failure
LV: left ventricular
MI: myocardial infarction
MSC: mesenchymal stem cells
non‐STEMI: non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction
n/r: not reported
NTG: nitroglycerine
OPCAB: off‐pump coronary artery bypass
PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention
ULN: upper limit of normal
VF: ventricular fibrillation

Figures and Tables -
Table 5. Periprocedural adverse events
Table 6. Quality of life and performance measures

Study ID

No. analysed participants

Performance assessment

Mean follow‐up

No. analysed participants

Quality of life assessment

Mean follow‐up

Cells

No cells

ST

LT

Cells

No cells

ST

LT

Ang 2008

21

21

NYHA class (SR)a

6 mths

n/r

21

21

CCS class (SR)b

6 mths

n/r

Assmus 2006

43

18

NYHA class (EP)

3 mths

n/r

Assmus 2013

43

39

NYHA class (EP/MC)

4 mths

n/r

Bartunek 2012

21

15

NYHA class (SR)c

6 mths

n/r

21

15

MLHFQ (SR)c

6 mths

n/r

21

15

6MWT (distance) (EP)

6 mths

n/r

Chen 2006

22d

23d

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

22d

23d

ETT (METs) (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

Erbs 2005

12

10

Bike test (max O2 update) (EP)

3 mths

15 mths

Hamshere 2015_IC

15

15

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

15

15

CCS class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

Hamshere 2015_IM

15

15

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

15

15

CCS class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

Heldman 2014_BMMNC

17

16

NYHA class (SR)e

n/r

12 mths

15

19

MLHFQ (MC)

6 mths

12 mths

15f

19f

6MWT (distance) (MC)

6 mths

12 mths

Heldman 2014_BM‐MSC

17

16

NYHA class (SR)e

n/r

12 mths

19g

19g

MLHFQ (MC)

6 mths

12 mths

18h

19h

6MWT (distance) (MC)

6 mths

12 mths

Honold 2012

21j

10j

NYHA class (EP)

3 mths

60 mths

12k

5k

Bike test (sec) (EP)

3 mths

12 mths

Hu 2011

30

27

6MWT (distance) (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

Jimenez‐Quevedo 2011

19

9

CCS class (median)m

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

SAQ (median)m

6 mths

n/r

15

7

ETT (time; METs) (median)m

6 mths

n/r

19

9

Angina frequency (median)n

6 mths

n/r

Losordo 2007

18

6

CCS class (MC)

6 mths

n/r

18

6

SAQ (SR)p

6 mths

n/r

18

6

ETT (time) (MC)

6 mths

n/r

17

6

Angina frequency (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

Losordo 2011

109q

53q

CCS class (SR)r

6 mths

12 mths

109q

53q

SAQ (MC)

6 mths

12 mths

109q

53q

ETT (time) (MC)

6 mths

12 mths

109

53

Angina frequency (EP)

6 mths

n/r

Mathiasen 2015

40

40

NYHA class (SR)s

6 mths

n/r

40

40

KCCQ‐QOL (SR)s

6 mths

n/r

40

40

CCS class (SR)s

6 mths

n/r

40

40

SAQ (SR)s

6 mths

n/r

40

40

6MWT (SR)s

6 mths

n/r

40

40

Angina frequency (SR)s

6 mths

n/r

Mozid 2014_IC

14

2

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

14

2

CCS class (SR)

6 mths

n/r

Mozid 2014_IM

10

8

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

10

8

CCS class (SR)

6 mths

n/r

Nasseri 2012

28

26

NYHA class (EP/MC)t

6 mths

n/r

28

26

MLHFQu

6 mths

n/r

28

26

6MWTu

6 mths

n/r

28

26

CCS class (EP/MC)t

6 mths

n/r

Patel 2005

10

10

NYHA class (EP/MC)t

6 mths

n/r

Patel 2015

17

4

NYHA class (EP)t

n/r

12 mths

17

4

MLHFQ (SR)

n/r

12 mths

17

4

CCS class (SR)

n/r

12 mths

Patila 2014

20

19

NYHA class (EP/MC)

n/r

12 mthsv

20

19

SF‐36w

n/r

60 mths

Perin 2011

20

10

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

17

9

MLHFQ (EP)

