Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical rubefacients for acute and chronic pain in adults

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 26 November 2014

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007403.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 08 July 2009see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Paul Matthews

    West Oxfordshire Adult Community Mental Health Team, OBMH NHS Foundation Trust, Witney, UK

  • Sheena Derry

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • R Andrew Moore

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Henry J McQuay

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Contributions of authors

PM and SD identified studies and carried out data extraction, analysis and writing. RAM and HJM were involved in planning, acted as adjudicators, and were involved with writing the protocol and full review. SD will be responsible for conducting any update of this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Pain Research Funds, UK.

External sources

  • NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme, UK.

  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme, UK.

Declarations of interest

RAM, HJM, SD have received research support from charities, government and industry sources at various times. RAM and HJM have consulted for various pharmaceutical companies and have received lecture fees from pharmaceutical companies related to analgesics and other healthcare interventions. Support for this review came from Oxford Pain Research, the NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme, and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Nov 26

Salicylate‐containing rubefacients for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults

Review

Sheena Derry, Paul R L Matthews, Philip J Wiffen, R Andrew Moore

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007403.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Topical rubefacients for acute and chronic pain in adults

Review

Paul Matthews, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Henry J McQuay

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007403.pub2

2008 Oct 08

Topical rubefacients for acute and chronic pain in adults

Protocol

Paul Matthews, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Henry J McQuay

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007403

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.