Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intervenciones para el tratamiento de la fibrosis submucosa oral

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007156.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 08 October 2008see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Oral Health Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Zbys Fedorowicz

    Correspondence to: UKCC (Bahrain Branch), Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Awali, Bahrain

    [email protected]

  • Edwin Chan Shih‐Yen

    Singapore Branch, Australasian Cochrane Centre, Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore

  • Mojtaba Dorri

    Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK

  • Mona Nasser

    Department of Health Information, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health care, Köln, Germany

  • Tim Newton

    Department of Oral Health Services Research & Dental Public Health, GKT Dental Institute King's College Hospital, London, UK

  • Luming Shi

    Singapore Branch, Australasian Cochrane Centre, Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore

Contributions of authors

Zbys Fedorowicz (ZF), Mojtaba Dorri (MD) and Mona Nasser (MN) were responsible for:
Designing the review
Co‐ordinating the review.

ZF and Luming Shi (LS) were responsible for:
Organising retrieval of papers
Writing to authors of papers for additional information
Providing additional data about papers.

ZF, MN, MD and Edwin Chan (EC) were responsible for:
Data collection for the review
Screening search results
Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria
Appraising quality of papers
Extracting data from papers
Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies
Entering data into RevMan
Analysis of data.

ZF, MN, LS, MD and Tim Newton (TN) were responsible for interpretation of the data and writing the review.

ZF will be the guarantor for the review.

Declaraciones de interés

available in

No existen conflictos de intereses económicos y los revisores declaran que no tienen asociaciones con ninguna de las partes que puedan tener intereses personales en los resultados de esta revisión.

Agradecimientos

available in

Los revisores agradecen a Luisa Fernández Mauleffinch, Sylvia Bickley y Philip Riley del Grupo Cochrane de Salud Oral, así como a los evaluadores externos, por sus observaciones, apoyo y ayuda en la realización de esta revisión. También se agradece la ayuda recibida de Chandrani Kuruppu, Senior Assistant Librarian de la Medical Library, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka, quien realizó una búsqueda en los registros de la biblioteca médica de publicaciones que pudieran ser pertinentes para esta revisión.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2024 Feb 28

Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis

Review

Adam Jones, Benjamin Veale, Tiffany Li, Vishal R Aggarwal, Joshua Twigg

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007156.pub3

2008 Oct 08

Interventions for the management of oral submucous fibrosis

Review

Zbys Fedorowicz, Edwin Chan Shih‐Yen, Mojtaba Dorri, Mona Nasser, Tim Newton, Luming Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007156.pub2

2008 Apr 23

Interventions for the management of oral submucous fibrosis

Protocol

Zbys Fedorowicz, Edwin Chan Shih‐Yen, Mojtaba Dorri, Mona Nasser, Tim Newton, Luming Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007156

Differences between protocol and review

The primary outcomes have been resequenced from the order they appear in the published protocol.
(1) Resumption of normal eating, chewing and speech.
(2) Change or improvement in maximal jaw opening, measured as the interincisal distance.
(3) Improvement in range of jaw movement utilising any validated assessment tool.
(4) Change in severity of oral/mucosal burning pain using any recognised validated pain scale.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.