6 mths

n/r

20

10

CCS class (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

13

10

SF‐36 (physical/mental) (EP)

6 mths

n/r

Perin 2012a

55

30

NYHA class (MC)

6 mths

n/r

44

22

CCS class (MC)

6 mths

n/r

51

29

6MWT (distance) (EP)

6 mths

n/r

Perin 2012b

10

10

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

10

10

CCS class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

Pokushalov 2010

53x

46x

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

53x

46x

MLHFQ (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

53x

46x

CCS class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

53x

46x

Angina frequency (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

53x

46x

6MWT (distance) (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

Santoso 2014

19

9

NYHA class (EP)y

6 mths

n/r

19

9

6MWT (distance) (EP)y

6 mths

n/r

Trifunovic 2015

15

15

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

15

15

6MWT (distance) (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

Tse 2007

19

9

NYHA class (EP)t

6 mths

n/r

19

9

CCS class (EP)t

6 mths

n/r

19

9

Treadmill test (time; METs) (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

Turan 2011

33

16

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

12 mths

Van Ramshorst 2009

24

25

CCS class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

24

25

SAQ (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

24

25

Bike test (workload) (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

Wang 2009

16

16

CCS class (MC)

6 mths

n/r

16

16

Angina frequency (MC)

6 mths

n/r

16

16

ETT (min) (MC)

6 mths

n/r

Wang 2010

56

56

CCS class (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

56

56

Angina frequency (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

56

56

ETT (min) (EP/MC)

6 mths

n/r

Wang 2014

n/r

n/r

NYHA class (SR)

6 mths

n/r

n/r

n/r

5MWT (distance) (SR)

6 mths

n/r

Zhao 2008

16

18

NYHA class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

16

18

CCS class (EP)

6 mths

n/r

CCS: Canadian Cardiovascular Society; EP: endpoint; ETT: exercise tolerance test; KCCQ‐QOL: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire – Quality of Life; LT: long term; MC: mean change from baseline; MET: metabolic equivalent test (mL/kg/min); MLHFQ: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; n/r: not reported; NYHA: New York Heart Association; SAQ: Seattle Angina Questionnaire; SF‐36: 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey; SR: summary results; ST: short term; 5MWT: 5‐minute walk test; 6MWT: 6‐minute walk test

aReported as number of participants in NYHA class III/IV.
bReported as number of participants in CCS class II or greater.
cReported graphically as percentage of participants showing improvement or deterioration.
d20/19 at 12 months.
eReported as number who improved/did not change/deteriorated.
f17/19 at 12 months.
g16/19 at 12 months.
h16/19 at 12 months.
j20/6 at 5 years.
k10/5 at 12 months.
mReported as median absolute difference with 95% confidence interval.
nMedian time to onset of angina also reported.
pResults presented graphically.
q106/50 at 12 months.
rReported as percentage of participants changed.
sResults presented graphically with P values for differences between groups.
tCalculated from frequency data.
uUnclear whether mean or median values are reported.
vAlso reported: median values at 60 months.
wReported graphically for each of eight components of SF‐36 at 60 months.
x49/33 at 12 months.
yReported as difference between groups at endpoint.

Figures and Tables -
Table 6. Quality of life and performance measures
Table 7. Surrogate (continous) outcome: LVEF

Study ID

No. randomised participants

No. analysed participants

Baseline LVEF: Mean (SD)

Mean follow‐up of LVEF

Cells

No cells

Cells

No cells

Cells

No cells

ST

LT

Measured by MRI

Ang 2008

42

21

18

7

IM: 25.4 (8.1)

IC: 28.5 (6.5)

20.9 (8.9)

6 mths

Assmus 2013

43

39

15

12

n/r

n/r

4 mths

Erbs 2005

14

14

12a

11a

51.0 (12.1)

55.8 (12.4)

3 mths

15 mths

Hendrikx 2006

11

12

10

10

42.9 (10.3)

39.5 (5.5)

4 mths

Honold 2012

23

10

9

4

33.4 (SEM 12.7)

23.3 (SEM 7.2)

3 mths

12 mths

Hu 2011

31

29

31b

28b

23.5 (6.7)

24.8 (5.2)

6 mths

12 mths

Mathiasen 2015

40

20

40

20

28.2 (9.3)

25.1 (8.5)

6 mths

Nasseri 2012

30

30

26

22

27 (6)

26 (6)

6 mths

Patila 2014

20

19

18

7

37.1 (9.5)

38.5 (13.5)

60 mths

Santoso 2014

19

9

19

9

23.6 (8.4)

26.8 (8.8)

6 mths

Tse 2007

19

9

18

8

51.9 (8.5)

45.7 (8.3)

6 mths

Van Ramshorst 2009

25

25

22

18

56 (12)

54 (10)

6 mths

Wang 2014

35

35

35

35

29 (7)

28 (6)

6 mths

Measured by echocardiography

Bartunek 2012

32

15

21

15

27.5 (95% CI 25.5, 29.5)

27.8 (95% CI 25.9, 29.8)

6 mths

Hu 2011

31

29

24

18

36.0 (1.2)

34.7 (1.4)

12 mths

Perin 2011

20

10

20

10

37.0 (10.6)

39.0 (9.1)

6 mths

Perin 2012a

61

31

54

28

34.7 (8.8)

32.3 (8.6)

6 mths

Perin 2012b

10

10

10

10

36.1 (10.9)

32.1 (10.6)

6 mths

Pokushalov 2010

55

54

53c

46c

27.8 (3.4)

26.8 (3.8)

6 mths

12 mths

Trifunovic 2015

15

15

15

15

35.3 (3.9)

36.5 (5.3)

6 mths

12 mths

Van Ramshorst 2009

25

25

24

25

50 (5)

52 (5)

6 mths

Wang 2015

45

45

45

45

39.3 (6.2)

38.2 (8.0)

6 mths

Zhao 2008

18

18

16

18

35.8 (7.3)

36.7 (9.2)

6 mths

Measured by SPECT

Chen 2006

24

24

22d

23d

26 (6)

23 (8)

6 mths

12 mths

Perin 2011

20

10

20

10

41.5 (11.2)

43.0 (10.4)

6 mths

Van Ramshorst 2009

25

25

24

25

53 (12)

54 (12)

6 mths

12 mths

Measured by LV angiography

Assmus 2006

52

23

43

18

BMMNC: 41 (11)

CPC: 39 (10)

43 (13)

3 mths

Assmus 2013

43

39

41

38

LDSW: 37.2 (95% CI 31.7, 42.7)

HDSW: 32.4 (95% CI 26.9, 37.9)

LDSW: 29.9 (95% CI 24.0, 35.7)

HDSW: 32.3 (95% CI 26.5, 38.1)

4 mths

Honold 2012

23

10

21

5

37.5 (SEM 12.9)

37.6 (SEM 7.5)

3 mths

Perin 2011

20

10

20

10

37.5 (8.2)

40.0 (3.2)

6 mths

Perin 2012b

10

10

10

10

38.0 (17.5)

41.9 (11.8)

6 mths

Turan 2011

38

18

33

16

46 (10)

46 (10)

3 mths

12 mths

95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMMNC: bone marrow mononuclear cells; CPC: circulating progenitor cells; HDSW: high‐dose shockwave; IC: intracoronary; IM: intramyocardial; LDSW: low‐dose shockwave; LT: long term; LV: left ventricular; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SD: standard deviation; SEM: standard error of the mean; SPECT: single‐photon emission computed tomography; ST: short term

a12/10 at 15 months.
b25/25 at 12 months.
c20/19 at 12 months.
d49/33 at 12 months.

Figures and Tables -
Table 7. Surrogate (continous) outcome: LVEF
Comparison 1. Cells versus no cells

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause) Show forest plot

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

33

1637

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.26, 0.87]

1.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

21

1010

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.25, 0.58]

2 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction Show forest plot

25

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

20

881

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.17, 2.15]

2.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

9

461

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.17, 0.93]

3 Rehospitalisation due to heart failure Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

10

482

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.36, 1.12]

3.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

10

495

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.36, 1.04]

4 Arrhythmias Show forest plot

24

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

22

959

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.33, 1.45]

4.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

7

363

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.22, 0.97]

5 Composite MACE Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

8

288

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.18, 1.42]

5.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

5

201

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.41, 1.12]

6 MLHFQ: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Mean value at endpoint

2

125

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐29.52 [‐33.76, ‐25.27]

6.2 Mean change from baseline

2

72

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐9.07 [‐22.09, 3.95]

6.3 Combined

4

197

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐18.96 [‐31.97, ‐5.94]

7 MLHFQ: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Mean value at endpoint

1

82

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐36.5 [‐42.21, ‐30.79]

7.2 Mean change from baseline

2

69

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐7.63 [‐16.35, 1.09]

7.3 Combined

3

151

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐17.80 [‐39.87, 4.26]

8 Seattle Angina Questionnaire: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Mean value at endpoint

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [‐3.21, 13.21]

8.2 Mean change from baseline

2

211

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

9.34 [2.62, 16.07]

8.3 Combined

2

211

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

9.34 [2.62, 16.07]

9 Angina episodes per week: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Mean value at endpoint

4

396

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.96 [‐11.99, ‐1.93]

9.2 Mean change from baseline

3

167

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.77 [‐14.61, 11.08]

9.3 Combined

5

428

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.11 [‐11.30, 1.09]

10 NYHA classification: short‐term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

17

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 Mean value at endpoint

16

658

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.42 [‐0.84, ‐0.00]

10.2 Mean change from baseline

4

239

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐1.49, 0.36]

10.3 Combined

17

741

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.84, ‐0.05]

11 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 Mean value at endpoint

9

346

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐1.03, ‐0.10]

11.2 Mean change from baseline

1

39

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.2 [‐2.70, ‐1.70]

11.3 Combined

9

346

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.81 [‐1.23, ‐0.39]

12 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

13

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 Mean value at endpoint

10

486

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.32 [‐0.82, 0.18]

12.2 Mean change from baseline

6

318

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.62 [‐1.40, 0.17]

12.3 Combined

13

608

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.92, 0.06]

13 CCS class: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 Mean value at endpoint

3

142

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐2.04, 0.88]

14 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

16

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14.1 Mean value at endpoint

11

563

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.19, 0.93]

14.2 Mean change from baseline

9

535

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.05, 0.61]

15 Exercise capacity: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

8

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 Mean value at endpoint

5

178

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.04, 2.25]

15.2 Mean change from baseline

3

227

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.07, 0.62]

16 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 Mean value at endpoint

10

352

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.01 [‐0.05, 6.07]

16.2 Mean change from baseline

9

308

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.05 [2.55, 5.55]

16.3 Combined

12

439

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.92 [1.03, 4.82]

17 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

17.1 Mean value at endpoint

4

110

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.37 [‐1.54, 6.29]

17.2 Mean change from baseline

3

97

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.83 [‐0.42, 8.08]

17.3 Combined

4

110

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.38 [0.82, 7.93]

18 LVEF (%) measured by echocardiography: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18.1 Mean value at endpoint

8

388

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.16 [2.87, 7.44]

18.2 Mean change from baseline

3

161

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.47 [1.59, 5.34]

18.3 Combined

9

470

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.71 [4.29, 7.13]

19 LVEF (%) measured by echocardiography: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

19.1 Mean value at endpoint

3

154

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.69 [6.47, 8.92]

19.2 Mean change from baseline

1

82

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

6.1 [‐1.27, 13.47]

19.3 Combined

3

154

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.96 [6.39, 9.54]

20 LVEF (%) measured by SPECT: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

20.1 Mean value at endpoint

4

145

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.41 [‐2.65, 7.46]

20.2 Mean change from baseline

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.3 [‐17.33, 12.73]

20.3 Combined

4

145

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.22 [2.60, 7.85]

21 LVEF (%) measured by SPECT: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

21.1 Mean value at endpoint

2

88

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.37 [‐2.30, 3.04]

21.2 Mean change from baseline

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.0 [‐6.48, 14.48]

21.3 Combined

2

88

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [‐2.48, 3.03]

22 LVEF (%) measured by LV angiography: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

22.1 Mean value at endpoint

6

265

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.18 [0.39, 5.97]

22.2 Mean change from baseline

4

181

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.72 [0.50, 2.95]

22.3 Combined

6

250

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.00 [0.53, 3.46]

23 LVEF (%) measured by LV angiography: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

23.1 Mean value at endpoint

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

6.0 [0.81, 11.19]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Cells versus no cells
Comparison 2. Cell dose: subgroup analysis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

30

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 < 107 cells

6

334

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.02, 1.63]

1.2 107 < 108 cells

18

771

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.15, 0.79]

1.3 ≥ 108 cells

8

487

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.35, 1.94]

2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 < 107 cells

4

297

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.10, 1.09]

2.2 107 < 108 cells

7

330

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.17, 0.53]

2.3 ≥ 108 cells

5

236

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.30, 1.26]

3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

15

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 < 107 cells

4

149

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐0.94, 0.36]

3.2 107 < 108 cells

8

309

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐1.22, ‐0.08]

3.3 ≥ 108 cells

4

241

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐0.72, ‐0.11]

4 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 < 107 cells

4

288

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.92, 0.19]

4.2 107 < 108 cells

5

160

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐1.40, 0.32]

5 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

10

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 107 < 108 cells

7

357

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [‐0.03, 1.14]

5.2 ≥ 108 cells

3

161

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.10, 0.77]

6 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 107 < 108 cells

7

199

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.23 [3.91, 6.54]

6.2 ≥ 108 cells

3

101

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.37 [‐0.92, 5.66]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Cell dose: subgroup analysis
Comparison 3. Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 < 30%

11

508

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.09, 0.59]

1.2 30 ‐ 50%

13

642

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.36, 2.11]

1.3 > 50%

4

271

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.11, 3.35]

2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 < 30%

9

426

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.20, 0.64]

2.2 30 ‐ 50%

7

289

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.27, 1.21]

3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

15

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 < 30%

6

273

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐1.22, 0.43]

3.2 30 ‐ 50%

9

420

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.32 [‐0.54, ‐0.10]

4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 < 30%

5

202

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐1.28, ‐0.04]

4.2 30 ‐ 50%

4

144

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.98 [‐1.72, ‐0.25]

5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

8

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 < 30%

4

213

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐1.47, 0.97]

5.2 30 ‐ 50%

4

150

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.31, 0.09]

6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 < 30%

4

225

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.37, 1.56]

6.2 30 ‐ 50%

3

127

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [‐0.57, 1.33]

7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 < 30%

6

290

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.54 [‐1.96, 5.03]

7.2 30 ‐ 50%

3

60

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.31 [0.88, 5.75]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Baseline cardiac function: subgroup analysis
Comparison 4. Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Intramyocardial

22

1049

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.21, 1.03]

1.2 Intracoronary

12

607

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.21, 1.23]

2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

21

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Intramyocardial

13

652

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.17, 0.50]

2.2 Intracoronary

8

358

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.30, 1.09]

3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

17

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Intramyocardial

11

445

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.48 [‐0.99, 0.03]

3.2 Intracoronary

6

296

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.38 [‐0.76, 0.00]

4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Intramyocardial

4

181

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.09 [‐1.76, ‐0.41]

4.2 Intracoronary

5

165

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.61 [‐0.92, ‐0.30]

5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

13

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Intramyocardial

10

434

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐0.87, 0.22]

5.2 Intracoronary

3

174

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐2.87, 0.86]

6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

11

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Intramyocardial

6

310

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.19, 1.36]

6.2 Intracoronary

5

253

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [‐0.06, 0.72]

7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Intramyocardial

8

309

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.18 [‐0.41, 4.77]

7.2 Intracoronary

5

137

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.72 [0.86, 6.57]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Route of cell administration: subgroup analysis
Comparison 5. Cell type: subgroup analysis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Mononuclear cells

20

966

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.28, 1.04]

1.2 Circulating progenitor cells

3

104

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 7.48]

1.3 Haematopoietic progenitor cells

8

464

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 1.46]

1.4 Mesenchymal stem cells

3

126

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.03, 7.59]

2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

19

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Mononuclear cells

12

540

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.25, 0.70]

2.2 Haematopoietic progenitor cells

4

302

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.10, 0.69]

2.3 Mesenchymal stem cells

3

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.15, 1.57]

3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

15

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Mononuclear cells

12

547

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.42 [‐0.86, 0.02]

3.2 Haematopoietic progenitor cells

3

94

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐1.95, 1.02]

4 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

13

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Mononuclear cells

8

366

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.39 [‐0.99, 0.21]

4.2 Haematopoietic progenitor cells

5

242

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐1.55, 0.46]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Cell type: subgroup analysis
Comparison 6. Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Chronic IHD

11

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.26, 1.62]

1.2 HF (secondary to IHD)

15

645

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.14, 0.82]

1.3 Refractory/intractable angina

7

442

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.11, 3.35]

2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

21

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Chronic IHD

9

389

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.27, 0.99]

2.2 HF (secondary to IHD)

9

401

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.19, 0.58]

2.3 Refractory/intractable angina

3

220

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.01, 0.91]

3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

16

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Chronic IHD

6

296

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.78, ‐0.07]

3.2 HF (secondary to IHD)

10

417

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐1.02, 0.09]

4 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Chronic IHD

3

105

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.91, ‐0.42]

4.2 HF (secondary to IHD)

6

241

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.92 [‐1.47, ‐0.37]

5 CCS class: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

13

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 HF (secondary to IHD)

8

363

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.90, 0.40]

5.2 Refractory/intractable angina

5

245

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.78 [‐1.44, ‐0.11]

6 Exercise capacity: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

11

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Chronic IHD

4

114

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [‐0.26, 1.22]

6.2 HF (secondary to IHD)

4

260

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.04, 1.53]

6.3 Refractory/intractable angina

3

189

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐0.03, 0.55]

7 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

10

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Chronic IHD

6

178

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.58 [‐0.16, 5.31]

7.2 HF (secondary to IHD)

4

195

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.50 [‐1.97, 6.97]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 6. Participant diagnosis: subgroup analysis
Comparison 7. Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause): short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Co‐interventions

8

432

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.32, 1.70]

1.2 No co‐interventions

25

1205

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.13, 0.72]

2 Mortality (all‐cause): long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

21

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Co‐interventions

6

312

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.26, 0.88]

2.2 No co‐interventions

15

698

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.19, 0.56]

3 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

17

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Co‐interventions

6

233

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐1.20, 0.05]

3.2 No co‐interventions

11

508

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.87, 0.13]

4 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Co‐interventions

5

179

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.01 [‐0.26, 4.29]

4.2 No co‐interventions

7

260

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.55 [0.82, 6.27]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 7. Co‐interventions: subgroup analysis
Comparison 8. Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause) Show forest plot

15

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

14

744

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.32, 1.50]

1.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

9

491

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.21, 0.87]

2 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction Show forest plot

11

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

6

288

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.05, 4.58]

2.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

5

345

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.15, 0.97]

3 Rehospitalisation due to heart failure Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

3

234

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.32, 1.32]

3.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

6

375

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.36, 1.09]

4 Arrhythmias Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

6

224

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.18, 3.21]

4.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

1

82

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.18, 0.99]

5 Composite MACE Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

2

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

3

141

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.38, 1.08]

6 NYHA classification: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Combined

5

277

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.59, 0.07]

7 NYHA classification: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Combined

1

39

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.2 [‐2.70, ‐1.70]

8 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: short term follow‐up (< 12 months) Show forest plot

7

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Combined

7

249

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.92 [0.67, 5.17]

9 LVEF (%) measured by MRI: long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Combined

1

25

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.60 [‐8.70, 5.50]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 8. Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of selection bias
Comparison 9. Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of performance bias

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause) Show forest plot

26

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

25

1216

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.29, 1.16]

1.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

13

624

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.21, 0.86]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 9. Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of performance bias
Comparison 10. Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of attrition bias

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality (all‐cause) Show forest plot

32

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Short term follow‐up (< 12 months)

28

1449

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.26, 0.89]

1.2 Long term follow‐up (≥ 12 months)

17

883

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.25, 0.60]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 10. Sensitivity analysis: excluding studies with high/unclear risk of attrition bias